Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Importance of the Basics

Emergency medicine updates: Defibrillation strategies in cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrest is a commonly managed condition in the emergency department (ED), and defibrillation of shockable rhythms is a key component of treatment, along with high-quality chest compressions.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review seeks to evaluate evidence-based updates concerning defibrillation in cardiac arrest.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac arrest management includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation of shockable rhythms. CPR should be provided until a defibrillator is applied. In those with pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation should be performed as soon as possible. If the arrest is unwitnessed, or there will be a delay in rhythm analysis or applying/obtaining a defibrillator, CPR should be performed while the defibrillator is being obtained and prepared for use. Biphasic waveform defibrillators are recommended. Shorter pre- and peri-shock pauses are associated with higher survival rates. Charging the defibrillator during chest compressions, holding compressions for rhythm analysis alone, and immediately resuming compressions following defibrillation are recommended to maximize chest compression fraction. Two common defibrillator pad configurations include anterolateral (AL) and anterior-posterior (AP). Vector-change defibrillation can be attempted if the first defibrillation attempt is unsuccessful. Double defibrillation (DD) includes either double simultaneous defibrillation (DSD) or dual sequential external defibrillation (DSED), though DSED is more common. DD utilizes two biphasic defibrillators and two sets of defibrillator pads in an AL and AP configuration. If the patient is refractory to 3 or more defibrillation attempts, DD may be attempted. Defibrillator damage with DD is rare, and clinicians must consider the potential survival benefit with DD, patient and provider safety issues, cost, and system-level impact when using two defibrillators.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates focused on defibrillation can improve the ED care of patients in cardiac arrest.

Emergency medicine updates: Cardiac arrest airway management

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrest is the loss of systemic circulation. The approach to airway management is an important component of the resuscitation of patients in cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning airway management in cardiac arrest.

DISCUSSION

Management of cardiac arrest focuses on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including high-quality chest compressions and ventilation. Resuscitation should prioritize circulation with high-quality compressions, but as the resuscitation continues, airway management is necessary to provide ventilation. During initial CPR efforts, a compression to ventilation ratio of 30:2 is recommended. Bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation is an effective means of ventilation during CPR efforts, though providers should ensure appropriate mask seal with a two-person BVM strategy (one person holding the mask and one person ventilating) if possible. Breaths should be provided over less than 1 s with enough tidal volume to cause chest rise. Advanced airways include a supraglottic airway (SGA) or endotracheal tube via endotracheal intubation (ETI). If an advanced airway is present, one asynchronous ventilation should be provided every 8-10 s. An advanced airway may be considered with an asphyxial cause of arrest, those with prolonged arrest or transport, and cases managed with limited numbers of experienced personnel, though compressions must not be interrupted for placement of an advanced airway. An SGA is a viable option for an advanced airway. In settings with high ETI success rate, ETI may be performed, but in other settings SGA is recommended. If performing ETI, video laryngoscopy is associated with an improved view of the glottis and higher first pass success compared to direct laryngoscopy. Cricoid pressure is not recommended. Confirmation of ETI is necessary. Following ETI and return of spontaneous circulation, a lung protective strategy of ventilation is recommended while avoiding hypoxia.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates regarding airway management can improve the ED care of patients in cardiac arrest.

Emergency medicine updates: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrest is the loss of functional cardiac activity; emergency clinicians are integral in the management of this condition.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

DISCUSSION

Cardiac arrest includes shockable rhythms (i.e., pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) and non-shockable rhythms (i.e., asystole and pulseless electrical activity). The goal of cardiac arrest management is to achieve survival with a good neurologic outcome, in part by restoring systemic perfusion and obtaining return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), while seeking to diagnose and treat the underlying etiology of the arrest. CPR includes high-quality chest compressions to optimize coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure. Chest compressions should be centered over the mid-sternum, with the compressor's body weight over the middle of the chest. A compression depth of 5-6 cm is recommended at a rate of 100-120 compressions per minute, while allowing the chest to fully recoil between each compression. Clinicians should seek to minimize any interruptions in compressions. When performed by bystanders, compression-only CPR may be associated with improved survival to hospital discharge when compared to conventional CPR with ventilations. However, in trained personnel, there is likely no difference with compression-only versus conventional CPR. Mechanical approaches for CPR are not associated with improved patient outcomes, including ROSC or survival with good neurologic function, but mechanical compression devices may be beneficial in select circumstances (e.g., few rescuers available, prolonged arrest/transport). Monitoring of chest compressions is not associated with improved ROSC, survival, or neurologic outcomes, but it can improve guideline adherence. Types of monitoring include real-time feedback, a CPR coach, end tidal CO2, arterial line monitoring, regional cerebral tissue oxygenation, and point-of-care ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of CPR literature updates can improve the ED care of patients in cardiac arrest.

When life-saving measures lead to trauma: Subcapsular hepatic hematoma after CPR

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention for cardiac arrest but can result in significant internal injuries due to the force of chest compressions. Among these, subcapsular hepatic hematoma is a rare and serious complication. Here we present a 55-year-old male with a history of alcohol abuse presented with a severe ischemic stroke and subsequently required CPR due to pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Following resuscitation, the patient developed a subcapsular hepatic hematoma, likely caused by the trauma of chest compressions. The patient also had a complex clinical course involving hemorrhagic conversion of the stroke and the need for anticoagulation due to bilateral pulmonary emboli, which further complicated the management of the hepatic hematoma. The identification of the hematoma was achieved through contrast-enhanced CT imaging after the patient exhibited worsening abdominal discomfort and signs of internal bleeding. The management focused on balancing the need for anticoagulation with the risks of further bleeding from the hematoma. A multidisciplinary approach was essential, involving close monitoring, potential surgical intervention, and careful adjustment of anticoagulant therapy. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing the potential for internal injuries following CPR, especially in patients requiring anticoagulation. Early detection through imaging and a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach are crucial in managing such complications and improving patient outcomes.

Impact of teaching on use of mechanical chest compression devices: a simulation-based trial

BACKGROUND

The use of mechanical chest compression devices on patients in cardiac arrest has not shown benefits in previous trials. This is surprising, given that these devices can deliver consistently high-quality chest compressions without interruption. It is possible that this discrepancy is due to the no-flow time (NFT) during the application of the device. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate a reduction in no-flow time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with mechanical chest compression devices following 10 min of structured training in novices.

METHODS

270 medical students were recruited for the study. The participants were divided as a convenience sample into two groups. Both groups were instructed in how to use the device according to the manufacturer's specifications. The control group trained in teams of three, according to their own needs, to familiarise themselves with the device. The intervention group received 10 min of structured team training, also in teams of three. The participants then had to go through a CPR scenario in an ad-hoc team of three, in order to evaluate the training effect.

RESULTS

The median NFT was 26.0 s (IQR: 20.0-30.0) in the intervention group and 37.0 s (IQR: 29.0-42.0) in the control group (p < 0.001). In a follow-up examination of the intervention group four months after the training, the NFT was 34.5 s (IQR: 24.0-45.8). This represented a significant deterioration (p = 0.015) and was at the same level as the control group immediately after training (p = 0.650). The position of the compression stamp did not differ significantly between the groups. Groups that lifted the manikin to position the backboard achieved an NFT of 35.0 s (IQR: 27.5-42.0), compared to 41.0 s (IQR: 36.5-50.5) for the groups that turned the manikin to the side (p = 0.074).

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation-based study demonstrated that structured training can significantly reduce the no-flow time when using mechanical resuscitation devices, even in ad-hoc teams. However, this benefit seems to be short-lived: after four months no effect could be detected.