Technical Success and Complication Rates of Retrograde Arterial Access for Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative Analysis of Transpedal and Transfemoral Access During Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transpedal access (TPA) with transfemoral access (TFA) in Genicular Artery Embolization (GAE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 patients who underwent GAE between January and June 2023, were recruited and outcomes were compared between the TFA (n = 37) and TPA (n = 23) groups. Technical and clinical success rates, complications, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

All patients attained a 100% technical success rate, which was defined as the successful selective catheterization and embolization of at least one feeding artery to the knee joint, without encountering any major complications. Minor complications, observed in 12/60 patients (20%), were predominantly manifested as a transient skin discoloration. The TPA group had a comparatively higher (p = 0.008) rate of minor complication than the TFA group. Notably, TPA was associated with a longer duration of the procedure (p = 0.013), duration of fluoroscopy (p = 0.004), increased total air kerma (p = 0.037), dose-area product values (p = 0.021), and a greater incidence of vasospasm (p = 0.018) than TFA. However, TPA patients reported shorter recovery times and less post-procedural discomfort, especially reduced back pain due to postinterventional bedrest (p < 0.001). At the 3-month follow-up, the clinical success rate was similar between the two groups (p = 0.905).

CONCLUSION

TFA is the safer and faster method for GAE, offering fewer complications and reduced radiation exposure. For patients with challenging groin anatomies, however, TPA may provide a valuable alternative.

Retrospective Case Control Matched Comparison of the Antegrade Versus Retrograde Strategy After Antegrade Recanalisation Failure in Complex de novo Femoropopliteal Occlusive Lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate dissection severity, need for bailout stenting and limb outcomes in patients undergoing antegrade vs. retrograde revascularisation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent either antegrade or retrograde revascularisation after failed antegrade recanalisation of long femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion (CTO) due to symptomatic peripheral artery disease between January 2017 and June 2022 were studied. Retrospective case control matching was used to adjust for lesion length and calcification using the peripheral artery calcification scoring system (PACSS). Procedural outcomes included severity of dissection (Type A to F dissections, numerically graded on a scale from 0 - 6 with increasing severity) after angioplasty and number and location of stents needed to be implanted during the index procedure. Additionally, clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) and major (above ankle) amputation rates were assessed during follow up.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were analysed who underwent antegrade (n = 90) or retrograde after failed antegrade (n = 90) recanalisation. The median patient age was 76.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 67.0, 82.0) years and 76 (42.2%) were female. Moreover, 78 patients (43.3%) had intermittent claudication, whereas 102 (56.7%) had chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). The mean lesion length was 30.0 (IQR 24.0, 36.0) cm with moderate to severe (3.0 [IQR 2.0, 4.0]) lesion calcification. Dissection severity after angioplasty was higher in the antegrade than retrograde after failed antegrade recanalisation group (4.0 [IQR 3.0, 4.0] vs. 3.0 [IQR 2.0, 4.0]; p < .001). Additionally, the number of stents in all segments and the rate of bailout stenting in popliteal segments was significantly higher with the antegrade strategy (2.0 [IQR 1.0, 3.0] vs. 1.0 [IQR 0, 2.0], p < .010; and 37% vs. 14%, p < .001). During a median follow up of 1.48 (IQR 0.63, 3.09) years, CD-TLR rates (p = .90) and amputation rates in patients with CLTI (p = .15) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In complex femoropopliteal CTOs, retrograde after failed antegrade recanalisation, is safe for endovascular revascularisation, which in experienced hands may result in less severe dissections and lower rates of stent placement. However, considering the relatively short follow up, CD-TLR and amputation rates were not statistically different between the two approaches. [German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015277.].

