A Multicentric Experience with Open Surgical Repair and Endovascular Exclusion of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

Intraluminal thrombus volume correlates with the crural vessel runoff in popliteal artery aneurysms upon initial presentation

Background: Patients having emergency surgery due to ischemia caused by a popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) have worse outcomes in all endpoints (operation time, major adverse limb events (MALE), amputation-free survival) than after elective treatment, mostly due to a limited crural vessel runoff. This study investigates the relationship between PAA diameter, volume, and luminal thrombus load in relation to the preoperative crural runoff. Patients and methods: Retrospective single-centre evaluation of surgically treated patients with PAA and semi-automated quantitative CT analysis of PAA morphologies (diameter, volume and intraluminal thrombus volume). Primary endpoints were the correlations these characteristics with the number of patent crural vessels. Results: A total of 89 PAAs (61 patients, median age 75, IQR 12; 94.4% male) were identified, of which 47.2% were symptomatic with 18 acute limb ischemia (ALI). The diameter at surgery was 33.8 ± 12.1mm and the volume 68.5 ± 13.6mm3. A median of two lower leg vessels were patent (elective 3 [1, 2, 3] vs. emergency 1 [1, 2], p=0.1) upon preoperative CTA. 77 PAAs underwent elective surgery, five PAAs (5.6%) received endovascular treatment. The surgical complication rate was 23.6% without immediate or early occlusion. The follow-up was 42.5 [39-45] months. The overall mortality rate was 11.2% and the primary patency rate 73.9%. While the total aneurysm volume correlated well with the diameter (r=0.77, p<0.01), the intraluminal thrombus volume (ILT) showed the clearest correlation with the crural runoff (r=-0.34, p=0.01). No correlation between the diameter and crural runoff was observed (r=-0.17, p=0.1). A reduced crural run-off was significantly associated with impaired amputation-free survival (p=0.01). A subgroup analysis (n=21) with sequential CTs showed a tendency towards greater increase of thrombus volume compared to plain diameter during PAA growth. The thrombus volume index (=ILT/total PAA volume) was significantly higher in emergency patients (p=0.01), while diameters tended to be smaller (p=0.57). Conclusions: The increasing intraluminal thrombus volume correlates most distinctly with a reduced crural runoff in PAAs and should therefore be considered prognostically important, especially in the presence of an increased growth rate compared to the diameter.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Potential Marker of Outcome in Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair

Objective: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inexpensive and easily available inflammatory marker for cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study is to evaluate a possible association between preoperative NLR value and popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair outcomes. Methods: A single-center retrospective study on all patients, who underwent urgent or elective PAA repair from June 2010 to October 2022, was performed. Study outcomes were immediate technical success, 30-day and mid-term primary patency, reintervention, limb salvage, and mortality rates. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count, and, according to the literature, a cut-off of five has been considered as a possible threshold for the analysis. Results: Eighty-two patients (80 male) with a total of 97 popliteal artery aneurysms were enrolled in this study. The mean preoperative NLR was 2.9 ± 2.4. In 10 (10.3%) PAAs, the NRL was >5 (High-NLR group), and, in the remaining 87 (89.7%), the NLR was <5 (Low-NLR group). The preoperative NLR for urgent procedures was higher than elective cases (4.37 vs. 2.30; p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found as far as immediate 24 h technical success (p = 0.48) and 30-day primary patency (p = 39). At mean follow-up, the primary patency rate was significantly higher in the Low-NLR group (p = 0.0044), without statistical differences for re-operation (p = 0.27), limb salvage (p = 0.09), and mortality rates (p = 0.51). The Kaplan-Mayer analysis showed a significant difference in freedom from major amputation in patients with an NLR > 5 compared to the ones with an NLR < 5 (p = 0.038), without any differences in terms of survival, primary patency, and the need for reintervention rates. The multivariable Cox regression analysis identified the NLR value as an independent predictor of better outcomes regarding freedom from the amputation rate (p = 0.25). Conclusions: Our experience indicates that a preoperative NLR value > 5 can identify high-risk patients affected by a PAA and may negatively influence the surgery's long-term outcomes. Therefore, this selected group of patients could need a more tailored approach and closer monitoring over time.

Safety and Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment of Complications Associated with Persistent Sciatic Artery: A Qualitative Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovascular therapy with stent grafts (SGs) to treat complications associated with persistent sciatic artery (PSA) by conducting a systematic review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ichushi Web databases were searched to identify articles focusing on endovascular treatment with SGs for complications associated with PSA published from inception to September 15, 2023. The review included 31 case reports, 2 case series, and 7 conference proceedings. Forty patients (median age, 67 years [range, 22-88 years]; 25 women) with 41 limbs underwent endovascular treatment with 65 SGs for ischemia (n = 26), aneurysm (n = 13), and trauma (n = 2). Prior treatments were systemic anticoagulation (n = 7), thrombolysis (n = 5), thrombectomy (n = 3), and amputation (n = 1), whereas concurrent treatments were thrombolysis (n = 6) and thrombectomy (n = 2). The median number of SGs implanted was 2 (range, 1-4). Early outcomes were technical success and adverse events (AEs). Late outcomes were primary patency, secondary patency, freedom from reintervention, and clinical success.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. Intervention-specific AEs were reported in 4 cases; however, there were no severe AEs. The clinical success rates at 1 and 2 years were 100% and 95.7%, respectively. The primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years were 81.5% and 67.6%, respectively, and the secondary patency rates at 1 and 2 years were 94.5% and 81.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment with SGs for complications associated with PSA is safe and effective with acceptable midterm patency and durability, and is supportable as the first-choice treatment.

Bypass Patency and Amputation-Free Survival after Popliteal Aneurysm Exclusion Significantly Depends on Patient Age and Medical Complications: A Detailed Dual-Center Analysis of 395 Consecutive Elective and Emergency Procedures

