A Pilot Study to Predict Risk of IgA Nephropathy Progression Based on miR-204 Expression

Glomerular transcriptomics predicts long term outcome and identifies therapeutic strategies for patients with assumed benign IgA nephropathy

Some patients diagnosed with benign IgA nephropathy (IgAN) develop a progressive clinical course, not predictable by known clinical or histopathological parameters. To assess if gene expression can differentiate between progressors and non-progressors with assumed benign IgAN, we tested microdissected glomeruli from archival kidney biopsy sections from adult patients with stable clinical remission (21 non-progressors) or from 15 patients that had undergone clinical progression within a 25-year time frame. Based on 1 240 differentially expressed genes from patients with suitable sequencing results, we identified eight IgAN progressor and nine non-progressor genes using a two-component classifier. These genes, including APOL5 and ZXDC, predicted disease progression with 88% accuracy, 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity on average 21.6 years before progressive disease was clinically documented. APOL lipoproteins are associated with inflammation, autophagy and kidney disease while ZXDC is a zinc-finger transcription factor modulating adaptive immunity. Ten genes from our transcriptomics data overlapped with an external genome wide association study dataset, although the gene set enrichment test was not statistically significant. We also identified 45 drug targets in the DrugBank database, including angiotensinogen, a target of sparsentan (dual antagonist of the endothelin type A receptor and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor) currently investigated for IgAN treatment. Two validation cohorts were used for substantiating key results, one by immunohistochemistry and the other by nCounter technology. Thus, glomerular mRNA sequencing from diagnostic kidney biopsies from patients with assumed benign IgAN can differentiate between future progressors and non-progressors at the time of diagnosis.

Examining the association between serum galactose-deficient IgA1 and primary IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common primary glomerular disease. The O-glycosylation status of IgA1 plays a crucial role in disease pathophysiology. The level of poorly-O-galactosylated IgA1, or galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), has also been identified as a potential biomarker in IgAN. We sought to examine the value of serum Gd-IgA1 as a biomarker in IgAN, by investigating its association with clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features of IgAN.

METHODS

The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021287423). The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus, and the selected articles were evaluated for eligibility based on predefined criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate effect sizes and assess heterogeneity among the studies.

RESULTS

This review analyzed 29 out of 1,986 studies, conducted between 2005 and 2022, with participants from multiple countries. Gd-IgA1 levels were not associated with age and gender, while associations with hypertension, hematuria, and proteinuria were inconsistent. In the meta-analyses, a correlation between serum Gd-IgA1 and estimated glomerular filtration rate was identified, however, the relationships between Gd-IgA1 levels and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and progression to kidney failure were inconsistent.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum Gd-IgA1 levels were not associated with validated prognostic risk factors, but were negatively correlated with kidney function. Further research in larger studies using standardized assays are needed to establish the value of Gd-IgA1 as a prognostic risk factor in IgAN.

Evaluating Progression Risk in Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy

The highly variable rate of decline in kidney function in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) provides a major clinical challenge. Predicting which patients will progress to kidney failure, and how quickly, is difficult. Multiple novel therapies are likely to be approved in the short-term, but clinicians lack the tools to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific treatments at the right time. Noninvasive and validated markers for selecting at-risk patients and longitudinal monitoring are urgently needed. This review summarizes what is known about demographic, clinical, and histopathologic prognostic markers in the clinician's toolkit, including the International IgAN Prediction Tool. We also briefly review what is known on these topics in children and adolescents with IgAN. Although helpful, currently used markers leave clinicians heavily reliant on histologic features from the diagnostic kidney biopsy and standard clinical data to guide treatment choice, and very few noninvasive markers reflect treatment efficacy over time. Novel prognostic and predictive markers are under clinical investigation, with considerable progress being made in markers of complement activation. Other areas of research are the interplay between gut microbiota and galactose-deficient IgA1 expression; microRNAs; imaging; artificial intelligence; and markers of fibrosis. Given the rate of therapeutic advancement, the remaining gaps in biomarker research need to be addressed. We finish by describing our route to clinical utility of predictive and prognostic markers in IgAN. This route will provide us with the chance to improve IgAN prognosis by using robust, clinically practical markers to inform patient care.

Clinical significance of urinary exosomal microRNAs in patients with IgA nephropathy

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. The clinical relevance of 11 urinary exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) was evaluated in patients with IgAN. From January 2009 to November 2018, IgAN (n = 93), disease control (n = 11), and normal control (n = 19) groups were enrolled. We evaluated the expression levels of urinary exosomal miRNAs at the baseline and their relationship with clinical and pathologic features. This study aimed to discriminate statistically powerful urinary exosomal miRNAs for the prognosis of IgAN. Urinary miRNA levels of miR-16-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-124-3p, miR-126-3p, miR-199a-3p, miR-199b-5p, and miR-335-3p showed significant correlation with both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (uPCR). In univariate regression analysis, age, body mass index, hypertension, eGFR, uPCR, Oxford classification E, and three miRNAs (miR-16-5p, miR-199a-3p, and miR-335-3p) were associated with disease progression in patients with IgAN. The area under the curve (AUC) of miR-199a-3p was high enough (0.749) without any other clinical or pathologic factors, considering that the AUC of the International IgAN Risk Prediction Tool was 0.853. Urinary exosomal miRNAs may serve as alternative prognostic biomarkers of IgAN with further research.