Intraoperative Pedal Pressure Changes Offers Another Quantitative Assessment for Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity angiography is one of the most prevalent vascular procedures performed, generally via the contralateral common femoral artery. The use of retrograde pedal artery access to perform angiography has long been reserved as a "bail-out" technique to help cross chronic total occlusions that were not amenable from an antegrade approach. Recently, there have been reports and discussions involving increased utilization of pedal access for primary revascularization. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of pedal access as a primary approach and to propose a novel evaluation of distal perfusion changes associated with interventions using direct pressure measurements.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study evaluating all patients who underwent lower extremity angiography via retrograde pedal access between December 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, within a single health-care system spanning 3 hospitals was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, procedural indications, and details were all recorded. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained and recorded upon initial pedal access and post intervention with a pressure transducer connected directly to the access sheath. Outcomes were analyzed with paired t-test.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight angiograms using primary pedal access for endovascular intervention were performed during the study period. Most patients were African American (75%) females (57.1%) with hypertension (89.3%), hyperlipidemia (78.6%), diabetes (85.7%), coronary artery disease (64.3%), and current tobacco users (57.1%). The most prevalent indication for angiography was nonhealing wounds (67.9%). Pedal access was mostly achieved via the anterior tibial artery (79%). Sixty-three vessels were treated during the 28 angiograms (averaging 2.3 vessels per angiogram), most commonly the superficial femoral (27%), anterior tibial (25%), and popliteal (22%) arteries. Balloon angioplasty with or without stenting (98.5%) was predominately performed with an overall technical success rate of 94%. The mean preintervention and postintervention pressures were 36.5 mm Hg (standard deviation [SD] 25.7) and 83.4 mm Hg (SD 19.5), respectively. The mean change in pressure after intervention was 46.9 mm Hg (SD 23.3) (Table 3). There was a statistically significant difference detected between preintervention and postintervention pressure (P < 0.001) (Figure 1). There were no major amputations or adverse cardiovascular events at a mean first follow-up duration of 89 days. Six of the total 28 patients (21.4%) underwent repeat endovascular intervention on the ipsilateral extremity within a median of 45 (interquartile range 22.5-62.3) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary pedal access is a viable option for performing lower extremity angiographic interventions. A significant increase in pedal artery pressure can be observed after angiographic intervention from retrograde pedal artery access. Further studies are necessary to define the clinical prognostic importance of these findings in relation to wound healing rates.

Retrograde distal access versus femoral access for below the knee angioplasty

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the general population is about 12% to 14% and it increases with age. PAD increased from 164 million people in 2000 to 202 million people in 2010. More than two-thirds of people with PAD are based in low- or middle-income countries. Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) occurs in 1% to 2% of people with intermittent claudication over five years. One third of people with CLI have isolated below the knee (BTK) lesions. CLI and isolated BTK lesions are associated with a higher incidence of limb loss when compared with people with multilevel arterial disease. Endovascular procedures such as angioplasty (with or without stenting) are widely used to treat isolated BTK lesions, aiming to improve blood flow and limb salvage. The technical success of any angioplasty procedure depends on the ability to cross the target lesion. Failed attempts are underestimated in the literature and failures in the real world appear to be higher than reported. People with isolated BTK lesions undergoing angioplasty by conventional femoral access present a high failure rate to cross these lesions. Retrograde distal access may provide some advantages that can lead to successful crossing of the target lesion.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of retrograde distal access versus conventional femoral access for people undergoing below the knee angioplasty.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 September 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing people undergoing retrograde distal access versus people undergoing conventional femoral access (ipsilateral antegrade or contralateral retrograde) for BTK angioplasty.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed identified studies for potential inclusion in the review. We used standard methodological procedures in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Our primary outcomes were technical success of angioplasty procedure and major procedural complications. Our secondary outcomes were mortality rate, amputation-free survival, primary patency, minor procedural complications and wound healing. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We identified no randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared retrograde distal access versus femoral access for BTK angioplasty. High-quality studies that compare retrograde distal access versus conventional femoral access for BTK angioplasty are needed.