Background/Objectives: A popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is traditionally treated by an open PAA repair (OPAR) with a popliteo-popliteal venous graft interposition. Although excellent outcomes have been reported in elective cases, the results are much worse in cases of emergency presentation or with the necessity of adjunct procedures. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that might decrease amputation-free survival (efficacy endpoint) and lower graft patency (technical endpoint). Patients and Methods: A dual-center retrospective analysis was performed from 2000 to 2021 covering all consecutive PAA repairs stratified for elective vs. emergency repair, considering the patient (i.e., age and comorbidities), PAA (i.e., diameter and tibial runoff vessels), and procedural characteristics (i.e., procedure time, material, and bypass configuration). Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were used. Results: In 316 patients (69.8 ± 10.5 years), 395 PAAs (mean diameter 31.9 ± 12.9 mm) were operated, 67 as an emergency procedure (6× rupture; 93.8% severe acute limb ischemia). The majority had OPAR (366 procedures). Emergency patients had worse pre- and postoperative tibial runoff, longer procedure times, and more complex reconstructions harboring a variety of adjunct procedures as well as more medical and surgical complications (all p < 0.001). Overall, the in-hospital major amputation rate and mortality rate were 3.6% and 0.8%, respectively. The median follow-up was 49 months. Five-year primary and secondary patency rates were 80% and 94.7%. Patency for venous grafts outperformed alloplastic and composite reconstructions (p < 0.001), but prolonged the average procedure time by 51.4 (24.3-78.6) min (p < 0.001). Amputation-free survival was significantly better after elective procedures (p < 0.001), but only during the early (in-hospital) phase. An increase in patient age and any medical complications were significant negative predictors, regardless of the aneurysm size. Conclusions: A popliteo-popliteal vein interposition remains the gold standard for treatment despite a probably longer procedure time for both elective and emergency PAA repairs. To determine the most effective treatment strategies for older and probably frailer patients, factors such as the aneurysm size and the patient's overall condition should be considered.

Early and long-term results of surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms using a heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethilene graft

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess early and long-term results of open surgical interventions for popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) with the use of heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (HePTFE) in a single center, retrospective, non-comparative cohort study.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained dataset, including 207 open interventions for PAAs between 2002 and 2022, was performed and 170 procedures carried on with the use of a HePTFE graft were found. Perioperative results were analyzed in terms of mortality, graft thrombosis and amputation rates. Follow-up results were analyzed in terms of survival, primary and secondary patency, freedom from amputation, freedom from reintervention with life-table analysis and Kaplan Meier curves. Follow-up results were considered as primary outcomes, whereas perioperative results were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In 82 interventions (48%) the PAA was asymptomatic. In 140 cases a medial approach was used, while in 30 cases a posterior approach was preferred. The level of the distal anastomosis was the p3 tract of the popliteal artery in 89% of the cases. One perioperative death occurred; early thromboses occurred in eight cases and the overall perioperative amputation rate was 2.8%. The median duration of follow-up was 48 months (range 1-251). Estimated survival rate at 10 years was 55% (standard error, SE, 0.065). The 10-year rates of primary and secondary patency and freedom from amputation were 40.8% (SE 0.06), 47.6% (SE 0.065) and 93.4% (SE 0.04), respectively. The estimated freedom from reintervention rate at 10 years was 57% (SE 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large monocentric experience showed that open surgical repair of PAAs with HePTFE is a safe procedure, with low rates of perioperative complications, and excellent results in the long-term setting.

Idiopathic pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery with endovascular treatment: A case report

Popliteal pseudoaneurysms are a rare vascular pathology, usually caused by trauma or iatrogenic interventions. Idiopathic cases are exceptionally uncommon. This case report aims to describe the diagnosis and successful endovascular treatment of an idiopathic pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery in a 90-year-old bedridden female patient presented with acute pain and swelling in the left knee at the emergency department. The patient underwent successful endovascular treatment with a covered stent and thrombin injection, leading to complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm. Popliteal pseudoaneurysms are a rare pathology, and idiopathic cases are even more uncommon. Endovascular therapy for popliteal pseudoaneurysms is associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to open surgical repair. This case report highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists in the management of rare vascular pathologies.

The Combination of Vacuum-Assisted Thromboaspiration and Covered Stent Graft for Acute Limb Ischemia due to Thromboembolic Complications of Popliteal Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

We present a standardized protocol of endovascular revascularization for patients with acute limb ischemia due to popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) thromboembolic complication, based on the combination of vacuum-assisted thromboaspiration to improve tibiopedal outflow and covered stent graft to exclude the PAA.

METHODS

All patients with a diagnosis of PAA complicated by thromboembolic events undergoing total endovascular rescue were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated database from November 2018 to November 2021. To assess vessel patency, the TIPI (Thromboaspiration In Peripheral Ischemia) classification was used. The primary end point was the primary technical success (at least one tibial vessel with a TIPI flow of 2 or 3). The 30-day overall mortality and amputation rates were considered as secondary end points. Patients' overall survival, limb salvage, freedom from reocclusion and reinterventions were reported as secondary late outcomes using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Seventeen male patients were enrolled with a mean age of 75.7 ± 9 years. Rutherford grading score was IIa in 52.9% (9/17) and IIb in 47.1% (8/17). PAA mean diameter was 37.4 ± 11.2 mm. All patients had tibial arteries involvement, and in 9 cases (52.9%) there was also the occlusion of the PAA. Mechanical thrombectomy with Indigo/Penumbra thromboaspiration system was used in all patients. PAAs were excluded using one or more VIABAHN covered endografts (range 1-3 pieces). Technical success was achieved in 94.1%. Fasciotomy was performed in 1 case (5.9%). Mortality and amputation rates at 30-day follow-up were respectively 0% and 5.9%. Survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were respectively 94.1%, 86.3%, and 67.9%. Secondary patency was achieved in all cases (100%). Freedom from reintervention was 80.4%, 65.8%, and 54.8% at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Limb salvage was 88.2% at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preliminary, our experience of total endovascular rescue for complicated PAA with thromboembolic events highlighted promising rates of limb salvage at 30 days after intervention. The total endovascular approach seems able to maximize tibiopedal outflow offering an interesting strategy in limb salvage.

Comparisons of outcomes of open surgery versus endovascular intervention for thrombotic popliteal artery aneurysm with acute lower limb ischemia: a systematic review

Background

Thrombotic popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) with acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) is a serious disease leading to amputation. The choice of emergency procedures is not clearly defined, and the difference in therapeutic efficiency between open surgery and endovascular intervention is still unclear.

Method

We conducted a comprehensive search through PubMed, Wiley Online Library and ScienceDirect. According to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible articles were screened out, and all relevant data were extracted for further analysis. Our study was designed and developed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guideline. We critically assessed all included articles by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS).

Result

A total of 29 articles (1338 patients/1387 limbs) were included in the study. After a 1-year follow-up, the primary patency rate of the open surgery group was significantly lower than that of the endovascular intervention group (72.65 vs. 81.46%, P = 0.004), but without significant difference in the secondary patency rate (86.19 vs. 86.86%, P = 0.825). The limb salvage rate of the open surgery group was also significantly lower (83.07 vs. 98.25%, P < 0.001). After the 2-year follow-up, the primary patency rate of the open surgery group was still significantly lower (48.57 vs. 59.90%, P = 0.021).

Conclusion

The outcome of endovascular intervention was better than that of open surgery especially in the 1-year limb salvage rate and primary patency rate at the 1-year and 2-year follow-ups.

What Is the Best Treatment for Acute Limb Ischemia?

