Verification of the association between cognitive decline and olfactory dysfunction using a DEmentia screening kit in subjects with Alzheimer's dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and normal cognitive function (DESK study): A multicenter, open-label, interventional study

Diagnostic value of olfactory function testing for Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is clinically classified into prodromal (asymptomatic), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, and dementia due to AD. This study investigates the diagnostic value of olfactory function testing for AD and MCI.

Methods

Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were conducted up to February 1, 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Effect sizes were combined using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method), and statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 15.1 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software.

Results

Twenty-five studies with 13,611 participants were included. For diagnosing AD, combined sensitivity (SE) was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85), specificity (SP) was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84), and AUC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88). For MCI, SE was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.78), SP was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), and AUC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84). Combined SE and SP for diagnosing AD and MCI were 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82). SE and SP for AD or MCI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.36-0.98) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98), with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that olfactory function testing, as a simple, non-invasive, and cost-effective assessment method, demonstrates high diagnostic efficacy in the early identification of AD and MCI, showing promising clinical application.

Systematic review registration

CRD42024520871.

Association of olfactory and cognitive function test scores with hippocampal and amygdalar grey matter volume: a cross-sectional study

Few population-based studies including younger adults have examined the potential of olfactory function tests to capture the degree of atrophy in memory-associated brain regions, which cannot be adequately explained by cognitive function tests screening for cognitive impairment. This population-based study investigated associations between high-resolution olfactory test data with few odours and grey matter volumes (GMVs) of the left and right hippocampi, amygdala, parahippocampi, and olfactory cortex, while accounting for differences in cognitive decline, in 1444 participants (aged 31-91 years). Regression analyses included intracranial volume (ICV)-normalised GMVs of eight memory-related regions as objective variables and age, sex, education duration, smoking history, olfaction test score, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version (MoCA-J) score as explanatory variables. Significant relationships were found between olfactory test scores and ICV-normalised GMVs of the left and right hippocampi and left amygdala (p = 0.020, 0.024, and 0.028, respectively), adjusting for the MoCA-J score. The olfactory test score was significantly related to the right amygdalar GMV (p = 0.020) in older adults (age ≥ 65 years). These associations remained significant after applying Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction (false discovery rate < 0.1). Therefore, olfactory and cognitive function tests may efficiently capture the degree of atrophy in the hippocampi and amygdala, especially in older adults.

The role of olfactory dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This comprehensive meta-analysis investigates the association between olfactory deficits in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

A thorough search across databases identified articles analyzing olfactory status in MCI or AD patients. Methodological quality assessment followed PRISMA guidelines. Hedges' g effect size statistic computed standard mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Moderator analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Among the included studies (65 for MCI and 61 for AD), odor identification exhibited larger effect sizes compared to odor threshold and discrimination, in both MCI and AD samples. Moderate effect size is found in OI scores in MCI (k = 65, SE = 0.078, CI 95% = [-1.151, -0.844]). Furthermore, compared to MCI, AD had moderate to large heterogeneous effects in olfactory identification (k = 61, g = -2.062, SE = 0.125, CI 95% = [-2.308, -1.816]). Global cognitive status is positively related to olfactory identification impairment in both MCI (k = 57, Z = 2.74, p = 0.006) and AD (k = 53, Z = 5.03, p < 0.0001) samples.

CONCLUSION

Olfactory impairments exhibit a notable and substantial presence in MCI. Among these impairments, odor identification experiences the greatest decline in MCI, mirroring the primary sensory deficit observed in AD. Consequently, the incorporation of a straightforward odor identification test is advisable in the evaluation of individuals vulnerable to the onset of AD, offering a practical screening tool for early detection.

Valid olfactory impairment tests can help identify mild cognitive impairment: an updated meta-analysis

Background

Olfactory testing is emerging as a potentially effective screening method for identifying mild cognitive impairment in the elderly population.

Objective

Olfactory impairment is comorbid with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults but is not well-documented in subdomains of either olfactory or subtypes of cognitive impairments in older adults. This meta-analysis was aimed at synthesizing the differentiated relationships with updated studies.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in seven databases from their availability to April 2023. A total of 38 publications were included, including 3,828 MCI patients and 8,160 healthy older adults. Two investigators independently performed the literature review, quality assessment, and data extraction. The meta-analyses were conducted with Stata to estimate the average effects and causes of the heterogeneity.

Results

Compared to normal adults, MCI patients had severe impairments in olfactory function and severe deficits in specific domains of odor identification and discrimination. Olfactory impairment was more severe in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment than in patients with non-amnestic MCI. Diverse test instruments of olfactory function caused large heterogeneity in effect sizes.

Conclusion

Valid olfactory tests can be complementary tools for accurate screening of MCI in older adults.

The Association of Allergy-Related and Non-Allergy-Related Olfactory Impairment with Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Two Cross- Sectional Studies

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the association of Olfactory Impairment (OI) with age-related cognitive decline is inconclusive, and the potential influence of allergy remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the cross-sectional associations of allergy-related and non-allergy- related OI to cognitive function.

METHODS

We included 2,499 participants from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS)-Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) sub-study and 1,086 participants from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA)-HCAP. The Olfactory Function Field Exam (OFFE) using Sniffin' Stick odor pens was used to objectively assess olfactory function and an olfactory score <6/11 indicated OI. Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) was used to assess global cognitive function and define cognitive impairment (<24/30). A neuropsychologic battery was used to assess five cognitive domains.

RESULTS

Compared to non-OI participants, individuals with OI had lower MMSE z-score [βHRS = -0.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.41 to -0.24; βELSA = -0.31, -0.43 to -0.18] and higher prevalence of cognitive impairment (Prevalence Ratio (PR)HRS = 1.46, 1.06 to 2.01; PRELSA = 1.63, 1.26 to 2.11). The associations were stronger for non-allergy-related OI (βHRS = -0.36; βELSA = -0.34) than for allergy-related OI (βHRS = -0.26; βELSA = 0.13). Similar associations were observed with domain- specific cognitive function measures.

CONCLUSION

OI, particularly non-allergy-related OI, was related to poorer cognitive function in older adults. Although the current cross-sectional study is subject to several limitations, such as reverse causality and residual confounding, the findings will provide insights into the OI-cognition association and enlighten future attention to non-allergy-related OI for the prevention of potential cognitive impairment.