Is Nonoperative Management the Best First-line Option for High-grade Renal trauma? A Systematic Review

Conservative management of high-grade renal trauma

INTRODUCTION

Renal trauma is the most common of urological trauma and accounts for up to 5% of all. The AAST scale is the most widely used to assess renal trauma. This study focuses on high-grade trauma, whose treatment has evolved towards a conservative approach, with techniques such as angioembolization. The aim is to describe the evolution in the management of high-grade renal trauma in all patients treated at La Paz University Hospital from 2001 to 2022.

METHODS

A descriptive retrospective study was conducted on patients treated at the hospital. The study was divided into two periods (2001-2010 and 2011-2022). A total of 285 patients with renal trauma were collected, of which 54 were high grade. The main variable is the type of management, conservative (embolization) or interventional through nephrectomy.

RESULTS

In the completed series, there was a decrease in radical nephrectomy in high-grade renal trauma from 50% to 13.8% over time, with an increase in embolization from 23,1% to 44,8%. In patients with isolated renal trauma, those treated with embolization increased from 28.6% to 69.2%, while those undergoing radical/partial nephrectomy decreased from 42.8% to 7.69%.

CONCLUSION

The management of renal trauma has evolved over the years in our center. The number of patients treated by embolization has increased, while the number of complications and nephrectomies has decreased.

The Japanese Urological Association's clinical practice guidelines for urotrauma 2023

The Japanese Urological Association's guidelines for the treatment of renal trauma were published in 2016. In conjunction with its revision, herein, we present the new guidelines for overall urotrauma. Its purpose is to provide standard diagnostic and treatment recommendations for urotrauma, including iatrogenic trauma, to preserve organ function and minimize complications and fatality. The guidelines committee comprised urologists with experience in urotrauma care, selected by the Trauma and Emergency Medicine Subcommittee of the Specialty Area Committee of the Japanese Urological Association, and specialists recommended by the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology. The guidelines committee established the domains of renal and ureteral, bladder, urethral, and genital trauma, and determined the lead person for each domain. A total of 30 clinical questions (CQs) were established for all domains; 15 for renal and ureteral trauma and five each for the other domains. An extensive literature search was conducted for studies published between January 1, 1983 and July 16, 2020, based on the preset keywords for each CQ. Since only few randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses were found on urotrauma clinical practice, conducting a systematic review and summarizing the evidence proved challenging; hence, the grade of recommendation was determined according to the 2007 "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guidelines" based on a consensus reached by the guidelines committee. We hope that these guidelines will be useful for clinicians in their daily practice, especially those involved in urotrauma care.

Mobility and Sporting Activity After Renal Trauma: A Survey Regarding Best Clinical Practice During the Recovery Stage

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate strategies that are followed after pediatric renal trauma during the recovery stage, with an emphasis on mobility and involvement in subsequent sporting activities. Renal trauma is the most common urogenital trauma in children. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) scale is most commonly used to stratify the severity of injury. There is no consensus in the existing literature with respect to the recovery stage following renal trauma.

METHODS

A survey was constructed by the European Association of Urology (EAU) - Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Pediatric Urology Working Group and then made digitally available on SurveyMonkey. The survey consists of 15 questions exploring relevant factors and timing to start again with mobility and activity.

RESULTS

In total 153 people responded, of whom 107 completed the entire survey. The presence of pain and severity of trauma were acknowledged as most important factors to commence mobilization, whereas presence of hematuria was identified as an additional factor for sporting activity. Regardless of severity of trauma a minimum of 90% of respondents recommend return to noncontact sports within 12weeks. For contact sports, a minimum of 33% of respondents advised >12weeks minimum before starting again. A small number of respondents would never allow sporting activities again.

CONCLUSION

The time to allow sporting activity shows high variation among the respondents, some even restricting sporting activities completely. This survey highlights the need for a standardized protocol based on multicenter follow-up data.

Summary Paper of the Updated 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological Trauma

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel for Urological Trauma has produced guidelines in order to assist medical professionals in the management of urological trauma in adults for the past 20 yr. It must be emphasised that clinical guidelines present the best evidence available to the experts, but following guideline recommendations will not necessarily result in the best outcome. Guidelines can never replace clinical expertise when making treatment decisions for individual patients regarding other parameters such as experience and available facilities. Guidelines are not mandates and do not purport to be a legal standard of care.

