Focus on Internal Urethrotomy as Primary Treatment for Untreated Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Results from a Multivariable Analysis

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Strictures: Is This the Future? A Review of the Current Literature

Urethral strictures significantly impact patients' quality of life, with endoscopic treatments such as direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and dilatation showing high recurrence rates. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment, which delivers paclitaxel locally after dilation, is an innovative, minimally invasive approach aimed at reducing fibrosis and stricture recurrence. Paclitaxel's antiproliferative and antifibrotic properties inhibit excessive collagen deposition, improving long-term outcomes. DCB treatment is now included in guidelines for managing recurrent bulbar strictures less than 3 cm in length. Recent studies, including the ROBUST trials, have demonstrated the efficacy of Optilume in improving the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax). DCB has also shown a significant reduction in reintervention rates compared with endoscopic treatments in long-term studies, confirming its safety profile. However, the durability of DCB in complex or longer strictures remains uncertain, and its role as a salvage therapy post-urethroplasty requires further investigation. DCB represents a promising, cost-effective advancement in managing recurrent bulbar urethral strictures, particularly for patients unsuitable for urethroplasty. Future research should focus on refining patient selection criteria and exploring indications for other anatomical sites.

Optilume Drug-Coated Balloon for Acute Urinary Retention After Failed Treatment for Complex Recurrent Urethral Stricture Disease

Background and Objectives: We aimed to assess the outcomes of upfront Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) dilation in patients after failed treatment for complex recurrent urethral stricture disease. All patients presented with acute urinary retention and were treated with DCB dilation regardless of stricture site and length. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with acute urinary retention and known complex recurrent urethral strictures. Patients presented at the urology emergency room of our tertiary centre with an inability to void or a post-void residual (PVR) volume exceeding 400 mL between August 2021 and February 2024. Urethrography and/or endoscopic imaging confirmed the diagnosis. Patients with urinary tract infection/sepsis and those with neurological disease were excluded. Urethral dilation to 20 Fr was performed, followed by DCB dilation (30 Fr, 10 bar, 10 min). The primary endpoints were anatomical success (≥14 Fr by cystoscopy/calibration) at 12 months and freedom from repeat interventions. Results: Thirty-one consecutive male patients were evaluated, with twenty-six patients followed for ≥12 months (mean age 65 ± 16.8 years). The stricture sites included seven bulbopenile, seven bulbomembranous, seven anastomotic, three bladder neck, one penile, and one panurethral stricture. The median number of prior urethral/surgical interventions was 2 [IQR: 1-3] (range: 1-31). The median stricture length was 3 [IQR: 2-4] cm (range: 1-8). At 12 months, 65.4% (17/26) of subjects voided satisfactorily and were free of recurrence and reoperation. Conclusions: Timely DCB dilation may offer a viable treatment option for patients with complex recurrent urethral strictures and urinary retention, particularly those who are unable or unwilling to undergo surgical reconstruction and prefer to avoid indwelling catheters.

Predictors of urethral stricture recurrence following internal urethrotomy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the factors associated with urethral stricture recurrence in patients undergoing internal urethrotomy by direct vision.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, LILACS, and central databases. Clinical, quasi-experimental, cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional trials were included.

RESULTS

The search strategy found 402 studies, and 6 were finally included. All of them were clinical trials. A total of 1723 patients diagnosed with urethral stricture undergoing internal urethrotomy were included. The primary associated factor was the association between the length of stricture and recurrence. Other factors described were post-RTU as etiology, previous interventions for urethral stricture management, and previous Qmax on uroflowmetry less than 5 ml/s.

CONCLUSION

The length of urethral stricture was identified as the leading association with stricture recurrence following internal urethrotomy. Other associated factors were post-URT as etiology, previous interventions for managing stricture, and Qmax less than 5 ml/s. However, studies with better methodology are required.

Assessment of predictive factors in endoscopic internal urethrotomy for bulbar urethral strictures

INTRODUCTION

Direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) is usually the first treatment offered to patients with bulbar urethral strictures (US). Advances in devices and surgical techniques have contributed to reducing associated complications. Despite the favorable success rate of DVIU, various factors predicting better outcomes have been studied, including patient characteristics, stricture features, and procedural aspects. The main aim of our study is to assess predictive factors for success.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of patients who underwent endoscopic internal urethrotomy at our hospital over a 30 year period. Out of 788 DVIU performed, we selected 491 (62.3%) conducted for bulbar US with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. We examined clinical outcomes obtained, and assessed the relationship between different patient characteristics, stricture-related factors and procedural aspects related with clinical success-considered as the avoidance of further interventions for stricture recurrence. Descriptive statistics were calculated and parametrical and non-parametrical comparative tests were applied. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for evaluating time until recurrence.