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency associated with high rates of limb loss and mortality. Management of these patients is challenging given the severe systemic illness resulting from tissue ischemia and the high incidence of preexisting comorbid conditions and underlying peripheral arterial disease. Expeditious diagnosis, anticoagulation, and revascularization are of utmost importance in reducing morbidity. Revascularization may be accomplished using open, endovascular, or hybrid techniques. Approach to revascularization depends on the severity of ischemia, location of occlusion, cause, chance of recovery, comorbidities, and available resources.

Open Repair versus Endovascular Repair in The Treatment of Symptomatic Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular and open surgical modalities are currently used to treat popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA). However, there is limited data on the comparative durability of both repairs to guide physicians especially in the treatment of patients presenting symptomatic. We aimed to study the comparative effectiveness of endovascular PAA repair (EPAR) versus open PAA repair (OPAR).

METHODS

The vascular quality initiative (VQI)-Medicare linked database was queried for patients with symptomatic PAA who underwent OPAR or EPAR from January 2010 to December 2018. Kaplan-Meier estimates, log rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were employed to study the outcomes of amputation free survival (AFS), freedom from major amputation, and overall survival in 2 years following the index procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 1375 patients were studied, of which 23.7% (n=326) were treated with EPAR. Patients treated with OPAR were younger, less likely to have coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), but more likely to be smokers and to present with acute lower extremity ischemia. OPAR patients had better 2-year AFS (84.5% vs. 72.5%, P<0.001) and overall survival (86.2% vs 74.7%, P<0.001). Freedom from major amputation at 2 years was comparable between EPAR and OPAR (95.5% vs 97.7%, P=0.164) in the overall cohort. Within the sub cohort of patients with acute limb ischemia, freedom from major amputation was significantly higher for OPAR compared to EPAR (97.4% vs. 90.6%, P=0.021). After adjustment for confounders, OPAR was associated with decreased risk of amputation or death (aHR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.48-0.80; P<0.001) and mortality (aHR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.48-0.81; P<0.001) at 2 years. OPAR and EPAR had comparable adjusted risk of 2-year major amputation in the overall cohort. However, for patients presenting with acute limb ischemia OPAR was associated with 72% lower risk of 2-year major amputation compared to EPAR (aHR, 0.28; 95%CI, 0.10-0.83; P=0.021).

CONCLUSION

In this multi-institutional observational study of symptomatic popliteal aneurysms, OPAR was associated with significantly better amputation free and overall survival compared to EPAR. For patients with acute ischemia, OPAR was associated with reduced risk of amputation. These findings suggest that OPAR may be superior to EPAR in the treatment of symptomatic PAA. A consideration of OPAR as first line definitive treatment for symptomatic PAA patients who are good surgical candidates is suggested.

Real-world data of popliteal artery aneurysm treatment. Analysis of the POPART registry

OBJECTIVE

Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is a rare disease with a prevalence of 0.1-1%. Within the last years, endovascular repair of PAA (ER) has been performed more frequently despite the lack of high-level evidence compared to open surgery (OR). In 2014, the POPART registry was initiated to validate current treatment options in PAA repair.
 METHOD: POPART is a multinational multicenter registry for peri- and postoperative outcome of endovascular and open PAA repair. Data sets are recorded by the online survey tool "SurveyMonkey®". Regular monitoring and plausibility checks of the data sets are performed to ensure reliability. The aim of this study is to present results of the POPART registry, with data of 41 centers.
 RESULTS: From June 2014 to August 2019, a total of 794 cases were recorded in the PAA registry. OR was performed in 662 patients and ER in 106 patients; 23 Patients were treated conservatively. Four of the 106 patients with primary ER underwent conversion to OR. ER patients were significantly older (ER x˜= 71 vs. OR x˜= 67 (p<0.05). There were no other significant differences in demographics or comorbidities and aneurysm morphology between the two groups. 50.3% patients in the OR group were symptomatic; in the ER group 29.2% (p<0.05). Emergency treatment for acute ischemia, critical ischemia or rupture was necessary in 149 patients (22.5%) in the OR group vs. 11 patients (10.3%) in the ER group.
Most frequent complications after surgery were impaired wound healing (OR n=47, 7.1%; ER n=3, 2.8%, p>0.05) and major bleeding (OR n=26, 3.9%; ER n=3, 2.8%, p>0.05). In-hospital length of stay (= 10d [3-65] OR vs. x˜=7d [1-73] ER) was significantly higher in the OR group. Overall patency was 83.2% vs. 44.7% (OR/ER, p<0.005) after 12 months and 74.2% vs. 29.1% (OR/ER, p<0.005) after 24 months. There was a significantly poorer outcome for prosthetic graft compared to autologous vein in the OR group (71.4% vs. 88.1% 12-month primary patency).
 CONCLUSION: 
 In order to evaluate new treatment techniques such as endovascular repair (ER) for PAA, real world data is of essential importance. This analysis of the first results for the POPART registry shows good perioperative results for endovascular treatment of PAA in asymptomatic patients with good outflow vessels. The perioperative complication rate is low and the postoperative hospital stay is shorter than after OR. However, the patency rates after 12 and 24 months are low in the ER group compared to patients treated with open repair. More follow-up data is required for further interpretation; the completion of the data sets in the registry is ongoing.

Early and mid-term outcomes of open popliteal artery aneurysm repair with prosthetic grafts

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the early and mid-term outcomes of open surgical repair (OR) for popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) with prosthetic grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pre-, intra-, and postoperative data of all patients who underwent PAA OR with prosthetic grafts at our Institution between January 2009 and July 2019 were included in a prospectively maintained database which was retrospectively analysed. Primary patency was defined as uninterrupted flow (<50% stenosis) in the graft with no additional procedures performed. Secondary patency was defined as the restoration of graft patency.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients underwent OR for 104 PAA (age: 71, 67-78; 82 males) with prosthetic grafts. Seventy-two aneurysms (68%) were asymptomatic. The median diameter was 30mm (24-37). A medial approach was used in 35 aneurysms (34%) while a posterior approach (PA) in 69 (65%). Repairs either consisted of aneurysmectomy or aneurysm ligation without removal with an interposition graft with end-to-end anastomoses. Median operative time was 120 (103-142) minutes. The estimated blood loss (EBL) was 281 (150-281) ml. Only one patient treated by PA sustained a permanent peroneal nerve lesion, and a second patient treated via the same approach needed a surgical revision due to bleeding on postoperative day two. No temporary lesions were recorded. There were no early amputations. No perioperative deaths occurred. The median length of stay (LOS) was 3 (3-4) days. An expanded poly-tetra-flour-ethylene graft was used in 102 cases (98%) and a Dacron graft in the remain two cases (2%). As for the caliber, the 8mm graft was used in 64 cases (62%). Median follow-up was 34.6 (8.5-62.7) months. There was no related mortality. Nineteen PAA underwent reintervention with primary and secondary rate patency of 78% and 88% at three years. The median time to reintervention was 28.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Popliteal artery aneurysms open repair with prosthetic grafts are safe and feasible, with good mid-term results and satisfactory primary and secondary patency at three years.

