Sepsis Resuscitation in Resource-Limited Settings

Virtual Deliberate Practice Module for Tracheostomy Change Training: An Application of Educational Design Research

Background

The pandemic poses challenges for in-person procedural skills training. We developed a virtual module for teaching hands-on tracheostomy skills.

Objective

To develop and evaluate a virtual module prototype grounded in deliberate practice using tracheostomy change as an example.

Methods

After identifying desirable features of a virtual module by surveying stakeholders, we designed a prototype using VoiceThread, a multimedia-based collaborative learning platform. We created an asynchronous module accessible to learners for repeated skill practice and for video upload of individual performance on a tracheostomy task trainer using personal devices. This virtual module provided a four-step coaching (demonstration, deconstruction, formulation, and performance) to practice tracheostomy change. Two instructors reviewed the learners’ performance videos, providing timely feedback for further refinement of skills.

Results

Sixty-four residents completed the module, System Usability Scale, and self-efficacy survey. All residents rated the module, with a mean System Usability Scale score of 68.6 ± 18.4 (maximum score of 100). Two independent instructors rated performance videos using a 12-item checklist with mean interobserver agreement of 88.1% (standard deviation, 9.7) and mean performance checklist score (n = 40) of 10.1 (standard deviation, 1.2) out of 12. After training, residents reported high confidence in their ability to list and perform procedural steps, with improvement in median (interquartile range) comfort levels from 1 (1–2) to 4 (3–4) out of 5 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

We developed an asynchronous deliberate practice module on a virtual platform using tracheostomy change as an example. Residents evaluated the module favorably using system usability and learner self-efficacy surveys with improvement of skills.

Considerations for Assessing the Appropriateness of High-Cost Pediatric Care in Low-Income Regions

It may be difficult to predict the consequences of provision of high-cost pediatric care (HCC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and these consequences may be different to those experienced in high-income countries. An evaluation of the implications of HCC in LMICs must incorporate considerations of the specific context in that country (population age profile, profile of disease, resources available), likely costs of the HCC, likely benefits that can be gained versus the costs that will be incurred. Ideally, the process that is followed in decision making around HCC should be transparent and should involve the communities that will be most affected by those decisions. It is essential that the impacts of provision of HCC are carefully monitored so that informed decisions can be made about future provision medical interventions.