RESULTS

Mean stricture length was 1.2 cm (SD 0.5), with only 12 patients presenting with more than 1 US in the bulbar area during DVIU. After a median follow-up of 170 months, 67.4% of patients did not experience clinical recurrence. Severe postoperative complications appear in 0.4% of cases, and need for overnight admission was 4.5%. A positive association was observed between clinical recurrence and a history of prior pelvic radiotherapy (OR 2.8, 95%IC 1.3-22.2), active smoking (OR 2.1, 95%IC 1.6-2.4), infectious etiology of stricture (OR 2.3, 95%IC 1.6-8), history of previous urethroplasty (OR 2.5, 95%IC 1.7-3.2), and higher postoperative urinary catheter sizes (OR 1.8 95%IC 1.1-2.9). Median time until recurrence after the first DVIU was 65 months, after the second was 60 months, after the third was 32 months, and after the fourth was 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Bulbar US could be safely managed with DVIU. The best clinical success is achieved in non-irradiated, non-smoker patients, without prior urethroplasties. The repetition of the procedure is significantly associated with a shorter time to clinical recurrence.

Treatment of strictures of the male anterior urethra: Bulbar urethra

BACKGROUND

Bulbar urethral strictures are the most frequently encountered. Their management is standardized and needs to be applied to improve results.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted from December 2020 to December 2023, combined with a summary of recommendations from the American, Canadian, European, and French urological associations. References from these recommendations were also used.

RESULTS

Endoscopic treatment is only associated with good results in the case of initial treatment of a short stricture (<2cm). Repeat treatment is not recommended. In all other cases, urethroplasty should be performed. The main techniques, including excision and primary anastomosis (EPA), augmentation and stage urethroplasty, are detailed in this chapter. EPA with or without transection is associated with over 90% success rate for short stenoses. Penile and sexual complications are more frequent with transection of the corpus spongiosum. Augmentation urethroplasty is associated with a similar success rate. The impact of augmentation position on patency has not yet been demonstrated. In the most complicated cases, a stage urethroplasty is required, with a success rate of 33.3-94.6%. Perineal urethrostomy is still a valid option in refractory cases.

CONCLUSION

This review should provide a better understanding of the different surgical treatments available, in order to propose the best management for each patient.

Evaluation of bi-layer silk fibroin grafts for onlay urethroplasty in a rabbit model of urethral stricture disease

Background: Autologous tissues such as buccal mucosa (BM) are widely used for reconstruction of urethral strictures; however, limitations such as donor site morbidity and scarce tissue supply require the development of alternative biomaterials for urethral repair. The goals of this study were to determine the safety and efficacy of bi-layer silk fibroin (BLSF) matrices for urethral stricture repair and compare histological and functional outcomes to the standard approach, BM urethroplasty under good laboratory practices.Material and methods: A total of 13 rabbits exhibiting urethral stricture formation following electrocoagulation injury were treated with onlay urethroplasty with either acellular BLSF (N = 7) or autologous BM (N = 6) grafts for 3 months. Uninjured control rabbits were maintained in parallel (N = 4).Results and conclusion: Animals receiving BLSF implants were demonstrated to be functionally equivalent to BM grafts in their ability to restored strictured calibers, support micturition and promote tissue regeneration with minimal inflammation.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Temporary Bulbar Urethral Stent Placement After Internal Urethrotomy in the Largest Multicenter Series

BACKGROUND

Recent years have seen the development of a new generation of temporary urethral stents as an adjuvant option after direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU). Despite some early promising results, large series addressing their safety and outcomes are still lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To report complications and outcomes from the largest series of patients receiving a temporary bulbar urethral stent to date.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of bulbar urethral stenting procedures after DVIU in seven centers. Patients either refused urethroplasty or were not fit for surgery. The stents were removed after at least 6 mo in place unless complications requiring earlier removal occurred.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

DVIU with a cold knife or laser is performed, followed by stent placement. At the end of the treatment period, the stent is removed under cystoscopy with gripping forceps.

MEASUREMENTS

All patients underwent postoperative follow-up (FU) for assessment of complications while the stent was in place. After removal, the FU schedule consisted of office evaluation at 6 mo and 12 mo, and then annually. Failure was defined as any treatment for urethral stricture after stent removal.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 49% of the patients experienced complications. The most frequent were discomfort (23.8%), stress incontinence (17.5%), and stent dislocation (9.8%). Some 85% of the adverse events observed were Clavien-Dindo grade <3. The overall success rate at median FU of 38.2 mo was 76.9%. The success rate was significantly lower if the stent was removed before 6 mo (53.3% vs 79.7%; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary urethral stents may be a safe choice with satisfactory results in patients not undergoing urethroplasty. A stent indwelling time shorter than 6 mo provides worse outcomes that are comparable to those with DVIU alone.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We assessed complications and outcomes after placement of a temporary narrow tube in the urethra after surgery to widen a narrowing of the urethra. The treatment is safe and easily reproducible with satisfactory results. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Fast Track Surgery as the Latest Multimodal Strategy of Enhanced Recovery after Urethroplasty

