Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer

Emerging Treatment Modalities for Gastric Cancer With Macroscopic Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review

Gastric cancer with macroscopic peritoneal metastases represents a major therapeutic challenge and is associated with a poor prognosis. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new treatment modalities. A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify studies published between January 2014 and April 2024. Inclusion criteria were trials investigating novel therapies for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases. Data on treatment efficacy, survival outcomes, and side effects were extracted.

Prognostic Impact of Tumor Growth Rate During Second-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastric Cancer

Background/Aim

Despite the remarkable developments in chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC), rapid tumor growth is sometimes experienced during chemotherapy. This study investigated the association of tumor growth rate (TGR) during second-line chemotherapy with the prognosis of patients with GC.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients with GC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy between 2017 and 2019 at Osaka Metropolitan University. Of them, 13 cases with target lesions were classified into two groups according to TGR using a cutoff value of 0.25. Clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes were compared between the high TGR (n=5) and low TGR (n=8) groups.

Results

The median duration of first-line chemotherapy was significantly longer in the high TGR group than in the low TGR group [median 298 days vs. 72.5 days, p=0.030]. Progressive disease (PD) was observed in 60% of patients with high TGR, whereas stable disease (SD) was observed in 75% patients with low TGR. The median survival time (MST) after starting chemotherapy was 488 days in the low TGR group but was not reached in the high TGR group (log rank p=0.215). The MST after PD was 145 days in the low TGR group but was not estimated in the high TGR group (log rank p=0.345).

Conclusion

Based on the absence of significant differences in survival outcomes between the high and low TGR groups, sequential late-line chemotherapy might be considered important, even for patients with high TGR.

Real-world outcomes of third-line immune checkpoint inhibitors versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a Korean, multicenter study (KCSG ST22-06)

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or irinotecan-based chemotherapy is frequently used after failure of second-line paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy between ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy as third-line treatment in patients with AGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with AGC, whose third-line treatment started between July 2019 and June 2021 at 17 institutions in Korea. The ICI group included patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and the irinotecan-based chemotherapy group included patients who received irinotecan or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan).

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients [n = 129 (ICI) and n = 234 (irinotecan-based chemotherapy)] were analyzed. The median progression-free survival was 2.3 and 2.9 months in ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.802). The median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 and 6.0 months in ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.786). For all patients included in this study, multivariable analysis showed that weight loss, peritoneal metastasis, low serum sodium or albumin, and short duration of second-line treatment were associated with inferior OS (p < 0.05). ICI showed significantly longer OS than irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients without peritoneal metastasis. Whereas ICI showed significantly shorter OS in patients without PD-L1 expression than irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in survival outcome was observed between ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy as third-line treatment for AGC patients. ICI might be preferred for patients without peritoneal metastasis and irinotecan-based chemotherapy for patients with tumors without PD-L1 expression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr : KCT 0007732).