Treatment and course of different subtypes of status epilepticus

Trends and Differences in Status Epilepticus Treatment of Children and Adults Over 10 Years: A Comparative Study of Medical Records (2012-2021) from a University Hospital in Germany

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in status epilepticus (SE) management, influenced by landmark trials such as ESETT and RAMPART. The objectives of this study were to explore the evolution of drug treatments for patients with SE, to investigate its association with outcomes and mortality, and to evaluate differences in treatment patterns between adults and children for a potential shift in medication trends due to the above mentioned trials.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with SE treated at University Hospital Frankfurt between 2012 and 2021 were evaluated for medication trends and outcomes. Children and adults were analyzed separately and jointly.

RESULTS

This study included 1151 SE episodes in 1021 patients (mean age = 53.3 ± 28.3 years; 52.5 % female [n = 533]). The overall percentage of patients with SE treated prehospital was stable over the last decade. More than half (53.6 %) of children were treated prehospital, compared with less than one-third (26.7 %) of adults. Prehospital midazolam use increased over time, while diazepam use decreased. Lorazepam was the most commonly used benzodiazepine in hospitals in 2012-2013, used in 40.8 % of all episodes. However, its use declined to 27.2 % in 2020-2021, while midazolam use increased to 44.0 %. While the use of older antiseizure medications (ASMs) such as phenobarbital (p = 0.02), phenytoin (p < 0.001), and valproate (p < 0.001) decreased, the use of newer ASMs such as levetiracetam and lacosamide significantly increased (p < 0.001). Propofol and continuous midazolam infusion remained the most used third-line therapy drugs. Overall mortality was 16.5 % at discharge and 18.9 % at 30 days. Mortality rates did not change between 2012 and 2021.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam has become the preferred benzodiazepine in pre- and in-hospital settings, both in children and adults. The same applies to the increased use of levetiracetam and lacosamide over time in children and adults, while phenobarbital, phenytoin, and valproate use decreased. Continuous midazolam infusion and propofol remain the most frequently used anesthetic drugs. Mortality and outcome remain stable despite changes in medication patterns.

Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus

Background

In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset.

Results

We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552–8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221–7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280–2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184–2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts.

Conclusions

Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y.

Reponse of second-line treatment in focal status epilepticus: A tertiary hospital experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response to various antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the treatment of focal status epilepticus (SE) in the established phase, and the effect of administering several ASMs prior to sedation.

METHODS

All SE cases in patients aged > 16 years treated with non-BZDs ASMs were prospectively collected in our centre from February 2011 to April 2019. In total, 281 episodes were analysed.

RESULTS

Median age at SE onset was 65.1 years; 47 % were focal motor and 53 % focal non-motor episodes. SE cessation was achieved in 79 % episodes with second-line drugs, whereas a third line (anesthetics) was required in 47 episodes. SE cessation was achieved in only 27 % with the first ASM, 48 % with the second, and 51 % with the third. Prompt resolution of the SE episode with a first or second ASM was associated with a better outcome than episodes requiring a larger number of drugs (p = 0.024). The first option in our sample was levetiracetam in 70 % of cases. Among the total of non-responding SE cases treated with levetiracetam as the first ASM option, 107 were subsequently given lacosamide (seizure cessation in 53.3 %) and 34 valproic acid (seizure cessation in 29.4 %) (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Our findings further support the notion that early termination of SE with a first or second ASM confers a better functional outcome. The large difference in response between the first ASM and consecutive ones suggests that the sum of different ASMs might be the key to resolving focal SE.

Benzodiazepines in the Management of Seizures and Status Epilepticus: A Review of Routes of Delivery, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability

Status epilepticus (SE) is an acute, life-threatening medical condition that requires immediate, effective therapy. Therefore, the acute care of prolonged seizures and SE is a constant challenge for healthcare professionals, in both the pre-hospital and the in-hospital settings. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are the first-line treatment for SE worldwide due to their efficacy, tolerability, and rapid onset of action. Although all BZDs act as allosteric modulators at the inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)_A receptor, the individual agents have different efficacy profiles and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, some of which differ significantly. The conventional BZDs clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam and midazolam differ mainly in their durations of action and available routes of administration. In addition to the common intravenous, intramuscular and rectal administrations that have long been established in the acute treatment of SE, other administration routes for BZDs-such as intranasal administration-have been developed in recent years, with some preparations already commercially available. Most recently, the intrapulmonary administration of BZDs via an inhaler has been investigated. This narrative review provides an overview of the current knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of different BZDs, with a focus on different routes of administration and therapeutic specificities for different patient groups, and offers an outlook on potential future drug developments for the treatment of prolonged seizures and SE.

