1
|
Rymer JA, Narcisse D, Cosiano M, Tanaka J, McDermott MM, Treat-Jacobson DJ, Conte MS, Tuttle B, Patel MR, Smolderen KG. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Symptomatic, Non-Limb-Threatening Peripheral Artery Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 15:e011320. [PMID: 34937395 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.121.011320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are health outcomes directly reported by the patient that can be used to measure the effect of disease and treatments on patient perceived well-being. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the validation of PROMs in people with symptomatic, nonlimb-threatening peripheral artery disease. A literature search was conducted to identify studies of symptomatic peripheral artery disease without limb-threatening ischemia that included PROMs and had sample sizes ≥25. PROMs were summarized along a continuum of validation using classical test theory framework and according to whether they fulfilled defined criteria for (1) content validity; (2) psychometric validation; and (3) further validation evidence base expansion. Of 2198 articles identified, 157 (7.1%) met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four PROMs in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease were reviewed. Among disease-specific PROMs, 8 of 15 had excellent reliability as measured by a Cronbach alpha ≥0.80. Based on established criteria for PROM responsiveness, 6 of 15 disease-specific PROMs demonstrated excellent sensitivity to change. Of these, the disease-specific peripheral artery questionnaire, vascular quality of life questionnaire, and walking impairment questionnaire met criteria for validation at each stage of the continuum. For generic (nondisease specific) PROMs, the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension and SF-36 had the most extensive evidence of validation. Evidence from this review can inform selection of PROMs aligned with scientific and clinical goals, given the variable degree of validation and potential complementary nature of the measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Rymer
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.A.R., D.N., M.C., J.T., M.R.P.)
| | - Dennis Narcisse
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.A.R., D.N., M.C., J.T., M.R.P.)
| | - Michael Cosiano
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.A.R., D.N., M.C., J.T., M.R.P.)
| | - John Tanaka
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.A.R., D.N., M.C., J.T., M.R.P.)
| | - Mary M McDermott
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (M.M.M.)
| | | | - Michael S Conte
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine (M.S.C.)
| | - Brandi Tuttle
- Duke University Center Medical Library, Durham, NC (B.T.)
| | - Manesh R Patel
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.A.R., D.N., M.C., J.T., M.R.P.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Michaels J, Wilson E, Maheswaran R, Radley S, Jones G, Tong TS, Kaltenthaler E, Aber A, Booth A, Buckley Woods H, Chilcott J, Duncan R, Essat M, Goka E, Howard A, Keetharuth A, Lumley E, Nawaz S, Paisley S, Palfreyman S, Poku E, Phillips P, Rooney G, Thokala P, Thomas S, Tod A, Wickramasekera N, Shackley P. Configuration of vascular services: a multiple methods research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Vascular services is changing rapidly, having emerged as a new specialty with its own training and specialised techniques. This has resulted in the need for reconfiguration of services to provide adequate specialist provision and accessible and equitable services.
Objectives
To identify the effects of service configuration on practice, resource use and outcomes. To model potential changes in configuration. To identify and/or develop electronic data collection tools for collecting patient-reported outcome measures and other clinical information. To evaluate patient preferences for aspects of services other than health-related quality of life.
Design
This was a multiple methods study comprising multiple systematic literature reviews; the development of a new outcome measure for users of vascular services (the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular) based on the reviews, qualitative studies and psychometric evaluation; a trade-off exercise to measure process utilities; Hospital Episode Statistics analysis; and the development of individual disease models and a metamodel of service configuration.
Setting
Specialist vascular inpatient services in England.
Data sources
Modelling and Hospital Episode Statistics analysis for all vascular inpatients in England from 2006 to 2018. Qualitative studies and electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular evaluation with vascular patients from the Sheffield area. The trade-off studies were based on a societal sample from across England.
Interventions
The data analysis, preference studies and modelling explored the effect of different potential arrangements for service provision on the resource use, workload and outcomes for all interventions in the three main areas of inpatient vascular treatment: peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm and carotid artery disease. The electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular was evaluated as a potential tool for clinical data collection and outcome monitoring.
