Treadmill Measured vs. Questionnaire Estimated Changes in Walking Ability in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

Contributions for the Validation of the European Portuguese Version of the Vascular Quality of Life-6 Questionnaire for Peripheral Artery Disease

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the arteries of the extremities of the body that affects more than 230 million people worldwide. The most common symptom is intermittent claudication, described as leg pain which occurs mainly while walking. The symptoms impair the ambulation and functional capacity of patients, leading to loss of mobility, disease deterioration, increased risk of other cardiovascular diseases, and lower quality of life (QoL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the VascuQol-6 questionnaire for the Portuguese population to obtain a quick, sensitive, and easy-to-use way to assess the QoL of Portuguese patients diagnosed with PAD.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality of Life-6 Questionnaire (VascuQoL-6) was adapted and translated into European Portuguese using standard validation methodology, including 115 patients with a mean age of 64.67 (7.23) years, with PAD with IC stable for more than three months; and ABI < 0.9 at rest. VascuQoL-6, SF-36, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and the PAD Knowledge Questionnaire (PADKQ) were used. Reliability, construct validity analysis through convergent and discriminant validity, known-group validity, and responsiveness analysis were tested.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha was 0.64 and the average inter-item correlation was 0.27, indicating acceptable internal consistency. VascuQoL-6 was positively associated with SF-36 Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores (r = 0.64, p < 0.01 and r = 0.42, p < 0.01, respectively). In turn, there was no significant correlation between VascuQoL-6 scores and the PADKQ or IPAQ. A statistically significant difference between groups according to IC severity [F(2.47) = 8.35, p < 0.001] was found. A paired samples t-test showed differences between VascuQol-6 scores before a walking program (M = 15.65, SD = 3.09), and after a walking program (M = 17.41, SD = 2.71), t(67) = 3.94, p ≤ 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The VascuQoL-6 is a six-item instrument to assess the QoL associated with PAD with good psychometric properties, convergent and discriminant validity with SF-36, PADKQ and IPAQ. The instrument proved to have known group validity and responsiveness.

Use of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History questionnaire to detect maximal walking distance equal to or lower than 250 m in patients with lower extremity arterial disease

Objective

The objective was to assess the accuracy and optimal threshold of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire in identifying patients with a maximal walking distance (MWD) below or equal to 250 m.

Methods

This retrospective study screened 388 consecutive patients with suspected symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). Collected data included the patient's history, resting ankle-brachial index, WIQ, and WELCH. MWD was assessed with a treadmill test at 2 mph (3.2 km/h) with a 10% grade. An optimized threshold for detection of MWD ≤ 250 m was determined for each questionnaire via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Subsequently, multivariate analysis was performed to build a new simple score to detect MWD ≤ 250 m.

Results

The study included 297 patients (63 ± 10 years old). With a threshold of ≤ 64%, the WIQ predicted MWD ≤ 250 m with an accuracy of 71.4% (66.2, 76.5%). With a threshold of ≤ 22, the WELCH predicted a treadmill walking distance of ≤ 250 m with an accuracy of 68.7% (63.4, 74.0%). A new score with only four "yes or no" questions had an accuracy of 71.4% (66.3, 76.6%). Items on this new score consisted of the level of difficulty of walking 1 block, declared maximum walking distance, usual walking speed, and maximum duration of slow walking.

Conclusion

A WIQ score ≤ 64% and a WELCH score ≤ 22 help to predict a walking distance of ≤ 250 m in a treadmill test at 2 mph (3.2 km/h) with a 10% grade. A 4-item score could be used for rapid evaluation of walking distance among patients with LEAD, but the validity of this 4-item score requires further confirmation studies.

Measuring walking impairment in patients with intermittent claudication: psychometric properties of the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire

Objectives

Patient-reported outcome measures can facilitate the assessment of walking impairment in peripheral artery disease patients with intermittent claudication in clinical trials and practice. The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the German version of the 'Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History' (WELCH) questionnaire.

Methods

The assessed properties included feasibility, test-retest reliability, construct validity (i.e., convergent, divergent and known-groups validity) and responsiveness using classic psychometric methods. Psychometric properties were tested as part of a randomized controlled home-based exercise trial for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease at Fontaine stage IIA/B.

Results

Analyses were conducted in subgroups of 1,696 patients at baseline and 1,233 patients at 12-month follow-up (i.e., post-intervention) who completed the WELCH along with a battery of other self-report measures. The WELCH did not exhibit relevant floor or ceiling effects (< 15% achieved lowest or highest possible scores), showed evidence for good test-retest reliability (ICC = .81, 95% CI [.71-.88]) and was found to be well suited for self-completion by patients (< 5% missing data per item). WELCH scores showed moderate to strong correlations with related measures of walking impairment at both time points (Walking Impairment Questionnaire: r = .56 - .74; VascuQoL-25 activity subscale: r = .61 - .66) and distinguished well among patients with poor and high quality of life when adjusting for confounders (t = 13.67, p < .001, d = .96). Adequate divergent validity was indicated by a weaker correlation between the WELCH and general anxiety at both time points (GAD-7: r =  - .14 to  - .22). The WELCH improved by 6.61 points (SD = 17.04, 95% CI [5.13-8.10], d = 0.39) in response to exercise treatment and was able to identify large clinically important improvements observed on the walking distance (AUC = .78, 95% CI [.71-.84]) and speed subscales (AUC = .77, 95% CI [.68-.86]) of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire.

Conclusions

The WELCH is considered a feasible, reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure for the measurement of walking impairment in patients with peripheral artery disease. The WELCH showed evidence for responsiveness to changes in walking impairment, yet further studies are warranted to conclusively determine the WELCH's ability to detect intervention effects.

Simple assessment of quality of life and lower limb functional capacity during cilostazol treatment – results of the SHort-tERm cIlostazol eFFicacy and quality of life (SHERIFF) study

Summary: Background: Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (intermittent claudication) is a major cause of disability and mobility loss in older men and women and thus has a significant negative impact on the patients’ quality of life. Both surgical and endovascular revascularization procedures and noninvasive medical therapies, such as supervised training and drug treatment, can improve walking capacity. Cilostazol is the only drug having a class I (level of evidence A) recommendation for the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three-month cilostazol treatment on the health-related quality of life and on the lower limb functional capacity in patients with IC in the clinical practice. Patients and methods: The study was a multicenter, non-interventional trial, performed in Hungary in 2018. 812 PAD patients (Fontaine II stage, mean age: 67.17 years, male/female: 58.25/41.75 %) were enrolled, who received cilostazol (50 or 100 mg b.i.d.) for 3 months. 802 patients completed the study. Quality of life was evaluated with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire functional capacity with the WELCH (Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History) questionnaire. Pain-free and maximal walking distance, ankle-brachial index (ABI) were measured at baseline and after 3-month treatment. Results: Upon conclusion of the study, the EQ-5D-3L index improved (baseline: –0.46 ± 0.22, 3rd month: –0.26 ± 0.18; p < 0.0001) and there was a significant increase in the WELCH score as well (19 ± 14, 31 ± 18; respectively, p < 0.0001). Both pain-free and maximal walking distance improved significantly by 54.52 % (median: 53.85 %) and 42.5 % (median: 34.68 %); respectively (p < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 10 patients, 1 patient stopped cilostazol treatment because of side effects. Conclusions: Three months cilostazol treatment significantly improved quality of life and lower limb functional capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. The WELCH questionnaire is a useful tool for the evaluation of intermittent claudication treatment in the clinical practice.