In Search of C3G Tissue Biomarkers

Complement detection in kidney biopsies - utility and challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses the important role of staining for components of the complement cascade in both native and transplant kidney biopsies. The use of complement staining as a marker of prognosis, disease activity, and as a potential future tool in identifying patients who may benefit from complement-targeted therapies is discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

While staining for C3, C1q and C4d can yield valuable information about complement activation in kidney biopsies, to adequately assess complement activation and potential therapeutic targets, expanded staining panels looking at multiple split products and complement regulatory proteins are needed. Recent progress has been made in identifying markers of disease severity in C3 glomerulonephritis and IgA nephropathy, such as Factor H-related Protein-5, which may serve as future tissue biomarkers. In the transplant setting, the limitation of relying on C4d staining to identify antibody mediated rejection is giving way to molecular diagnostics, including The Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel, which includes numerous complement complement-related transcripts, with the classical, lectin, alternative, and common pathways.

SUMMARY

Staining for complement components in kidney biopsies to understand how complement is activated in individual cases may help to identify patients who may benefit from complement-targeted therapies.

Kidney diseases

Dysregulation and accelerated activation of the alternative pathway (AP) of complement is known to cause or accentuate several pathologic conditions in which kidney injury leads to the appearance of hematuria and proteinuria and ultimately to the development of chronic renal failure. Multiple genetic and acquired defects involving plasma- and membrane-associated proteins are probably necessary to impair the protection of host tissues and to confer a significant predisposition to AP-mediated kidney diseases. This review aims to explore how our current understanding will make it possible to identify the mechanisms that underlie AP-mediated kidney diseases and to discuss the available clinical evidence that supports complement-directed therapies. Although the value of limiting uncontrolled complement activation has long been recognized, incorporating complement-targeted treatments into clinical use has proved challenging. Availability of anti-complement therapy has dramatically transformed the outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, one of the most severe kidney diseases. Innovative drugs that directly counteract AP dysregulation have also opened new perspectives for the management of other kidney diseases in which complement activation is involved. However, gained experience indicates that the choice of drug should be tailored to each patient's characteristics, including clinical, histologic, genetic, and biochemical parameters. Successfully treating patients requires further research in the field and close collaboration between clinicians and researchers who have special expertise in the complement system.