Effect of concomitant statin treatment in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant denosumab or placebo: a post hoc analysis of ABCSG-18

Association of statin use on survival outcomes of patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in the APHINITY trial

PURPOSE

There is evidence that statins might improve the outcome of patients with breast cancer. The role of statins in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer is unknown. Therefore, we explored the association between statin use and survival outcomes in early HER2-positive breast cancer patients in the phase III APHINITY trial (adjuvant pertuzumab/trastuzumab).

METHODS

All patients (intent-to-treat population, n = 4804) were included (6.2 years median follow-up database). The primary objective was to investigate the association of statin use on invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), and overall survival (OS). Patients who received statins at baseline, or started statins within 1 year from randomization were considered statin users. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used a Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 423 (8.8%) patients were classified as statin users. They were older, more often postmenopausal, had a higher body mass index, more often diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease and hyperlipidemia, had smaller sized tumors, were treated more often with breast conserving surgery, and less often with anthracycline-containing regimens. Overall, 508 IDFS events (12.8% among statin users and 10.4% among non-statin users) and 272 deaths (8.5% and 5.4%, respectively) occurred. In multivariate analysis, statin use was not associated with IDFS (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.80-1.52), DRFI (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.81-1.81) nor OS (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.78-1.73).

CONCLUSION

In APHINITY, statin use was not associated with improved survival outcomes. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the exploratory nature of the analysis and the associated limitations.

The role of statins in the regulation of breast and colorectal cancer and future directions

Statins, widely recognized as a cornerstone in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, have garnered increasing attention in oncology due to their pleiotropic effects, particularly their potential roles in regulating breast and colorectal cancer. Emerging evidence suggests that statins may exert anticancer effects through multiple mechanisms, including the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway, the LKB1-AMPK-p38MAPK-p53-survivin signaling cascade, inhibition of the mevalonate pathway, modulation of the EGFR/RhoA and IGF-1 signaling pathways, and regulation of the BMP/SMAD4 signaling pathway. However, significant heterogeneity exists in the reported anticancer effects of statins, likely due to variations in statin type (lipophilic vs hydrophilic), dosage, treatment duration, and population-specific characteristics. These factors contribute to inconsistencies in study outcomes. Additionally, while combination therapies incorporating statins with chemotherapy and immunotherapy have demonstrated synergistic effects in certain studies, their clinical utility remains to be fully established. Nevertheless, current evidence suggests that statins may have a potential role in reducing breast and colorectal cancer-related mortality. Future research should prioritize elucidating their precise molecular mechanisms, defining dose-response relationships, developing personalized treatment strategies within the framework of precision medicine, and validating their efficacy through large-scale, long-term prospective studies. These efforts will provide a more robust scientific foundation for the clinical application of statins in oncology. This review systematically explores the role of statins in breast and colorectal cancer regulation, covering clinical evidence, underlying biological mechanisms, pharmacological distinctions, synergistic therapeutic potential, and translational medicine prospects.

Statins and prognosis of female breast cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) incidence is estimated to achieve over 3-million new cases and one million deaths by 2040. Beyond its physical toll, breast cancer detrimentally affects quality of life, imposing emotional, social, and financial burdens on patients and their families. Statins, commonly prescribed for managing cardiovascular health, have garnered attention for their potential role in breast cancer management. Emerging evidence suggests that statins possess anti-proliferative properties, which could impact BC progression. Understanding the potential benefits of statin therapy in BC patients is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving outcomes.

METHODS

Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the outcomes. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used for all pooled analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic with corresponding 95% CIs, considering I2 > 25% as indicative of substantial heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 4.3.2) using the "meta" package, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies and 344,936 patients were included, of whom 72,784 (21.1%) was in the statins group and 272,152 (78.9%) was in the non-statin users group. Statin therapy was associated with a significantly reduced risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.8583; 95% CI 0.7980-0.9231; P < 0.001; I2 = 81.1%), of BCSM (HR 0.8183; 95% CI 0.7334-0.9132; P < 0.001; I2 = 84.4%), and of BC recurrence (HR 0.7911; 95% CI 0.6882-0.9095; P < 0.001; I2 = 48.6%). However, the analysis of DFS did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (HR 0.8415; 95% CI 0.4220-1.6780; P = 0.624; I2 = 74.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that statin therapy may confer beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in female breast cancer patients, including reduced all-cause mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality, and recurrence. However, further research is warranted to confirm these findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Role of low-density cholesterol and Interleukin-17 interaction in breast cancer pathogenesis and treatment

Breast cancer (BC) has become the most prevalent cancer worldwide, and further research is being conducted to deepen our understanding of its pathogenesis and treatment. Lipid metabolism disorder is a significant alteration in cancer cells, and the investigation into the role of Interleukin-17 (IL-17) in malignant tumors has emerged as a research focus in recent years. Thus, exploring changes in lipid metabolism and inflammatory factors in BC cells is crucial in identifying potential therapeutic targets. This article summarizes the progress made in the research on the main low-density cholesterol (LDL) transporter and IL-17 in lipid metabolism, and their potential involvement in the development of BC. The article aims to establish a theoretical foundation for the development of BC-related therapies.