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2023 version of the EAU guidelines on the management of urological trauma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search was conducted from 1966 to 2022, and articles with the highest certainty evidence were selected. It is important to note that due to its nature, genitourinary trauma literature still relies heavily on expert opinion and retrospective series.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries, covering a time frame between May 1, 2021 and April 29, 2022. A total of 1236 unique records were identified, retrieved, and screened for relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines provide an evidence-based approach for the management of urological trauma.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Trauma is a serious public health problem with significant social and economic costs. Urological trauma is common; traffic accidents, falls, intrapersonal violence, and iatrogenic injuries are the main causes. Developments in technology, continuous training of medical professionals, and improved care of polytrauma patients reduce morbidity and maximise the opportunity for quick recovery.

Nonoperative management with angioembolization for blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature on associated outcomes of angioembolization in blunt abdominal solid organ traumas.

METHODS

The databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were explored until 24 September 2021. All studies with data on the efficacy or safety of angioembolization in patients suffering from hemodynamically unstable blunt abdominal solid organ trauma were included. The primary outcomes were clinical success rate and mortality. Pooled event rates were calculated using a double arcsine transformation to stabilize the variance of the original proportion.

RESULTS

In total, 13 reports of 12 studies were included in the systematic review. According to the current meta-analysis, the angioembolization for blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients had a high clinical success rate [0.97 (95% CI 0.93-0.99)] and low mortality [0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.07)]. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the various injured solid organs for either of these parameters. In addition, the technique-associated adverse events were seldom and tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

For blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients, this review shows that angioembolization exhibited a high clinical success rate, low mortality, and tolerable technique-related adverse events. Furthermore, the top possible indication for angioembolization in hemodynamically unstable patients is an individual who responds to rapid fluid resuscitation. However, high-quality and large-scale trials are needed to confirm these results and determine the selection criteria for appropriate patients in this setting.

[Traumatic injuries of the kidney and the urinary tract in blunt abdominal trauma]

BACKGROUND

In the context of blunt abdominal trauma, injuries to the urinary tracts often occur, especially in polytrauma patients. Urotrauma is rarely immediately life-threatening but can lead to serious complications and chronic functional limitations during treatment. Therefore early urological involvement is crucial for adequate interdisciplinary treatment.

METHODS

The most important facts for the clinical routine on the consultant urological management of urogenital injuries in blunt abdominal trauma are discussed according to the European "EAU guidelines on Urological Trauma" and the German "S3 guidelines on Polytrauma/Treatment of Severely Injured Patients" as well as the relevant literature.

RESULTS

Urinary tract injuries can occur even with an initially inconspicuous status and always require explicit exclusion diagnostics by means of contrast medium tomography of the entire urinary tract and, if necessary, by means of urographic and endoscopic examinations. The most common urological intervention is catheterization of the urinary tract which is often required. Less common is urological surgery, which should be coordinated interdisciplinarily with visceral and trauma surgery. More than 90% of vitally threatening kidney injuries (usually up to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades 4-5) are now treated by interventional radiology.

CONCLUSION

Due to possible complex injury patterns in blunt abdominal trauma, these patients should ideally be directed to (certified) trauma centers with subspecialized or maximum care from the departments of visceral and vascular surgery, trauma surgery, interventional radiology and urology.

N-butyl 2-Cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in Nephron Sparing Superselective Embolization of Iatrogenic Renovascular Injuries: A Single Centre Experience

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of N-butyl-2-cyano-acrylate (NBCA) for endovascular management of iatrogenic renal-vascular injuries and effects on renal function. Material & Methods Fifteen patients with diagnosed or suspected iatrogenic renal vascular injuries, following percutaneous procedures formed the study group. All the patients were having retroperitoneal hemorrhage or hematuria, with hemodynamic instability at the time of presentation. Pseudoaneurysms, active extravasation of contrast, and the arteriovenous fistula were identified as the cause of bleeding on digital subtraction angiography. Patients underwent trans arterial super-selective embolization. Renal function was monitored using serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and mean blood pressure of all the patients at immediate post-procedure and two months intervals. Results Technical and clinical success was achieved in all the cases using NBCA alone. Patients improved hemodynamically. None of the patients required repeat embolization. No derangement in renal function was observed immediately after the procedure and at interval follow-up. Conclusion NBCA can be used as a safe embolizing agent to provide a quick and effective cure for iatrogenic renovascular injuries. Renal parenchymal loss can be minimized by super selective technique.