Main outcome measures
Systematic reviews assessed quality and psychometric properties of published outcome measures for vascular disease and the relationship between volume and outcome in vascular services. The electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular development considered face and construct validity, test–retest reliability and responsiveness. Models were validated using case studies from previous reconfigurations and comparisons with Hospital Episode Statistics data. Preference studies resulted in estimates of process utilities for aneurysm treatment and for travelling distances to access services.
Results
Systematic reviews provided evidence of an association between increasing volume of activity and improved outcomes for peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm and carotid artery disease. Reviews of existing patient-reported outcome measures did not identify suitable condition-specific tools for incorporation in the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular. Reviews of qualitative evidence, primary qualitative studies and a Delphi exercise identified the issues to be incorporated into the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular, resulting in a questionnaire with one generic and three disease-specific domains. After initial item reduction, the final version has 55 items in eight scales and has acceptable psychometric properties. The preference studies showed strong preference for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment (willingness to trade up to 0.135 quality-adjusted life-years) and for local services (up to 0.631 quality-adjusted life-years). A simulation model with a web-based interface was developed, incorporating disease-specific models for abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease and carotid artery disease. This predicts the effects of specified reconfigurations on workload, resource use, outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Initial exploration suggested that further reconfiguration of services in England to accomplish high-volume centres would result in improved outcomes, within the bounds of cost-effectiveness usually considered acceptable in the NHS.
Limitations
The major source of evidence to populate the models was Hospital Episode Statistics data, which have limitations owing to the complexity of the data, deficiencies in the coding systems and variations in coding practice. The studies were not able to address all of the potential barriers to change where vascular services are not compliant with current NHS recommendations.
Conclusions
There is evidence of potential for improvement in the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vascular services through further centralisation of sites where major vascular procedures are undertaken. Preferences for local services are strong, and this may be addressed through more integrated services, with a range of services being provided more locally. The use of a web-based tool for the collection of clinical data and patient-reported outcome measures is feasible and can provide outcome data for clinical use and service evaluation.
Future work
Further evaluation of the economic models in real-world situations where local vascular service reconfiguration is under consideration and of the barriers to change where vascular services do not meet NHS recommendations for service configuration is needed. Further work on the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular is required to assess its acceptability and usefulness in clinical practice and to develop appropriate report formats for clinical use and service evaluation. Further studies to assess the implications of including non-health-related preferences for care processes, and location of services, in calculations of cost-effectiveness are required.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016042570, CRD42016042573, CRD42016042574, CRD42016042576, CRD42016042575, CRD42014014850, CRD42015023877 and CRD42015024820.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Michaels
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emma Wilson
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ravi Maheswaran
- Department of Public Health, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stephen Radley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Georgina Jones
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Thai-Son Tong
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eva Kaltenthaler
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ahmed Aber
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Buckley Woods
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - James Chilcott
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rosie Duncan
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Munira Essat
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Goka
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aoife Howard
- Department of Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Lumley
- Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shah Nawaz
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Suzy Paisley
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Edith Poku
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Patrick Phillips
- Cancer Clinical Trials Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gill Rooney
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Praveen Thokala
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steven Thomas
- Department of Vascular Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Angela Tod
- Division of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nyantara Wickramasekera
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Phil Shackley
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duncan R, Essat M, Jones G, Booth A, Buckley Woods H, Poku E, Kaltenthaler E, Keetharuth AD, Palfreyman S, Michaels J. Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of patient-reported outcome measures for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2016; 104:317-327. [PMID: 27935014 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to identify and evaluate existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to inform the selection for use in surgical practice. METHODS Two reviews were conducted: a systematic review to identify valid, reliable and acceptable PROMs for patients with an AAA, and a qualitative evidence synthesis to assess the relevance to patients of the identified PROM items. PROM studies were evaluated for their psychometric properties using established assessment criteria, and for their methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist. Qualitative studies were synthesized using framework analysis, and concepts identified were then triangulated using a protocol with the item concepts of the identified PROMs. RESULTS Four PROMs from three studies were identified in the first review: Short Form 36, Australian Vascular Quality of Life Index, Aneurysm Dependent Quality of Life (AneurysmDQoL) and Aneurysm Symptoms Rating Questionnaire (AneurysmSRQ). None of the identified PROMs had undergone a rigorous psychometric evaluation within the AAA population. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which 28 concepts important to patients with an AAA were identified. The AneurysmDQoL and AneurysmSRQ together provided the most comprehensive assessment of these concepts. Fear of rupture, control, ability to forget about the condition and size of aneurysm were all concepts identified in the qualitative studies but not covered by items in the identified PROMs. CONCLUSION Further research is needed to develop PROMs for AAA that are reliable, valid and acceptable to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Duncan
