1
|
Tinelli G, D'Oria M, Sica S, Mani K, Rancic Z, Resch TA, Beccia F, Azizzadeh A, Da Volta Ferreira MM, Gargiulo M, Lepidi S, Tshomba Y, Oderich GS, Haulon S. The sac evolution imaging follow-up after endovascular aortic repair: An international expert opinion-based Delphi consensus study. J Vasc Surg 2024; 80:937-945. [PMID: 38462062 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management of follow-up protocols after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) varies significantly between centers and is not standardized according to sac regression. By designing an international expert-based Delphi consensus, the study aimed to create recommendations on follow-up after EVAR according to sac evolution. METHODS Eight facilitators created appropriate statements regarding the study topic that were voted, using a 4-point Likert scale, by a selected panel of international experts using a three-round modified Delphi consensus process. Based on the experts' responses, only those statements reaching a grade A (full agreement ≥75%) or B (overall agreement ≥80% and full disagreement <5%) were included in the final document. RESULTS One-hundred and seventy-four participants were included in the final analysis, and each voted the initial 29 statements related to the definition of sac regression (Q1-Q9), EVAR follow-up (Q10-Q14), and the assessment and role of sac regression during follow-up (Q15-Q29). At the end of the process, 2 statements (6.9%) were rejected, 9 statements (31%) received a grade B consensus strength, and 18 (62.1%) reached a grade A consensus strength. Of 27 final statements, 15 (55.6%) were classified as grade I, whereas 12 (44.4%) were classified as grade II. Experts agreed that sac regression should be considered an important indicator of EVAR success and always be assessed during follow-up after EVAR. CONCLUSIONS Based on the elevated strength and high consistency of this international expert-based Delphi consensus, most of the statements might guide the current clinical management of follow-up after EVAR according to the sac regression. Future studies are needed to clarify debated issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Tinelli
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Unit of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Simona Sica
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Unit of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Zoran Rancic
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Timothy Andrew Resch
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flavia Beccia
- Section of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ali Azizzadeh
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery University of Bologna, Vascular Surgery Unit IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Yamume Tshomba
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Unit of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, GHPSJ, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali T, Stather PW. Rupture Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Are We Missing the Signs? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 64:175. [PMID: 35599135 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tariq Ali
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK
| | - Philip W Stather
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bastos Gonçalves F. Stratified Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Follow Up Is No Longer Utopia But Remains Undefined. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62:886. [PMID: 34711503 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Hospital de Santa Marta, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|