Fast track surgery (FTS), as well as ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery/rapid recovery programs), is the latest multimodal treatment strategy, designed to reduce the disability period and improve the medical care quality. The study aims to analyze the enhanced recovery protocol effectiveness in a comparative study of elective urethral stricture surgery. A prospective study included 54 patients with an established diagnosis of urethral stricture in 2019-2020 in the urological hospital of the Irkutsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1. All 54 patients have completed the study. There were two groups of patients FTS-group (group II, n = 25) and standard group (group I, n = 29). In terms of preoperative parameters, the comparison groups have statistical homogeneity. The comparative intergroup efficacy analysis of the treatment based on the criteria established in the study demonstrated good treatment results for 5 (17.2%) patients of group I and 20 (80%) patients of group II (p=0.004). The overall efficacy of urethroplasty surgeries, regardless of the treatment protocol, was comparable (86.2% vs 92%; p=0.870), as well as the likelihood of relapse within two years (p=0.512). The predictors of recurrence were technical complications and urethral suture failure (OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.6; 7.11; p=0.002). The FTS protocol reduced the treatment period (p < 0.001) and decreased the severity of postoperative pain (p < 0.001). The use of the "fast track surgery" protocol in urethroplasty with generally similar treatment results makes it possible to achieve a better functional and objective condition of patients in the postoperative period due to less pain, shorter catheterization, and hospitalization.

[Which management for anterior urethral stricture in male? 2021 guidelines from the uro-genital reconstruction urologist group (GURU) under the aegis of CAMS-AFU (Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the French Association of Urology)]

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this first french guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of anterior urethral strictures. The statements are established by the subgroup working on uro-genital reconstruction surgery (GURU) from the CAMS-AFU (Andrology and Sexual Medicine Committee from the French Association of Urology).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

These guidelines are adapted from the Male Urethral Stricture : American Urological Association Guideline 2016, updated by an additional bibliography from January 2016 to December 2019. Twenty-seven main scenarios seen in clinical practice are identified: from diagnosis, to treatment and follow-up. In addition, this guidelines are powered by anatomical diagrams, treatment algorithms, summaries and follow-up tables.

RESULTS

Anterior urethral strictures are a common condition (0,1 à 1,4 %) in men. The diagnosis is based on a trifecta including an examination with patient reported questionnaires, urethroscopy and retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography. Short meatal stenosis can be treated by dilation or meatotomy, otherwise a urethroplasty can be performed. First line treatment of penile strictures is urethroplasty. Short bulbar strictures (<2cm) may benefit from endourethral treatment (direct visual internal urethrotomy or dilation). In case of recurrence or when the stenosis measures more than 2 cm, a urethroplasty will be proposed. Repeated endourethral treatment management are no longer recommended except in case of palliative option. Urethroplasty is usually done with oral mucosa graft as the primary option, in one or two stages approach depending on the extent of the stenosis and the quality of the tissues. Excision and primary anastomosis or non-transecting techniques are discussed for bulbar urethra strictures. Follow-up by clinical monitoring with urethroscopy, or retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography, is performed at least the first year and then on demand according to symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Anterior urethral strictures need an open surgical approach and should be treated by urethroplasty in most cases. This statement requires a major paradigm shift in practices. Training urologist through reconstructive surgery is the next challenge in order to meet the demand.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urethral Stricture Disease (Part 1): Management of Male Urethral Stricture Disease

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2021 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on management of male urethral stricture disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The panel performed a literature review on these topics covering a time frame between 2008 and 2018, and used predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for the literature to be selected. Key papers beyond this time period could be included as per panel consensus. A strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a review of the available literature and after panel discussion.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Management of male urethral strictures has extensively been described in literature. Nevertheless, few well-designed studies providing high level of evidence are available. In well-resourced countries, iatrogenic injury to the urethra is one of the most common causes of strictures. Asymptomatic strictures do not always need active treatment. Endoluminal treatments can be used for short, nonobliterative strictures at the bulbar and posterior urethra as first-line treatment. Repetitive endoluminal treatments are not curative. Urethroplasty encompasses a multitude of techniques, and adaptation of the technique to the local conditions of the stricture is crucial to obtain durable patency rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of male urethral strictures is complex, and a multitude of techniques are available. Selection of the appropriate technique is crucial, and these guidelines provide relevant recommendations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Injury to the urethra by medical interventions is one of the most common reasons of male urethral stricture disease in well-resourced countries. Although different techniques are available to manage urethral strictures, not every technique is appropriate for every type of stricture. These guidelines, developed based on an extensive literature review, aim to guide physicians in the selection of the appropriate technique(s) to treat a specific type of urethral stricture.

