1
|
Shahpari M, Hajji M, Mirnajafi-Zadeh J, Setoodeh P. Modeling plasticity during epileptogenesis by long short term memory neural networks. Cogn Neurodyn 2021; 16:401-409. [PMID: 35401870 PMCID: PMC8934824 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-021-09698-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the pathogenesis of epilepsy including changes in synaptic pathways can improve our knowledge about epilepsy and development of new treatments. In this regard, data-driven models such as artificial neural networks, which are able to capture the effects of synaptic plasticity, can play an important role. This paper proposes long short term memory (LSTM) as the ideal architecture for modeling plasticity changes, and validates this proposal via experimental data. As a special class of recurrent neural networks (RNNs), LSTM is able to track information through time and control its flow via several gating mechanisms, which allow for maintaining the relevant and forgetting the irrelevant information. In our experiments, potentiation and depotentiation of motor circuit and perforant pathway as two forms of plasticity were respectively induced by kindled and kindled + transcranial magnetic stimulation of animal groups. In kindling, both procedure duration and gradual synaptic changes play critical roles. The stimulation of both groups continued for six days. Both after-discharge (AD) and seizure behavior as two biologically measurable effects of plasticity were recorded immediately post each stimulation. Three classes of artificial neural networks-LSTM, RNN, and feedforward neural network (FFNN)-were trained to predict AD and seizure behavior as indicators of plasticity during these six days. Results obtained from the collected data confirm the superiority of LSTM. For seizure behavior, the prediction accuracies achieved by these three models were 0.91 ± 0.01, 0.77 ± 0.02, and 0.59 ± 0.02%, respectively, and for AD, the prediction accuracies were 0.82 ± 0.01, 0.74 ± 0.08 and 0.42 ± 0.1, respectively.
Collapse
|
2
|
Khajei S, Mirnajafi-Zadeh J, Sheibani V, Ahmadi-Zeidabadi M, Masoumi-Ardakani Y, Rajizadeh MA, Esmaeilpour K. Electromagnetic field protects against cognitive and synaptic plasticity impairment induced by electrical kindling in rats. Brain Res Bull 2021; 171:75-83. [PMID: 33753209 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Kindling results in abnormal synaptic potentiation and significant impairment in learning and memory. Electromagnetic field (EMF) effects on learning and memory in kindled animals and its effects on hippocampal neural activity are largely unknown. In the current study, the effects of EMF on learning and memory, as well as hippocampal synaptic plasticity, in kindled rats were investigated. EMF (10 mT; 100 Hz) was applied to fully kindled animals one hour/day for a period of one week. The behavioral and electrophysiological studies were performed 24 h following the EMF application. The kindled rats showed spatial learning deficits during the training phase of the Morris water maze (MWM) test. Moreover, there were increments in escape latency and path length compared to the sham group. The kindled rats spent less time in the target-quadrant probe test, indicating spatial memory impairment. Applying EMF to the KEMF group (kindling + EMF) restored learning and memory, and decreased escape latency and path length significantly compared to the kindled group. EMF alone had no significant effects on the learning and memory parameters. Based on the open field (OF) test results, EMF alone in the EMF group, but not in the kindled or the KEMF groups, decreased the total traveled distance and increased the spent time in the peripheral zone, compared to the sham group. Based on electrophysiological results, applying EMF in the KEMF group returned the ability of synaptic potentiation to the hippocampal CA1 area and high-frequency stimulation induced long-term potentiation (LTP). Accordingly, EMF can be considered a potential therapy for seizure-induced deficits in learning and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Khajei
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Javad Mirnajafi-Zadeh
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vahid Sheibani
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Meysam Ahmadi-Zeidabadi
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Yaser Masoumi-Ardakani
- Physiology Research Center, Institute of Basic and Clinical Physiology Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Rajizadeh
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Khadijeh Esmaeilpour
