Adjuncts to the Management of Graft Aorto-Enteric Erosion and Fistula with in situ Reconstruction

A Modern Series of Secondary Aortoenteric Fistula - A 19-Year Experience

OBJECTIVES

Secondary aortoenteric fistula is a rare and life-threatening condition. Clear evidence on the ideal therapeutic approach is largely missing. This study aims to analyze symptoms, etiology, risk factors, and outcomes based on procedural details.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with secondary aortoenteric fistula admitted between 2003 and 2021 were included. Patient characteristics, surgical procedure details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Outcomes were stratified and compared according to the urgency of operation and the procedure performed. Descriptive statistics were used. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of twentytwo patients (68% male, median age 70 years) were identified. Main symptoms were gastrointestinal bleeding, pain, and fever. From the twentytwo patients ten patients required emergency surgery and ten urgent surgery. Emergency patients were older on average (74 vs 63 years, P = .015) and had a higher risk of postoperative respiratory complications (80% vs 10%, P = .005). Primary open surgery with direct replacement of the aorta or an extra-anatomic bypass with an additional direct suture or resection of the involved bowel was performed in sixteen patients. In four patients underwent endovascular bridging treatment with the definitive approach as a second step. Other two patients died without operation (1x refusal; 1x palliative cancer history). In-hospital mortality was 27%, respectively. Compared to patients undergoing urgent surgery, those treated emergently showed significantly higher in-hospital (50% vs 0%, P = .0033) mortalities.

CONCLUSION

Despite rapid diagnosis and treatment, secondary aortoenteric fistula remains a life-threatening condition with 27% in-hospital mortality, significantly increased upon emergency presentation.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulae: a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are a rare, complex and life-threatening complication following aortic repair. Traditional treatment strategy has been with open aortic repair (OAR), with emergence of endovascular repair (EVAR) as a potentially viable initial treatment option. Controversy exists over optimal immediate and long-term management.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients who had been treated for SAEF between 2003 and 2020 were identified using a standardized database. Baseline characteristics, presenting features, microbiological, operative, and post-operative variables were recorded. The primary outcomes were short and mid-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, binomial regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox age-adjusted survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Across 5 tertiary centres, a total of 47 patients treated for SAEF were included, 7 were female and the median (range) age at presentation was 74 years (48-93). In this cohort, 24 (51%) patients were treated with initially with OAR, 15 (32%) with EVAR-first and 8 (17%) non-operatively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality for all cases that underwent intervention was 21% and 46% respectively. Age-adjusted survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality in the EVAR-first group compared to the OAR-first group, HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03, P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

In this study there was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients who had OAR or EVAR as first line treatment for SAEF. In the acute setting, alongside broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, EVAR can be considered as an initial treatment for patients with SAEF, as a primary treatment or a bridge to definitive OAR.

Aortoenteric Fistula: A Differential Diagnosis of Anemia

Aortoenteric fistulas (AEFs) are a rare and deadly cause of gastrointestinal bleeding that can be easily overlooked, leading to massive bleeding. Secondary AEFs are more common than primary AEFs. An example of a secondary cause of anemia is postoperative hemorrhage due to a surgically placed aortic graft or after endovascular aneurysm repair. This report aims to increase the awareness of AEF as a differential diagnosis when anemia is detected. The clinical report presents a case of anemia in a 79-year-old man due to a secondary AEF, which occurred in a patient who had undergone abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery 10 years before. Surgical repair is considered the gold standard for AEF treatment; however, in this case, the patient was managed with medical therapy and discharged after two months.

Treatment of Secondary Aortoenteric Fistulas Following AORTIC Aneurysm Repair in a Tertiary Reference Center

Objectives: To present our experience with various therapeutic approaches for the treatment of secondary aortoenteric fistulas following open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Methods and Materials: A retrospective data analysis of patients treated for secondary aortoenteric fistulas in a single vascular institution between January 2005 and December 2018 was performed. Analyzed parameters included patients’ demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, perioperative data and repair durability during follow-up. Results: Twenty-three patients with aortoenteric fistulas were treated in the target period. The fistulous connection was located in 21 cases (91.3%) in the duodenum and in two cases (8.7%) in the small intestine. Average time between the initial procedure and detection of the aortoenteric fistula was 69.4 ± 72.5 months. The most common presenting symptom was gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 12, 52.2%), followed by symptoms suggestive of chronic infection (n = 11, 47.8%). Open surgical repair was performed in 19 patients (bridging in 3 patients), and endovascular repair was carried out in two cases and one patient underwent a hybrid operation. One patient underwent abscess drainage due to significant comorbidities. Mean follow-up was 35.1 ± 35.5 months. In-hospital mortality and overall mortality were 43.5% (10/23) and 65.2% (15/23), respectively. Patients presenting with bleeding had a significantly higher perioperative mortality rate in comparison to patients presenting with chronic infection (66.7% (8/12) and 18.2% (2/11), respectively, p = 0.019). Patients who underwent stent-graft implantation for control of acute life-threatening bleeding showed significantly better perioperative survival in comparison to patients that were acutely treated with an open procedure (66.6%, (4/6) and 0% (0/6), respectively, p = 0.014). Perioperative mortality was also higher for ASA IV patients (71.4%, 5/7), when compared to ASA III Patients (31.2%, 5/16), although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.074). Conclusion: Treatment of secondary aortoenteric fistulas is associated with a high perioperative mortality rate. Patients who survive the perioperative period following open surgical repair in the absence of hemorrhagic shock show acceptable midterm results during follow-up. Stent-graft implantation for bleeding control in patients presenting with life-threatening bleeding seems to be associated with lower perioperative mortality rates.