Comments regarding 'operative management of penetrating carotid artery injuries'

Transection of the Common Carotid and Vertebral Arteries Following a Penetrating Neck Injury

A case of a 30-year-old man who was admitted following a penetrating neck injury is presented. A clinical examination and operative findings identified semi-comatose mentality, neck muscle laceration, and transection of the left common carotid and vertebral arteries and the internal jugular vein. During the operation, the carotid arteries were repaired by interposition grafting, and the internal jugular vein was ligated. The vertebral artery was managed by interventional embolization. Although the patient had some neurological deficit, he was discharged on postoperative Day 52. This surgical case prompted a discussion regarding neurological outcomes, and surgical and endovascular treatment following vascular neck injury.

The management of penetrating neck injury

Penetrating neck injuries are serious as there is a high concentration of vital structures in close proximity to each other in a compressed anatomical area. Penetrating neck injuries can be immediately life threatening due to massive bleeding from vascular structures or due to airway compromise. Injury to the digestive tract in the neck may also result in delayed and potentially life-threatening conditions. The majority (79%) of penetrating neck injuries can be managed conservatively. The clinician caring for such a patient requires a structured and comprehensive approach to managing these injuries. This article will provide a general overview of penetrating neck injuries, including resuscitation, epidemiology, surgical management and the use of appropriate imaging.

Management of carotid artery trauma

With increased awareness and liberal screening of trauma patients with identified risk factors, recent case series demonstrate improved early diagnosis of carotid artery trauma before they become problematio. There remains a need for unified screening criteria for both intracranial and extracranial carotid trauma. In the absence of contraindications, antithrombotic agents should be considered in blunt carotid artery injuries, as there is a significant risk of progression of vessel injury with observation alone. Despite CTA being used as a common screening modality, it appears to lack sufficient sensitivity. DSA remains to be the gold standard in screening. Endovascular techniques are becoming more widely accepted as the primary surgical modality in the treatment of blunt extracranial carotid injuries and penetrating/blunt intracranial carotid lessions. Nonetheless, open surgical approaches are still needed for the treatment of penetrating extracranial carotid injuries and in patients with unfavorable lesions for endovascular intervention.