Same Day Discharge is a Successful Approach for the Majority of Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

[Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) Compared to Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP): A Propensity Score Matched Analysis]

This study investigates and compares the clinical safety and efficiency of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted transvesical enucleation of the prostate (RASP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with large prostate volumes in a tertiary care centre. Perioperative data were collected from 39 patients who underwent RASP at our centre between 2015 and 2021. Propensity score matching was performed based on prostate volume, patient age, and body mass index (BMI), comparing these patients with 721 individuals treated with HoLEP at our clinic. An analysis was performed of preoperative parameters, including prostate volume, age, BMI, PSA level, IPSS score, and IIEF score, as well as intra- and postoperative parameters, including operative time, resected tissue weight, postoperative catheterization duration, length of hospital stay, haemoglobin decrease, transfusion rate, postoperative urinary retention, Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). A statistically significant advantage was observed in favour of HoLEP regarding operative time (114.5 vs. 153.5 minutes; p<0.001), catheterization duration (2.6 vs. 7.4 days; p<0.001), and length of hospital stay (2.9 vs. 8.8 days; p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in terms of haemoglobin decrease or transfusion rate. The overall complication rate was lower in the HoLEP group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.051). However, regarding the severity of complications, a statistically significant disadvantage for RASP was observed based on the CDC (p=0.027), while the CCI did not show a statistically significant difference between the cohorts (p=0.098). Both HoLEP and RASP proved to be effective and safe for the treatment of BPH with large prostate volumes. Compared to RASP, HoLEP demonstrated advantages in terms of catheterization duration and length of hospital stay. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding the overall complication rate.

Assessment of the Patient's Perceived Fear and Anxiety During Ambulatory Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate: A Prospective, Real-Practice Study from a Single Center

Background and Objective: Ambulatory holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) has shown low rates of readmission and postoperative complications. However, the patient's experience has been undervalued. We aimed to measure the patient's perceived fear and anxiety during ambulatory HoLEP. Methods: We performed a prospective study on patients scheduled for HoLEP at our institution. We excluded patients with cognitive or psychiatric disorders and those who had to be hospitalized. The week preceding the surgery, we administered the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) by phone. The day following the surgery, we readministered the HADS and asked the patients if they would undergo HoLEP in the same setting. Key Findings and Limitations: Overall, 70 patients completed the study (mean age 72.3, standard deviation [SD] 6.5 years). The mean SFQ score was 18.4/90 (SD 13.5); the two highest rated items were "I am afraid of pain after the operation" and "I am afraid of unpleasant side effects after the operation." with a mean of 3.7/10 and 2.7/10, respectively. For the HADS, the mean preoperative score was 4.6/21 (SD 3.4), and the mean postoperative score was 3.9/21 (SD 3.0), with a mean difference of -0.7 (p = 0.059). The majority (90%) of patients reported they would undergo HoLEP in the same setting. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Most patients described low levels of anxiety and fear, and would undergo ambulatory HoLEP again. Given the high satisfaction and low levels of anxiety, widespread adoption of ambulatory HoLEP should be considered. Patient Summary: Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, or an enlarged prostate, often need surgery to improve urinary function. We studied the acceptability of same-day discharge surgery for this condition by assessing patients' anxiety, fear, and willingness to repeat the procedure. Most patients described low levels of anxiety and fear, and would undergo ambulatory HoLEP again.

Prospective analysis of the learning curve in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): A 125 case series

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a surgeon's learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in 125 consecutive cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative baseline characteristics, functional outcomes, surgical times, and complications of the first 125 patients treated by HoLEP were recorded. The sample was divided into quintiles (25 cases/group), and statistical analysis was carried out using the ANOVA test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Chi-squared test, and likelihood-ratio test.

RESULTS

Surgical time decreased progressively: 92 min. (Q1), 65 min. (Q2), 54 min. (Q3), 45 min. (Q4) and 50 min. (Q5) (p < 0.001). Enucleation rate gradually increased: 1.08 g/min (Q1), 1.65 g/min (Q2), 1.82 g/min (Q3), 1.96 g/min (Q4) and 2.74 g/min (Q5) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in enucleated weight (Q1: 51 g, Q2: 57 g, Q3: 51 g, Q4: 53 g, Q5: 65 g) (p = 0.21), length of hospital stay (median 1.12 days), bladder catheterization (mean 1.51 days), intra- and postoperative complications or urethral stricture (5.6%) (p > 0.05). Time to continence recovery was similar in quintiles 1-4 (23, 27, 21, 20 days) and shorter in quintile 5 (3.5 days) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The initiation of a HoLEP program following the completion of training demonstrates a low morbidity rate and highly favorable functional outcomes. The efficiency of the technique demonstrates a linear and consistent increase from the outset of the learning curve, with significantly reduced surgical times achieved after 25 cases.

