Attenuation of bacterial hazard indicators in the subsurface of an informal settlement and their application in quantitative microbial risk assessment

Activated carbon amendment of sand in the base of a permeable pavement reduces total nitrogen and nitrate leaching

Urban runoff from impermeable surfaces contains various pollutants. Stormwater samples were collected for one year from car parks on the campus of Newcastle University, located in northeast England, to monitor seasonal variation in stormwater properties and leachate quality following stormwater percolation through pilot-scale, outdoor permeable pavements. The pilot study compared an innovative 'pollution munching' permeable pavement with 2 % activated carbon (AC) amendment in the sand base with a conventional, un-amended sand base permeable pavement. Faecal coliforms were detected in stormwater at an average value of 3.75 ± 0.79 log10 CFUs per 100 mL. The permeable pavements without and with AC had mean log removal values of 0.81 ± 0.35 and 0.70 ± 0.35 for these faecal bacteria. The absence of genetic markers for human host associated Bacteroides (HF183) in eleven out of twelve stormwater samples showed that the faecal bacteria were mainly from animal sources. 16S rRNA gene sequencing results confirmed the presence of nitrifying bacteria from the genera Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter, Nitrosococcus, Nitrospira, and Nitrosospira in stormwater. Nitrification and nitrate leaching was more notable for the conventional permeable pavement and may pose a groundwater pollution risk. Two percent AC amendment of the sand base reduced nitrate and total nitrogen leaching significantly compared with the conventional permeable pavement, by 57 ± 15 % and 40 ± 20 %, respectively. The AC amendment also resulted in significantly reduced Cu and DOC leaching, and lesser accumulation of PAHs by passive samplers embedded in the permeable pavement base. Hydraulic tests showed that the AC amended base layer still met the design specifications for permeable pavements, making it a promising proposition for pollution reduction in Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Fixed-bed biofilter for polluted surface water treatment using chitosan impregnated-coconut husk biochar

Pelletizing biochar enables its use as a biofilter medium for polluted canal water treatment. Coconut husk biochar pellets and their modification with chitosan (CHC) were compared with conventional activated carbon pellets and gravel. The biofilter columns with these media were operated with a hydraulic loading rate of 0.1 m3/m2∙h. CHC showed the highest potential to reduce phosphate and nitrogen, via the adsorption process in the first week of filtration and later enhanced by biodegradation, to achieve removal efficiencies of 61.70 and 54.37% for these two key nutrients, respectively, over five weeks of biofilter operation. The predominant bacteria in the biofilter communities were characterized at the end of the experiments by next generation sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. The biofilter communities included ammonium oxidizing, nitrite oxidizing, denitrifying, polyphosphate accumulating and denitrifying phosphate-accumulating bacteria that benefit nutrient removal. The CHC biofilter also effectively removed micropollutants, including pharmaceuticals.

The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: A sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot?

Pit latrines are widely promoted to improve sanitation in low-income settings, but their pollution and health risks receive cursory attention. The present narrative review presents the pit latrine paradox; (1) the pit latrine is considered a sanitation technology of choice to safeguard human health, and (2) conversely, pit latrines are pollution and health risk hotspots. Evidence shows that the pit latrine is a 'catch-all' receptacle for household disposal of hazardous waste, including; (1) medical wastes (COVID-19 PPE, pharmaceuticals, placenta, used condoms), (2) pesticides and pesticide containers, (3) menstrual hygiene wastes (e.g., sanitary pads), and (4) electronic wastes (batteries). Pit latrines serve as hotspot reservoirs that receive, harbour, and then transmit the following into the environment; (1) conventional contaminants (nitrates, phosphates, pesticides), (2) emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals and personal care products, antibiotic resistance), and (3) indicator organisms, and human bacterial and viral pathogens, and disease vectors (rodents, houseflies, bats). As greenhouse gas emission hotspots, pit latrines contribute 3.3 to 9.4 Tg/year of methane, but this could be an under-estimation. Contaminants in pit latrines may migrate into surface water, and groundwater systems serving as drinking water sources and pose human health risks. In turn, this culminates into the pit latrine-groundwater-human continuum or connectivity, mediated via water and contaminant migration. Human health risks of pit latrines, a critique of current evidence, and current and emerging mitigation measures are presented, including isolation distance, hydraulic liners/ barriers, ecological sanitation, and the concept of a circular bioeconomy. Finally, future research directions on the epidemiology and fate of contaminants in pit latrines are presented. The pit latrine paradox is not meant to downplay pit latrines' role or promote open defaecation. Rather, it seeks to stimulate discussion and research to refine the technology to enhance its functionality while mitigating pollution and health risks.