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hamed SA. Cortical excitability in epilepsy and the impact of antiepileptic drugs: transcranial magnetic stimulation applications. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:707-723. [PMID: 3251028 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1780122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epileptic conditions are characterized by impaired cortical excitation/inhibition balance and interneuronal disinhibition. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a neurophysiological method that assesses brain excitation/inhibition. AREA COVERED This review was written after a detailed search in PubMed, EMBASE, ISI web of science, SciELO, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases from 1990 to 2020. It summarizes TMS applications for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in epilepsy. TMS studies help to distinguish different epilepsy conditions and explore the antiepileptic drugs' (AEDs') effects on neuronal microcircuits and plasticity mechanisms. Repetitive TMS studies showed that low-frequency rTMS (0.33-1 Hz) can reduce seizures' frequency in refractory epilepsy or pause ongoing seizures; however, there is no current approval for its use in such patients as adjunctive treatment to AEDs. EXPERT OPINION There are variable and conflicting TMS results which reflect the distinct pathogenic mechanisms of each epilepsy condition, the dynamic epileptogenic process over the long disease course resulting in the development of recurrent spontaneous seizures and/or progression of epilepsy after it is established, and the differential effect of AEDs on cortical excitability. Future epilepsy research should focus on combined TMS/functional connectivity studies that explore the complex cortical excitability circuits and networks using different TMS parameters and techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherifa Ahmed Hamed
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Assiut University Hospital , Assiut, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
San-Juan D, Dávila-Rodríguez DO, Jiménez CR, González MS, Carranza SM, Hernández Mendoza JR, Anschel DJ. Neuromodulation techniques for status epilepticus: A review. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:835-844. [PMID: 31053521 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are neuromodulation therapies that have been used to treat Status Epilepticus (SE). OBJECTIVE Review the literature about the efficacy and safety of neuromodulation therapies in SE in humans. METHODS We searched studies in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Science Direct (inception to June 2018). Four review authors independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, PRISMA guidelines, Oxford and GRADE scales, and Murad et al., 2018 methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. RESULTS We analyzed 27 articles (45 patients) with 4 different neuromodulation therapies. In ECT we found 80% rate of disruption of SE and 5% of adverse events was reported. Using iVNS 15/16 (93.7%) patients resolved the SE. All patients who underwent TMS and DBS aborted SE, however, 50% of patients with DBS had severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Case series and case reports suggest that neuromodulation therapies can abort SE in 80-100% of patients (Oxford scale and GRADE were level 4 and D) with a wide range of adverse effects, which claims for prospective studies on the relationship be-tween efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel San-Juan
- Neurophysiology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | | | - Christian Ramos Jiménez
- Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of State of Mexico, Toluca de Lerdo, State of Mexico, Mexico
| | | | | | - Jesús Ricardo Hernández Mendoza
- Faculty of Medicine Mexicali, Autonomous University of Baja California, Dr. Humberto Torres Sangines, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
| | - David J Anschel
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center of Long Island, Port Jefferson, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jalilifar M, Yadollahpour A, Moazedi AA, Ghotbeddin Z. Quantitative Analysis of the Antiepileptogenic Effects of Low Frequency Stimulation Applied Prior or After Kindling Stimulation in Rats. Front Physiol 2018; 9:711. [PMID: 29967583 PMCID: PMC6016317 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: Developing quantitative measures based on spectral analysis of electroencephalograph (EEG) recordings of neural activities plays an important role in developing efficient treatments for epilepsy. Such biomarkers can be used for developing open or closed loop approaches for seizure prediction or prevention. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate antiepileptogenic effects of low frequency stimulation (LFS) applied immediately before or after kindling stimulations using spectral power analysis of extracellular EEG in rat. Methods: Nineteen adult rats were used: seven for kindle, six for LFS+Kindle (LFSK) and six for Kindle+LFS (KLFS). Four packages of LFS (1Hz) were applied immediately before or after rapid kindling stimulations. The power spectral densities of afterdischarge (AD) sections of EEG corresponding to different stages of kindling for delta (0-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (12-28 Hz), gamma (28-40 Hz) sub-bands, and theta/alpha ratio were comparatively investigated. Moreover, correlation between AD duration (ADD) and its different frequency components was calculated. Results: Both LFSK and KLFS significantly increased delta and reduced beta and gamma oscillations, compared with kindle group. However, just the reduction in LFSK group was significant. Both protocols increased theta/alpha ratio, but just LFSK showed significant increase (p < 0.05). Although LFSK enhanced theta/alpha ratio more than KLFS, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, strong correlation between each frequency sub band and ADD was not observed in kindle and LFS treated groups (both LFSK and KLFS). Conclusion: Although behavioral assessments showed relatively the same level of antiepileptogenic effects for KLFS and LFSK, quantitative assessments showed more significant differences in the quantitative measures between the two protocols. Developing more quantitative EEG based measures correlated with LFS-induced effects can facilitate developing open or closed loop seizure prevention modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Jalilifar
