A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Off-label use of anlotinib in malignancies' treatment: efficacy and management of adverse reactions

Anlotinib is a novel small-molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) independently developed in China, it possesses the functions of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and suppressing tumor growth. Anlotinib has achieved notable therapeutic effects in approved indications for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, small cell lung cancer, and medullary thyroid carcinoma. Additionally, with unanimous expert consensus, it has been used off-label in various other tumors, yielding favorable outcomes. This article reviews the efficacy and common adverse reactions, as well as their management, of off-label use of anlotinib in various malignant tumors.

Anlotinib in combination with metronomic chemotherapy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: an observational and retrospective study

Anti-angiogenesis offers an important treatment strategy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) provides antiangiogenic effects without increased toxicities, making it good partner for antiangiogenic therapy. We conducted the present retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus MCT for HER2 negative MBC. Patients with HER2 negative MBC who received metronomic chemotherapy (Vinorelbine (NVB), Capecitabine (CAPE), Etoposide (VP-16)) with anlotinib were retrospectively analyzed from Jan 2019 to Dec 2021. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. 48 patients with HER2 negative MBC were enrolled. 19 (39.6%) patients received NVB, 17 (35.4%) patients received CAPE and 12 (25.0%) patients received VP-16. The overall ORR and DCR were 8.3% (4/48) and 87.5% (42/48) respectively. The median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.3-7.0 months), and the median OS was 25.2 months (95% CI 20.2-30.1 months). The patients with age ≥ 50 (5.3 vs. 7.7 months, P = 0.014, HR = 0.407) and pathologic grade 1 or 2 (6.2 vs. 3.2 months, P = 0.023, HR = 2.471) had significantly longer PFS. The patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive (5.3 vs. 7.7 months, P = 0.004, HR = 0.206) and pathologic grade 1 or 2 (6.2 vs. 3.2 months, P = 0.020, HR = 3.882) had significantly longer OS. The incidence of all grades adverse events (AEs) was 56.3% (27/48) and grade 3-4 AEs was 12.5% (6/48). Within the context of real-world clinical practice, anlotinib in combination with metronomic chemotherapy provides a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for HER2-negative MBC, which warrants further investigation in the future.

Efficacy and safety of Anlotinib based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib, an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown the ability to inhibit tumor angiogenesis. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TEC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced TNBC.

METHODS

Locally advanced TNBC patients who had received no prior systemic treatment were eligible for this study. The enrolled patients were scheduled to undergo six cycles of anlotinib (12 mg, d1-14, q3w) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w), epirubicin (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, d1, q3w) prior to surgery, unless there was disease progression or severe toxicity. The primary objective of this study was the safety of this therapeutic regimen, and the secondary objective was the tumor response. The safety of this regimen was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 and the efficacy of this treatment was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients were included in this study. Participants completed an average of 5.56 neoadjuvant treatment cycles. The objective response rate (ORR) was 83.33%, and the disease control rate was 100%, respectively. The pCR was 55.6%. No patients discontinued therapy because of Adverse effects (AEs). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 5 cases (27.8%), with neutropenia and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome being the most common.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with TEC as neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity for locally advanced TNBC. Further investigation of this combination regimen is warranted.

Case report: outcome of anlotinib treatment in breast cancer patient with brain metastases

Brain metastases (BM) represent a common and severe complication of breast cancer (BC), emerging in approximately 10%-16% of all BC patients. The prevalent approach for treating BC patients with BM encompasses a multimodal strategy, combining surgery, whole brain radiation therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Yet, a concrete guideline for localized treatment strategies remains elusive, while systemic treatments like small-molecule-targeted therapy and immunotherapy are still in the clinical trial phase. This case study presents a significant clinical response to anlotinib treatment in a patient with estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, complicated by BM. After the standard first-line treatment including albumin-bound paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, and a second-line treatment involving pyrotinib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy did not produce the desired results, the patient was then administered anlotinib in combination with pyrotinib and letrozole as a third-line treatment, which led to a partial response (PR). The findings suggest that anti-angiogenic therapy, specifically anlotinib, could be regarded as a promising therapeutic option for BC patients with BM.

Combination of eribulin and anlotinib exerts synergistic cytotoxicity in retroperitoneal liposarcoma by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress

Primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is a rare heterogeneous tumor occurring within retroperitoneal space, and its overall survival has not improved much in the past few decades. Based on a small-sample clinical practice at our center, patients with RLPS can greatly benefit from anlotinib and eribulin combination. In this study, we investigated the combinational effect of anlotinib and eribulin on RLPS. In vitro experiments revealed that a low dose of anlotinib significantly enhances the cytotoxic effects of eribulin, leading to a remarkable suppression of RLPS cell proliferation, viability, colony formation, migration, and cell-cycle progression compared to individual drug treatments. At the organoid level, the combination treatment causes the spheroids in Matrigel to disintegrate earlier than the single-drug group. In vivo, RLPS patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models demonstrated that the combination of these two drugs can obviously exert a safe and effective anti-tumor effect. Through transcriptome analysis, we uncovered and validated that the synergistic effect mainly is induced by the endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Further analyses indicate that anlotinib plus eribulin treatment results in micro-vessel density and PD-L1 expression alterations, suggesting a potential impact on the tumor microenvironment. This study extensively explored the combination regimen at multiple levels and its underlying molecular mechanism in RLPS, thus providing a foundation for translational medicine research.

