Response to Commentary on ‘Factors Influencing Wound Healing of Critical Ischaemic Foot after Bypass Surgery: Is the Angiosome Important in Selecting Bypass Target Artery?’

Angiosome-Targeted Infrapopliteal Angioplasty: Impact on Clinical Outcomes-An Observational Study

Background: Revascularization based on the angiosome concept (AC) is a controversial subject because there is currently no clear evidence of its efficacy, due to the heterogeneity of patients (multiple and diverse risk factors and comorbidities, multiple variations in the affected angiosomes). Choke vessels change the paradigm of the AC, and the presence or absence of the plantar arch directly affects the course of targeted revascularization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of revascularization based on the AC in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods: This retrospective analysis included 51 patients (40 men, 11 women), with a mean age of 69 years (66-72) and a total of 51 limbs, who presented with Rutherford 5-6 CLTI, before and after having undergone a drug-coated balloon angioplasty (8 patients) or plain balloon angioplasty (43). Between November 2018 and November 2019, all patients underwent below-the-knee balloon angioplasties and were followed up for an average of 12 months. The alteration of microcirculation was compared between directly and indirectly revascularized angiosomes. The study assessed clinical findings and patient outcomes, with follow-up investigations, comparing wound healing rates between the different revascularization methods. Patient records and periprocedural leg digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) were analyzed. Differences in outcomes after direct revascularization and indirect percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTa) were examined using Cox proportional hazards analysis, with the following endpoints: ulcer healing, limb salvage, and also amputation-free survival. Results: Direct blood flow to the angiosome supplying the ulcer area was achieved in 38 legs, in contrast to 13 legs with indirect revascularization. Among the cases, there were 39 lesions in the anterior tibial artery (ATA), 42 lesions in the posterior tibial artery (PTA), and 8 lesions in the peroneal artery (PA). According to a Cox proportional hazards analysis, having fewer than three (<3) affected angiosomes (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19-1.25, p = 0.136) was associated with improved wound healing. Conversely, wound healing outcomes were least favorable after indirect angioplasty (p = 0.206). When adjusting the Cox proportional hazard analysis for the number of affected angiosomes, it was found that direct drug-coated angioplasty resulted in the most favorable wound healing (p = 0.091). At the 1-year follow-up, the major amputation rate was 17.7%, and, according to a Cox proportional hazards analysis, atrial fibrillation (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42-1.69, p = 0.637), hemodialysis (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.39-4.04, p = 0.699), and number of affected angiosomes > 3 (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.39, p = 0.748) were significantly associated with poor leg salvage. Additionally, direct endovascular revascularization was associated with a lower rate of major amputation compared to indirect angioplasty (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.34-3.50, p = 0.884). Conclusions: Observing the angiosomes concept in decision-making appears to result in improved rates of arterial ulcer healing and leg salvage, particularly in targeted drug-coated balloon angioplasty for diabetic critical limb ischemia, where multiple angiosomes are typically affected.

Presepsin as a predictor of critical colonization in CLI hemodialysis patients

Infection during critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a challenging issue. Plasma presepsin is a novel biomarker for infection, which is related to bacterial phagocytosis by macrophages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of presepsin as an indicator and predictor for early detection of infectious CLI. A retrospective observational study was conducted among 20 CLI patients (Rutherford 5 and 6) on hemodialysis (HD). Twenty CLI patients on HD (mean age 70.7 ± 5.6 years, male 85%) and 15 healthy patients on HD without CLI and infection (control group) were analyzed. All CLI patients received appropriate revascularization and plastic surgical treatment. CLI patients were classified into two groups: the healing group with complete epithelialization without discharge and the nonhealing group with infection signs. Plasma presepsin was measured and compared among the two groups and the control group using an automated immunoanalyzer, PATHFAST, based on a noncompetitive chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. The median plasma presepsin and its interquartile range were 1,320 (1,055-1,465) pg/mL in the control group, 1,320 (1,050-1,613) pg/mL in the healing group and 3,193 (2,519-3,832) pg/mL in the nonhealing group. The plasma presepsin concentrations were significantly higher in the nonhealing group compared with the control group (p < 0.001) and the healing group (p < 0.01). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that presepsin had highest accuracy (0.979) among various inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein and the white blood cell count. The diagnostic cutoff value of 2,083 pg/mL was able to distinguish the nonhealing group and healing group with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88.9%. Our results suggest that plasma presepsin may be useful for predicting "critical colonization" and "infection" in nonhealing CLI in HD patients, therefore, the definitive cutoff value may be used for determinating the indication for reintervention and/or major limb amputation.