How I do it: Pedal access and pedal loop revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

An increasing proportion of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia are older and have multiple comorbidities, including diabetes and renal failure. For those who are not candidates for a surgical bypass, this set of patients presents a challenge to vascular surgeons and interventionalists owing to the complex below-the-knee and increasingly below-the-ankle disease pattern that can fail traditional approaches for endovascular intervention. Two techniques, the retrograde pedal access and the pedal-plantar loop technique, can be useful in these settings and in skilled hands can be used safely, with a high technical success rate. In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who are not candidates for a single-segment saphenous vein bypass, the retrograde pedal access technique can be used not only in the setting of failed antegrade treatment, but also primarily when faced with a difficult groin or as an adjunct during a planned antegrade-retrograde intervention. The pedal plantar loop technique allows for retrograde access to tibial vessels without retrograde vessel puncture and additionally offers the ability to treat the pedal-plantar arch, which may have added benefit in wound healing. We describe the tips and tricks for these two techniques used in our limb salvage practice.

Best crossing of peripheral chronic total occlusions

Together with colleagues from different disciplines, including cardiologists, interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons, committee members of the of the German Society of Angiology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Angiologie [DGA]), developed a novel algorithm for the endovascular treatment of peripheral chronic total occlusive lesions (CTOs). Our aim is to improve patient and limb related outcomes, by increasing the success rate of endovascular procedures. This can be achieved by adherence to the proposed crossing algorithm, aiding the standardization of endovascular procedures. The following steps are proposed: (i) APPLY Duplex sonography and if required 3D techniques such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography. This will help you to select the optimal access site. (ii) EVALUATE the CTO cap morphology and distal vessel refilling sites during diagnostic angiography, which are potential targets for a retrograde access. (iii) START with antegrade wiring strategies including guidewire (GW) and support catheter technology. Use GW escalation strategies to penetrate the proximal cap of the CTO, which may usually be fibrotic and calcified. (iv) STOP the antegrade attempt depending on patient specific parameters and the presence of retrograde options, as evaluated by pre-procedural imaging and during angiography. (v) In case of FAILURE, consider advanced bidirectional techniques and reentry devices. (vi) In case of SUCCESS, externalize the GW and treat the CTO. Manage the retrograde access at the end of the endovascular procedure. (vii) STOP the procedure if no progress can be obtained within 3 hours, in case of specific complications or when reaching maximum contrast administration based on individual patient's renal function. Consider radiation exposure both for patients and operators. In this manuscript we systematically follow and explain each of the steps (i)-(vi) based on practical examples from our daily routine. We strongly believe that the integration of this algorithm in the daily practice of endovascular specialists, can improve vessel and patient specific outcomes.

Crossing Algorithm for Infrainguinal Chronic Total Occlusions: An Interdisciplinary Expert Opinion Statement

A crossing algorithm was developed for the endovascular treatment of peripheral chronic total occlusive lesions (CTOs) to educate, guide, and appropriately influence clinical practice aiming at harmonization and standardization of endovascular procedures. The following steps are proposed: One, duplex sonography and if required computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography for the selection of the optimal access site. Two, angiographic evaluation of the proximal/distal cap morphology, presence of collaterals at the origin of the proximal cap and at the distal vessel refilling site. In addition, evaluation of distal vessels, including their diameters and quality, and the presence of calcification or stents within the occlusion zone. Three, antegrade wiring strategies, guidewire (GW) and support catheter technology, as well as GW escalation strategies. Stop the antegrade attempt depending on clinical indication for peripheral artery disease treatment and the presence of retrograde options. Four, retrograde access site, support catheter, or sheath insertion and wiring technology from distally. Five, considering strategy change when progress cannot by achieved, using advanced bidirectional techniques and re-entry devices. Six, in case of successful GW passage from retrograde, GW externalization and treatment from antegrade. Management of the retrograde access by internal or external hemostasis at the end of the procedure. Alternatively, stop the procedure if no progress can be obtained within 3 hours or in case of specific complications. By establishing the algorithm in the daily routine of endovascular specialists, improvements in vessel- and patient-specific outcomes are anticipated. In addition, future research, and continuous collaboration between experts is warranted.

