The short-term effects of manual and interactive powered toothbrushes on the periodontal status of orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial

Powered tooth brushes are beneficial for long-term oral health: Results from the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-TREND)

AIM

To determine the long-term effects of the use of powered tooth brush (PTB) in comparison to manual tooth brush (MTB) on periodontitis severity, coronal caries experience, and the number of missing teeth using in a population-based cohort study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 7-year follow-up data of 2214 participants of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-TREND), comprehensively adjusted linear models using generalized least squares and ordinal regression models estimated the effects of PTB usage on dental outcomes in complete case and imputed data.

RESULTS

At follow-up, PTB users had lower medians for mean probing depth (PD; 2.21 mm) and mean clinical attachment levels (1.73 mm) than MTB users (2.30 and 1.96 mm, respectively). Adjusted models revealed the beneficial effects of PTB usage on follow-up levels of plaque, bleeding on probing, mean PD, percentage of sites with PDs ≥4 mm, mean clinical attachment levels (all, interdental, and non-interdental sites, respectively), and the number of missing teeth. For the number of missing teeth, the effects were more pronounced in participants aged ≥50 years. No significant effects of PTB usage on the number of decayed or filled surfaces (all and interdental sites) were found.

CONCLUSIONS

A recommendation of PTB usage in dental practice could contribute to the long-term promotion of oral health.

Effects of interactive power toothbrush with or without application assistance on the plaque, gingivitis, and gingival abrasion among dental students: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomized controlled study is to determine if an interactive power toothbrush (PTB) with application (app) promotes additional benefit on dental plaque, gingivitis, and gingival abrasion to that of a manual toothbrush (MTB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety participants (dental students) diagnosed with gingivitis were randomly assigned, into three groups, 1:1:1 ratio, given an app-assisted interactive PTB (PTB-A) (Oral-B Genius® Rechargeable 8000 PTB with CrossAction brush head) or the same PTB without app-assistance (PTB-NA) or a regular MTB for home-use. Plaque was assessed using the Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein Plaque Index (QHPI-TM), and gingivitis was evaluated using the Bleeding on Marginal Probing Index (BOMP) at baseline (T0), week 2 (T1), and week 8 (T2). Gingival abrasions were recorded at T1 and T2. Exit survey was used to assess brushing time and visual-analogue-scale (VAS) scores.

RESULTS

PTB improved QHPI-TM significantly in terms of time-dependent changes, irrespective of app-assistance. BOMP was observed to be statistically lower in PTB-A than in MTB only at T2. Brushing times were longer in PTB-A than in MTB. Gingival abrasion was less in both PTB than MTB. PTB-A had better results to MTB in cleaning ability according to subject-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PTBs were more effective to MTB; however, the app-assisted interactive PTB was similar to the non-assisted one in plaque removal efficacy, gingivitis reduction, and incidence of gingival abrasion, yet better than MTB in cleaning ability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Developing an application software to prevent gingival abrasion might be clinically beneficial regardless of the individual factor.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT05150132.

The influence of mobile applications and social media-based interventions in producing behavior change among orthodontic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this project was to systematically review the effectiveness of mobile applications and social media-based interventions in producing a behavioral change in orthodontic patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases and reference lists of relevant studies were searched on March 1, 2021, with no language restrictions (PROSPERO: CRD42019157298). Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials assessing the impact of mobile applications and social media-based interventions on orthodontic patients were identified. Primary outcomes included adherence to wear, appointment attendance, knowledge, oral health-related behaviors, oral hygiene levels, periodontal outcomes, and related iatrogenic effects. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. A weighted treatment effect of interventions on periodontal outcomes was calculated. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

A total of 3617 articles were identified. Of these, 16 studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 2 nonrandomized controlled trials) were deemed eligible. Nine randomized controlled trials were judged to be of either low or unclear risk of bias. The intervention was favored in relation to gingival and plaque indexes, standardized mean difference: -0.81 (95% confidence intervals [CI], -1.35 to -0.28) and -0.91 (95% CI, -1.64 to -0.19), respectively. However, no significant effect was observed in bleeding on probing (standardized mean difference: -0.22; 95% CI, -0.5 to 0.05). The level of evidence was high in probing depth and bleeding on probing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A very low to moderate level of evidence supports the effects of mobile applications and social media-based interventions in producing positive behavioral changes in orthodontic patients. Further high-quality trials would assist in further elucidating the potential of these approaches to influence orthodontic treatment outcomes and experiences.