Safety and efficacy of anlotinib combined with taxane and lobaplatin in neoadjuvant treatment of clinical stage II/III triple-negative breast cancer in China (the neoALTAL trial): a single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

Anlotinib is a new type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1/2/3, platelet-derived growth factor receptors α/β, and fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-4 and c-Kit, with a broad spectrum of inhibitory effects on tumor angiogenesis and growth. It has been proven effective in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, but its efficacy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unknown. This phase 2 study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC.

Methods

Patients with clinical stage II/III TNBC were treated with 5 cycles of anlotinib (12 mg, d1-14, q3w) plus 6 cycles of taxanes (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 ,d1, q3w or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, d1 and d8, q3w) and lobaplatin (30 mg/m2, d1, q3w), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0) and the secondary endpoints include breast pCR (bpCR), axillary pCR (apCR), residual cancer burden (RCB), objective response rate (ORR), survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints were efficacy biomarkers based on Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Immunohistochemical (FUSCC IHC) classification for TNBC and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA from tumor tissue and blood samples of patients with 425-gene panel. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100043027).

Findings

From Jan 2021 to Aug 2022, 48 patients were assessed and 45 were enrolled. All patients received at least one dose of study treatment and underwent surgery. The median age was 48.5 years (SD: 8.7), 71% were nodal involved, and 20% had stage III. In the intention-to-treat population, 26 out of 45 patients achieved pCR (57.8%; 90% CI, 44.5%-70.3%), and 39 achieved residual cancer burden class 0-I (86.7%; 95% CI, 73.2%-94.9%). The bpCR and apCR rate were 64.4% (29/45) and 71.9% (23/32), respectively. No recurrence or metastasis occurred during the short-term follow-up. Based on the FUSCC IHC-based subtypes, the pCR rates were 68.8% (11/16) for immunomodulatory subtype, 58.3% (7/12) for basal-like immune-suppressed subtype and 33.3% (4/12) for luminal androgen receptor subtype, respectively. NGS revealed that the pCR were 77% (10/13) and 50% (14/28) in MYC-amplified and wild-type patients, respectively, and 78% (7/9) and 53% (17/32) in gBRCA1/2-mutated and wild-type patients, respectively. The median follow-up time of the study was 14.9 months (95% CI: 13.5-16.3 months). There was no disease progression or death during neoadjuvant therapy. No deaths occurred during postoperative follow-up. In the safety population (N = 45), Grade 3 or 4 treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 29 patients (64%), and the most common events were neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (25%), anemia (13%), and hypertension (13%), respectively.

Interpretation

The addition of anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed manageable toxicity and encouraging antitumor activity for patients with clinical stage II/III TNBC.

Funding

Chongqing Talents Project, Chongqing Key Project of Technology Innovation and Application Development and Chongqing Outstanding Youth Natural Science Foundation.

Efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline/taxanes

BACKGROUND

This prospective real-world study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of eribulin in the clinical practice against advanced breast cancer (ABC) in China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, eligible patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had experienced prior neo-/adjuvant or failed the palliative treatment with anthracycline/taxanes were included. Eribulin (1.4 mg/m2) was infused intravenously on Day 1 and Day 8 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety of the treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median PFS (mPFS) was 4.3 months (95% CI: 0.3-15.4). The ORR and DCR was 32.1% and 79.1%, respectively. The mPFS of patients who received eribulin as first- or second-line treatment was significantly better than those who received eribulin as ≥3-line treatment (6.9 months [95% CI: 3.2-8.8] vs. 4.0 months [95% CI: 3.4-4.6], p = 0.006). The mPFS of patients with triple-negative, HER2-positive, and HER2(-)/HR(+) was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.7-4.1), 6.2 (95% CI: 2.3-10.1) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.1-5.9), respectively. HER2(+) patients had significantly longer PFS than TNBC patients (p = 0.022). Patients received combination therapy had a significantly longer mPFS than those who received eribulin monotherapy (5.0 months [95% CI 3.6-6.3] vs. 4.0 months [95% CI: 3.3-4.7] [p = 0.016]). Multivariate analysis revealed that MBC patients with a molecular typing of non-TNBC receiving eribulin as ≤2-line therapy and combination therapy had a low risk of disease progression. Neutropenia (33.58%), leukopenia (11.94%), and thrombocytopenia (4.48%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Eribulin demonstrated effective clinical activity and a favorable tolerability profile in Chinese patients with ABC in the real-world. The efficacy and safety profile were consistent with those reported in previous randomized phase 3 trials.