[Effect of different propranolol doses on skeletal structural and mechanic efficiency in an animal model of growth retardation]

Mechanical mandible competence in rats with nutritional growth retardation

OBJECTIVE

In order to provide a better understanding of the sympathetic nervous system as a negative regulator of bone status, the aim of the study was to establish the biomechanical mandible response to different doses of a β-adrenergic antagonist such as propranolol (P) in a stress-induced food restriction model of growth retardation.

METHODS

Rats were assigned to eight groups: Control (C), C+P3.5 (CP3.5), C+P7 (CP7), C+P14 (CP14), NGR, NGR+P3.5 (NGRP3.5), NGR+P7 (NGRP7) and NGR+P14 (NGRP14). C, CP3.5, CP7 and CP14 rats were freely fed with the standard diet. NGR, NGRP3.5, NGRP7 and NGRP14 rats received, for 4 weeks (W4), 80% of the amount of controls food consumed. Propranolol 3.5, 7 and 14mg/kg/day was injected ip 5days per week in CP3.5 and NGRP3.5, CP7 and NGRP7, CP14 and NGRP14, respectively. At W4, zoometry, mandible morphometry, static histomorphometric and biomechanical competence were performed.

RESULTS

A dose of Propranolol 7mg/kg/day induced interradicular bone volume accretion reaching a mandible stiffness according to chronological age.

CONCLUSION

These findings evidenced that sympathetic nervous system activity is a negative regulator of mandible mechanical competence in the nutritional growth retardation model. Propranolol 7mg/kg/day, under the regimen usage, seems to be appropriate to blockade SNS activity on mandible mechanical performance in NGR rats, probably associated to an effect on bone mechanostat system ability to detect disuse mode as an error.

The combination therapy with zoledronic Acid and propranolol improves the trabecular microarchitecture and mechanical property in an rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis

We conducted the present study to investigate the therapeutic effects of propranolol (PRO), alone and in combination with the antiresorptive agent ZOL, in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Female Wistar rats were OVX or sham-operated at 3 months of age. Twelve weeks after surgery, rats were randomized into six groups: (1) sham + vehicle, (2) OVX + vehicle, (3) OVX + ZOL (100  μ g/kg, i.v. single dose), (4) OVX + ZOL (50  μ g/kg, i.v. single dose), (5) OVX + PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week), and (6) OVX + ZOL (50  μ g/kg, i.v. single dose) + PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week) for 12 weeks. At the end of treatment study, various bone parameters were evaluated. With respect to improvement in the mechanical strength of the lumbar spine and the femoral mid-shaft, the combination treatment of ZOL and PRO was more effective than each drug administered as a monotherapy. Moreover, combination therapy using ZOL and PRO preserved the trabecular microarchitecture better than single-drug therapy using ZOL or PRO in OVX rats. These data suggest that combination therapy with ZOL plus PRO represents a potentially useful therapeutic option for patients with osteoporosis.

Prophylactic Effects of Propranolol versus the Standard Therapy on a New Model of Disuse Osteoporosis in Rats

Disuse by bed rest, limb immobilization, or space flight causes rapid bone loss by arresting bone formation and accelerating bone resorption. Propranolol (a non-selective β-adrenergic antagonist) has been shown to improve bone properties by increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption in an ovariectomy-induced rat model. However, no studies have yet compared the osteoprotective properties of propranolol with well-accepted therapeutic interventions for the treatment and prevention of immobilization/disuse osteoporosis. To clarify this, we investigated the effects of propranolol compared with zoledronic acid and alfacalcidol in a new animal model of immobilization/disuse osteoporosis. Three-month-old male Wistar rats were divided into five groups with six animals in each group: (1) immobilized (IMM) control; (2) normal control; (3) IMM + zoledronic acid (50 μg/kg, intravenous single dose); (4) IMM + alfacalcidol (0.5 μg/kg, per oral daily); (5) IMM + propranolol (0.1 mg/kg, subcutaneously 5 days/week) for 10 weeks. In groups 1 and 3-5, the right hindlimb was immobilized. At the end of treatment, the femurs were removed and tested for bone porosity, bone mechanical properties, and cortical microarchitecture. Treatment with propranolol induced greater reductions in the bone porosity of the right femur and improved the mechanical properties of the femoral mid-shaft femur in comparison to the IMM control. Moreover, treatment with propranolol also improved the microarchitecture of cortical bones when compared with the IMM control, as indicated by scanning electron microscopy. The anti-osteoporotic property of propranolol was comparable with zoledronic acid and alfacalcidol. This study shows that the bone resorption induced by immobilization/disuse in rats can be suppressed by treatment with propranolol.

Beta Blockade Protection of Bone Marrow Following Injury: A Critical Link between Heart Rate and Immunomodulation

Introduction

Severe trauma induces a profound elevation of catecholamines that is associated with bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) colony growth suppression, excessive BM HPC mobilization, and a persistent anemia. Previously, propranolol (BB) use after injury and shock has been shown to prevent this BM dysfunction and improve hemoglobin levels. This study seeks to further investigate the optimal therapeutic dose and timing of BB administration following injury and shock.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to a combined lung contusion (LC), hemorrhagic shock (HS) model ± BB. In our dose response experiments, animals received BB at 1, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg immediately following resuscitation. In our therapeutic window experiments, following LCHS rats were given BB immediately, 1 hour, or 3 hours following resuscitation. BM and peripheral blood (PB) were collected in all animals to measure cellularity, BM HPC growth, circulating HPCs, and plasma G-CSF levels.

Results

Propranolol at 5 and 10 mg/kg significantly reduced HPC mobilization, restored BM cellularity and BM HPC growth, and decreased plasma G-CSF levels. Propranolol at 5 and 10 mg/kg also significantly decreased heart rate. When BB was administered beyond 1 hour after LCHS, its protective effects on cellularity, BM HPC growth, HPC mobilization, and plasma G-CSF levels were greatly diminished.

Conclusion

Early Buse following injury and shock at a dose of at least 5mg/kg is required to maintain BM cellularity and HPC growth, prevent HPC mobilization, and reduce plasma G-CSF levels. This suggests that propranolol exerts its BM protective effect in a dose and time dependent fashion in a rodent model. Finally, heart rate may be a valuable clinical marker to assess effective dosing of propranolol.