Late Vascular Injury at Both Edges of the VIABAHN Stent Graft after Endovascular Repair for Idiopathic Superficial Femoral Artery Rupture

The VIABAHN stent graft is often used for traumatic and iatrogenic vascular injuries. In this case, vascular injury at both edges of the VIABAHN stent graft was noted 4 months after endovascular repair for idiopathic superficial femoral artery (SFA) rupture. The longitudinal compression of the SFA with a decrease in hematoma size was assumed to exceed the flexibility of the stent graft. Thus, the use of stent grafts for vascular injuries with giant pseudoaneurysms may result in late vascular injuries at both edges of the stent graft. Therefore, cautious assessment of its indications and strict surveillance are required.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment and natural history of popliteal artery aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the best available evidence comparing open vs endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair. We also summarized the natural history of PAAs to support of the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with PAAs treated with an open vs an endovascular approach. We also included studies of natural history of untreated patients. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed when appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 32 original studies and 4 systematic reviews from 2191 candidate references. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the endovascular approach, open surgical repair was associated with higher primary patency at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.12), lower occlusion rate at 30 days (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68) and fewer reinterventions (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17-0.45), but a longer hospital stay (standardized mean difference, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.23-3.09) and more wound complications (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 2.19-12.26). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency at 3 years (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.97-1.97), secondary patency (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.84-3.03), mortality at the longest follow-up (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.17), mortality at 30 days (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-1.36), or amputation (incidence rate ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31). The certainty in these estimates was, in general, low. Studies of PAA natural history suggest that thromboembolic complications and amputation develop at a mean observation time of 18 months and they are frequent. One study showed that at 5 years, approximately one-half of the patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with PAAs. Despite the low certainty of the evidence, these rates along with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility can help patients and surgeons to engage in shared decision-making.

The Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on popliteal artery aneurysms

The Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) leverage the work of a panel of experts chosen by the Society for Vascular Surgery to review the current world literature as it applies to PAAs to extract the most salient, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of these patients. These guidelines focus on PAA screening, indications for intervention, choice of repair strategy, management of asymptomatic and symptomatic PAAs (including those presenting with acute limb ischemia), and follow-up of both untreated and treated PAAs. They offer long-awaited evidence-based recommendations for physicians taking care of these patients.

Comparison of Outcomes for Open Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair Using Vein and Prosthetic Conduits

BACKGROUND

Autologous vein is considered the preferred conduit for lower extremity bypass. There is, however, limited literature regarding conduit choice for open popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair. We sought to compare outcomes of PAA repair using vein versus prosthetic conduits.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2019) was queried for patients with PAAs undergoing elective conventional revascularization originating from the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Conduits were categorized as vein or prosthetic. Primary outcomes were primary graft patency, freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE) and MALE-free survival at 2-years. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was used for estimation and comparison of patency.

RESULTS

A total of 1,146 limbs in 1,065 patients underwent elective open revascularization for PAA. Vein was used in 921 limbs (80%), and prosthetic in 225 (20%). Patients in the prosthetic cohort had a shorter procedure time, were older, and had a higher prevalence of COPD. Postoperatively, prosthetic patients were more likely to be started and maintained on anticoagulation without increased incidence of hematoma. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection (2% vs. 2%; P = 0.946). There was an increased tendency toward more symptomatic patients in the vein cohort although not statistically significant (49% vein vs. 41% prosthetic; P = 0.096). On a mean follow-up of 13 ± 5 months, the incidence of MALE and MALE-free survival were comparable between the two groups. The 2-year primary and secondary patency rates were similar, 87% and 96% in the vein, and 91% and 95% in the prosthetic groups, respectively. At multivariable analysis, outflow bypass targets to the infrapopliteal arteries (HR 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-3.65; P = 0.014) and symptomatic aneurysm (HR 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.15; P = 0.037) were independently associated with loss of primary patency. Conduit type did not make a difference in MALE-free survival, or primary graft patency at 2-years.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that conventional open PAA repair with prosthetic conduit yields results comparable to those with vein conduit with regard to primary and secondary patency and MALEs at 2-years for targets to the popliteal artery. However, when the distal target was infrapopliteal, worse outcomes were observed with prosthetic conduit. Our results suggest that vein conduit should be preferentially used for infrapopliteal targets, while prosthetic conduit confers comparable outcomes in a subset of patients who do not have suitable autologous vein conduits.

Results After Open and Endovascular Repair of Popliteal Aneurysm: A Matched Comparison Within a Population Based Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors affecting the outcome after open surgical (OSR) and endovascular (ER) repair of popliteal artery aneurysm (PA) in comparable cohorts.

METHODS

A matched comparison in a national, population based cohort of 592 legs treated for PA (2008 - 2012), with long term follow up. Registry data from 899 PA patients treated in 2014 - 2018 were analysed for time trends. The 77 legs treated by ER were matched, by indication, with 154 legs treated with OSR. Medical records and imaging were collected. Analysed risk factors were anatomy, comorbidities, and medication. Elongation and angulations were examined in a core lab. The main outcome was occlusion.

RESULTS

Patients in the ER group were older (73 vs. 68 years, p = .001), had more lung disease (p = .012), and were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulants more often (p < .001). The hazard ratio (HR with 95% confidence intervals) for occlusion was 2.69 (1.60 - 4.55, p < .001) for ER, but 3.03 (1.26 - 7.27, p = .013) for poor outflow. For permanent occlusion, the HR after ER was 2.47 (1.35 - 4.50, p = .003), but 4.68 (1.89 - 11.62, p < .001) for poor outflow. In the ER subgroup, occlusion was more common after acute ischaemia (HR 2.94 [1.45 - 5.97], p = .003; and poor outflow HR 14.39 [3.46 - 59.92], p < .001). Larger stent graft diameter reduced the risk (HR 0.71 [0.54 - 0.93], p = .014). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for indication and stent graft diameter, elongation increased the risk (HR 1.020 per degree [1.002 - 1.033], p = .030). PAs treated for acute ischaemia had a median stent graft diameter of 6.5 mm, with those for elective procedures being 8 mm (p < .001). Indications and outcomes were similar during both time periods (2008 - 2012 and 2014 - 2018).

