Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Should Be Avoided for the Inpatient Management of Hyperglycemia

Pros and Cons of Inpatient SGLT2i Use for Hyperglycemia and Heart Failure

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), originally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), have shown substantial cardiovascular and renal benefits, leading to their expanded use in managing heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease in the outpatient setting. Despite these benefits, their use for inpatient hyperglycemia management is not universally endorsed due to safety concerns and inadequate data. However, emerging evidence suggests potential advantages of initiating SGLT2i treatment for patients during hospitalization in the setting of HF. While SGLT2is are not recommended for managing inpatient hyperglycemia, initiation during hospitalization for HF provides significant benefits. We review the current literature on the pros and cons of using SGLT2is in hospitalized DM2 and HF patients and provide guidance on careful patient selection and risk mitigation for inpatient use.

Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients

People with diabetes account for 25% of hospitalizations, or 8 million admissions annually. Poor glycemic control in the hospital is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and readmissions. Key considerations of inpatient diabetes management include initiation of appropriate insulin or medication regimens and frequent dose adjustments based on patient-specific factors. Inpatient diabetes management teams and new technologies are increasingly prevalent and can assist in achieving glycemic targets in the hospital. At discharge, standardized checklists should be used to ensure successful transitions of care.

Inpatient diabetes management

Diabetes mellitus is currently approaching epidemic proportions and disproportionately affects patients in the hospital setting. In the United States, individuals living with diabetes represent over 17 million emergency department visits and 8 million admissions annually. The management of these patients in the hospital setting is complex and differs considerably from the outpatient setting. All patients with hyperglycemia should be screened for diabetes, as in-hospital hyperglycemia portends a greater risk for morbidity, mortality, admission to an intensive care unit, and increased hospital length of stay. However, the definition of hyperglycemia, glycemic targets, and strategies to manage hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting can vary greatly depending on the population considered. Moreover, the presenting illness, changing nutritional status, and concurrent hospital medications often necessitate thoughtful consideration to adjustments of home diabetes regimens and/or the initiation of new insulin doses. This review article will examine core concepts and emerging new literature surrounding inpatient diabetes management, including glycemic targets, insulin dosing strategies, noninsulin medications, new diabetes technologies, inpatient diabetes management teams, and discharge planning strategies, to optimize patient safety and satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and even hospital financial health.

Sotagliflozin versus dapagliflozin to improve outcome of patients with diabetes and worsening heart failure: a cost per outcome analysis

Background and aim

Dapagliflozin inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter protein 2 (SGLT-2), while sotagliflozin, belonging to a new class of dual-acting SGLT-1/SGLT-2 inhibitors, has garnered considerable attention due to its efficacy and safety. Both Dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin play a significant role in treating worsening heart failure in diabetes/nondiabetes patients with heart failure. Therefore, this article was to analyze and compare the cost per outcome of both drugs in preventing one event in patients diagnosed with diabetes-related heart failure.

Method

The Cost Needed to Treat (CNT) was employed to calculate the cost of preventing one event, and the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) represents the anticipated number of patients requiring the intervention treatment to prevent a single adverse event, or the anticipated number of patients needing multiple treatments to achieve a beneficial outcome. The efficacy and safety data were obtained from the results of two published clinical trials, DAPA-HF and SOLOIST-WHF. Due to the temporal difference in the drugs' releases, we temporarily analyzed the price of dapagliflozin to calculate the price of sotagliflozin within the same timeframe. The secondary analyses aimed to assess the stability of the CNT study and minimize differences between the results of the RCT control and trial groups, employing one-way sensitivity analyses.

Result

The final results revealed an annualized Number Needed to Treat (aNNT) of 4 (95% CI 3-7) for preventing one event with sotagliflozin, as opposed to 23 (95% CI 16-55) for dapagliflozin. We calculated dapagliflozin's cost per prevented event (CNT) to be $109,043 (95% CI $75,856-$260,755). The price of sotagliflozin was set below $27,260, providing a favorable advantage. Sensitivity analysis suggests that sotagliflozin may hold a cost advantage.

Conclusion

In this study, sotagliflozin was observed to exhibit a price advantage over dapagliflozin in preventing one events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes.

Pros of Inpatient Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Use

OBJECTIVE

Sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are widely used for diabetes management especially because their effects go beyond glucose control. More recently, their indications and usage have expanded to heart failure (HF) and renal dysfunction therapy in patients both with and without diabetes. Beneficial effects, especially for HF readmission, accrue very early in their treatment trajectory, and this has promoted their use in the hospital setting. Data on their safety and efficacy for inpatient use are accumulating but have lagged behind the outpatient data for their use. The objective of this counterpoint piece is to highlight areas of benefit for starting or continuing SGLT-2 inhibitors in the inpatient setting.

METHODS

Discussion after literature review of available studies with a focus on HF outcomes and SGLT-2 inhibitor use.

RESULTS

The benefits of starting or continuing an SGLT-2 inhibitor in the inpatient setting are well documented, mainly in HF. Similar data are not available for glucose or renal outcomes alone. Starting in the hospital allows the ability to titrate medications with similar effects, such as diabetes and HF agents, as well as reducing treatment inertia to obtain and start new medications after patients are discharged home. It is important to choose patients appropriately and hold these drugs when patients are without nutrition or on low-carbohydrate diets which can lead to diabetic ketoacidosis.

CONCLUSION

In the right setting, using an SGLT-2 inhibitor in the hospital can affect multiple aspects of a patient's treatment trajectory and should be a consideration.