Case Report: single low-dose of denosumab as a trigger of MRONJ development in a patient with osteoporosis after bisphosphonate therapy

Both denosumab (DMB) and bisphosphonates (BPs), antiresorptive drugs (ARDs) used for the treatment of osteoporosis and oncological disorders, are known for their potential to cause medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). Besides ARDs, statins were recently associated with MRONJ development, especially in patients taking higher doses of statins for a longer period of time. Here, we report a case of a female patient with osteoporosis using statins and treated with alendronate for 3 years who rapidly developed MRONJ stage III after only a single low dose of DMB. After partial maxillectomy complete healing was observed without any recurrence. We performed a literature review of cases with MRONJ triggered by a single low dose of DMB, with or without previous application of other ARDs. Only six similar cases of patients who developed MRONJ after a single low dose of DMB following previous BP therapy have been reported so far. Besides these, literature reports one patient who developed MRONJ after a single dose of DMB following romosozumab treatment and five cases developing MRONJ after a single dose of DMB even without any previous ARD treatment. We suggest that before DMB therapy is initiated, all factors predisposing to MRONJ development should be considered.

β-blockers and statins: exploring the potential off-label applications in breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers

Despite advances in cancer treatment, current cancer incidence and prevalence still demand multimodal treatments to enhance survival and clinical outcomes. Drugs used in cardiology, such as β-blockers and statins have gained attention for their potential roles in oncology. This review focused on their possible complementary use in solid tumors, including breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers. The involvement of the autonomic nervous system in promoting tumor growth can be disrupted by β-blockers, potentially hindering cancer progression. Statins, known for their pleiotropic effects, may also inhibit cancer growth by reducing cholesterol availability, a key factor in cell proliferation. We will provide an update on the impact of these therapies on cancer treatment and surveillance, discuss the underlying mechanisms, and explore their effects on the heart, contributing to the growing field of cardio-oncology.

The effect of tamoxifen as an adjuvant therapy for breast cancer on apolipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) concentrations in women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Tamoxifen has been used in the management of breast cancer. The available evidence on the effect of tamoxifen on lipoprotein(a) and apolipoproteins is controversial. Hence, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to increase the quality of evidence on the effect of tamoxifen on lipoprotein(a) and apolipoproteins.

METHODS

Eligible RCTs published up to September 2023 were carefully selected following a comprehensive search. Thereafter, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and the results were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The results from the random-effects model indicated a rise in ApoA-I (WMD: 16.24 mg/dL, 95 % CI: 5.35, 27.12, P = 0.003), and a decrease in ApoB (WMD: -9.37 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -15.16, -3.59, P = 0.001) and lipoprotein(a) (WMD: -3.24 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -5.66, -0.83, P < 0.001) concentrations following tamoxifen administration in women. Furthermore, a more pronounced decrease in ApoB (WMD: -12.86 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -19.78, -5.93, P < 0.001) and elevation in ApoA-1 levels (WMD: 51.97 mg/dL, 95 % CI: 45.89, 58.05, P < 0.001) were identified in a single study on patients with breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis demonstrated an increase of ApoA-I and a decrease of ApoB and lipoprotein(a) levels after treatment with tamoxifen in women.

Bone-modifying agents for reducing bone loss in women with early and locally advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-inhibitors are amongst the bone-modifying agents used as supportive treatment in women with breast cancer who do not have bone metastases. These agents aim to reduce bone loss and the risk of fractures. Bisphosphonates have demonstrated survival benefits, particularly in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the effects of different bone-modifying agents as supportive treatment to reduce bone mineral density loss and osteoporotic fractures in women with breast cancer without bone metastases and generate a ranking of treatment options using network meta-analyses (NMAs).