Therapy delay in status epilepticus extends its duration and worsens its prognosis

BACKGROUND

Timing in status epilepticus (SE) attention is probably the most relevant modifiable prognostic factor and may influence SE duration and prognosis. We aimed to describe the precise relationship between management timing, duration, and prognosis of SE.

METHODS

Observational longitudinal prospective study on a cohort of all patients diagnosed with SE admitted to our tertiary hospital from September 2017 to August 2019, with a 3-month follow-up. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify clinical and timing variables associated with SE duration and prognosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-three SE affecting 76 patients were included. Median age was 73 years, 61.4% were women, median baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 2, and 55.4% had prior epilepsy. In the out-of-hospital group (n = 50), median time to emergencies was 1.3 h and to hospital admission 2.8 h. In the global series, median time to neurologist was 4.3 h, and median time to therapy initiation was 4.5 h. These four times positively correlated with SE duration (all Spearman's rho coefficient >0.5, all p < .001). SE median duration was 24 h and was extended 1.2 h for each hour of treatment delay. A longer SE duration was associated with increased mortality and morbidity, both at hospital discharge and at 3-month follow-up (both p < .05). After 3 months, mortality was 30.1%, while recovery to baseline mRS occurred in 39.5%, with an overall median mRS of 4.

CONCLUSIONS

There were pervasive delays in all phases of SE attention, which conditioned a longer SE duration, and this led to increased long-term morbimortality.

Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee

Purpose:

Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE.

Methods:

A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process.

Results:

No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study).

Conclusions:

Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE.

Predictors of mortality at one year after generalized convulsive status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurologic emergency, which requires prompt medical treatment. Little is known of the long-term survival of SE. The aim of this study was to investigate which factors influence 90 days and 1-year mortality after SE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes all consecutive adult (>16 years) patients (N = 70) diagnosed with generalized convulsive SE (GCSE) in Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) emergency department (ED) over 2 years. We defined specific factors including patient demographics, GCSE characteristics, treatment, complications, delays in treatment, and outcome at hospital discharge and determined their relation to 90 days and 1-year mortality after GCSE by using logistic regression models. Survival analyses at 1 year after GCSE were performed with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 7.1%. Mortality rate was 14.3% at 90 days and 24.3% at 1 year after GCSE. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, Status Epilepticus Severity Score > 4 (STESS) (ODDS = 7.30, p = 0.012), worse-than-baseline condition at hospital discharge (ODDS = 3.5, p = 0.006), long delays in attaining seizure freedom (ODDS = 2.2, p = 0.041), and consciousness (ODDS = 3.4, p = 0.014) were risk factors for mortality at 90 days whereas epilepsy (ODDS = 0.2, p = 0.014) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) >3 at hospital discharge (ODDS = 0.05, p = 0.006) were protective factors. Risk factors for mortality at 1 year were STESS >4 (ODDS = 5.1, p = 0.028), use of vasopressors (ODDS = 8.2, p = 0.049), and worse-than-baseline condition at discharge (ODDS = 7.8, p = 0.010) while GOS >3 (ODDS = 0.2, p = 0.005) was protective. The univariate survival analysis at 1 year confirmed the significant findings regarding parameters STESS >4 (Hazard ratio (HR) = 4.1, p = 0.009), worse-than-baseline condition (HR = 6.2, p = 0.015), GOS >3 (HR = 0.2, p = 0.004) at hospital discharge and epilepsy (HR = 0.4, p = 0.044). Additionally, diagnostic delay over 6 h (HR = 3.8, p = 0.022) and Complication Burden Index (CBI) as an ordinal variable (0-2, 3-6, >6) (HR = 2.7, p = 0.027) were predictive for mortality. In the multivariate survival analysis, STESS > 4 (HR = 5.1, p = 0.007), CBI (HR = 3.2, p = 0.025, ordinal variable), diagnostic delay over 6 h (HR = 7.2, p = 0.003), and worse-than-baseline condition at hospital discharge (HR = 5.8, p = 0.027) were all independent risk factors for mortality at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe form of SE, delayed recognition of GCSE, high number of complications during treatment period, and poor condition at hospital discharge are all independent predictors of long-term mortality. Most of these factors are also associated with mortality at 90 days, though at that point, delays in treatment seem to have a greater impact on prognosis than at 1 year. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures.