CONCLUSION

In comparable groups, ER had a 2.7 fold increased risk of any occlusion, and 2.4 fold increased risk of permanent occlusion, despite more aggressive medical therapy. Risk factors associated with occlusion in ER were poor outflow, smaller stent graft diameter, acute ischaemia, and angulation/elongation. An association between indication, acute ischaemia, and small stent graft diameter was identified.

Unusual source of fever: the curious case of an infected arterial stent graft presenting as a ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm

A 71-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 1-week history of lethargy, general malaise and intermittent high fever. He had presented 18 months ago, and again 12 months earlier with similar symptoms. On this third presentation, the fever was accompanied by right thigh swelling and pain. The patient was referred to the vascular surgeons with concern regarding an infected vascular stent graft from previous treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) 8 years earlier. CT angiogram demonstrated a collapsed right PAA sac with a large collection, consistent with ruptured PAA, and a single gas bubble around the indwelling stent graft. The patient recovered well after a course of antibiotics and surgical explantation of the graft. Infection is a potential complication of any implanted arterial advice, and needs to be considered even years after initial intervention and with no localising symptoms.

Hybrid Approach to Popliteal Artery Aneurysm with Thromboembolic Symptoms. A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with thromboembolic symptoms due to a popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is still controversial with poor results in terms of primary patency. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate whether improving the outflow with an endovascular pretreatment consisting in thromboaspiration and angioplasty could positively ameliorate the primary patency of the subsequent femoropopliteal (FP) bypass in symptomatic patients with at least one below the knee (BTK) patent vessel.

METHODS

This is a single-center pilot case-control study that involves patients treated at the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit of Udine, Italy, from January 2015 to November 2019. The inclusion criteria were the presence of thromboembolic symptoms due to PAA distal embolization, associated with the presence of a patent PAA >20 mm and a poor runoff (no more than one patent BTK artery). The case group was treated in a two-step approach: the first step consisted in thromboaspiration followed by BTK angioplasty, when appropriate, and the second one consisted in performing the surgical FP bypass. The control group moved on directly to the open surgical intervention.

RESULTS

The case group was composed of 11 patients, 10 males and 1 female, with a mean age of 69.3 ± 10.8 years. The mean PAA dimension was 32.6 ± 9.9 mm. Particularly, 9 patients were operated on through the medial vascular approach and 2 through the posterior one. The grafts used were 10 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and 1 great saphenous vein (GSV) in situ. The control group was composed of 11 male patients with a mean age of 75.5 ± 8.7 years, and the mean PAA dimension was 29.8 ± 13.4 mm. All the FP bypasses were approached medially, and the materials used were 10 PTFE and 1 reversed GSV. The median follow-up was 31.5 ± 12.6 months. Primary patency in the case group was 72.7% within one year; on the contrary, it was 27.3% in the control group. The amputation rate was 0% in the case group, 27.3% in the controls. By comparing the 2 groups, we found a higher and significant risk (P = 0.0261) of early FP bypass occlusion and major limb amputation in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study shows encouraging results; the endovascular approach is a safe and repeatable procedure which, improving the runoff in thromboembolic symptomatic PAA, seems to guarantee a better FP graft primary patency.

Successful surgical management of a ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm with acute common peroneal nerve neuropathy: A rare case

OBJECTIVES

Ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm is a rare entity, which can cause severe nerve neuropathy. Open surgical repair is the preferred treatment for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm but may aggravate nerve injuries or lead to postoperative aneurysm enlargement. The current surgical techniques for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm have some deficiencies.

METHODS

We present the case of a 78-year-old woman with sudden swelling of left knee joint and left foot drop, which was caused by the ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm and its compression. A modified open surgical repair was applied in our case, and glucocorticoid therapy was given perioperatively.

RESULTS

The motor function of left lower limb had rapidly recovered after operation, and six-month follow-up showed patency of prosthetic vessel and significant shrinkage of aneurysm sac.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified open surgical repair can relieve the compression and prevent possible "type II endoleak" without dissecting in popliteal fossa. Acute common peroneal nerve neuropathy and foot drop are reversible with immediate removal of compression and glucocorticoid therapy for patients with ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm.

Progressive stenosis of a popliteal artery stent graft by laminated thrombus

We present a case of failed popliteal artery aneurysm repair using a Viabahn stent graft (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) due to laminated thrombus formation. A 75-year-old man presented with a symptomatic popliteal artery aneurysm. He was treated with a Viabahn stent graft. On follow-up, the patient complained of lower extremity claudication, and duplex ultrasound examination showed a focal intrastent stenosis. A computed tomography scan showed a significant stenosis within the stent graft, at the level of the knee joint creases. The patient underwent superficial femoral artery to distal popliteal surgery. This case report aims to expand on the mechanism of stent graft failure in popliteal aneurysms.

Eligibility of Endovascular Repair for Popliteal Artery Aneurysms According the Instructions for Use

BACKGROUND

Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral aneurysms. Although rare and often asymptomatic, there is a significant risk of thrombosis, embolism, and limb loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the eligibility for endovascular repair of patients treated for symptomatic and asymptomatic PAAs in accordance with the instructions for use (IFU).

METHODS

All patients treated for PAA with open surgical repair between the years 2010 and 2017 were analyzed if suitable for endovascular treatment. Preoperative imaging was reviewed for applicability with an interventional radiologist and 2 vascular surgeons. Evaluation was performed in accordance with the following criteria adopted from the IFU of the Gore ® Viabahn stent graft: at least a single-vessel tibial runoff, proximal and distal landing zone more than 2 cm, no large difference in vessel diameter proximal and distal to the aneurysm, no overstenting of significant collaterals necessary, and no inadequate kinking of the artery. The patients were classified in 3 categories: the patient was eligible, endovascular treatment was feasible, and endovascular treatment was not appropriate.

RESULTS

51 patients with 61 symptomatic and asymptomatic PAAs were identified. Forty-five cases were asymptomatic, 11 cases showed clinical symptoms such as claudication, and in 5 cases, the patients presented with acute ischemia. Twenty-four patients were eligible for endovascular intervention, 14 cases were feasible, and in 23 cases, it was not appropriate in accordance with the IFU.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, more than one-third of the patients with PAA were not eligible for endovascular treatment in accordance with the IFU and another 23 % showed substantial reasons against endovascular treatment. These data suggest that endovascular repair remains a treatment option for selected patients only. Cross-sectional imaging is mandatory for procedure selection.

A Comparison of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: An Updated Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, popliteal artery aneurysms (PPAs) were treated via open repair (OR). However, more recently endovascular repair (EVR) approaches have become more common for the treatment of PPAs. The present meta-analysis therefore sought to conduct an up-to-date review of studies comparing the relative safety and efficacy of these 2 repair strategies. To that end, patient outcomes including primary patency, operating time, hospital stay duration, and re-intervention, amputation, and graft occlusion within 30 days were compared for these OR and EVR approaches.

