Post-concussion syndrome: Still forgotten? From the disappearance of the DSM-5 to a multidisciplinary consultation

Efficacy of biomarkers and imaging techniques for the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury: challenges and opportunities

Concussion is a pervasive health issue in the present day. Increased prevalence in recent years has indicated a need to improve the current understanding of minor traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Effort has been devoted to understanding the underlying pathophysiology of TBIs, but some mechanisms remain unknown. Potentially lethal secondary effects of concussion include second impact syndrome and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), introducing long-term considerations for the management of mTBI. Post-concussion syndrome is another long-term consequence of concussion and may be influenced by both neuroinflammation and hormonal imbalances resulting from head trauma. Genetically mutated apolipoprotein E may also contribute to the severity and persistence of concussion symptoms, perhaps even acting as a risk factor for CTE. As it stands, the diagnosis of concussion is nuanced, depending primarily on subjective diagnostic tools that incorporate patient-reported symptoms and neurocognitive tests. Diagnostic tools provide some assistance in concussion diagnosis, but still lack accuracy and inherently leave room for uncertainty. To mitigate some of this uncertainty, considerable research has been devoted to the development of methods to diagnose concussions objectively. Biomarkers such as S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light protein (Nf-L), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and microRNAs (miRNAs) as well as imaging techniques including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and blood-oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-fMRI) show great promise in this regard. This review aims to compile the relevant literature in these areas in the hopes of being used as a reference point for future research regarding concussions.

Advancements in diagnosing Post-concussion Syndrome: insights into epidemiology, pathophysiology, neuropathology, neuroimaging, and salivary biomarkers

Post-Concussion Syndrome (PCS) represents a complex constellation of symptoms that persist following a concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), with significant implications for patient care and outcomes. Despite its prevalence, diagnosing PCS presents considerable challenges due to the subjective nature of symptoms, the absence of specific diagnostic tests, and the overlap with other neurological and psychiatric conditions. This review explores the multifaceted diagnostic challenges associated with PCS, including the heterogeneity of symptom presentation, the limitations of current neuroimaging techniques, and the overlap of PCS symptoms with other disorders. We also discuss the potential of emerging biomarkers and advanced imaging modalities to enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide a more objective basis for PCS identification. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the diagnosis and management of PCS, integrating clinical evaluation with innovative diagnostic tools to improve patient outcomes. Through a comprehensive analysis of current practices and future directions, this review aims to shed light on the complexities of PCS diagnosis and pave the way for improved strategies in the identification and treatment of this condition.

What traditional neuropsychological assessment got wrong about mild traumatic brain injury. II: limitations in test development, research design, statistical and psychometric issues

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

This is Part II of a four-part opinion review on traditional neuropsychological assessment methods and findings associated with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This Part II review focuses on historical, psychometric and statistical issues involving traditional neuropsychological methods that have been used in neuropsychological outcome studies of mTBI, but demonstrates the critical limitations of traditional methods.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This is an opinion review.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Traditional neuropsychological tests are dated and lack specificity in evaluating such a heterogenous and complex injury as occurs with mTBI.

MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS

In this review, we demonstrate traditional neuropsychological methods were never developed as standalone measures for detecting subtle changes in neurocognitive or neurobehavioral functioning and likewise, never designed to address the multifaceted issues related to underlying mTBI neuropathology symptom burden from having sustained a concussive brain injury.

CONCLUSIONS

For neuropsychological assessment to continue to contribute to clinical practice and outcome literature involving mTBI, major innovative changes are needed that will likely require technological advances of novel assessment techniques more specifically directed to evaluating the mTBI patient. These will be discussed in Part IV.

Conservative Management of Acute Sports-Related Concussions: A Narrative Review

This review explores the application of the conservative management model for pain to sports-related concussions (SRCs), framing concussions as a distinct form of pain syndrome with a pathophysiological foundation in central sensitization. Drawing parallels with proven pain management models, we underscore the significance of a proactive approach to concussion management. Recognizing concussions as a pain syndrome allows for the tailoring of interventions in alignment with conservative principles. This review first covers the epidemiology and controversies surrounding prolonged concussion recovery and persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). Next, the pathophysiology of concussions is presented within the central sensitization framework, emphasizing the need for early intervention to mitigate the neuroplastic changes that lead to heightened pain sensitivity. Five components of the central sensitization process specific to concussion injuries are highlighted as targets for conservative interventions in the acute period: peripheral sensitization, cerebral metabolic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, glymphatic system dysfunction, and pain catastrophizing. These proactive interventions are emphasized as pivotal in accelerating concussion recovery and reducing the risk of prolonged symptoms and PPCS, in line with the philosophy of conservative management.