Wilderness Emergency Medical Services Systems

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Medical Direction of Search and Rescue Teams

The Wilderness Medical Society convened a panel to review available evidence supporting practices for medical direction of search and rescue teams. This panel included of members of the Wilderness Medical Society Search and Rescue Committee, the National Association of EMS Physicians Wilderness Committee, and leadership of the Mountain Rescue Association. Literature about definitions and terminology, epidemiology, currently accepted best practices, and regulatory and legal considerations was reviewed. The panel graded available evidence supporting practices according to the American College of Chest Physicians criteria and then made recommendations based on that evidence. Recommendations were based on the panel's collective clinical experience and judgment when published evidence was lacking.

An Integrative Systematic Review of Promoting Patient Safety Within Prehospital Emergency Medical Services by Paramedics: A Role Theory Perspective

Timely and effective prehospital care significantly impacts patient outcomes. Paramedics, as the frontline providers of emergency medical services, are entrusted with a range of critical responsibilities aimed at safeguarding the well-being of patients from the moment they initiate contact in the out-of-hospital environment to the time of handover at healthcare facilities. This study aimed to understand the multifaceted roles of paramedics in promoting patient safety within the context of prehospital emergency medical services. A systematic review with an integrative approach using the Whittemore and Knafl's framework was performed examining qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research, then conducting data assessment, quality appraisal, and narrative research synthesis. Literature search encompassed PubMed (including MEDLINE), Scopus, Cinahl, ProQuest, Web of Science, and EMBASE, with the aim of retrieving studies published in English in the last decade from 2013 to 2023. To conceptualize the roles of paramedics in ensuring patient safety, the review findings were reflected to and analyzed through the role theory. The preliminary exploration of the database yielded 2397 studies, ultimately narrowing down to a final selection of 16 studies for in-depth data analysis and research synthesis. The review findings explored facilitators and obstacles faced by paramedics in maintaining patient safety in terms of role ambiguity, role conflict, role overload, role identity, and role insufficiency in the dynamic nature of prehospital care. It also highlighted the diverse roles of paramedics in ensuring patient safety, which encompassed effective communication and decision making for the appropriate management of life-threatening emergencies. The effectiveness of paramedics in playing their roles in promoting patient safety relies on acknowledging the contributions of paramedics to the culture of patient safety; training and educational initiatives focused on enhancing their decision-making abilities and both their non-technical and technical competencies; developing relevant guidelines and protocols; improving collaboration between paramedics and other healthcare peers; optimizing environmental conditions and equipment; fostering a supportive work environment.

Wilderness Paramedic-A Practice Analysis

Emergency medical services (EMS) has existed in its modern form for over 50 years. EMS has become a critical public safety net and access point to the larger health care system. Mature EMS systems are in place in most urban areas. However, EMS systems are not as developed in wilderness areas. A barrier to further development of these systems is the lack of an agreed-upon standard of minimum competence and validation of specialized practice. A practice analysis was completed to create such standards. The practice analysis was completed using a multi-step process. A group of subject matter experts constructed a survey of tasks and knowledge needed for wilderness EMS (WEMS) specialty practice. The tasks and knowledge were validated through an industry survey. A total of 947 surveys were submitted for analysis. Of these, 196 were at least 55% complete and used for analysis. North America was heavily represented as a primary practice location with 177 (90.3%) responses out of the 196 total. Of these 177 responses, 164 (92.7%) were from the United States and 12 (6.8%) were from Canada. One hundred seven of the 116 tasks identified by the subject matter expert group were passed by the survey group, and 164 of the 175 knowledge statements were passed by the survey group. An index of agreement (IOA) was calculated and found to be greater than 0.9 for each task and knowledge statement across all subgroups. A content coverage rating was also calculated and the results indicate survey participants felt the content was "adequate" to "well" covered. The survey results were used to construct a pilot examination. Beta testing of the pilot examination was performed. The beta test results were analyzed and a cut score was determined using the Angoff method with a Beuk compromise. The final product of this process is a defensible exam that will certify candidates' cognitive knowledge of the specialty of WEMS. Completion of this practice analysis solidifies WEMS as distinct subspecialty of out-of-hospital medicine. Additionally, it establishes a consensus definition of wilderness paramedicine and standards that may be used by WEMS systems and regulatory entities.

A Survey of Ski Patrols in the United States Comparing Medical Direction, Patroller Training, and Patient Care

INTRODUCTION

Ski patrols are tasked with substantial challenges: distance from definitive care, complex extrications, and winter environments. Rules for US ski patrols stipulate that ≥1 persons be trained in basic first aid, but no further regulations regarding the specifics of provided medical care exist. This project investigated patroller training, patient care, and medical direction of US ski patrols through a survey of ski patrol directors and medical directors.

METHODS

Participants were contacted via email, phone, and personal contacts. After consultation with known ski patrol directors and medical directors for question guidance, 2 separate institutional review board-approved surveys were designed: 1 for ski patrol directors and 1 for ski patrol medical directors, containing 28 and 15 qualitative questions, respectively. The surveys were distributed with a link to the encrypted Qualtrics survey platform. After 2 reminders and 4 mo, results were downloaded from Qualtrics into an Excel spreadsheet.

RESULTS

Twenty-two responses from patrol directors and 15 from medical directors were received. The response rate is unknown. Outdoor emergency care certification was the minimum medical training required by 77% of the study participants. Twenty-seven percent of surveyed patrols belonged to an emergency medical service agency. Fifty percent of 11 surveyed ski patrols had a medical director, 6 of whom were board certified in emergency medicine. All surveyed medical directors stated that they assisted with patroller education, and 93% assisted with protocol development.

CONCLUSIONS

The surveys demonstrated variability in patroller training, protocols, and medical directorship. The authors questioned whether ski patrols would benefit from increased standardization of care and training, quality improvement programs, and medical directorship.

Wilderness Medicine Curricula in United States EMS Fellowship, Emergency Medicine Residency, and Wilderness Medicine Programs

OBJECTIVE

Wilderness Medicine (WM) focuses on care delivered in austere or resource-scarce environments. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements and core content for Emergency Medicine (EM) residency and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) fellowship in the United States (US) include some WM topics that are covered to varying degrees in these programs. Furthermore, there are no ACGME-approved WM fellowships or specific curricula. Different training programs may develop WM content and curricula that differ significantly, leading to variations in WM competencies and training. In 2009, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Wilderness Medicine Section created a Fellowship Subcommittee and Taskforce to develop a standardized curriculum and core content for EM-based WM fellowships. However, to date, EMS fellowship and EM residency WM curricula in the US content have not been analyzed for consistency with the ACEP WM fellowship curriculum.

METHODS

In this study, the WM curricula components of EM residency and EMS fellowship were evaluated using the ACEP WM fellowship curriculum as a control. Potential curriculum gaps for each program type were identified.

RESULTS

Of the 19 WM competencies developed by the ACEP Wilderness Medicine Section Fellowship Subcommittee and Taskforce, EMS fellowship covers more WM topics (16 topics, or 84%) than EM residency (12 topics, or 63%), and combined, they cover 89% of these topics.

CONCLUSIONS

By expanding to cover two additional WM topics, all WM curricula topics recommended by the ACEP WM fellowship curriculum could potentially be covered in EM residency + EMS fellowship; however, the depth of education in each topic may vary. It may be beneficial for Graduate Medical Education (GME)-level learners for programs to implement hands-on educational experiences in WM topics.