Long Term Mortality Rate in Patients Treated with Carotid Endarterectomy

Mutational landscape of atherosclerotic plaques reveals large clonal cell populations

The notion of clonal cell populations in human atherosclerosis has been suggested but not demonstrated. Somatic mutations are used to define cellular clones in tumors. Here, we characterized the mutational landscape of human carotid plaques through whole-exome sequencing to explore the presence of clonal cell populations. Somatic mutations were identified in 12 of 13 investigated plaques, while no mutations were detected in 11 non-atherosclerotic arteries. Mutated clones often constituted over 10% of the sample cell population, with genes related to the contractile apparatus enriched for mutations. In carriers of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), hematopoietic clones had infiltrated the plaque tissue and constituted substantial fractions of the plaque cell population alongside locally expanded clones. Our findings establish somatic mutations as a common feature of human atherosclerosis and demonstrate the existence of mutated clones expanding locally, as well as CHIP clones invading from the circulation. While our data do not support plaque monoclonality, we observed a pattern suggesting the coexistence of multiple mutated clones of considerable size spanning different regions of plaques. Mutated clones are likely to be relevant to disease development, and somatic mutations will serve as a convenient tool to uncover novel pathological processes of atherosclerosis in future studies.

A Nationwide Analysis in France on Sex Difference and Outcomes Following Carotid Intervention in Asymptomatic Patients

Objective: The impact of sex on outcomes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) is not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between sex and outcomes of asymptomatic patients who underwent primary carotid interventions in France. Methods: This nationwide retrospective study was performed using the French National Health Insurance Information System and included asymptomatic patients who underwent primary carotid intervention over a 10-year period (1 January 2013 to 31 August 2023). Symptomatic patients and patients who had peri-operative neurologic events were excluded. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of death and stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) at 30 days, 1 and 5 years after patients' discharge. Results: In total, 115,879 patients were admitted for an index CEA (29.4% women) and 6500 for CAS (29.8% women). In the CEA group, no significant sex-related difference was observed for 30-day mortality; however, women had significantly lower 1-year and 5-year mortality rates compared to men (1.9% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001 and 7.9% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). In the CAS group, women had lower 30-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality (0.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.040, 3.8% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.048, and 10.4% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that sex was not associated with the risk of stroke/TIA and mortality at 30 days (OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.67-1.04) and 1.27 (95% CI 0.98-1.64)). Male sex was associated with a higher risk of 1-year and 5-year mortality (OR 1.24 (95% CI 1.13-1.36) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.18-1.31)), but a lower risk of stroke/TIA than female sex. Conclusions: No significant sex-related difference was observed at 30 days in patients being discharged alive and without peri-operative neurologic events. Male sex was associated with a higher risk of mortality but a lower risk of stroke/TIA at 1 and 5 years.

Comparative outcomes of open mesenteric bypass after a failed endovascular or open mesenteric revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Clinical practice guidelines have recommended an endovascular-first approach (ENDO) for the management of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), whereas an open mesenteric bypass (OMB) is proposed for subjects deemed to be poor ENDO candidates. However, the impact of a previous failed endovascular or open mesenteric reconstruction on a subsequent OMB is unknown. Accordingly, this study was designed to examine the results of a remedial OMB (R-OMB) after a failed ENDO or a primary OMB (P-OMB) for patients with recurrent CMI.

METHODS

All patients who underwent an OMB from 2002 to 2022 at the University of Florida were reviewed. Outcomes after an R-OMB (ie, history of a failed ENDO or P-OMB) and P-OMB were compared. The primary end point was 30-day mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and survival. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate freedom from reintervention and all-cause mortality, whereas multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling identified predictors of death.

RESULTS

A total of 145 OMB procedures (R-OMB, n = 48 [33%]; P-OMB, n = 97 [67%]) were analyzed. A majority of R-OMB operations were performed for a failed stent (prior ENDO, n = 39 [81%]; prior OMB, n = 9 [19%]). R-OMB patients were generally younger (66 ± 9 years vs P-OMB, 69 ± 11 years; P = .09) and had lower incidence of smoking exposure (29% vs P-OMB, 48%; P = .07); however, there were no other differences in demographics or comorbidities. R-OMB was associated with less intraoperative transfusion (0.6 units vs P-OMB, 1.4 units; P = .01), but there were no differences in conduit choice or bypass configuration.The overall 30-day mortality and complication rates were 7% (n = 10/145) and 53% (n = 77/145), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Notably, R-OMB had decreased cardiac (6% vs P-OMB, 21%; P < .01) and bleeding complication rates (2% vs P-OMB, 15%; P = .01). The freedom from reintervention (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 95% ± 4%, 83% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 97% ± 2%, 93% ± 5%, respectively; log-rank P = .21) and survival (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 82% ± 6%, 68% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 84% ± 4%, 66% ± 7%; P = .91) were similar. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality included new postoperative hemodialysis requirement (hazard ratio [HR], 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-17.3; P < .001), pulmonary (HR, 2.7, 95% CI, 1.4-5.3; P = .004) and cardiac (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 1.1-5.1; P = .04) complications, and female sex (HR, 2.1, 95% CI, 1.03-4.8; P = .04). Notably, R-OMB was not a predictor of death.

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative and longer-term outcomes for a remedial OMB after a failed intraluminal stent or previous open bypass appear to be comparable to a P-OMB. These findings support the recently updated clinical practice guideline recommendations for an endovascular-first approach to treating recurrent CMI due to the significant perioperative complication risk of OMB. However, among the subset of patients deemed ineligible for endoluminal reconstruction after failed mesenteric revascularization, R-OMB results appear to be acceptable and highlight the utility of this strategy in selected patients.

Carotid Endarterectomy in the Very Elderly: Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Outcomes

Purpose

: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has an established effect on stroke-free survival in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Most landmark trials excluded patients ≥80 years of age due to their perceived high risk and uncertainty regarding the benefits of CEA. Despite the ongoing global increase in life expectancy, guidelines have not changed. The current study aimed to assess CEA outcomes in patients ≥80 years of age.

Materials and Methods

: Data from patients ≥80 years of age, who underwent CEA between April 2016 and April 2022, were collected. Demographic information, comorbidities, surgical details, operative details, outcomes, and post-CEA survival were reviewed, and long-term data up to April 2023 were collected.

Results

: Over the 6-year study period, 258 CEA procedures were recorded, of which 70 (27.1%) were performed in patients ≥80 years of age; the mean age was 84 years (range, 80-96 years), 47 (67.1%) were males, and 69 (98.6%) were symptomatic. Twenty-three (32.9%) patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 2, and 47 (67.1%) were grade 3. The 30-day stroke and mortality rates were 4.3% and 1.4%, respectively. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the cumulative freedom-from-stroke rates were 95.7%, 92.9%, and 91.4%, respectively, and the cumulative survival rates were 94.3%, 75.7%, and 61.4%, respectively. No risk factors affected early or late stroke or early mortality rates. Patients with ASA grade 3 had significantly lower cumulative survival than those with grade 2 (HR, 5.29; 95% CI, 1.590-17.603; P<0.01).

Conclusion

: CEA was safe and effective in average-risk, elderly patients. Higher risk patients (i.e., ASA 3) showed no increased 30-day risk for stroke or mortality but exhibited significantly worse long-term survival. Hence, careful consideration of the benefits before performing CEA is crucial.