Quantitative analysis of double inversion recovery and FLAIR signals in temporal lobe epilepsy

Accurate lateralization and classification of MRI-negative 18F-FDG-PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy using double inversion recovery and machine-learning

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to determine the ability of double inversion recovery (DIR) data coupled with machine-learning algorithms to distinguish normal individuals from epileptic subjects and to identify the laterality of the focus side in MRI-negative, PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used whole-brain DIR data as the input features with which to train a linear support-vector machine model in 63 participants who underwent high-resolution structural MRI and DIR scans. The subjects included 20 left TLE patients, 19 right TLE patients, and 24 healthy controls (HCs).

RESULTS

Using the DIR data, we achieved a robust accuracy of 87.30% for discriminating among the left TLE, right TLE, and HC groups as well as 84.61%, 97.72%, and 93.02% prediction accuracies for distinguishing left TLE from right TLE, HC from right TLE, and HC from left TLE, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Our experimental results suggest that DIR data coupled with machine-learning algorithms provide a promising approach to identifying MRI-negative TLE patients, especially when fluorodeoxyglucose-PET is not available.

Making the Invisible Visible: Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques in Focal Epilepsy

It has been a clinically important, long-standing challenge to accurately localize epileptogenic focus in drug-resistant focal epilepsy because more intensive intervention to the detected focus, including resection neurosurgery, can provide significant seizure reduction. In addition to neurophysiological examinations, neuroimaging plays a crucial role in the detection of focus by providing morphological and neuroanatomical information. On the other hand, epileptogenic lesions in the brain may sometimes show only subtle or even invisible abnormalities on conventional MRI sequences, and thus, efforts have been made for better visualization and improved detection of the focus lesions. Recent advance in neuroimaging has been attracting attention because of the potentials to better visualize the epileptogenic lesions as well as provide novel information about the pathophysiology of epilepsy. While the progress of newer neuroimaging techniques, including the non-Gaussian diffusion model and arterial spin labeling, could non-invasively detect decreased neurite parameters or hypoperfusion within the focus lesions, advances in analytic technology may also provide usefulness for both focus detection and understanding of epilepsy. There has been an increasing number of clinical and experimental applications of machine learning and network analysis in the field of epilepsy. This review article will shed light on recent advances in neuroimaging for focal epilepsy, including both technical progress of images and newer analytical methodologies and discuss about the potential usefulness in clinical practice.

Neuroimaging and DNA Methylation: An Innovative Approach to Study the Effects of Early Life Stress on Developmental Plasticity

DNA methylation plays a key role in neural cell fate and provides a molecular link between early life stress and later-life behavioral phenotypes. Here, studies that combine neuroimaging methods and DNA methylation analysis in pediatric population with a history of adverse experiences were systematically reviewed focusing on: targeted genes and neural correlates; statistical models used to examine the link between DNA methylation and neuroimaging data also considering early life stress and behavioral outcomes. We identified 8 studies that report associations between DNA methylation and brain structure/functions in infants, school age children and adolescents faced with early life stress condition (e.g., preterm birth, childhood maltreatment, low socioeconomic status, and less-than optimal caregiving). Results showed that several genes were investigated (e.g., OXTR, SLC6A4, FKBP5, and BDNF) and different neuroimaging techniques were performed (MRI and f-NIRS). Statistical model used ranged from correlational to more complex moderated mediation models. Most of the studies (n = 5) considered DNA methylation and neural correlates as mediators in the relationship between early life stress and behavioral phenotypes. Understanding what role DNA methylation and neural correlates play in interaction with early life stress and behavioral outcomes is crucial to promote theory-driven studies as the future direction of this research fields.