METHODS

Studies in which OR and EVR were compared as treatments for PPAs were identified through systematic searching of the PubMed and Embase databases. Any studies either analyzing only one of these treatments in isolation or analyzing <5 patients were not included in this analysis. For all relevant studies, patient demographic information and outcome details were compiled. Risk of bias was analyzed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios, mean differences, and hazard ratios (HRs) for patient outcomes were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 17 relevant studies including a single randomized controlled trial and 16 retrospective cohort studies, incorporating 6887 total cases (1662 EVR and 5225 OR). The quality of evidence for all measured outcomes was deemed to be very low or low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Rates of primary patency were found to be significantly higher for patients treated via OR relative to those treated via EVR (HR = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.30; P = .03). Operative and hospitalization durations, in contrast, were significantly lower for patients treated via EVR. Patients treated via EVR also experienced significantly higher rates of graft thrombosis and reintervention within 30 days relative to patients treated via OR. However, no significant differences were observed between treatments with respect to rates of patient amputation (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.55-1.85; P = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

The available data suggest that PPA repair via EVR is a safe alternative to OR, but that short-term graft thrombosis and reintervention rates are significantly greater for the former approach. Moreover, few studies to date have compared these techniques and those that were largely retrospective in nature with relatively low-quality evidence, making it difficult to make definitive statements regarding the relative safety and efficacy of these 2 repair strategies. Additional population-based large-scale studies are therefore essential in order to conduct a robust evaluation of the safety and utility of EVR as an alternative to OR for PPA repair.

Predictors of long-term outcomes after polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft repair of peripheral arterial aneurysms, pseudo-aneurysms, and arterio-venous fistulas

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the primary patency rate at three years for the infra-aortic peripheral arterial pathologies treated with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts.

METHODS

Patients treated with self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts for infra-aortic peripheral arterial aneurysms, pseudo-aneurysms, and arterio-venous fistulas were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 48 patients (35 male, 13 female; mean age: 53.8 ± 13.5) were included with 29.0 ± 16.5 months (median 27, range 4-70) mean follow-up period. The primary objective was to determine the primary patency rate at three years. The secondary objectives were to compare type and localization of pathology, and length and diameter of the stent-grafts with primary patency rate. Kaplan-Meier test was used as the main statistical method.

RESULTS

Overall mean primary patency rate at three years was 77.10%. Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft implantation in aneurysms had worse primary patency rate than pseudo-aneurysms and arterio-venous fistulas (66.6%, P = 0.03; 76.9%, P = 0.03; 88.2%, P = 0.01, respectively). Stent-graft location, length, and diameter are not associated with primary patency rate (P > 0.05) but stent diameter is associated with better primary assisted and secondary patency rates (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathology of the lesion is associated with the long-term primary patency rate of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts but not the stent-graft location, length, or diameter. Stent diameter is associated with primary assisted and secondary patency rates.

[Treatment of Peripheral Aneurysms - Dual Supera for Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: Immediate and Long-Term Results]

Popliteal aneurysms have the highest incidence of all peripheral aneurysms. The clinical symptoms are dominated by chronic embolism, resulting in irreversible ischemia with the associated risk of amputation and mortality, but rupture is less important. Acute aneurysm thrombosis bears a high risk of amputation and mortality. Endovascular exclusion with covered stents instead of open surgery has gained widespread acceptance and is based on reliable data. The principle of flow diversion for aneurysm treatment is well known for the cerebral vasculature, and is now emerging as a potential alternative with promising results and is challenging the concept of complete endovascular aneurysm exclusion or surgical bypassing. Since 2011, thirty-four out of 142 electively treated popliteal aneurysms and 8 thrombosed aneurysms were treated with a bare metal woven Nitinol stent. In this single centre series with continuous mid- to long-term follow-up, as described below, this option showed reliable results in terms of clinical outcome, material fatigue and preservation of outflow vasculature with the option for conversion. The limitation of the technique is determined by the available maximum outer stent diameter of 7.5 mm.

Treatment of bilateral popliteal artery aneurysms

Popliteal artery aneurysms are the most frequent type of peripheral aneurysm, accounting for 85% of the all of these aneurysms. Usually asymptomatic, they are generally diagnosed during clinical examination. Incidence is higher among males and seniors. They are bilateral in 50% of the cases and 60% are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms. This paper describes a 72-year-old male patient who presented with two bilateral pulsatile masses, one in each popliteal region, was otherwise asymptomatic, and had a history of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Clinical examination and ultrasound imaging confirmed a diagnosis of bilateral aneurysms of the popliteal arteries. Popliteal artery aneurysms can be treated with open bypass surgery, with or without aneurysm resection, or with endovascular surgery. This Therapeutic Challenge discusses these possibilities.

In Vivo Morphological Changes of the Femoropopliteal Arteries due to Knee Flexion After Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Aneurysm

Purpose: To evaluate morphological changes of the femoropopliteal (FP) arteries due to limb flexion in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs). Materials and Methods: Seven male patients (mean age 68 years) underwent endovascular treatment of PAA with a Viabahn stent-graft between January 2013 and December 2017. During follow-up, one contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan of the lower limbs was acquired for each recruited patient. A standardized CTA protocol for acquisitions in both straight-leg and bent-leg positions was used to visualize changes in artery shape due to limb flexion. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the FP segment was performed to compute mean diameter and eccentricity of the vascular lumen and to measure length, tortuosity, and curvature of the vessel centerline in 3 arterial zones: (A) between the origin of the superficial femoral artery and the proximal end of the stent-graft, (B) within the stent-graft, and (C) from the distal end of the stent-graft to the origin of the anterior tibial artery. Results: After limb flexion, all zones of the FP segment foreshortened: 6% in zone A (p=0.001), 4% in zone B (p=0.001), and 8% in zone C (p=0.07), which was the shortest (mean 4.5±3.6 cm compared with 23.8±5.7 cm in zone A and 23.6±7.4 cm in zone B). Tortuosity increased in zone A (mean 0.03 to 0.05, p=0.03), in zone B (0.06 to 0.15, p=0.005), and in zone C (0.027 to 0.031, p=0.1). Mean curvature increased 15% (p=0.05) in zone A, 27% (p=0.005) in zone B, and 95% (p=0.06) in zone C. In all zones, the mean artery diameter and eccentricity were not significantly affected by limb flexion. Conclusion: Limb flexion induces vessel foreshortening and increases mean curvature and tortuosity of the FP segment both within and outside the area of the stent-graft.