Posterior urethral stenosis: a comparative review of the guidelines

PURPOSE

We aimed to provide a thorough comparative review of the available guidelines on the diagnosis, management, and follow-up for patients with posterior urethral stenosis by the American Urologic Association (2016), Société Internationale d'Urologie (2010), and European Urologic Association (2022).

METHODS

The AUA, SIU, and EAU guidelines were evaluated for recommendations on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of posterior urethral stenosis. We also included the EAU and AUA urologic trauma guidelines for the trauma-related stenosis. The level or strength of recommendations is included in case of disparity between the guidelines.

RESULTS

The three guidelines align considerably in recommendations provided for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with posterior urethral stenosis. SIU and EAU emphasize the role of repeat endoscopic treatment in guidelines compared to AUA.

CONCLUSION

The preferred method to repair bulbo-membranous stricture/stenosis following radiation therapy remains an area of active interest, focusing on continence preservation. Additionally, there may be a role for advanced endoscopic treatments with or without adjunct therapies to manage even obliterated stenoses.

Urology Consult Association with Renal Trauma Imaging and Intervention

OBJECTIVE

To describe rates of urology consultation following renal trauma and assess subsequent impact on imaging and intervention. Renal trauma may be initially managed by either trauma or urologic surgeons alone or collaboratively. Differences in management between the specialties are not well studied.

METHODS

We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective review of patients at a Level I trauma center sustaining renal trauma between 2014 and 2021. Demographic, injury, radiologic, and intervention variables were extracted. Frequencies and medians were compared using chi-squared and Fischer's exact tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Analyses were performed using STATA with p<0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2021, 118 patients with median age 29 (IQR 22-41) sustained renal trauma. Urology was consulted in 18 (15.3%) cases. Demographic and injury characteristics were similar between the two groups. AAST renal injury grade was transcribed in the initial radiologic reports for 49 (41.5%) of patients. Those in the urology consult group were more likely to receive delayed contrast imaging during their admission (50.0% vs. 17.0%, p<0.01). Among those with high-grade injuries, those with urology consult were less likely to undergo nephrectomy (36.4% vs. 78.8%, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed differences in imaging patterns between renal trauma patients who are managed primarily by trauma surgery versus urology. However, the impact of these differences in imaging remains to be elucidated. Among patients with high-grade renal trauma, urology consult was associated with decreased rate of nephrectomy, emphasizing the feasibility of renal salvage in a multidisciplinary trauma setting.

Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre

Background

Current guidelines recommend repeat computed tomography (CT) imaging in high-grade blunt renal injury within 48–96 h, yet diagnostic value and clinical significance remain controversial. The aim of this work was to determine the possible gain of CT re-imaging in uncomplicated patients with blunt renal trauma at 48 h after injury, presenting one of the largest case series.

Methods

A retrospective database of patients admitted to our centre with isolated blunt renal trauma due to sporting injuries was analysed for a period of 20 years (2000–2020). We included only patients who underwent repeat imaging at 48 h after trauma irrespective of AAST renal injury grading (grade 1–5) and initial management. The primary outcome was intervention rates after CT imaging at 48 h in uncomplicated patients versus CT scan at the time of clinical symptoms.

Results

A total of 280 patients (mean age: 37.8 years; 244 (87.1%) male) with repeat CT after 48 h were included. 150 (53.6%) patients were classified as low-grade (grade 1–3) and 130 (46.4%) as high-grade (grade 4–5) trauma. Immediate intervention at trauma was necessary in 59 (21.1%) patients with high-grade injuries: minimally invasive therapy in 48 (81.4%) and open surgery in 11 (18.6%) patients, respectively. In only 16 (5.7%) cases, intervention was performed based on CT re-imaging at 48 h (low-grade vs. high-grade: 3.3% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.075). On the contrary, intervention rate due to clinical symptoms was 12.5% (n = 35). Onset of clinical progress was on average (range) 5.3 (1–17) days post trauma. High-grade trauma (odds ratio [OR]_{grade 4 vs. grade 3}, 14.62; p < 0.001; OR_{grade 5 vs. grade 3}, 22.88, p = 0.004) and intervention performed at the day of trauma (OR 3.22; p = 0.014) were powerful predictors of occurrence of clinical progress.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that routine CT imaging 48 h post trauma can be safely omitted for patients with low- and high-grade blunt renal injury as long as they remain clinically stable. Patients with high-grade renal injury have the highest risk for clinical progress; thus, close surveillance should be considered especially in this group.

