Inter-laboratory comparison of turkey in ovo carcinogenicity assessment (IOCA) of hepatocarcinogens

Fertilized Avian Egg Fetal Liver Assays for Assessing DNA Damaging Potential of Chemicals: A Comparative Analysis With In Vitro and In Vivo Genotoxicity Assays and Rodent Carcinogenicity

The ability to produce direct DNA damage (genotoxicity), which underlies the carcinogenicity of various chemicals, is typically evaluated in a regulatory-approved battery of in vitro tests with potential in vivo follow-up. Growing concerns for animal welfare and implementation of regulations restricting the use of animal testing necessitate the introduction of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The avian egg-based (in ovo) models were developed as metabolically competent NAMs capable of bioactivation, detoxication, and elimination of xenobiotics to potentially replace short-term in vivo genotoxicity assays for chemicals that are genotoxic in vitro. These models utilize avian (chicken or turkey) fetal livers for the evaluation of endpoints indicative of DNA damage produced by either direct or indirect mechanisms, the formation of nuclear DNA adducts and strand breaks. Avian embryos have genetic and morphologic resemblance to mammals and can be used for the evaluation of other endpoints including histopathology and genomic profiling. A concordance analysis of 87 and 59 chemicals assessed in the chicken and turkey models, respectively, revealed a stronger correlation with the results from in vivo genotoxicity assays (76% and 67% sensitivity, 79% and 72% specificity for chicken and turkey, respectively) compared to in vitro assays (58% and 56% sensitivity, 45% and 63% specificity for chicken and turkey, respectively). These results demonstrate that in ovo models detect the genotoxic potential of a broader range of compounds compared to in vitro assays with S9 supplementation. In conclusion, fertilized avian egg fetal liver assays offer a promising alternative to traditional in vivo genotoxicity assays.

Mechanisms of DNA-reactive and epigenetic chemical carcinogens: applications to carcinogenicity testing and risk assessment

Chemicals with carcinogenic activity in either animals or humans produce increases in neoplasia through diverse mechanisms. One mechanism is reaction with nuclear DNA. Other mechanisms consist of epigenetic effects involving either modifications of regulatory macromolecules or perturbation of cellular regulatory processes. The basis for distinguishing between carcinogens that have either DNA reactivity or an epigenetic activity as their primary mechanism of action is detailed in this review. In addition, important applications of information on these mechanisms of action to carcinogenicity testing and human risk assessment are discussed.

Effects of sorafenib and cisplatin on preneoplastic foci of altered hepatocytes in fetal turkey liver

Foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH) were induced in fetal turkey liver (FTL) by diethyl nitrosamine. FAH in FTL were resistant to iron overload similar to FAH in humans and rodents. The mitotic index was significantly higher in FAH (6.2 mitosis in 1000 hepatocytes) than in extrafocal liver tissue (1.8 mitosis in 1000 hepatocytes). The calculation of the net growth rate based on both cell proliferation (mitosis) and cell death (TUNEL positive) revealed a threefold growth advantage of the FAH over the surrounding liver. Two well established anti-tumor substances from different chemical classes, different modes of action and with different clinical use in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were used to study their effect on FAH. Sorafenib is the only approved drug for systemic pharmacological treatment of HCC; cisplatin has been used for many years in hepatic arterial infusion. Cisplatin had no clear effect on number of size of FAH, cell proliferation (mitosis) or cell loss (TUNEL positive). Sorafenib enhanced the development of FAH. Morphometric quantification revealed a sorafenib-induced 2-3-fold increase in number (FAH per cm² and FAH per cm³), size and volume fraction of FAH. This unexpected finding was confirmed in two experiments. The effect was driven by an increased cell proliferation in the FAH, resulting in an increased, 5.4-fold growth advantage of FAH versus the surrounding liver in sorafenib-treated FTL. In this model, sorafenib has a promoting effect on preneoplastic FAH. This might be of relevance for the treatment of patients with long term survival perspective, e.g. in an adjuvant setting.

Chicken fetal liver DNA damage and adduct formation by activation-dependent DNA-reactive carcinogens and related compounds of several structural classes

The chicken egg genotoxicity assay (CEGA), which utilizes the liver of an intact and aseptic embryo-fetal test organism, was evaluated using four activation-dependent DNA-reactive carcinogens and four structurally related less potent carcinogens or non-carcinogens. In the assay, three daily doses of test substances were administered to eggs containing 9-11-day-old fetuses and the fetal livers were assessed for two endpoints, DNA breaks using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay and DNA adducts using the (32)P-nucleotide postlabeling (NPL) assay. The effects of four carcinogens of different structures requiring distinct pathways of bioactivation, i.e., 2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF), aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), and diethylnitrosamine (DEN), were compared with structurally related non-carcinogens fluorene (FLU) and benzo[e]pyrene (B[e]P) or weak carcinogens, aflatoxin B2 (AFB2) and N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA). The four carcinogens all produced DNA breaks at microgram or low milligram total doses, whereas less potent carcinogens and non-carcinogens yielded borderline or negative results, respectively, at higher doses. AAF and B[a]P produced DNA adducts, whereas none was found with the related comparators FLU or B[e]P, consistent with comet results. DEN and NDELA were also negative for adducts, as expected in the case of DEN for an alkylating agent in the standard NPL assay. Also, AFB1 and AFB2 were negative in NPL, as expected, due to the nature of ring opened aflatoxin adducts, which are resistant to enzymatic digestion. Thus, the CEGA, using comet and NPL, is capable of detection of the genotoxicity of diverse DNA-reactive carcinogens, while not yielding false positives for non-carcinogens.