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies by electronically searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase until January 2023. We searched various trial registries and screened abstracts of conference proceedings and reference lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing different bisphosphonates and RANKL-inihibitors with each other or against no further treatment or placebo for women with breast cancer without bone metastases.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Outcomes were bone mineral density, quality of life, overall fractures, overall survival and adverse events. We conducted NMAs and generated treatment rankings.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-seven trials (35,163 participants) fulfilled our inclusion criteria; 34 trials (33,793 participants) could be considered in the NMA (8 different treatment options). Bone mineral density We estimated that the bone mineral density of participants with no treatment/placebo measured as total T-score was -1.34. Evidence from the NMA (9 trials; 1166 participants) suggests that treatment with ibandronate (T-score -0.77; MD 0.57, 95% CI -0.05 to 1.19) may slightly increase bone mineral density (low certainty) and treatment with zoledronic acid (T-score -0.45; MD 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.16) probably slightly increases bone mineral density compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Risedronate (T-score -1.08; MD 0.26, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.84) may result in little to no difference compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). We are uncertain whether alendronate (T-score 2.36; MD 3.70, 95% CI -2.01 to 9.41) increases bone mineral density compared to no treatment/placebo (very low certainty). Quality of life No quantitative analyses could be performed for quality of life, as only three studies reported this outcome. All three studies showed only minimal differences between the respective interventions examined. Overall fracture rate We estimated that 70 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo had fractures. Evidence from the NMA (16 trials; 19,492 participants) indicates that treatment with clodronate or ibandronate (42 of 1000; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.92; 40 of 1000; RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86, respectively) decreases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (high certainty). Denosumab or zoledronic acid (51 of 1000; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.01; 55 of 1000; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.11, respectively) probably slightly decreases the number of fractures; and risedronate (39 of 1000; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.16) probably decreases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Pamidronate (106 of 1000; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.06) probably increases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Overall survival We estimated that 920 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo survived overall. Evidence from the NMA (17 trials; 30,991 participants) suggests that clodronate (924 of 1000; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.17), denosumab (927 of 1000; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.21), ibandronate (915 of 1000; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.34) and zoledronic acid (925 of 1000; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.14) may result in little to no difference regarding overall survival compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). Additionally, we are uncertain whether pamidronate (905 of 1000; HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.78) decreases overall survival compared to no treatment/placebo (very low certainty). Osteonecrosis of the jaw We estimated that 1 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. Evidence from the NMA (12 trials; 23,527 participants) suggests that denosumab (25 of 1000; RR 24.70, 95% CI 9.56 to 63.83), ibandronate (6 of 1000; RR 5.77, 95% CI 2.04 to 16.35) and zoledronic acid (9 of 1000; RR 9.41, 95% CI 3.54 to 24.99) probably increases the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Additionally, clodronate (3 of 1000; RR 2.65, 95% CI 0.83 to 8.50) may increase the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). Renal impairment We estimated that 14 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo developed renal impairment. Evidence from the NMA (12 trials; 22,469 participants) suggests that ibandronate (28 of 1000; RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.88) probably increases the occurrence of renal impairment compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Zoledronic acid (21 of 1000; RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.58) probably increases the occurrence of renal impairment while clodronate (12 of 1000; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.39) and denosumab (11 of 1000; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.19) probably results in little to no difference regarding the occurrence of renal impairment compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When considering bone-modifying agents for managing bone loss in women with early or locally advanced breast cancer, one has to balance between efficacy and safety. Our findings suggest that bisphosphonates (excluding alendronate and pamidronate) or denosumab compared to no treatment or placebo likely results in increased bone mineral density and reduced fracture rates. Our survival analysis that included pre and postmenopausal women showed little to no difference regarding overall survival. These treatments may lead to more adverse events. Therefore, forming an overall judgement of the best ranked bone-modifying agent is challenging. More head-to-head comparisons, especially comparing denosumab with any bisphosphonate, are needed to address gaps and validate the findings of this review.

Osteoblasts and osteoclasts: an important switch of tumour cell dormancy during bone metastasis

Bone metastasis occurs when tumour cells dissociate from primary tumours, enter the circulation (circulating tumour cells, CTCs), and colonize sites in bone (disseminated tumour cells, DTCs). The bone marrow seems to be a particularly dormancy-inducing environment for DTCs, yet the mechanisms of dormancy initiation, reactivation, and interaction within the bone marrow have to be elucidated. Intriguingly, some evidence has suggested that dormancy is a reversible state that is switched 'on' or 'off' depending on the presence of various bone marrow resident cells, particularly osteoclasts and osteoblasts. It has become clear that these two cells contribute to regulating dormant tumour cells in bone both directly (interaction) and indirectly (secreted factors). The involved mechanisms include TGFβ signalling, the Wnt signalling axis, the Notch2 pathway, etc. There is no detailed review that specifically focuses on ascertaining the dynamic interactions between tumour cell dormancy and bone remodelling. In addition, we highlighted the roles of inflammatory cytokines during this 'cell-to-cell' communication. We also discussed the potential clinical relevance of remodelling the bone marrow niche in controlling dormant tumour cells. Understanding the unique role of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in regulating tumour dormancy in bone marrow will provide new insight into preventing and treating tumour bone metastasis.