Comparison of efficiency of vascular-preserving urethroplastic methods of the bulbo-membranous part of the urethra

INTRODUCTION

There are several options for vessel-sparing anastomotic procedures that allow one to avoid disturbances in the normal blood supply to the spongy body and successfully perform plastic surgery of distal urethral strictures.

AIM

To perform a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of reconstructive surgical treatment of strictures of the bulbo-membranous urethra with anastomotic surgery with and without vessel-sparing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was carried out on 28 patients with a diagnosis of stricture of the bulbo-membranous urethra who underwent treatment in the period 2012-2018 in the conditions of a urological hospital of Irkutsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1. Anastomotic urethroplasty was performed using one of two methods: with full mobilization of the spongy body bulb and a vessel-sparing method when the spongy body does not intersect.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of the classical method of anastomosing EPA-TWW ((excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty (Turner-Warwick) and excision and Jordan's technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis)) was comparable with the method of anastomosing without crossing the (spongy body of EPA-J). Postoperative changes in the parameters of the functional status of patients based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function, and Quality of Life were comparable in patients undergoing EPA-TWW and EPA-J. The final data indicate a statistically equivalent risk of developing complications such as urinary incontinence, shortening of the penis, and decreased erectile function.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the treatment and the risks of complications during anastomotic surgery with or without vessel-sparing. However, an unformalized assessment demonstrates the best state of erectile function in patients after vascular-preserving surgery.

Is Standardization Transferable? Initial Experience of Urethral Surgery at the University Hospital Frankfurt

Background: Since January 2018 performance of urethroplasties is done on regular basis at the University Hospital Frankfurt (UKF). We aimed to implement and transfer an institutional standardized perioperative algorithm for urethral surgery (established at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf—UKE) using a validated Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (USS-PROM) in patients undergoing urethroplasty at UKF.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease between January 2018 and January 2020 at UKF. All patients were offered to revisit for clinical follow-up (FU) and completion of USS-PROM. Primary end point was stricture recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints were functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and patient satisfaction.

Results: In total, 50 patients underwent urethroplasty and 74 and 24% had a history of previous urethrotomy or urethroplasty, respectively. A buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty was performed in 86% (n = 43). After patient's exclusion due to lost of FU, FU <3 months, and/or a pending second stage procedure, 40 patients were eligible for final analysis. At median FU of 10 months (interquartile-range 5.0–18.0), RFS was 83%. After successful voiding trial, the postoperative median Qmax significantly improved (24.0 vs. 7.0 mL/s; p < 0.01). Conversely, median residual urine decreased significantly (78 vs. 10 mL; p < 0.01). Overall, 95% of patients stated that QoL improved and 90% were satisfied by the surgical outcome.

Conclusions: We demonstrated a successful implementation and transfer of an institutional standardized perioperative algorithm for urethral surgery from one location (UKE) to another (UKF). In our short-term FU, urethroplasty showed excellent RFS, low complication rates, good functional results, improvement of QoL and high patient satisfaction. PROMs allow an objective comparison between different centers.

Patient-reported outcomes for typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting: a single-center analysis of more than 800 patients

PURPOSE

The optimal harvesting site for oral grafting in patients with urethral strictures remain controversial, with no study investigating morbidity on large scale. We aimed to compare typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting in terms of complications and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Within 827 patients treated at our referral center with oral graft urethroplasty, we compared typical vs atypical harvesting techniques. A self-administered, semiquantitative, non-validated questionnaire assessed early (10 days) and late (4 months) postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes. A semiquantitative score was calculated according to patient responses, and it was used to assess early (6 questions) and late (13 questions) patient dissatisfaction status. Patients were defined early and/or late dissatisfied when they scored ≥ 7 and ≥ 10 at the early or late questionnaires, respectively.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2019, our patients predominantly received typical single cheek harvesting (89% vs 11%), with + 1.5% increase rate per year (p < 0.001). Early and late dissatisfied patients were, respectively, 170 (23%) vs 39 (44%) and 59 (8%) vs 16 (18%) in the typical vs atypical groups. Atypical harvesting was associated with higher rates of early (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.34; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.75; p = 0.001) and late (OR: 2.37; 95%CI 1.22-4.42; p = 0.008) postoperative dissatisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Typical single cheek harvesting was the preferred surgical option at our center and it was associated with negligible early and late rates of complications and patient's dissatisfaction. Conversely, atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting was associated with higher complications and frequent patient dissatisfaction.