Sclérodermie systémique

Perception of aesthetic impairment in patients with systemic sclerosis determined using a semi-quantitative scale and its association with disease characteristics

Background

Systemic sclerosis is a fibrotic disease. Body image assessments could be key in optimizing care; however, data are scarce. The main objective was to assess the perception of aesthetic impairment using a visual aesthetic evaluation scale in patients with systemic sclerosis compared with healthy subjects. The secondary objectives were to assess associations between the perception of aesthetic impairment and scores on standardized questionnaires for aesthetic impairment as well as clinical, psychological/quality of life, and functional parameters of patients with systemic sclerosis.

Methods

This study evaluated and compared the perception of aesthetic impairment in two populations: patients with systemic sclerosis from a referral center at Lille Hospital, France, and healthy controls.

Results

This study included 88 patients (69 (78.4%) women) with a median age of 52 years and 88 controls (49 (55.7%) women) with a median age of 45 years. The perception of aesthetic impairment assessed using the aesthetic evaluation scale was poorer in systemic sclerosis patients than in controls (3.7 ± 0.3 vs 2.8 ± 0.3, p = 0.028) and was statistically correlated with assessments using the adapted satisfaction with appearance, a specific aesthetic impact assessment questionnaire for patients with systemic sclerosis. Patients with anxiety or depressive symptoms had significantly higher aesthetic evaluation scale scores. Systemic sclerosis patients with facial involvement and pitting scars had a worse perception of aesthetic impairment. Compared with healthy controls, systemic sclerosis patients had a worse perception of aesthetic impairment, especially systemic sclerosis patients with anxiety or depression and those with facial and hand involvement.

Conclusion

The aesthetic evaluation scale appears to be an easy-to-use tool to evaluate body image. Correlations of the aesthetic evaluation scale score with psychological and quality of life parameters reflect the importance of these parameters for body image evaluation and its complex assessment.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial NCT03271320 (Registered 9 January 2017, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03271320?term=NCT03271320&cntry=FR&draw=2&rank=1).

[Erasmus' syndrome with pseudo-tumour masses]

INTRODUCTION

Erasmus' syndrome involves the association of systemic scleroderma (SS) and exposure to silica. Silicosis may precede the SS but the latter may be the presentation, in which case a history of exposure to silica should be sought as part of the diagnosis.

CASE REPORT

A 46-year-old man with history of pulmonary tuberculosis presented with dyspnoea and dysphagea. Clinical examination revealed thickening of the facial skin with a pointed nose, erythema and telangiectasia, Raynaud's syndrome and sclerodactyly. A thoracic CT scan revealed bilateral, fibrotic, pseudo-tumoural masses. Antinuclear antibodies, anti-topoisomerase 1 and antihistone were positive.

CONCLUSION

The clinical presentation of Erasmus' syndrome associating systemic scleroderma and pulmonary pseudo-tumours may pose a problem of differential diagnosis from lung cancer. This condition requires regular clinical and radiological monitoring, particularly as both scleroderma and silicosis increase the risk of lung cancer.