Exploring the Link Between Hepatic Perfusion and Endotoxemia in Hemodialysis

Dialysis and cognitive impairment

People with chronic kidney disease who require maintenance dialysis characteristically experience accelerated and aggravated cognitive decline compared with those with advanced kidney disease who are not receiving this form of kidney replacement therapy. This effect is inadequately appreciated, but of crucial importance to patients, their carers and the health-care systems that support them. Although many of the comorbid conditions prevalent in this patient population have the potential to affect brain structure and function, an evolving body of evidence indicates that the dialysis therapy itself has a central role in the pathophysiology of progressive cognitive impairment. Both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with structural and functional changes in the brain that can lead to characteristic short-term symptoms, such as headache, confusion, delirium and brain fog, as well as long-term reductions in cognitive functional ability. Here, we explore the mechanisms, both established and putative, underlying these effects and consider approaches to addressing this issue with both single and complex therapeutic interventions.

The liver's dilemma: sensing real danger in a sea of PAMPs: the (arterial) sinusoidal segment theory

The liver is susceptible to viruses and bacterial infections, tumors, and sterile tissue damage, but immunological danger recognition in the liver is highly unconventional. When analyzing innate and adaptive immunity in the organ, the valid concepts that guide danger recognition and immune response in the periphery should be put aside. In the liver, the vascular anatomy is a game changer, as about 80% of the blood that percolates the organ arrives from the hepatic portal vein, draining blood rich in molecules from the intestinal flora. This 24/7 exposure to high amounts of pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs) molecules results in hepatic immunological tolerance. In the liver, dendritic, Kupffer (KC), liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), and even hepatocytes express PD-L1, a T lymphocyte downregulatory molecule. Most cells express Fas-L, IL-10, TGF-β, low levels of co-stimulatory molecules, lack of or have low levels of MHC-I and/or MHC-II expression. Moreover, other negative regulators such as CTLA-4, IDO-1, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) are regularly expressed. Then, how can real danger be discerned and recognized in this sea of PAMPs? This is an open question. Here, we hypothesize that conventional immunological danger recognition can occur in the liver but in specific and minor arterial sinusoidal segments,. Then, in the portal triad, where the hepatic artery ramificates into the stroma and carries arterial blood with no gut-derived PAMPs, there is no evolutive or environmental pressure for immunosuppressive pathways, and conventional immunological danger recognition could occur. Therefore, in arterial sinusoidal segments with no sea of PAMPs, the liver could recognize real danger and support innate and adaptive immunity.

Update on Hemodialysis-Induced Multiorgan Ischemia: Brains and Beyond

Hemodialysis is a life-saving treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, patients requiring hemodialysis have a 10-20 times higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than that of the general population. Patients encounter complications such as episodic intradialytic hypotension, abnormal perfusion to critical organs (heart, brain, liver, and kidney), and damage to vulnerable vascular beds. Recurrent conventional hemodialysis exposes patients to multiple episodes of circulatory stress, exacerbating and being aggravated by microvascular endothelial dysfunction. This promulgates progressive injury that leads to irreversible multiorgan injury and the well-documented higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and premature death. This review aims to examine the underlying pathophysiology of hemodialysis-related vascular injury and consider a range of therapeutic approaches to improving outcomes set within this evolved rubric.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.

Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease Associated With Hemodialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiac insufficiency often co-exist, particularly in uremic patients on hemodialysis (HD). The occurrence of abnormal renal function in patients with cardiac insufficiency is often indicative of a poor prognosis. It has long been established that in patients with cardiac insufficiency, poorer renal function tends to indicate poorer cardiac mechanics, including left atrial reserve strain, left ventricular longitudinal strain, and right ventricular free wall strain (Unger et al., Eur J Heart Fail, 2016, 18(1), 103-12). Similarly, patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly uremic patients on HD, often have cardiovascular complications in addition to abnormal endothelial function with volume overload, persistent inflammatory states, calcium overload, and imbalances in redox responses. Cardiac insufficiency due to uremia is therefore mainly due to multifaceted non-specific pathological changes rather than pure renal insufficiency. Several studies have shown that the risk of adverse cardiovascular events is greatly increased and persistent in all patients treated with HD, especially in those who have just started HD treatment. Inflammation, as an important intersection between CKD and cardiovascular disease, is involved in the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with CKD and is indicative of prognosis (Chan et al., Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(13), 1244-1253). Therefore, only by understanding the mechanisms underlying the sequential development of inflammation in CKD patients and breaking the vicious circle between inflammation-mediated renal and cardiac insufficiency is it possible to improve the prognosis of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This review highlights the mechanisms of inflammation and the oxidative stress that co-exists with inflammation in uremic patients on dialysis, as well as the mechanisms of cardiovascular complications in the inflammatory state, and provides clinical recommendations for the anti-inflammatory treatment of cardiovascular complications in such patients.