Application trends and research hotspots of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a bibliometric and visualization analysis

PURPOSE

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) is a preferred treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This bibliometric analysis aims to analyze the application trends and research hotspots of EEP.

METHODS

We conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1989 to 2023. The techniques examined include holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP), thulium laser enucleation (ThuLEP/ThuFLEP), bipolar/monopolar transurethral enucleation (b-TUEP/m-TUEP), GreenLight laser enucleation (GreenLEP), and diode laser enucleation (DiLEP). We utilized VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package 'bibliometrix' for the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 739 English-language studies were analyzed, revealing a steady increase in EEP-related publications. HoLEP was the most extensively studied technique, followed by ThuLEP and b-TUEP, while ThuFLEP gaining emerging interest. There has been a notable lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for GreenLEP, DiLEP and m-TUEP. China, the United States, and Germany led in publication volume and collaboration networks. Key contributors in the field were identified, with recent research focusing on topics like postoperative transient urinary incontinence (TUI) and the role of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) in comparison to EEP.

CONCLUSIONS

EEP is gaining widespread clinical acceptance for BPH treatment. Future research should focus on addressing the gap in high-quality RCTs, especially for underexplored techniques like GreenLEP, DiLEP and m-TUEP, and explore strategies to reduce postoperative TUI. Prospective comparisons between RASP and EEP will be crucial for optimizing surgical approaches in BPH management.

Same-day Discharge Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison With General Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To determine if using spinal anesthesia (SA) for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) impacted the ability to perform same-day discharge (SDD) compared to a prostate volume-matched cohort undergoing HoLEP under general anesthesia (GA).

METHODS

From January 1, 2021 to March 28, 2024, 995 men underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon. Three hundred eleven were identified who had SA and a recorded preoperative prostate volume. Propensity score matching based on prostate volume was performed with the remaining cohort who received GA in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was rate of SDD.

RESULTS

When comparing SDD between the two groups, 84% of SA patients had SDD compared to 74% of GA patients (P-value .002). The operative time for SA was significantly shorter than GA (89 vs 101 minutes P-value <.001). The total operating room time (wheels-in to wheels-out) including anesthesia induction for SA was significantly shorter than GA (119 vs 128 minutes P-value .0003). There were no significant differences in early catheter reinsertion, emergency department visits, complications, or postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen measured at 3months.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing SA for HoLEP did not preclude SDD compared to a prostate volume-matched cohort who underwent HoLEP under GA. In fact, SDD were higher in the SA cohort without a corresponding increase in emergency department visits or catheter reinsertion.

Safety and Efficacy of Same Day Discharge for Men Undergoing Contemporary Robotic-assisted Aquablation Prostate Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting-First Global Experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of same-day discharge (SDD) after Aquablation specifically in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of men with significant BPH underwent Aquablation at a single ASC. Comprehensive preoperative assessments were conducted, including uroflowmetry, IPSS, and PVR. Aquablation was performed as morning cases by a single experienced surgeon. Following the procedure, men were assessed for immediate postoperative outcomes, including pain levels, hematuria, and voiding efficiency. Patients meeting discharge criteria were allowed to return home on the same calendar day.

RESULTS

A total of 60 consecutive men with a mean prostate size of 115 mL underwent Aquablation, 59 (98%) of whom were discharged the same day. No transfusions or return to the OR occurred. The procedure demonstrated a significant improvement in urinary flow rates and a substantial reduction in IPSS scores at the 1-month post-operative period. Pain scores were found to be minimal, and the incidence of postoperative complications, including hematuria and urinary retention was low and comparable to previously published outcomes. Despite more meticulous focal cautery, no differences in erectile, ejaculatory or adverse outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSION

Aquablation for BPH at an ASC appears to be a safe and effective approach. Morning procedures and attentive cautery and streamlined patient pathways seem essential for SDD. Despite electrosurgical hemostasis, ejaculatory, sexual, and post-operatively pain were not compromised.

To Hold or Continue Blood Thinners? A Retrospective Analysis on Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Who Either Held or Continued Antiplatelet/Anticoagulation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes between those who held or continued antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy (APAC) for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients on APAC who underwent HoLEP between January 2021 and August 2023 by a single surgeon at a high-volume center. APAC was further categorized to the specific medication: clopidogrel, apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics and outcomes were then compared. SPSS was used for statistical analysis with significance defined as P <.05.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients were on APAC, of which 82 held and 57 continued APAC: 38 on clopidogrel (21 held), 20 on warfarin (11 held), 57 on apixaban (34 held), 24 on rivaroxaban (16 held). Overall, there were no significant differences between those who held versus those who continued APAC. On sub-analysis, controlling for age and prostate size, patients who held clopidogrel had shorter length of stays (11.3 hours vs 27.3 hours, P = .016), higher likelihood for same-day catheter removal (90.5% vs 47.1%, P = .002) and same-day discharge (90.5% vs 35.3%, P = .002). Patients who held warfarin had shorter procedure (61.3 minutes vs 92.2 minutes, P = .025) and morcellation time (7.36 minutes vs 18 minutes, P = .048).