Impact of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Renal Trauma Management

Background

Some health care systems have set up referral trauma centers to centralize expertise to improve trauma management. There is scant and controversial evidence regarding the impact of provider’s volume on the outcomes of trauma management.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of hospital volume on the outcomes of renal trauma management in a European health care system.

Design, setting, and participants

A retrospective multicenter study, including all patients admitted for renal trauma in 17 French hospitals between 2005 and 2015, was conducted.

Intervention

Nephrectomy, angioembolization, or nonoperative management.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Four quartiles according to the caseload per year: low volume (eight or fewer per year), moderate volume (nine to 13 per year), high volume (14–25/yr), and very high volume (≥26/yr). The primary endpoint was failure of nonoperative management defined as any interventional radiology or surgical procedure needed within the first 30 d after admission.

Results and limitations

Of 1771 patients with renal trauma, 1704 were included. Nonoperative management was more prevalent in the very-high- and low-volume centers (p = 0.02). In a univariate analysis, very high hospital volume was associated with a lower risk of nonoperative management failure than low (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54; p = 0.05) and moderate (OR = 0.48; p = 0.02) hospital volume. There were fewer nephrectomies in the high- and very-high-volume groups (p = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, very high volume remained associated with a lower risk of nonoperative management failure than low (OR = 0.48; p = 0.04) and moderate (OR = 0.42; p = 0.01) volume. Study limitations include all the shortcomings inherent to its retrospective multicenter design.

Conclusions

In this multicenter study, management of renal trauma varied according to hospital volume. There were lower rates of nephrectomy and failure of nonoperative management in very-high-volume centers. These results raise the question of centralizing the management of renal trauma, which is currently not the case in our health care system.

Patient summary

In this study, management of renal trauma varied according to hospital volume. Very-high-volume centers had lower rates of nephrectomy and failure of nonoperative management.

Non-operatively managed blunt and penetrating renal trauma: Does early follow up CT scan change management? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Renal injury accounts for 1-5% of all traumatic injuries. Non-operative management (NOM) of renal trauma has demonstrated higher renal salvage rates and reduced morbidity.

AIMS

The aim of this review is to clarify the indications of early follow up CT scan for adult patients, with NOM, renal trauma, with a view to avoiding unnecessary CT scanning and radiation exposure in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library, with references from relevant articles also evaluated. Inclusion criteria were defined as studies reporting outcomes of patients ≥12 years of age, with NOM, renal trauma and early CT re-imaging. The outcomes of interest were renal complications requiring intervention, specifically collecting system and vascular complications.

RESULTS

Five studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 542 patients were included in this analysis; study sizes ranged from 48 to 207 patients. Early re-imaging was performed for 510 patients, including 489 CTs and 31 Ultrasounds (US). Mean time to re-imaging ranged from 1 - 35.9 days. Twenty three patients required intervention following re-imaging, all of which were for injuries grade ≥ 3 and presented with clinical deterioration prior to re-imaging, had a collecting system injury identified on initial CT scan or both. The number needed to re-image, in order to change the management of one patient, was 22.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the findings of this review are based on retrospective data, they suggest routine early re-imaging can be safely omitted for all NOM, renal injuries which remain asymptomatic, with no collecting system injury diagnosed on initial CT, provided appropriate delayed phase imaging is available. Future prospective studies are required to further clarify the indications of early re-imaging, specifically for NOM penetrating injuries, and the appropriate modality and timing of early re-imaging for all NOM renal trauma.

On the black slope: analysis of the course of a blunt renal trauma collective in a winter sports region

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze the injury patterns and clinical course of a winter sport dominated by blunt renal trauma collective.

Methods

Blunt renal trauma cases (N = 106) treated in a Level 1 Trauma Center in Austria were analyzed.