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ali Yadollahpour
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ahmad Ali Moazedi
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Zohreh Ghotbeddin
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jalilifar M, Yadollahpour A. Dataset of quantitative spectral EEG of different stages of kindling acquisition in rats. Data Brief 2018; 16:239-243. [PMID: 29204468 PMCID: PMC5709293 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
7
|
Quantitative assessments of extracellular EEG to classify specific features of main phases of seizure acquisition based on kindling model in Rat. Neurosci Lett 2017; 656:144-151. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
8
|
Shin SS, Pelled G. Novel Neuromodulation Techniques to Assess Interhemispheric Communication in Neural Injury and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Neural Circuits 2017; 11:15. [PMID: 28337129 PMCID: PMC5343068 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2017.00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Interhemispheric interaction has a major role in various neurobehavioral functions. Its disruption is a major contributor to the pathological changes in the setting of brain injury such as traumatic brain injury, peripheral nerve injury, and stroke, as well as neurodegenerative diseases. Because interhemispheric interaction has a crucial role in functional consequence in these neuropathological states, a review of noninvasive and state-of-the-art molecular based neuromodulation methods that focus on or have the potential to elucidate interhemispheric interaction have been performed. This yielded approximately 170 relevant articles on human subjects or animal models. There has been a recent surge of reports on noninvasive methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Since these are noninvasive techniques with little to no side effects, their widespread use in clinical studies can be easily justified. The overview of novel neuromodulation methods and how they can be applied to study the role of interhemispheric communication in neural injury and neurodegenerative disease is provided. Additionally, the potential of each method in therapeutic use as well as investigating the pathophysiology of interhemispheric interaction in neurodegenerative diseases and brain injury is discussed. New technologies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation could have a great impact in understanding interhemispheric pathophysiology associated with acquired injury and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as designing improved rehabilitation therapies. Also, advances in molecular based neuromodulation techniques such as optogenetics and other chemical, thermal, and magnetic based methods provide new capabilities to stimulate or inhibit a specific brain location and a specific neuronal population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel S Shin
- F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA
| | - Galit Pelled
- F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Low Frequency Electrical Stimulation Either Prior to Or after Rapid Kindling Stimulation Inhibits the Kindling-Induced Epileptogenesis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:8623743. [PMID: 28373988 PMCID: PMC5360964 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8623743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2016] [Revised: 01/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Studies are ongoing to find appropriate low frequency stimulation (LFS) protocol for treatment of epilepsy. The present study aimed at assessing the antiepileptogenesis effects of LFS with the same protocol applied either just before or immediately after kindling stimulations. Method. This experimental animal study was conducted on adult Wistar rats (200 ± 20 g) randomly divided into kindle (n = 7), LFS + Kindle (n = 6), and Kindle + LFS groups (n = 6). All animals underwent rapid kindling procedure and four packages of LFS (1 Hz) with 5 min interval were applied either immediately before (LFS-K) or after kindling stimulation (K-LFS). The after discharge duration (ADD), daily stages of kindling, and kindling seizure stage and number of stimulations required to reach each stage were compared between the three groups using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc and one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. Results. LFS in both protocols significantly decreased the ADD (p < 0.05) and daily seizure stages (p < 0.05) and increased the number of stimulations required to achieve stage 3 and stages 4 and 5 of kindling compared with the kindle group (stage 2: p > 0.05, stages 3 to 5: p < 0.05). Conclusion. Although LFS-K showed more inhibiting effect than K-LFS, the difference was not statistically significant.
