Utility of Epinephrine Levels in Determining Adrenal Vein Cannulation During Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism

Enhanced CT-guided adrenal venous sampling versus traditional X-ray-guided adrenal venous sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism

To compare the accuracy, safety, operation time, and radiation dose of enhanced computed tomography (CT)-guided adrenal vein sampling (AVS) versus traditional X-ray-guided AVS in patients with primary aldosteronism. A total of 97 patients with primary aldosteronism were randomly assigned to either the enhanced CT-guided group (n = 48) or the traditional X-ray-guided group (n = 49). Baseline characteristics were compared between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was the accuracy of AVS, assessed by aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio. Secondary outcomes included safety measures (intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, procedure termination rates, blood pressure, and heart rate changes), operation time, and radiation dose. The CT-guided group demonstrated significantly higher aldosterone-to-cortisol ratios, indicating improved accuracy in AVS (P < .001). The CT-guided group also showed significantly lower intraoperative blood pressure change and intraoperative heart rate change compared to the X-ray-guided group (P < .05). In addition, the CT-guided group had significantly shorter operation times (P < .001) and lower radiation exposure (P < .001). The enhanced CT-guided AVS demonstrated significantly better accuracy, safety, and efficiency compared to traditional X-ray-guided AVS in patients with primary aldosteronism. The enhanced CT-guided approach also resulted in lower radiation exposure for patients, making it a favorable option in the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism.

Role of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Guiding Surgical Decision in Primary Aldosteronism

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is recommended for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA) to identify lateralized or bilateral sources of aldosterone excess, allowing for better decision-making in regard to medical or surgical management on a case-by-case basis. To date, no consensus exists on protocols to be used during AVS, especially concerning sampling techniques, the timing of sampling, and whether or not to use adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation. Interpretation criteria for selectivity, lateralization, and contralateral suppression vary from one expert center to another, with some favoring strict cut-offs to others being more permissive. Clinical and biochemical post-operative outcomes can also be influenced by AVS criteria utilized to indicate surgical therapy.In this review, we reanalyze studies on AVS highlighting the recent pathological findings of frequent micronodular hyperplasia adjacent to a dominant aldosteronoma (APA) overlapping with bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) etiologies, as opposed to the less frequent unilateral single aldosteronoma. The variable expression of melanocortin type 2 receptors in the nodules and hyperplasia may explain the frequent discordance in lateralization ratios between unstimulated and ACTH- stimulated samples. We conclude that aldosterone values collected during simultaneous bilateral sampling, both at baseline and post-ACTH stimulation, are required to adequately evaluate selectivity, lateralization, and contralateral suppression during AVS, to better identify all patients with PA that can benefit from a surgical indication. Recommended cut-offs for each ratio are also presented.

Adrenal venous sampling for lateralization of cortisol hypersecretion in patients with bilateral adrenal masses

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in guiding the management of patients with corticotropin (ACTH)-independent glucocorticoid secretory autonomy and bilateral adrenal masses.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

A cohort with 25 patients underwent AVS and surgical management.

MEASUREMENTS

Cortisol was measured from the adrenal veins (AVs) and inferior vena cava (IVC). AV/IVC cortisol ratio and cortisol lateralization ratio (CLR) (dominant AV cortisol concentration divided by the nondominant AV cortisol concentration) were calculated. Posthoc receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the specificity of revised AV/IVC cortisol ratio and CLR in differentiating unilateral from bilateral disease.

RESULTS

Patients underwent unilateral (n = 21) or bilateral (n = 4) adrenalectomy. The mean AV/IVC cortisol ratio for unilateral adrenalectomy was 12.1 ± 9.6 (dominant) and 4.7 ± 3.8 (contralateral) with a mean CLR of 3.6 ± 3.5. The mean AV/IVC cortisol ratio for bilateral adrenalectomy was 7.5 ± 2.1, with a mean CLR of 1.1 ± 0.6. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, one patient who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for the predicted bilateral disease developed recurrent mild autonomous cortisol secretion. Posthoc analyses demonstrated a specificity of 95%-100% for unilateral disease with AV/IVC cortisol ratio >9 for one side, <2.0 for the opposite side and a CLR > 2.3. The specificity was 80%-90% for bilateral disease with AV/IVC cortisol ratio >5.1 bilaterally and a CLR < 1.1.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with bilateral adrenal masses and ACTH-independent autonomous cortisol secretion, AVS can distinguish between unilateral and bilateral disease with high specificity and may guide surgical management.

Effect of Intraprocedural Cortisol Measurement on ACTH-stimulated Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

Context

Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) loading is used to increase the success rate of adrenal vein sampling (AVS).