Spiral Vein Graft Technique for Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

In patients with popliteal artery aneurysm lacking a suitable vein for bypass, prosthetic graft, or endovascular stent graft are alternative treatment options. However, durability is limited. Construction of an autologous spiral vein graft has previously been used to replace infected aortic grafts and arteriovenous fistulas.

TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Five patients underwent surgery for popliteal arterial aneurysm with the spiral vein graft technique. Technical success was 100%. Operative technique and results are reported.

CONCLUSION

The spiral vein graft technique can be used for popliteal artery aneurysm with good short term results, avoiding use of prosthetic grafts.

Long-Term Results of Surgical Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the surgical repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs), and to analyze the factors associated with graft patency. Between January 1980 and December 2013, 45 limbs were subjected to open surgical repair at Tokyo Medical and Dental Hospital. We retrospectively examined the patients' clinical characteristics, clinical symptoms, and aneurysm-related anatomy. Surgical procedures were performed through a posterior or medial approach using autologous vein or prosthetic graft. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity, graft patency, and limb salvage. During the study period, 45 limbs (35 patients; mean age, 60 years) underwent open surgical repair. A total of 25 limbs were treated through a posterior approach using 23 autologous vein grafts (AVGs) and 2 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts. The other 20 limbs were treated through a medial approach using 13 AVGs and 7 ePTFE grafts. During the mean follow-up period of 65 months, the primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 88.0%, 75.7%, and 75.7%, respectively, and the limb salvage rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 97.1%, 91.4%, and 91.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the ligation and bypass grafting affected the primary patency rate significantly, and the ePTFE graft was associated with a poor primary patency in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 17.8). The use of resection or endoaneurysmorrhaphy for PAAs and graft interposition with an AVG might be more effective for the open repair of PAAs.

Early and mid-term results in the endovascular treatment of popliteal aneurysms with the multilayer flow modulator

Background The endovascular approach became an alternative to open surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysm over the last few years. Heparin-bonded stent-grafts have been employed for endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair, showing good and stable results. Only few reports about the use of multilayer flow modulator are available in literature, providing small patient series and short follow-up. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of patients with popliteal artery aneurysm treated with the multilayer flow modulator in three Italian centres. Methods We retrospectively analysed a series of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with popliteal artery aneurysm treated with the multilayer flow modulator from 2009 to 2015. Follow-up was undertaken with clinical and contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations at 1, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Computed tomography angiography was performed in selected cases. Primary endpoints were aneurysm sac thrombosis; freedom from sac enlargement and primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were technical success, collateral vessels patency, limb salvage and aneurysm-related complications. Results Twenty-three consecutive patients (19 males, age 72 ± 11) with 25 popliteal artery aneurysms (mean diameter 23 mm ± 1, 3 symptomatic patients) were treated with 40 multilayer flow modulators during the period of the study. Median follow-up was 22.6 ± 16.7 months. Complete aneurysm thrombosis occurred in 92.9% of cases (23/25 cases) at 18 months. Freedom from sac enlargement was 100% (25/25 cases) with 17 cases of aneurysm sac shrinkage (68%). At 1, 6, 12 and 24 months, estimated primary patency was 95.7%, 87.3%, 77% and 70.1%, respectively. At the same intervals, primary-assisted patency was 95.7%, 91.3%, 86% and 86%, respectively, and secondary patency was 100%, 95.7%, 90.3% and 90.3%, respectively. Technical success was 100%. The collateral vessels patency was 72.4%. Limb salvage was 91.4% at 24-month follow-up. One multilayer flow modulator fracture was reported in an asymptomatic patient. Conclusions Multilayer flow modulator seems a feasible and safe solution for endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms in selected patients.

Comparação entre cirurgia aberta e endovascular no tratamento do aneurisma da artéria poplítea: uma revisão

Os aneurismas de artéria poplítea correspondem a 70% dos aneurismas periféricos e o tratamento é cirúrgico, com controvérsias sobre os resultados da via endovascular. Este estudo objetivou realizar uma revisão da literatura sobre a comparação entre cirurgia aberta e endovascular no tratamento dos aneurismas da artéria poplítea. A pesquisa foi realizada utilizando os termos apropriados nos portais de periódicos LILACS e MEDLINE, com a seleção de 15 artigos. Um total de 5.166 procedimentos cirúrgicos foram comparados, sendo 3.930 cirurgias abertas e 1.236 cirurgias endovasculares. A cirurgia aberta com bypass venoso continua sendo o padrão-ouro. A cirurgia endovascular apresenta menor tempo de internação e é uma opção viável em pacientes eletivos, com baixa expectativa de vida, alto risco cirúrgico, comorbidades e mais idosos, desde que tenham anatomia favorável para o procedimento. Contudo, são necessários estudos de longo prazo para estabelecer os reais benefícios e indicações das duas técnicas, como o ensaio clínico randomizado controlado.

Tratamento endovascular versus tratamento aberto de aneurisma de artéria poplítea: artigo de revisão

Resumo O tratamento convencional do aneurisma da artéria poplítea é a cirurgia aberta de exclusão do aneurisma e revascularização do membro acometido. Nos últimos anos, o tratamento endovascular vem ganhando popularidade e interesse. O tratamento endovascular é menos invasivo e de menor morbidade; porém, é de alto custo e sua perviedade é incerta. O objetivo desta revisão é comparar os dois tratamentos através da análise de desfechos abordados em estudos primários e secundários. Realizou-se uma revisão narrativa da literatura publicada nos últimos 5 anos. Foram selecionados seis estudos retrospectivos, duas metanálises, um ensaio clínico e uma revisão sistemática Cochrane. Número limitado de pacientes e curto período de seguimento não nos permitem extrair conclusões consistentes. Não há evidência clara que sugere melhores resultados entre um ou outro tratamento eletivo. Novos ensaios randomizados devem ser realizados para determinar o papel do tratamento endovascular desse aneurisma.

A Matched Case-Control Study on Open and Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

Objective:

To compare early and late results of open and endovascular management of popliteal artery aneurysm in a retrospective single-center matched case-control study

Methods:

From 1981 to 2015, 309 consecutive interventions for popliteal artery aneurysm were performed in our institution, in 59 cases with endovascular repair and in 250 cases with open repair. Endovascular repair was preferred in older asymptomatic patients, while open repair was offered more frequently to patients with a thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm and a poor run-off status. A one-to-one coarsened exact matching on the basis of the baseline demographic, clinical, and anatomical covariates significantly different between the two treatment options was performed and two equivalent groups of 56 endovascular repairs and open repairs were generated. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative results with χ2 test and of follow-up outcomes with the Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test.

