Prognostic Value of Preoperative Border-zone (Watershed) Infarcts on the Early Postoperative Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy after Acute Ischemic Stroke

Twelve years of experience in carotid endarterectomy with general anesthesia and preserved consciousness

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed both under general anesthesia (GA) or local anesthesia (LA) with good results. General anesthesia with preserved consciousness (GAPC) using remifentanil infusion has been already reported in literature and could potentially merge the advantages of GA and LA overcoming the disadvantages of this last technique. Although the good results of GAPC reported in literature, this technique is not widespread in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to report the perioperative results of CEA under GAPC in a large series of consecutive patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center, observational study including all patients treated for CEA under GAPC in our institution between January 2008 and October 2019. Primary endpoints were neurological complications rate, mortality rate in the perioperative period, need to GAPC conversion to GA during surgery and evaluation of the technique with a specific questionnaire regarding patients' satisfaction. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI) rate, other perioperative complications rate, rate of intraoperative shunting and need of reintervention in the perioperative period.

RESULTS

In the considered period 1290 CEA under GAPC were performed and included in this study. Neurological complications rate was 2.01%, mortality rate in the perioperative period was 0.07%, need of GAPC conversion to GA rate during surgery was 0.46% and patients satisfaction regarding the technique were high with a mean vote of 9.1 in a 0 to 10 scale. In the perioperative period MI rate was 0.23%, other perioperative complications rate was 1.39%, intraoperative shunting rate was 7.1% and reintervention rate after surgery was 2.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA under GAPC may combine the advantages of LA and GA, with a very low rate of conversion to GA during surgery and good patients' satisfaction. Moreover, it does not increase neurological, cardiologic and systemic complications. For these reasons CEA under GAPC could represents a valid alternative to GA or LA.

Impact of cerebral ischemic lesions on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy

Patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS) are commonly defined as asymptomatic or symptomatic according with their neurological conditions, however, emerging evidences suggest stratifying patients according also with the presence of cerebral ischemic lesions (CIL). In asymptomatic patients, the presence of CIL increases the risk of future neurologic event from 1% to 4% per year, leading to a stronger indication to carotid revascularization. In symptomatic patients, the presence of CIL does not seem to influence the outcome of the carotid revascularization if the volume of the lesion is small (<4,000 mm³); the benefit of the revascularization is also more significant if performed within 2 weeks from the index event. However, high volume (>4,000 mm³) CIL are associated in some experiences with a higher risk of carotid revascularization suggesting to delay the carotid revascularization for at least 4 weeks. As a matter of fact, the evaluation of CIL dimensions and characteristics in patients with CAS gives to the physician involved in the treatment a valuable adjunctive tool in the choice of the ideal treatment.

Does butylphthalide affect on hemodynamics in patients with watershed stroke?: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study will specifically investigate the effect of butylphthalide on hemodynamics in patients with watershed stroke (WS).

METHODS

We will search the following databases from their inceptions to the March 1, 2020: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. All relevant randomized controlled trials on exploring the effect of butylphthalide on hemodynamics in patients with WS will be considered for inclusion. No language limitation will be imposed to this study. All study quality will be checked using Cochrane risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.3 software will be utilized for data analysis.

RESULTS

This study will summarize the latest evidence to investigate the effect of butylphthalide on hemodynamics in patients with WS.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study will provide theoretical basis of butylphthalide on hemodynamics in patients with WS for clinician and future research.

DISSEMINATION AND ETHICS

This study is carried out based on the published data, thus, no ethical approval is required. We will submit this study to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY 202030006.

Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Snapshot of Current Trends and Systematic Review of Literature on Changing Paradigm towards Early Surgery

Carotid revascularization has been recommended as the maximally beneficial treatment for stroke prevention in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS). The appropriate timing for performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within the first 14 d after the occurrence of the index event remains controversial. We aim to provide a snapshot of the pertinent current literature related to the timing of CEA for patients with SCS. A systematic review of literature was conducted to study the timing of CEA for SCS. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) were followed. A total of 63 articles were identified as relevant to this topic. A summary of 15 articles favoring urgent CEA (within 48 h) for SCS within 48 h of index event and 9 articles not favoring urgent CEA is presented. A consensus is still to be achieved on the ideal timing of CEA for SCS within the 14-d window presently prescribed. The current literature suggests that patients who undergo urgent CEA (within 48 h) after nondisabling stroke as the index event have an increased periprocedural risk as compared to those who had transient ischemic attack (TIA) as the index event. Further prospective studies and clinical trials studying this question with separate groups classified as per the index event are required to shed more light on the subject. The current literature points to a changing paradigm towards early carotid surgery, specifically targeted within 48 h if the index event is TIA, and within 7 d if the index event is stroke.

Cerebral Infarct Topography and Early Outcome after Surgery for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Multicentre Study

INTRODUCTION

Although carotid stenosis can cause both territorial and border-zone (BZ) cerebral infarcts (CI), the influence of CI topography on postoperative complications after surgery remains unclear. We compared early outcomes after endarterectomy on the basis of CI location: territorial (T group) or BZ group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During the period between 2009 and 2013, ischaemic stroke patients who had undergone surgery for symptomatic carotid stenosis were identified from prospective databases from 3 French centres. The outcome was the identification of a combined stroke/death rate 30 days after endarterectomy.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-nine patients were included, 216 (74.7%) in the T group and 73 (25.3%) in the BZ group. The mean degree of stenosis was comparable in the 2 groups (78 ± 12% in the T group vs. 80 ± 12% in the BZ group, p = 0.105), with, however, more sub-occlusions (stenosis >90%) in the BZ group (38.4 vs. 23.1%, p = 0.012). The mean time between the time CI developed and the time surgery was performed was 19.6 ± 24.8 days, with a majority of patients being operated upon within 2 weeks following the formation of CI (66.7% in the T group vs. 60.3% in the BZ group, p = 0.322). The combined endpoint was significantly more frequent in the BZ group (9.6 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.003), with 4 ischaemic strokes and 3 deaths. In multivariate analysis, BZ CI was an independent predictor of postoperative stroke or death at 30 days (HR 4.91-95% CI [1.3-18.9], p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

BZ infarcts carry a greater risk of postoperative complications after carotid surgery, thus suggesting that topography of the CI should be considered in the decision-making process regarding surgery.