Objective

We aimed to determine the effect of intraprocedural cortisol measurement (ICM) on ACTH-stimulated AVS (AS-AVS) owing to a lack of reliable data on this topic.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study took place in 28 tertiary centers in Japan. Among 4057 patients enrolled, 2396 received both basal AVS (B-AVS) and AS-AVS and were divided into 2 groups according to whether ICM was used. The effect of ICM on AS-AVS was measured.

Results

In patients who underwent both AVS procedures, the ICM group had significantly higher success rates for both B-AVS and AS-AVS than the non-ICM group did. However, the probability of failure of AS-AVS after a successful B-AVS and the probability of success of AS-AVS after a failed B-AVS were not significantly different in the 2 groups. For subtype diagnosis, propensity-score matching revealed no significant difference between the 2 groups, and the discrepancy rate between B-AVS and AS-AVS for subtype diagnosis was also not significantly different.

Conclusion

ICM significantly increased the success rate of B-AVS and AS-AVS in protocols in which both AVS procedures were performed and had no effect on subtype diagnosis. However, in protocols in which both AVS procedures were performed, the results suggest ICM may not be necessary when performing AS-AVS if ICM is used only when B-AVS is performed. Our study suggests that ICM during AVS plays an important role and should be recommended.

Successful Adrenal Vein Sampling Using Dexamethasone Premedication in Patients With Iodine Contrast Media Allergy

Context

Preparation of patients with iodine contrast media (ICM) allergy who require adrenal vein sampling (AVS) to establish source of aldosterone excess of their confirmed primary aldosteronism (PA) is controversial. Usual premedication with high-dose prednisone can interfere with cortisol determinations, possibly altering the aldosterone to cortisol ratios for the identification of lateralized aldosterone excess.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of premedication with high-dose dexamethasone to perform AVS in patients with ICM.

Methods

One hundred and seventy-seven consecutive patients with confirmed PA who underwent bilateral simultaneous basal and post-ACTH bolus AVS at our center between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for history of ICM allergy. A total of 7 patients (4%) with previous allergic reactions to ICM were prepared with 3 doses of 7.5 mg dexamethasone premedication rather than the usual 50 mg of prednisone.

Results

No breakthrough allergic reactions were reported in the 7 patients. Despite adequate serum cortisol suppression following dexamethasone, the basal and post-ACTH selectivity index were respectively &gt; 2 and &gt; 5 bilaterally in all patients, confirming adequate cannulation of both adrenal veins. Four patients had lateralized ratios (A/C ratio &gt; 2 basally and &gt; 4 post-ACTH), while 3 had bilateral source during AVS study. In the 3 patients undergoing unilateral adrenalectomy for lateralized source and contralateral suppression and adequate follow-up data, cure of PA was achieved at mean 58 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

AVS using dexamethasone premedication is safe and accurate for diagnosing the source of aldosterone excess in patients with PA and ICM allergy.

Wide Variability in Catecholamine Levels From Adrenal Venous Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

INTRODUCTION

While adrenal venous sampling (AVS) differentiates between the unilateral and bilateral disease in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), it is unknown if AVS can determine laterality of pheochromocytoma in patients with bilateral adrenal masses. This study analyzes adrenal vein (AV) epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in nonpheochromocytoma patients to determine the "normal" range.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent AVS for PA between 2009 and 2019 at a single institution; pheochromocytoma was excluded. Aldosterone, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine levels were obtained from the inferior vena cava (IVC), left adrenal vein (LAV), and right adrenal vein (RAV). Successful AV cannulation was defined by an AV/IVC cortisol ratio of ≥3:1 or an AV epinephrine level ≥364 pg/mL. Plasma measurements (pg/mL) are median values with interquartile ranges; normal ranges for epinephrine and norepinephrine are 10-200 pg/mL and 80-520 pg/mL, respectively.

RESULTS

AVS was performed in 172 patients in 405 AVs (173 LAV and 232 RAV). Median epinephrine levels were IVC = 19 (14 and 34), LAV = 3811 (1870 and 6915), and RAV = 2897 (1500 and 5288). Median norepinephrine levels were IVC = 325 (186 and 479), LAV = 1450 (896 and 2050), and RAV = 786 (436 and 1582). There was a difference between LAV and RAV epinephrine levels (P = 0.024) and between LAV and RAV norepinephrine (P = 0.002) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive experience with AVS demonstrated a wide range of "normal" AV catecholamine levels in patients without pheochromocytoma, which suggests that the utility of AVS to determine disease laterality in patients with pheochromocytoma and bilateral adrenal nodules is likely to be limited.