Change in Mortality of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in High-Income Countries Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Since the late 1990s, a more aggressive management of prolonged convulsive seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes has been advocated.

Objective

To determine if convulsive SE mortality has decreased during a time of increasing advocacy for out-of-hospital treatment and escalating and earlier treatment protocols for prolonged seizures and SE.

Data Source

This systemic review and meta-analysis on studies focused on the mortality of convulsive status epilepticus was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2017.

Study Selection

Studies were excluded if they had fewer than 30 participants (<20 for refractory SE), were limited to SE of single specific etiology or an evaluation of a single treatment modality, or were studies of nonconvulsive SE.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were abstracted and their quality was assessed via a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale independently by 2 reviewers (A.N. and T.D.G.) using the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality or 30-day case fatality expressed as proportional mortality.

Results

Sixty-one studies were included in the analysis. The pooled mortality ratios were 15.9% (95% CI, 12.7-19.2) for adult studies, 13.0% (95% CI, 7.2-19.0) for all-age population studies, 3.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.2%) for pediatric studies, and 17.3% (95% CI, 9.8-24.7) for refractory SE studies, with very high between-study heterogeneity. We found no evidence of a change in prognosis over time nor by the definition of SE used.

Conclusions and Relevance

The mortality of convulsive SE is higher in adults than in children and there was no evidence for improved survival over time. Although there are many explanations for these findings, they can be explained by aetiology of SE being the major determinant of mortality. However, there are potential confounders, including differences in case ascertainment and study heterogeneity. This meta-analysis highlights the need for strict international guidelines for the study of this condition.

Focal status epilepticus: a review of pharmacological treatment

INTRODUCTION

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. One prognostic factor is the type of SE. The purpose of this review is to analyse the most recent recommendations of different scientific societies and expert groups on the treatment of SE, and the latest studies, to assess the literature on the management of focal SE.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for studies published between 1 August 2008 and 1 August 2018 on the pharmacological treatment of focal SE and its different types in adults.

RESULTS

We identified 29 publications among reviews, treatment guidelines, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and case series on the treatment of SE. Only 3 of them accounted for whether SE was focal or generalised; 4 focused exclusively on focal SE, and 7 differentiated between convulsive and non-convulsive SE and also record the presence of focal seizures. Treatment recommendations for focal SE do not differ from those of generalised SE in stages I and II: initially intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, if the intravenous route is available, and otherwise intramuscular midazolam, followed by intravenous phenytoin, valproate, levetiracetam, or lacosamide if seizures persist. Use of anaesthetic drugs should be delayed for as long as possible in patients with refractory focal SE.

CONCLUSIONS

The available scientific evidence is insufficient to claim that pharmacological treatment of focal SE should be different from treatment for generalised SE. More studies with a greater number of patients are needed.

Factors predicting cessation of status epilepticus in clinical practice: Data from a prospective observational registry (SENSE)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the initial termination rate of status epilepticus (SE) in a large observational study and explore associated variables.

METHODS

Data of adults treated for SE were collected prospectively in centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, during 4.5 years. Incident episodes of 1,049 patients were analyzed using uni- and multivariate statistics to determine factors predicting cessation of SE within 1 hour (for generalized convulsive SE [GCSE]) and 12 hours (for non-GCSE) of initiating treatment.

RESULTS

Median age at SE onset was 70 years; most frequent etiologies were remote (32%) and acute (31%). GCSE was documented in 43%. Median latency between SE onset and first treatment was 30 minutes in GCSE and 150 minutes in non-GCSE. The first intravenous compound was a benzodiazepine in 86% in GCSE and 73% in non-GCSE. Bolus doses of the first treatment step were lower than recommended by current guidelines in 76% of GCSE patients and 78% of non-GCSE patients. In 319 GCSE patients (70%), SE was ongoing 1 hour after initiating treatment and in 342 non-GCSE patients (58%) 12 hours after initiating treatment. Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that use of benzodiazepines as first treatment step and a higher cumulative dose of anticonvulsants within the first period of treatment were associated with shorter time to cessation of SE for both groups.

INTERPRETATION

In clinical practice, treatment guidelines were not followed in a substantial proportion of patients. This underdosing correlated with lack of cessation of SE. Our data suggest that sufficiently dosed benzodiazepines should be used as a first treatment step. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:421-432.