Results

We encountered 12.3% grade 1, 10.4% grade 2, 32.1% grade 3, 38.7% grade 4 and 6.6% grade 5 renal traumata classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). The mechanisms of injury (MOI) did not have an influence on the frequency of HG trauma (i.e., grade 4 and 5). No concomitant injuries (CIs) were found in 57.9% of patients. The number of patients without CIs was significantly higher in the sports associated trauma group compared to other MOIs (p < 0.01). In 94.3% the primary treatment was a non-operative management (NOM) including 56.6% conservative, 34.0% endourological, and 3.8% interventional therapies. A follow-up computed tomography (FU-CT) was performed in 81.1%, 3.3 days after trauma. After FU-CT, the primary therapy was changed in 11.4% of cases (grade ≥ 3). Comparing the Hb loss between the patients with grade 3 and 4 kidney trauma with and without revision surgery, we find a significantly increased Hb loss within the first 96 h after the trauma in the group with a needed change of therapy (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of nephrectomy (primary or secondary) was 9.4%. Independent predictors of nephrectomy were HG trauma (p < 0.01), age (p < 0.05), and sex (p < 0.05). The probability of nephrectomy was lower with (winter) sports-associated trauma (p < 0.1).

Conclusions

Sports-associated blunt renal trauma is more likely to occur isolated, and has a lower risk of severe outcomes, compared to other trauma mechanisms. NOM can successfully be performed in over 90% of all trauma grades.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01830-w.

[Renal Parenchyma Trauma and General Trauma Recommandations]

INTRODUCTION

Among trauma emergencies, kidney damage is uncommon. The urologist is frequently on the second line in the management of patients with multiple traumatic lesions. Knowledge of treatment is necessary to be able to integrate the different teams involved in an approach that is both vital in the context of damage control and functional with a concern for parenchymal preservation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out using the Medline database in order to identify the most relevant articles in English and French.

RESULTS

Kidney trauma occurs either by direct shock or by a deceleration mechanism. They are classified by severity according to the AAST classification. Management is mostly conservative by avoiding surgery and controlling bleeding by arterial embolization. Surveillance checks for complications occurrence in high-grade trauma. Traumatic dissection of the renal artery, with a poor functional prognosis requires a short delay before treatment.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for trauma to the kidney, regardless of the grade, is currently good, with improvements of effective resuscitation and embolization in the event of bleeding.

[Conservative management of grade IV kidney lacerations due to stab wounds]

We report on two patients who were in initially circulatory stable condition with grade IV kidney trauma after knife stab accident. Patient 1 underwent reconstructive surgery to retrieve a broken knife blade, while patient 2 was treated conservatively for bleeding that did not require intervention. Both patients could ultimately be discharged in stable condition. These case studies show that even in the case of high-grade kidney trauma with the appropriate constellation of findings, conservative management and, if exploration is necessary, a reconstructive approach is possible.

Conservative management of grade 4 and 5 renal injuries: A high-volume trauma center experience

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic renal injuries represent a major public health issue concerning mostly young men. Over the last decades there is growing debate regarding the management of high-grade renal injuries due to the emerging role of conservative treatment. The aim of this study is to present our experience in the conservative management of patients presenting with grade 4 or grade 5 renal injuries in our department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single center study we evaluated data from a total of 57 hemodynamically stable patients who were managed conservatively for grade 4 or grade 5 renal injuries from 2015 to 2019 in our high-volume trauma center. Grading was based on contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients managed with immediate nephrectomy due to hemodynamic instability and patients who underwent immediate laparotomy due to concomitant injuries or penetrating wounds were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients diagnosed either with grade 4 or grade 5 renal trauma were finally successfully managed conservatively and included in the study. Median age was 34 years. Most patients presented with grade 4 renal trauma while five patients presented with grade 5 renal injury. Concomitant injuries not requiring surgical intervention were present in 48 patients. Continuous renal bleeding was detected in 15 patients (27.8%) and subsequent arterial embolization was performed with no further intervention required. Urine leak was diagnosed in 12 patients treated either by double j stent or by nephrostomy tube.

CONCLUSIONS

Grade 4 and selected cases of grade 5 renal trauma can be treated conservatively with close monitoring and CT scan protocols in hemodynamic stable patients. In cases of continuous bleeding, arterial embolization can be performed. In cases of severe urine leak conservative management is also feasible either by inserting a double j stent or a nephrostomy tube.

Damage Control for renal trauma: the more conservative the surgeon, better for the kidney

Urologic trauma is frequently reported in patients with penetrating trauma. Currently, the computerized tomography and vascular approach through angiography/embolization are the standard approaches for renal trauma. However, the management of renal or urinary tract trauma in a patient with hemodynamic instability and criteria for emergency laparotomy, is a topic of discussion. This article presents the consensus of the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) from Cali, for the management of penetrating renal and urinary tract trauma through damage control surgery. Intrasurgical perirenal hematoma characteristics, such as if it is expanding or actively bleeding, can be reference for deciding whether a conservative approach with subsequent radiological studies is possible. However, if there is evidence of severe kidney trauma, surgical exploration is mandatory and entails a high probability of requiring a nephrectomy. Urinary tract damage control should be conservative and deferred, because this type of trauma does not represent a risk in acute trauma management.