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Essat
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - G Jones
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - A Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - H Buckley Woods
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - E Poku
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - E Kaltenthaler
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - A D Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Palfreyman
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Michaels
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Poku E, Duncan R, Keetharuth A, Essat M, Phillips P, Woods HB, Palfreyman S, Jones G, Kaltenthaler E, Michaels J. Patient-reported outcome measures in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review of psychometric properties. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016; 14:161. [PMID: 27881127 PMCID: PMC5121983 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0563-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is generally associated with considerable morbidity and reduced quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide important information about the burden of disease and impact of treatment in affected patients. Objectives The objective of the review was to identify and appraise studies reporting the psychometric evaluation of PROMs administered to a specified population of patients with PAD with a view to recommending suitable PROMs. Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed English language articles was undertaken to identify primary studies reporting psychometric properties of PROMs in English-speaking patients with various stages of PAD. Comprehensive searches were completed up until January 2015. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by at least two researchers. Findings were presented as tabular and narrative summaries based on accepted guidance. Results Psychometric evaluation of 6 generic and 7 condition-specific PROMs reported in 14 studies contributed data to the review. The frequently reported measure was the SF-36 (n = 11 studies); others included the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (n = 8 studies), EQ-5D (n = 5 studies) and the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (n = 3 studies). Studies included a diverse PAD population and varied in methodology, including approach to validation of PROMs. Conclusions Various PROMs have been validated in patients with PAD but no study provided evidence of a full psychometric evaluation in the patient population. Careful selection is required to identify reliable and valid PROMs to use in clinical and research settings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0563-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith Poku
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Rosie Duncan
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Munira Essat
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Patrick Phillips
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Helen Buckley Woods
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Simon Palfreyman
- University of Alberta, 116 St & 85 Ave, Edmonton, T6G 2R3, AB, Canada
| | - Georgina Jones
- Leeds Beckett University, School of Social Sciences, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| | - Eva Kaltenthaler
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Jonathan Michaels
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Conijn A, Jens S, Terwee C, Breek J, Koelemay M. Assessing the Quality of Available Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Intermittent Claudication: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Checklist. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49:316-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2014] [Accepted: 12/01/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
6
|
Chen LC, Kuo LY, Tsao YF, Hong LS, Wang CS, Lee CC, Lin LJ, Chou CY, Tsieng YH. The Association Between Ankle-Brachial Index and Quality of Life in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. Angiology 2010; 61:537-40. [PMID: 20529978 DOI: 10.1177/0003319709360028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is an important indicator of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and PAD has a negative impact on quality of life (QOL). However, the correlation between ABI and QOL is unknown among chronic hemodialysis patients. Ankle-brachial index was measured, and WHOQOL-BRIEF (TW) questionnaire was completed. The association between ABI and QOL was analyzed using linear regression. A total of 54 chronic hemodialysis patients (mean age of 56.2 ± 14.6 years) were included. Ankle-brachial index was positively associated with QOL (r = .448, P = .001). The QOL scores were 3.1 ± 2.9 and 2.6 ± 0.4 for 37 patients with an ABI more than 0.9 and 17 patients with an ABI less than 0.9 or more than 1.3 (p < .001). In linear regression, only ABI was significantly associated with QOL scores with a β of .448 (95% CI: 0.443 to 1.55, P = .001). Ankle-brachial index is positively correlated to QOL among chronic hemodialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ching Chen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ying Kuo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Feng Tsao
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Show Hong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Suey Wang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Lih-Jen Lin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Che-Yi Chou
- Kidney Institute and Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsiung Tsieng
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lozano F. Calidad de vida relacionada con la cirugía vascular. ANGIOLOGIA 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3170(08)06001-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|