Results:

There were no differences between the two groups in terms of perioperative outcomes. Median duration of follow-up was 38 months. Five-year survival rates were 94% in endovascular repair group and 89.5% in open repair group (p = 0.4, log-rank 0.6). Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 78%, and 72% in endovascular repair group and 82.5%, 80%, and 64% in open repair group (p = 0.8, log-rank 0.01). Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 65.5% in endovascular repair group and 76% in open repair group (p = 0.2, log-rank 1.2). Secondary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94%, 86%, and 74% in endovascular repair group, and 94%, 89%, and 71% in open repair group, respectively (p = 0.9, log-rank 0.01). The rates of limb preservation at 5 years were 94% in endovascular repair group and 86.4% in open repair group (p = 0.3, log-rank 0.8).

Conclusion:

Open repair and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms provided in this retrospective single-center experience similar perioperative and follow-up results in equivalent groups of patients.

Meta-analysis of open and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair (EPAR) is increasingly used over open surgical repair (OPAR). The purpose of this study was to analyze the available literature on their comparative outcomes.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify studies comparing OPAR and EPAR. Studies with only one treatment and fewer than five patients were excluded. Demographics and outcomes were collected. Bias risk was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were computed from random-effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian-Laird algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were identified encompassing 4880 popliteal artery aneurysm repairs (OPAR, 3915; EPAR, 1210) during the last decade. OPAR patients were younger (standard mean difference, -0.798 [-0.798 to -1.108]; P < .001) and more likely to have worse tibial runoff (odds ratio [OR], 1.949 (1.15-3.31); P = .013) than EPAR patients. OPAR had higher odds of wound complications (OR, 5.182 [2.191-12.256]; P < .001) and lower odds of thrombotic complications (OR, 0.362 [0.155-0.848]; P < .001). OPAR had longer length of stay (standardized mean difference, 2.158 [1.225-3.090]; P < .001) and fewer reinterventions (OR, 0.275 [0.166-0.454]; P < .001). Primary patency was better for OPAR at 1 year and 3 years (relative risk, 0.607 [P = .01] and 0.580 [P = .006], respectively). There was no difference in secondary patency at 1 year and 3 years (0.770 [P = .458] and 0.642 [P = .073], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

EPAR has a lower wound complication rate and shorter length of hospital stay compared with OPAR. This comes at the cost of inferior primary patency but not secondary patency out to 3 years. Studies reporting long-term outcomes are lacking and necessary.

Cardiovascular Risk Reduction is Important for Improving Patient and Graft Survival After Ligation and Bypass Surgery for Popliteal Artery Aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

To report outcomes following ligation and bypass (LGB) surgery for popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) and study factors influencing patient and graft survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing LGB surgery for PAA between September 1999 and August 2012 at a tertiary referral vascular unit was performed. Primary graft patency (PGP), primary-assisted graft patency (PAGP), and secondary graft patency (SGP) rates were calculated using survival analyses. Patient, graft aneurysm-free survival (GAFS), aneurysm reperfusion-free survival (ARFS), and amputation-free survival (AFS) rates were also calculated. Log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to perform univariate and multivariate analysis of influencing factors, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-four LGB repairs in 69 patients (mean age 71.3 years, 68 males) were available for study. The 5-year PGP, PAGP, SGP, and patient survival rates were 58.1%, 84.4%, 85.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the principal determinants of PGP were urgency of operation ( P = .009) and smoking status ( P = .019). The principal determinants of PAGP were hyperlipidemia status ( P = .048) and of SGP were hyperlipidemia ( P = .042) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) status ( P = .045). The principal determinants of patient survival were previous myocardial infarction ( P = .004) and CVD ( P = .001). The 5-year GAFS, ARFS, and AFS rates were 87.9%, 91.6%, and 96.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as a smoking and ischemic heart disease, are the most important predictors of early graft failure and patient death following LGB surgery for PAA.

Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm have a high prevalence of popliteal artery aneurysms

Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are more prone to develop popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA), but the prevalence is not well known. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of PAA in patients with AAA, and to determine whether a certain risk factor profile is more commonly found in patients with concurrent aneurysms. All AAA patients (ICD code I71.3, I71.4) attending the outpatient clinic at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2011 and 2013 were included in the study cohort ( n=465); 48% (225) had been subjected to an ultrasound or computed tomography scan of their popliteal arteries. In these patients, three definitions of PAA were considered (⩾ 10.5, ⩾ 12, ⩾ 15 mm), although the overall analysis is based on PAA ⩾ 12 mm. The mean age was 70.7 years (SD 7.5), 89% were men, and the mean AAA diameter was 47 mm (SD 14). The prevalence of PAA was 19% ( n=43) by definition ⩾ 12 mm, and 11% ( n=25) with 15 mm. Claudication was more frequently found in AAA patients with PAA than patients without PAA. Sensitivity between clinical examination and radiology was 26%, and the specificity for clinical examination was 90%. In conclusion, owing to the high prevalence of PAA in AAA patients, described by us and others, the low cost and risks associated with ultrasound and the poor sensitivity at clinical examination, all women and men with AAA should undergo one radiological examination of their popliteal arteries.

Cirurgia aberta e endovascular no tratamento de aneurisma de artéria poplítea: experiência de cinco anos do HCRP-FMRP-USP

Resumo Contexto Aneurismas de artéria poplítea (AAPs) correspondem a 70,00% dos aneurismas periféricos. A indicação cirúrgica é para aneurismas com diâmetros maiores que 2,0 cm ou sintomáticos. O tratamento é feito por técnicas cirúrgicas convencionais ou endovasculares. Esta última tem ganho muitos adeptos, mas ainda não há consenso estabelecido sobre sua indicação. Objetivo Apresentar a experiência da Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular e Endovascular do Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo no tratamento dos AAPs. Método Foram revisados casos de reparo convencional e endovascular de AAPs tratados nos últimos cinco anos, avaliando dados demográficos, comorbidades, indicação cirúrgica, complicações pré e pós-operatórias precoces e tardias, tempo de internação e de perviedade em até um ano. Resultados Foram realizadas no período dez cirurgias endovasculares (CE) e 21 cirurgias abertas (CA). O grupo CE teve maior frequência de comorbidades. Houve maior frequência de pacientes sintomáticos no grupo CA (85,00%) do que no grupo CE (40,00%). O Grupo CE apresentou menor número de complicações clínicas e cirúrgicas. A idade entre os grupos e o tempo de internação de cada grupo não apresentaram diferença estatística. A perviedade primária em um ano no Grupo CE foi de 80,00%, enquanto no Grupo CA foi de 75,00%. Conclusão O tratamento endovascular para AAPs apresenta bons resultados, em termos de perviedade com taxas de complicações aceitáveis, em pacientes com risco cirúrgico elevado e anatomia favorável, justificando, assim, a necessidade de mais estudos controlados para modificar a posição da técnica endovascular como uma terapia alternativa para casos selecionados.