Timing is everything: Where status epilepticus treatment fails

Status epilepticus is an emergency; however, prompt treatment of patients with status epilepticus is challenging. Clinical trials, such as the ESETT (Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial), compare effectiveness of antiepileptic medications, and rigorous examination of effectiveness of care delivery is similarly warranted. We reviewed the medical literature on observed deviations from guidelines, clinical significance, and initiatives to improve timely treatment. We found pervasive, substantial gaps between recommended and "real-world" practice with regard to timing, dosing, and sequence of antiepileptic therapy. Applying quality improvement methodology at the institutional level can increase adherence to guidelines and may improve patient outcomes. Ann Neurol 2017;82:155-165.

The efficacy of different kinds of intravenously applied antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of status epilepticus. How can it be determined?

We explored the influence of four different efficacy criteria on the results of observational studies concerning the treatment of status epilepticus (SE) and its subtypes. We compared and contrasted the results of four different efficacy criteria for the effectiveness of phenytoin, valproate, levetiracetam, and lacosamide. Criterion 1=the last antiepileptic drug (AED) administered before SE termination. Criterion 2=the last drug introduced into the antiepileptic therapy within 72h before the cessation of SE and without changes in dosage or number of the co-medication. Criterion 3=the last drug introduced into the antiepileptic therapy or increased in dose within 24h before termination of the SE without changes in the co-medication. Criterion 4=the last drug introduced into the antiepileptic therapy within 72h before the cessation of SE even allowing changes in the co-medication. We used two-tailed χ²-tests with the Yates adjustment for small samples to evaluate statistical differences between efficacy rates of different AEDs in the entire group and in subgroups of SE according to the second level of subdivisions in axis 1 and according to axis 2 of the new ILAE classification. A total of 145 treatment episodes in 124 patients (47 male, 77 female) were evaluated. There were 23 significant differences in efficacy according to the different criteria. Only criteria 1 and 3 led to significant results in our analysis. When incorporating theoretical considerations and the results of this study, criterion 3 seems to be the most appropriate measure for the evaluation of efficacy of an AED in the treatment of SE, because it seems to be more reasonable than criterion 1.

[Can treatment with anesthetic anticonvulsive drugs worsen outcome in status epilepticus?]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nowadays, there is an ongoing discussion about the risks and benefits of anesthetic treatment concerning outcome in status epilepticus (SE). Therefore, we performed a retrospective database analysis to examine the influence of treatment with anesthetic drugs and narcosis in SE on mortality and disability.

METHODS

All treatment episodes of SE at the Department of Neurology of the University of Rostock between 01 January 2000 and 31 December 2009 were evaluated. SE severity before treatment, mortality, and disability at discharge were taken into account.

RESULTS

Of 167 treatment episodes of SE, 34 included treatment with anesthetic anticonvulsive drugs and narcosis. In the treatment episodes with use of anesthetic anticonvulsive drugs and narcosis, there was a more than twofold increased risk for death compared to the other treatment episodes. However, due to sample size this difference was not significant (p = 0.09). Cardiopulmonary complications were the cause of death in 4 of 5 patients dying during treatment episodes with anesthetic anticonvulsive drugs and narcosis. At discharge, disability as measured with the Modified Rankin Scale was higher in patients treated with anesthetic anticonvulsive drugs and narcosis than in the others (p = 0.03). A subgroup analysis revealed that especially in patients with nonconvulsive SE with impaired consciousness treatment with narcosis was associated with a higher rate of new deficits or mortality (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Especially when considering narcosis for treatment of nonconvulsive SE, risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. When treating SE with anesthetic drugs and narcosis, everything has to be done to avoid cardiopulmonary complications.

Latency to treatment of status epilepticus is associated with mortality and functional status