Collapse
|
10
|
Yadollahpour A, Hosseini SA, Shakeri A. rTMS for the Treatment of Depression: a Comprehensive Review of Effective Protocols on Right DLPFC. Int J Ment Health Addict 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s11469-016-9669-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
11
|
Klooster DCW, de Louw AJA, Aldenkamp AP, Besseling RMH, Mestrom RMC, Carrette S, Zinger S, Bergmans JWM, Mess WH, Vonck K, Carrette E, Breuer LEM, Bernas A, Tijhuis AG, Boon P. Technical aspects of neurostimulation: Focus on equipment, electric field modeling, and stimulation protocols. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016; 65:113-41. [PMID: 27021215 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Revised: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Neuromodulation is a field of science, medicine, and bioengineering that encompasses implantable and non-implantable technologies for the purpose of improving quality of life and functioning of humans. Brain neuromodulation involves different neurostimulation techniques: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), which are being used both to study their effects on cognitive brain functions and to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. The mechanisms of action of neurostimulation remain incompletely understood. Insight into the technical basis of neurostimulation might be a first step towards a more profound understanding of these mechanisms, which might lead to improved clinical outcome and therapeutic potential. This review provides an overview of the technical basis of neurostimulation focusing on the equipment, the present understanding of induced electric fields, and the stimulation protocols. The review is written from a technical perspective aimed at supporting the use of neurostimulation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C W Klooster
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - A J A de Louw
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - A P Aldenkamp
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - R M H Besseling
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - R M C Mestrom
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - S Carrette
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - S Zinger
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - J W M Bergmans
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - W H Mess
- Departments of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - K Vonck
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - E Carrette
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - L E M Breuer
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands.
| | - A Bernas
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - A G Tijhuis
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - P Boon
- Kempenhaeghe Academic Center for Epileptology, P.O. Box 61, 5590 AB Heeze, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Eindhoven, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Status Epilepticus. EPILEPSY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2015; 2015:678074. [PMID: 26682065 PMCID: PMC4670661 DOI: 10.1155/2015/678074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2015] [Revised: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background. Our goal was to perform a systematic review on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE). Methods. MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, Healthstar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov (inception to August 2015), and gray literature were searched. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using Oxford and GRADE methodology. Results. We identified 11 original articles. Twenty-one patients were described, with 13 adult and 8 pediatric. All studies were retrospective. Seizure reduction/control with rTMS occurred in 15 of the 21 patients (71.4%), with 5 (23.8%) and 10 (47.6%) displaying partial and complete responses, respectively. Seizures recurred after rTMS in 73.3% of the patients who had initially responded. All studies were an Oxford level 4, GRADE D level of evidence. Conclusions. Oxford level 4, GRADE D evidence exists to suggest a potential impact on seizure control with the use of rTMS for FSE and FRSE, though durability of the therapy is short-lived. Routine use of rTMS in this context cannot be recommended at this time. Further prospective study of this intervention is warranted.
Collapse
|
13
|
Moradi Chameh H, Janahmadi M, Semnanian S, Shojaei A, Mirnajafi-Zadeh J. Effect of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on kindling-induced changes in electrophysiological properties of rat CA1 pyramidal neurons. Brain Res 2015; 1606:34-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Revised: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
14
|
Shojaei A, Semnanian S, Janahmadi M, Moradi-Chameh H, Firoozabadi S, Mirnajafi-Zadeh J. Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation prevents kindling-induced changes in electrophysiological properties of rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neuroscience 2014; 280:181-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2014] [Revised: 09/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|