Challenges in IgA Nephropathy Management: An Era of Complement Inhibition

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common glomerular disease worldwide, with an estimated annual incidence of 25 per million adults. Despite optimized supportive care, some patients fail to achieve disease control and suffer progressive deterioration of kidney function. In this subpopulation of patients, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2021 guidelines recommend consideration of corticosteroids; however, their use is associated with significant side effects. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to identify corticosteroid-sparing therapies to help improve treatment and prognosis for patients with IgAN. It has been well-documented that the complement system plays a significant role in IgAN pathogenesis, and several complement inhibitors are now entering late-stage clinical development. This review evaluates what we know about the role of complement in the pathophysiology of IgAN and considers how the availability of targeted complement inhibitors may impact future clinical practice. Key knowledge gaps are evaluated, and research opportunities are recommended to help guide clinical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes. Such gaps include evaluating the relative contribution of the alternative and lectin pathways to disease pathogenesis, and the importance of determining the dominant pathway driving IgAN progression. Continued research into the staining of complement proteins in kidney biopsies and identifying targeted biomarkers to assess disease progression and treatment responses will also be needed to support the implementation of newer therapies in clinical practice. Considering the future horizons for enhancing the care of patients with IgAN, tackling the outstanding challenges now will help prepare for the best possible future outcomes.

Urinary Extracellular Vesicles in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Bench to Bedside?

Extracellular vesicles are a diverse group of particles that include exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies and are defined by size, composition, site of origin, and density. They incorporate various bioactive molecules from their cell of origin during formation, such as soluble proteins, membrane receptors, nucleic acids (mRNAs and miRNAs), and lipids, which can then be transferred to target cells. Extracellular vesicles/exosomes have been extensively studied as a critical factor in pathophysiological processes of human diseases. Urinary extracellular vesicles could be a promising liquid biopsy for determining the pattern and/or severity of kidney histologic injury. The signature of urinary extracellular vesicles may pave the way for noninvasive methods to supplement existing testing methods for diagnosing kidney diseases. We discuss the potential role of urinary extracellular vesicles in various chronic kidney diseases in this review, highlighting open questions and discussing the potential for future research.

The role of small extracellular vesicle non-coding RNAs in kidney diseases

Kidney diseases have become an increasingly common public health concern worldwide. The discovery of specific biomarkers is of substantial clinical significance in kidney disease diagnosis, therapy and prognosis. The small extracellular vesicle (sEV) can be secreted by several cell types, like renal tubular epithelial cells, podocytes, collecting duct cells and leap cells, and functions as a communication medium between cells by delivering signaling molecules, including proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. There has been growing evidence that kidney diseases are associated with aberrant expression of sEV-derived non-coding RNAs (sEV-ncRNAs). As a result, sEV-ncRNAs may provide valuable information about kidney diseases. In this paper, a systematic review is presented of what has been done in recent years regarding sEV-ncRNAs in kidney disease diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

What do we actually know about exosomal microRNAs in kidney diseases?

There are several types of kidney diseases with complex causes. If left untreated, these diseases irreversibly progress to end-stage renal disease. Thus, their early diagnosis and targeted treatment are important. Exosomes—extracellular vesicles released by a variety of cells—are ideal carriers for DNA, RNA, proteins, and other metabolites owing to their bilayer membranes. Studies have shown that almost all renal cells can secrete exosomes. While research on exosomal microRNAs in the context of renal diseases begun only recently, rapid progress has been achieved. This review summarizes the changes in exosomal microRNA expression in different kidney diseases. Thus, it highlights the diagnostic and prognostic value of these exosomal microRNAs. Further, this review analyzes their roles in the development of different kidney diseases, guiding research on molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.

Clinical application of microRNAs in glomerular diseases

RNA interference (RNAi) occurs in all organisms and modulates most, if not all, biological pathways. It is the process by which non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRs), regulate gene transcription and post-transcriptional processing of messenger RNA (mRNA). A single miR can modulate several genes within a cell, and several miRs can regulate expression of the same gene, adding tiers of complexity to regulation of gene expression. MicroRNAs and other RNAi approaches have been successfully used in vitro and in vivo to selectively manipulate gene transcription, making them pivotal agents for basic science research and candidates for targeted therapeutics. This review will focus on miRs and their potential as biomarkers and novel therapeutics for glomerular disease.

The divergent roles of exosomes in kidney diseases: Pathogenesis, diagnostics, prognostics and therapeutics

Exosomes are the self-packed nanoscale vesicles (nanovesicles) derived from late endosomes and released from the cells to the extracellular milieu. Exosomal biogenesis is based on endosomal pathway to form the nanovesicles surrounded by membrane originated from plasma membranes of the parental cells. During biogenesis, exosomes selectively encapsulate an array of biomolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, metabolites, etc.), thereby conveying diverse messages for cell-cell communications. Once released, these exosomal contents trigger signaling and trafficking that play roles in cell growth, development, immune responses, homeostasis, remodeling, etc. Recent advances in exosomal research have provided a wealth of useful information that enhances our knowledge on the roles for exosomes in pathogenic mechanisms of human diseases involving a wide variety of organ systems. In the kidney, exosomes play divergent roles, ranging from pathogenesis to therapeutics, based on their original sources and type of interventions. Herein, we summarize and update the current knowledge on the divergent roles of exosomes involving the pathogenesis, diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics in various groups of kidney diseases, including acute kidney injury, immune-mediated kidney diseases (e.g., IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), chronic kidney disease (caused by diabetic nephropathy and others), renal cell carcinoma, nephrolithiasis, kidney transplantation and related complications, and polycystic kidney disease. Finally, the future perspectives on research in this area are discussed.