Target Balloon-Assisted Antegrade and Retrograde Use of Re-Entry Catheters in Complex Chronic Total Occlusions

Purpose, Retrograde recanalizations have gained increasing recognition in complex arterial occlusive disease. Re-entry devices are a well described adjunct for antegrade recanalizations. We present our experience with target balloon-assisted antegrade and retrograde recanalizations using re-entry devices in challenging chronic total occlusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report data from a retrospective multicenter registry. Eligibility criteria included either antegrade or retrograde use of the Outback^TM or GoBack^TM re-entry catheter in combination with a balloon as a target to accomplish wire passage, when conventional antegrade and retrograde recanalization attempts had been unsuccessful. Procedural outcomes included technical success (defined as wire passage though the occlusion and delivery of adjunctive therapy with <30% residual stenosis at final angiogram), safety (periprocedural complications, e.g., bleeding, vessel injury, or occlusion of the artery at the re-entry site, and distal embolizations), and clinical outcome (amputation-free survival and freedom from target lesion revascularization after 12-months follow-up).

RESULTS

Thirty-six consecutive patients underwent target balloon-assisted recanalization attempts. Fourteen (39 %) patients had a history of open vascular surgery in the index limb. Fifteen patients were claudications (Rutherford Class 2 or 3, 21 presented with chronic limb threatening limb ischemia (Rutherford Class 4 to 6). The locations of the occlusive lesions were as follows: iliac arteries in 3 cases, femoropopliteal artery in 39 cases, and in below-the-knee arteries in 12 cases. In 15 cases, recanalization was attempted in multilevel occlusions. Retrograde access was attempted in 1 case in the common femoral artery, in the femoropopliteal segment in 10 cases, in below-the-knee arteries in 23 cases, and finally in 2 patients via the brachial artery. In 10 cases, the re-entry devices were inserted via the retrograde access site. Technical success was achieved in 34 (94 %) patients. There were 3 periprocedural complications, none directly related to the target balloon-assisted re-entry maneuver. Amputation-free survival was 87.8 % and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 86.6 % after 12-months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Target balloon-assisted use of re-entry devices in chronic total occlusions provides an effective and safe endovascular adjunct, when conventional antegrade and retrograde recanalization attempts have failed.

Algorithm of Femoropopliteal Endovascular Treatment

Background and Objectives: Indications for the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal lesions have steadily increased over the past decade. Accordingly, the number of devices has also increased, but the choice of the best endovascular treatment remains to be defined. Many devices are now available for physicians. However, in order to obtain a high success rate, it is necessary to respect an algorithm whose choice of device is only one step in the treatment. Materials and Methods: The first step is, therefore, to define the approach according to the lesion to be treated. Anterograde approaches (femoral, radial, or humeral) are distinguished from retrograde approaches depending on the patient’s anatomy and surgical history. Secondarily, the lesion will be crossed intraluminally or subintimally using a catheter or an angioplasty balloon. The third step corresponds to the preparation of the artery, which is essential before the implantation of the device. It has a crucial role in reducing the rate of restenosis. Several tools are available and are chosen according to the lesion requiring treatment (stenosis, occlusion). Among them, we find the angioplasty balloon, the atherectomy probes, or intravascular lithotripsy. Finally, the last step corresponds to the choice of the device to be implanted. This is also based on the nature of the lesion, which is considered short, up to 15 cm and complex beyond that. The choice of device will be between bare stents, covered stents, drug-coated balloons, and drug-eluting stents. Currently, drug-eluting stents appear to be the treatment of choice for short lesions, and active devices seem to be the preferred treatment for more complex lesions, although there is a lack of data. Results: In case of failure to cross the lesion, the retrograde approach is a safe and effective alternative. Balloon angioplasty currently remains the reference method for the preparation of the artery, the aim of which is to ensure the intraoperative technical success of the treatment (residual stenosis < 30%), to limit the risk of dissection and, finally, to limit the occurrence of restenosis. Concerning the treatment, the drug-eluting devices seem to present the best results, whether for simple or complex lesions. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions needs to be considered upstream of the intervention in order to anticipate the treatment and the choice of devices for each stage.