The Pathophysiology of Watershed Infarction: A Three-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Study

BACKGROUND

Most of the time, watershed infarcts (WIs) involve steno-occlusive carotid disease. The pathophysiological mechanism could be predicted by their pattern: internal WIs (IWIs) are thought to be due to hemodynamic impairment in contrast to cortical WIs (CWIs), which are more likely to be caused by microembolic phenomena. We used a 3D time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) study to assess this hypothesis.

METHODS

In 45 consecutive patients with a recent WI and ipsilateral cervical carotid stenosis, clinical and radiological data were obtained retrospectively. 3D TOF MRA were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively (internal carotid and anterior, middle and posterior cerebral arteries). Then, 2 groups were determined depending on their radiological patterns: WIs with (IWI+) or without (IWI-) an internal watershed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of the 45 patients (71%) had IWIs that were or were not associated with CWIs (IWI+), while 13 patients (29%) had only CWIs (IWI-). There was no significant relationship between the radiological pattern and the demographic data, the cardiovascular risk factors, or the degree of stenosis. However, IWI+ patients more frequently had motor weakness (P = .03) than CWI patients. An ipsilateral reduced middle cerebral artery intensity on 3D TOF MRA in both qualitative and quantitative analyses was significantly associated with IWI+. Instead within IWI-, no significantly reduced signal intensity was found.

CONCLUSION

These findings originally support the view that IWIs are mainly caused by a hemodynamic impairment related to carotid stenosis, whereas CWIs are mostly due to a microembolic mechanism. 3D TOF MRA, which gives pertinent information on pathophysiology on IWIs, can help in decision making.

Routine Shunting During Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients With Acute Watershed Stroke

Aim:

To evaluate the protective role of routine shunting in patients with acute watershed stroke (WS) undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Methods:

A total of 138 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS) who underwent CEA after acute ischemic stroke from March 2008 to March 2015 were included in this study. Transient ischemic attacks were excluded. These patients were divided into 2 groups according to the topographic pattern of the stroke on magnetic resonance imaging: group 1, territorial strokes (TS) caused by emboli of carotid origin, and group 2, WS caused by a hemodynamic mechanism related to an SCS. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and postoperative neurological morbidity. The insertion of a Pruitt carotid shunt was performed systematically.

Results:

Ninety (65.2%) patients presented a TS of carotid origin and were included in group 1, and 48 (34.8%) of the 138 patients had a WS related to an SCS and were included in group 2. The median time between clinical onset of the cerebral ischemic event and surgery was 9 days (range: 0-89 days). Postoperative mortality was 0%. Seven (5.1%) patients had an aggravation of the neurological status during the postoperative period, of whom 2 presented a complete regression of the symptoms in less than 1 hour (definitive postoperative neurologic morbidity: 3.6%). Postoperative neurologic morbidity rate was significantly higher in the TS group (7 of 90; 7.8%) compared to the WS group (0 of 48; P = .04). No other independent predictive factor of neurologic morbidity after CEA for an SCS was found.

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that routine shunting should be considered in case of acute WS since it may play a protective role. Further studies are eagerly awaited to better define the timing and the best treatment option for both acute WS and TS related to an SCS in order to reduce postoperative neurologic morbidity.

Summary of Evidence on Early Carotid Intervention for Recently Symptomatic Stenosis Based on Meta-Analysis of Current Risks

Background and Purpose—

This study aimed to assess the evidence on the periprocedural (<30 days) risks of carotid intervention in relation to timing of procedure in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Methods—

A systematic literature review of studies published in the past 8 years reporting periprocedural stroke/death after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) related to the time between qualifying neurological symptoms and intervention was performed. Pooled estimates of periprocedural risk for patients treated within 0 to 48 hours, 0 to 7 days, and 0 to 15 days were derived with proportional meta-analyses and reported separately for patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack as index events.

Results—

Of 47 studies included, 35 were on CEA, 7 on CAS, and 5 included both procedures. The pooled risk of periprocedural stroke was 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6–4.3) after CEA and 4.8% (95% CI, 2.5–7.8) after CAS performed <15 days; stroke/death rates were 3.8% and 6.9% after CEA and CAS, respectively. Pooled periprocedural stroke risk was 3.3% (95% CI, 2.1–4.6) after CEA and 4.8% (95% CI, 2.5–7.8) after CAS when performed within 0 to 7 days. In hyperacute surgery (<48 hours), periprocedural stroke risk after CEA was 5.3% (95% CI, 2.8–8.4) but with relevant risk differences among patients treated after transient ischemic attack (2.7%; 95% CI, 0.5–6.9) or stroke (8.0%; 95% CI, 4.6–12.2) as index.

Conclusions—

CEA within 15 days from stroke/transient ischemic attack can be performed with periprocedural stroke risk <3.5%. CAS within the same period may carry a stroke risk of 4.8%. Similar periprocedural risks occur after CEA and CAS performed earlier, within 0 to 7 days. Carotid revascularization can be safely performed within the first week (0–7 days) after symptom onset.