INTRODUCTION

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurologic emergency. Despite advances in management, in-hospital mortality remains unchanged. This is partly due to the pharmacoresistance which develops the longer that seizures persist. Therefore, rapid antiseizure medication (ASM) administration may represent a beneficial treatment option. The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) whether in-hospital mortality is reduced with shorter latencies to initial treatment of SE with an ASM (LTSE); and 2) the critical time frame during which LTSE is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of adults diagnosed with SE between 1/1/2005 and 10/31/2012. Demographic characteristics included seizure history, etiology, semiology, and duration. Subjects were assigned to LTSE groups at the time frames of 5, 10, 30 and 60min. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with poor functional status (mRS 3-6) as a secondary measure. Pearson's chi-square, Mann-Whitney-U, two-sample-t-tests, and binary logistic regression analysis were used as appropriate, with p<0.05.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analysis, LTSE>30min demonstrated increased risk of mortality (OR 2.06, CI 1.01-4.17, p=0.046) and poor functional status (OR 2.48, CI 1.05-5.85, p=0.038) compared to LTSE≤30min. Increased mortality risk remained after adjusting for SE duration (OR 2.07, CI 1.01-4.26, p=0.047) and nonconvulsive seizures (OR 2.28, CI 1.08-4.80, p=0.03). Compared to subjects treated within 60min, those treated after 60min were at increased risk of poor functional status, regardless of the presence of nonconvulsive seizures (OR 2.96, CI 1.14-7.73, p=0.026). In addition, when acute symptomatic SE was stratified by cardiac versus non-cardiac etiologies, subjects with non-cardiac acute symptomatic SE demonstrated worse functional outcome when treated after 60min (OR 7.20, CI 1.13-46.07, p=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of SE within 30min of onset is associated with reduced risk of in-hospital mortality and poor functional status, although this may be attenuated by acute symptomatic seizures related to cardiac arrest. This represents a therapeutic option which has the potential to benefit patient outcomes.

Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus

OPINION STATEMENT

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a medical emergency with an associated high mortality and morbidity. It is defined as a convulsive seizure lasting more than 5 min or consecutive seizures without recovery of consciousness. Successful management of CSE depends on rapid administration of adequate doses of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). The exact choice of AED is less important than rapid treatment and early consideration of reversible etiologies. Current guidelines recommend the use of benzodiazepines (BNZ) as first-line treatment in CSE. Midazolam is effective and safe in the pre-hospital or home setting when administered intramuscularly (best evidence), buccally, or nasally (the latter two possibly faster acting than intramuscular (IM) but with lower levels of evidence). Regular use of home rescue medications such as nasal/buccal midazolam by patients and caregivers for prolonged seizures and seizure clusters may prevent SE, prevent emergency room visits, improve quality of life, and lower health care costs. Traditionally, phenytoin is the preferred second-line agent in treating CSE, but it is limited by hypotension, potential arrhythmias, allergies, drug interactions, and problems from extravasation. Intravenous valproate is an effective and safe alternative to phenytoin. Valproate is loaded intravenously rapidly and more safely than phenytoin, has broad-spectrum efficacy, and fewer acute side effects. Levetiracetam and lacosamide are well tolerated intravenous (IV) AEDs with fewer interactions, allergies, and contraindications, making them potentially attractive as second- or third-line agents in treating CSE. However, data are limited on their efficacy in CSE. Ketamine is probably effective in treating refractory CSE (RCSE), and may warrant earlier use; this requires further study. CSE should be treated aggressively and quickly, with confirmation of treatment success with epileptiform electroencephalographic (EEG), as a transition to non-convulsive status epilepticus is common. If the patient is not fully awake, EEG should be continued for at least 24 h. How aggressively to treat refractory non-convulsive SE (NCSE) or intermittent non-convulsive seizures is less clear and requires additional study. Refractory SE (RSE) usually requires anesthetic doses of anti-seizure medications. If an auto-immune or paraneoplastic etiology is suspected or no etiology can be identified (as with cryptogenic new onset refractory status epilepticus, known as NORSE), early treatment with immuno-modulatory agents is now recommended by many experts.

Delays and Factors Related to Cessation of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Introduction. This study was designed to identify the delays and factors related to and predicting the cessation of generalized convulsive SE (GCSE). Methods. This retrospective study includes 70 consecutive patients (>16 years) diagnosed with GCSE and treated in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital over 2 years. We defined cessation of SE stepwise using clinical seizure freedom, achievement of burst-suppression, and return of consciousness as endpoints and calculated delays for these cessation markers. In addition 10 treatment delay parameters and 7 prognostic and GCSE episode related factors were defined. Multiple statistical analyses were performed on their relation to cessation markers. Results. Onset-to-second-stage-medication (p = 0.027), onset-to-burst-suppression (p = 0.005), and onset-to-clinical-seizure-freedom (p = 0.035) delays correlated with the onset-to-consciousness delay. We detected no correlation between age, epilepsy, STESS, prestatus period, type of SE onset, effect of the first medication, and cessation of SE. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that rapid administration of second-stage medication and early obtainment of clinical seizure freedom and burst-suppression predict early return of consciousness, an unambiguous marker for the end of SE. We propose that delays in treatment chain may be more significant determinants of SE cessation than the previously established outcome predictors. Thus, streamlining the treatment chain is advocated.

