Treatment-related adverse events as predictive biomarkers of efficacy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with surufatinib: results from two phase III studies

Efficacy and safety of surufatinib in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumor: a real-world study in Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms that originate from peptidergic neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Due to their increasing incidence, effective treatment strategies are required. Surufatinib, a novel small-molecule inhibitor with antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory effects, has shown promise in clinical trials for advanced NETs. However, the efficacy and safety of surufatinib are influenced by multiple factors, and there is currently a lack of sufficient real-world studies to explore these potential influencing factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients with NETs who were treated with surufatinib at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Patients were histologically confirmed to have primary NETs. Statistical analyses, including Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves, were conducted to assess the impact of the primary tumor site on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) exhibited significantly longer PFS and OS compared to extraGEP-NETs patients. Subgroup analyses also revealed variations in survival outcomes among patients with liver metastases depending on the primary tumor site. Adverse events (AEs), including proteinuria and increased bilirubin, were more common in GEP-NETs patients. These findings emphasize the importance of considering primary tumor site in treatment decisions for NETs.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor site is a critical factor influencing the efficacy of surufatinib in NETs. Clinicians should consider this factor when determining treatment strategies.

Surufatinib-induced renal thrombotic microangiopathy: first case report and review of literature

Angiogenesis inhibitors such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are common therapeutics currently used to treat oncologic disease. Surufatinib is a novel, small-molecule multiple receptor TKI approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for the treatment of progressive, advanced, and well-differentiated pancreatic and extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a well-documented complication of TKIs targeting the VEGF-A/VEGFR2 signalling pathway. Here, we describe a 43-year-old female patient with biopsy-proven TMA and nephrotic syndrome due to surufatinib treatment for adenoid cystic carcinoma. Histological lesions included glomerular endothelial swelling, widening of subendothelial spaces, mesangiolysis, and double contour, which caused nephrotic proteinuria. Effective management was achieved by drug withdrawal and oral anti-hypertensive regents. The management of surufatinib-related nephrotoxicity without compromising its anticancer effects is challenging. Hypertension and proteinuria must be closely monitored during drug use to reduce or stop the dose in a timely manner before severe nephrotoxicity occurs.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy Updates in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that arise from neuroendocrine cells dispersed throughout the organs/tissues of the body. Treatment of advanced/metastatic disease varies depending on tumor origin and grade. Somatostatin analogs (SSA) have been the mainstay first-line treatment in the advanced/metastatic setting for tumor control and managing hormonal syndromes. Treatments beyond SSAs have expanded to include everolimus (mTOR inhibitor), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (e.g., sunitinib), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with the choice of therapy to some extent dictated by the anatomic origin of the NETs. This review will focus on emerging systemic treatments for advanced/metastatic NETs, particularly TKIs, and immunotherapy.

Early Adverse Event Derived Biomarkers in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy

RATIONALE

Adverse events (AEs) have been shown to have clinical associations, in addition to patient safety assessments of drugs of interest. However, due to their complex content and associated data structure, AE evaluation has been restricted to descriptive statistics and small AE subset for efficacy analysis, limiting the opportunity for global discovery. This study takes a unique approach to utilize AE-associated parameters to derive a set of innovative AE metrics. Comprehensive analysis of the AE-derived biomarkers enhances the chance of discovering new predictive AE biomarkers of clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We utilized a set of AE-associated parameters (grade, treatment relatedness, occurrence, frequency, and duration) to derive 24 AE biomarkers. We further innovatively defined early AE biomarkers by landmark analysis at an early time point to assess the predictive value. Statistical methods included the Cox proportional hazards model for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), two-sample t-test for mean difference of AE frequency and duration between disease control (DC: complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD)) versus progressive disease (PD), and Pearson correlation analysis for relationship of AE frequency and duration versus treatment duration. Two study cohorts (Cohort A: vorinostat + pembrolizumab, and B: Taminadenant) from two immunotherapy trials in late-stage non-small cell lung cancer were used to test the potential predictiveness of AE-derived biomarkers. Data from over 800 AEs were collected per standard operating procedure in a clinical trial using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 (CTCAE). Clinical outcomes for statistical analysis included PFS, OS, and DC.

RESULTS

An early AE was defined as event occurrence at or prior to day 30 from initial treatment date. The early AEs were then used to calculate the 24 early AE biomarkers to assess overall AE, each toxicity category, and each individual AE. These early AE-derived biomarkers were evaluated for global discovery of clinical association. Both cohorts showed that early AE biomarkers were associated with clinical outcomes. Patients previously experienced with low-grade AEs (including treatment related AEs (TrAE)) had improved PFS, OS, and were associated with DC. The significant early AEs included low-grade TrAE in overall AE, endocrine disorders, hypothyroidism (pembrolizumab's immune-related adverse event (irAE)), and platelet count decreased (vorinostat related TrAE) for Cohort A and low-grade AE in overall AE, gastrointestinal disorders, and nausea for Cohort B. In contrast, patients with early development of high-grade AEs tended to have poorer PFS, OS, and correlated with PD. The associated early AEs included high-grade TrAE in overall AE, gastrointestinal disorders with two members, diarrhea and vomiting, for Cohort A and high-grade AE in overall AE, three toxicity categories, and five related individual AEs for Cohort B. One low-grade TrAE, alanine aminotransferase increased (vorinostat + pembrolizumab related), was an irAE and correlated with worse OS in Cohort A.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated the potential clinical utility of early AE-derived biomarkers in predicting positive and negative clinical outcomes. It could be TrAEs or combination of TrAEs and nonTrAEs from overall AEs, toxicity category AEs, to individual AEs with low-grade event leaning to encouraging effect and high-grade event to undesirable impact. Moreover, the methodology of the AE-derived biomarkers could change current AE analysis practice from a descriptive summary into modern informative statistics. It modernizes AE data analysis by helping clinicians discover novel AE biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes and facilitate the generation of vast clinically meaningful research hypotheses in a new AE content to fulfill the demands of precision medicine.

Angiogenesis in NENs, with a focus on gastroenteropancreatic NENs: from biology to current and future therapeutic implications

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly vascularized malignancies arising from cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system. An intricated cross-talk exists between NEN cells and the tumor microenvironment, and three main molecular circuits (VEGF/VEGFR pathway, FGF-dependent signaling and PDGF/PDGFR axis) have been shown to regulate angiogenesis in these neoplasms. Multiple randomized trials have investigated antiangiogenic agents over the past two decades, and sunitinib is currently approved for the treatment of advanced, progressive, G1/G2 pancreatic NENs. In recent years, two phase III clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of surufatinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase angioimmune inhibitor, in patients with well-differentiated pancreatic and extrapancreatic NENs, and two studies of this agent are currently underway in Europe and US. The HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan has recently received regulatory approval for the treatment of tumors arising in the context of Von-Hippel Lindau syndrome including pancreatic NENs, and a study of this drug in patients with sporadic tumors is presently ongoing. Combinations of antiangiogenic agents with chemotherapeutics and targeted drugs have been tested, with accumulating toxicities being a matter of concern. The potential of antiangiogenic agents in fine-tuning the immune microenvironment of NENs to enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been only partially elucidated, and further research should be carried out at this regard. Here, we review the current understanding of the biology of angiogenesis in NENs and provide a summary of the latest clinical investigations on antiangiogenic drugs in this malignancy.