Superficial femoral artery access for infrainguinal antegrade endovascular interventions in the hostile groin: A prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

In a hostile groin, it may be difficult to perform antegrade endovascular procedures at the lower extremities using the ipsilateral common femoral artery as vascular access; therefore, the use of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery (SFA) could be a useful alternative. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided SFA puncture versus traditional SFA cutdown to achieve arterial access.

METHODS

This prospective observational randomized study examined patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease who required endovascular interventions at the lower extremities. A hostile groin was defined as high femoral bifurcation, obesity, and surgical scarring due to previous surgical interventions. A 6-Fr sheath (12 cm long; ULTIMUM™ EV INTRODUCER; Abbott, Plymouth, MN, USA) was used in all procedures. In the percutaneous group, the puncture was performed under ultrasound guidance and hemostasis was performed using a percutaneous closure device (PCD) (Angioseal Vip 6-Fr; Terumo Medical Corporation, Somerset, NJ, USA). The primary endpoints were technical success and perioperative complications. The secondary endpoints were the time required for the management of vascular access and the type of anesthesia administered.

RESULTS

Between 2020 and 2021, 107 patients who underwent antegrade revascularization were enrolled. SFA was achieved in 50 cases by the femoral cutdown technique (c-group) and in 57 cases by percutaneous ultrasound-guided puncture (p-group). In the c-group, the time from incision to sheath introduction and the time of suturing the artery and wound closure was 35 ± 8 min. In the p-group, the time from skin puncture and sheath placement plus that from the sheath removal and hole closure with the PCD was 6 ± 3 min. For the c-group versus p-group, the following variables were as follows: high bifurcation, 10 vs. 6 cases (=p 0.2); severe obesity, 33 vs. 40 cases (p 0.46); and previous surgical groin interventions, 7 vs. 9 cases (p 0.53), respectively. The technical success rates were 100% vs. 96.49% for the c-group vs. p-group, respectively (p 0.63). Two percutaneous puncture failures were managed using the cutdown technique. In the p-group, two post-procedural hematomas were recorded, with only one requiring surgical treatment and two with SFA occlusion to intravascular cap hemostatic dislocation, which were subjected to surgical revision. A total of three percutaneous procedures in the p-group required surgical revision versus none in the c-group (p =0.1). Within 3 months, complications consisted of 6 cases of surgical wound complications in the c-group versus none in the p-group (p 0.009). All procedures in the p-group versus 72% of patients in the c-group were managed with local anesthesia (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral cutdown technique seems to be safe and successful approach for achieving vascular access in cases of hostile groin. Ultrasound-guided puncture and PCD make SFA puncture a successful and safe alternative with an acceptable complications rate. Moreover, it reduces the time required to manage vascular access and can be performed mainly under local anesthesia.

Distal Endarterectomy Combined With Endovascular Proximal Treatment: The Hybrid DEEP Retrograde Technique for High-Complexity Infrainguinal Disease