Single versus combinatorial therapies in status epilepticus: Novel data from preclinical models

Drug-refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is a major medical emergency with a mortality of up to 40% and the risk of severe long-term consequences. The mechanisms involved in RSE are incompletely understood. Animal models are important in developing treatment strategies for more effective termination of SE and prevention of its long-term outcomes. The pilocarpine and lithium-pilocarpine rat models are widely used in this respect. In these models, resistance to diazepam and other antiseizure drugs (ASDs) develops during SE so that an SE that is longer than 30 min is difficult to suppress. Furthermore, because all ASDs used in SE treatment are much more rapidly eliminated by rodents than by humans, SE recurs several hours after ASD treatment. Long-term consequences include hippocampal damage, behavioral alterations, and epilepsy with spontaneous recurrent seizures. In this review, different rational polytherapies for SE, which are more effective than monotherapies, are discussed, including a novel polytherapy recently developed by our group. Based on data from diverse seizure models, we hypothesized that cholinergic mechanisms are involved in the mechanisms underlying ASD resistance of SE. We, therefore, developed an intravenous drug cocktail, consisting of diazepam, phenobarbital, and the anticholinergic scopolamine. This drug combination irreversibly terminated SE when administered 60, 90, or 120 min after SE onset. The efficacy of this cocktail in terminating SE was comparable with the previously reported efficacy of polytherapies with the glutamate receptor antagonist ketamine. Furthermore, when injected 60 min after SE onset, the scopolamine-containing cocktail prevented development of epilepsy and hippocampal neurodegeneration, which was not observed with high doses of diazepam or a combination of phenobarbital and diazepam. Our data add to the existing preclinical evidence that rational polytherapy can be more effective than monotherapy in the treatment of SE and that combinatorial therapy may offer a clinically useful option for the treatment of RSE. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Practice variability and efficacy of clonazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam in status epilepticus: A multicenter comparison

OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines (BZD) are recommended as first-line treatment for status epilepticus (SE), with lorazepam (LZP) and midazolam (MDZ) being the most widely used drugs and part of current treatment guidelines. Clonazepam (CLZ) is also utilized in many countries; however, there is no systematic comparison of these agents for treatment of SE to date.

METHODS

We identified all patients treated with CLZ, LZP, or MDZ as a first-line agent from a prospectively collected observational cohort of adult patients treated for SE in four tertiary care centers. Relative efficacies of CLZ, LZP, and MDZ were compared by assessing the risk of developing refractory SE and the number of antiseizure drugs (ASDs) required to control SE.

RESULTS

Among 177 patients, 72 patients (40.62%) received CLZ, 82 patients (46.33%) LZP, and 23 (12.99%) MDZ; groups were similar in demographics and SE characteristics. Loading dose was considered insufficient in the majority of cases for LZP, with a similar rate (84%, 95%, and 87.5%) in the centers involved, and CLZ was used as recommended in 52% of patients. After adjustment for relevant variables, LZP was associated with an increased risk of refractoriness as compared to CLZ (odds ratio [OR] 6.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.66-15.5) and with an increased number of ASDs needed for SE control (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.8-10.49).

SIGNIFICANCE

CLZ seems to be an effective alternative to LZP and MDZ. LZP is frequently underdosed in this setting. These findings are highly relevant, since they may impact daily practice.

Efficacy of perampanel in refractory nonconvulsive status epilepticus and simple partial status epilepticus

We provide some evidence concerning the efficacy of perampanel (PER) in refractory status epilepticus (SE). We retroactively identified patients with SE treated in our department by searching for the term "status epilepticus" in the electronic archive of medical records. We present and analyze in this paper the subset of data of the patients treated with PER. We analyzed ten episodes of SE in nine patients. At the first administration, PER was given in a dosage of 6mg to most of our patients (7 of 10). On average, PER was administered as the 6th antiepileptic drug (AED) (range: 2-10). Depending on the criterion for efficacy, PER appears effective for the termination of SE in 2 to 6 (of 10) episodes. Unfortunately, safety data for the administration of PER with loading doses needed for the treatment of SE are lacking. Because of this, PER should be used very carefully in refractory SE and only after first-line treatment options have failed.