Initial radiological findings associated with active bleeding control necessity and long term functional outcomes after isolated high grade blunt renal trauma

INTRODUCTION

To assess the predictors for conservative management failure and long term outcomes after isolated blunt high grade renal trauma (HGRT).

METHODS

 A retrospective analysis of patients with isolated blunt HGRT (renal trauma grade ≥ IV) was conducted. Patients' demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological investigations, and different lines of treatment were retrieved. The primary outcome was to assess the predictors of conservative treatment failure (need for active bleeding control e.g.: transarterial angioembolization (TAE) and/or surgical exploration). The secondary outcome was to assess the renal parenchymal volume (RPV) changes post HGRT in correlation with the different lines of management using CT-measured RPV. The difference in RPV ≥ 5% at follow up was considered significant.

RESULTS

The study included 63 patients, mean (SD) age was 35.1 (16.6) years. Conservative management was successful in 39 patients (62%), while the need for active bleeding control was required in 16 and 8 patients who underwent TAE and surgical exploration, respectively. Increased hematoma rim distance (HRD), laceration numbers > 3, parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25%, and presence of vascular contrast extravasation (VCE) were predictors for conservative treatment failure (P= 0.006, 0.02, 0.045 and 0.002, respectively). After a mean of 19 months follow up, patients were subclassified into 2 groups: patients with preserved RPV (28 patients) and patients with decreased RPV (29 patients). Renal parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25% was found a predictor for ipsilateral RPV decrease (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Increased HRD, laceration numbers > 3, parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25%, and presence of VCE are findings that reflect the necessity for active bleeding interventions after isolated blunt HGRT. Parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25% is an independent factor for RPV deterioration. Neither the grade of renal trauma nor the type of treatment is a predictor for such deterioration.

Trends and outcomes of blunt renal trauma management: a nationwide cohort study in Japan

Background

There is a paucity of information for predicting patient outcomes other than the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) renal injury scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the patient characteristics and outcomes of patients with blunt renal trauma using a nationwide database in Japan.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) from 2004 to 2018. We identified patients with blunt renal trauma by AIS codes converted to AAST grades. We evaluated trends in patient characteristics and management and assessed factors associated with mortality and nephrectomy using a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

We identified 3550 patients with blunt renal trauma. Their median age was 43 years and 74.2% were male. Nephrectomy was performed in 3.8%, and the overall mortality rate was 9.5%. We found increasing trends in age and emergency abdominal angiography and decreasing trends in nephrectomy and mortality over the 15-year period. The following factors were associated with mortality: age ≥ 65 years (adjusted OR 3.36); pedestrian accident (adjusted OR 1.94); fall from height (adjusted OR 1.91); shock on arrival (adjusted OR 4.02); concomitant injuries to the head/neck (adjusted OR 3.14), pelvis/lower-extremity (adjusted OR 1.59), liver (adjusted OR 1.68), spleen (adjusted OR 1.45), and gastrointestinal tract (adjusted OR 1.90); AAST grades III–V (adjusted ORs 1.42, 2.16, and 5.55); and emergency abdominal angiography (adjusted OR 0.70). The following factors were associated with nephrectomy: shock on arrival (adjusted OR 1.98), concomitant injuries to the thorax (adjusted OR 0.46) and spleen (adjusted OR 2.07), AAST grades III, IV, and V (adjusted ORs 18.40, 113.89, and 468.17), and emergency abdominal angiography (adjusted OR 0.28).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the AAST grade and emergency angiography were associated with mortality and nephrectomy in blunt renal trauma in the Japanese population.

Kidney and uro-trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines

Renal and urogenital injuries occur in approximately 10-20% of abdominal trauma in adults and children. Optimal management should take into consideration the anatomic injury, the hemodynamic status, and the associated injuries. The management of urogenital trauma aims to restore homeostasis and normal physiology especially in pediatric patients where non-operative management is considered the gold standard. As with all traumatic conditions, the management of urogenital trauma should be multidisciplinary including urologists, interventional radiologists, and trauma surgeons, as well as emergency and ICU physicians. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) kidney and urogenital trauma management guidelines.