Purpose: We present a hybrid technique for the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) due to complex, multilevel infrainguinal disease. It consists of an open distal endarterectomy combined with endovascular proximal treatment (the DEEP technique). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Thirty-three limbs (30 patients) were treated. Main inclusion criteria were absence of significant disease in femoral bifurcation associated with a complex infrainguinal pattern. This approach was specially considered in absence of suitable vein for bypass, obesity, hostile groin, and overall high surgical risk. Results: Mean age was 72.8 ± 10 years (ranging 50–93). Most cases presented with severe limb threatening onset (90.9% Rutherford >4 and 81.8% WIfi >3) due to high-complexity infrainguinal disease pattern (Global Limb Anatomic Staging System [GLASS] stage III) in 31/33 (93.9%), chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in 24/33 (72.7%), and severe calcification (Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System [PACSS] grade 4) in 22/33 (66.6%). Mean lesion length was 228.2 mm ± 83 (ranging 40–340 mm). In all procedures, a covered-stent (25 cm length Viabahn) was implanted in a retrograde fashion as the endovascular component. Effective revascularization was achieved in all cases, showing significant clinical and hemodynamic improvement (median pre- and postprocedure ankle-brachial index [ABI]: 0.3 and 0.9, respectively). Results at 12 months follow-up were as follows: 93.9% limb salvage ratio, 75.7% primary patency, 84.6% assisted primary patency, and 90.9% secondary patency. Major adverse limb events (MALE) and cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 8/33 (24.2%) and 2/33 (6%), respectively. Mean length of postoperative stay was 7.5 ± 6.92 days (3–27). Conclusion: This less invasive hybrid technique has promising short-term results for limb salvage and it is worth to be included in vascular armamentarium for CLTI revascularization in selected patients.

Tratamento híbrido para revascularização de membro inferior em paciente com infecção de prótese vascular: relato de caso

Patients with severe arterial obstructive disease and critical limb ischemia associated with vascular graft infection have elevated morbidity and mortality rates and are at high risk of limb loss. We present the case of a 76-year-old male patient with left lower limb critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal vascular graft infection. We used a hybrid treatment approach with an open surgical approach to the inguinal and popliteal regions and used the vascular prosthesis as endovascular access for direct recanalization of the superficial femoral artery, because the long occlusion and extensive calcification had frustrated initial attempts at endovascular treatment. After endovascular recanalization, the infected graft was removed. Used in conjunction with open surgery, advances in endovascular techniques and materials offer new solutions for patients when usual procedures fail.

Hybrid treatment for lower limb revascularization in a patient with vascular graft infection: a case report

Abstract Patients with severe arterial obstructive disease and critical limb ischemia associated with vascular graft infection have elevated morbidity and mortality rates and are at high risk of limb loss. We present the case of a 76-year-old male patient with left lower limb critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal vascular graft infection. We used a hybrid treatment approach with an open surgical approach to the inguinal and popliteal regions and used the vascular prosthesis as endovascular access for direct recanalization of the superficial femoral artery, because the long occlusion and extensive calcification had frustrated initial attempts at endovascular treatment. After endovascular recanalization, the infected graft was removed. Used in conjunction with open surgery, advances in endovascular techniques and materials offer new solutions for patients when usual procedures fail.

Validation of the correlation between angiosome-based target arterial path, mid-term limb-based patency, and the global limb anatomical staging system

This study aimed to validate the correlation between the Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (GLASS) and limb-based patency (LBP) and angiosome-based target arterial path (TAP) and to detect the predictors of LBP loss. After the publication of the Global Vascular Guidelines in 2019, the evaluation of GLASS and identification of TAP have been recommended. However, there are few reports regarding GLASS. Eighty-three patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss from 2016 to 2020 were evaluated. The correlation between GLASS and LBP and successful revascularization of angiosome-based TAP was analyzed. We also investigated the predictors of LBP loss. The number of patients in each GLASS stage was as follows: GLASS I, 6 patients; GLASS II, 15 patients; GLASS III, 62 patients. At 6 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of LBP was 66.7% in GLASS I, 41.6% in GLASS II, and 16.4% in GLASS III, respectively (p = 0.034). The rate of successful revascularization of angiosome-based TAP was 100% in GLASS I, 86.7% in GLASS II, and 46.8% in GLASS III, respectively (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage [hazard ratio (HR) 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.33; p = 0.021] and GLASS infrapopliteal (IP) grade (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.31-2.95; p = 0.001) were the independent predictors of LBP loss. The GLASS stage was significantly correlated with successful revascularization of angiosome-based TAP and mid-term LBP. The WIfI stage and GLASS IP grade were the independent predictors of loss of LBP.