CONCLUSION

HoLEP is safe and efficacious in patients whether APAC is held or continued through surgery. Holding APAC in those on clopidogrel may decrease length of stay and improve rates of same-day Foley removal and discharge. Patients who held warfarin had shorter morcellation and procedure times.

Trend of ambulatory benign prostatic obstruction surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is one of the most common causes of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Some institutions routinely perform BPO surgeries in ambulatory setting, while others elect for overnight hospitalization. With the COVID-19 pandemic limiting resources and hospital space for elective surgery, we investigated the time trend of ambulatory BPO procedures performed around the COVID-19 outbreak.

METHODS

We identified BPO surgeries from the California State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases between 2018 and 2020. Our primary outcome was the proportion of procedures performed in ambulatory settings with a length of stay of zero days. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with ambulatory surgery around the COVID-19 outbreak. Spline regression with a knot at the pandemic outbreak was performed to compare time trends pre- and post-pandemic.

RESULTS

Among 37,148 patients who underwent BPO procedures, 30,067 (80.9%) were ambulatory. Before COVID-19, 80.1% BPO procedures were performed ambulatory, which increased to 83.4% after COVID-19 outbreak (p < 0.001). In multivariable model, BPO procedures performed after COVID-19 outbreak were 1.26 times more likely to be ambulatory (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.40, p < 0.0001). Spline curve analysis indicated significantly different trend of change pre- and post-pandemic (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a rising trend of BPO surgeries performed in ambulatory setting post-pandemic. It remains to be seen if the observed ambulatory transition remains as we continue to recover from the pandemic.

HoLEP Learning Curve-Resident Perspective: Survey of Senior Residents from High-Volume Tertiary Center

Objective: We aim to report the learning curve and experience performing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) from a resident standpoint trained at a tertiary high-volume center. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to 10 surveyees that included recently graduated chief residents trained at Indiana University in the past 3 years i.e., between 2020 and 2022 with a 100% response rate. The questionnaire focused on HoLEP training experience based on a recently established mentorship curriculum in training the residents through each individual step of the surgery. Results: The average learning curve for performing HoLEP was reported to be greater than 25 cases with 50% of the residents reporting >50 cases to master the technique. The surgical difficulty of steps of the HoLEP were rated on a subjective scale of 1-5: 1 = very easy, 2 = easy, 3 = neutral, 4 = hard, and 5 = very hard. The common challenging steps in decreasing the order of difficulty as reported are performing apical enucleation, joining anterior and posterior planes, and dividing anterior commissure with a mean rating of 3.5, 3.1, and 3.1, respectively. The most difficult aspect of the surgery to master was performing apical dissection (60%). Comparing operative parameters for HoLEP with transurethral resection of the prostate in aspects of resection volume and times, 70% of candidates reported it better for HoLEP whereas 20% had similar times for both procedures. A total of 90% of the residents felt confident to offer HoLEP as part of their practice without the need for any further training. Regarding the initial challenge of including HoLEP surgery in practice, the majority (60%) reported difficulty with equipment set up in their practice while 20% reported difficulty maintaining efficient operating room (OR) times and turnover. Conclusion: We believe HoLEP can be performed immediately after residency training and incorporated into practice with high volume, repeated exposure to HoLEP surgery throughout residency based on study results. The average learning curve reported for performing HoLEP was greater than 25 cases.

Same-day Catheter Removal and Hospital Discharge After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety, and predictive factors for the success of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with catheter removal and hospital discharge on the same day of the procedure.

METHODS

This prospective study included 34 patients who underwent HoLEP using a 60-W holmium laser device and the Wolf Piranha morcellation system. Surgeries began at 10:30 am and the patients were expected to be discharged by 5 pm on the same day. The patients underwent a voiding trial to remove the urinary catheter before hospital discharge. Functional outcomes were assessed 90 days after the procedure.

RESULTS

Mean (range) age, prostate-specific antigen value, and prostate weight were as follows: 63.4 (50-80) years, 4.81 (0.19-14) ng/mL, and 89.3 (33-258) g, respectively. The mean (range) enucleation and morcellation times were 56.2 (29-91) minutes and 14.67 (3-45) minutes, respectively. Thirty-one patients (91.1%) were discharged on the same day of the procedure after urinary catheter removal.

CONCLUSION

The performance of HoLEP is safe on an outpatient basis. Same-day catheter removal is feasible and does not affect hospital discharge.

The long-term learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the en-bloc technique: a single surgeon series of 500 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) of a single surgeon in 500 consecutive cases.

METHODS

Demographic parameters, outcomes, and adverse events were evaluated. The learning curve for HoLEP in en-bloc technique of the first 500 consecutive patients was analyzed in clusters of 100 (clusters 1-5) using the Wilcoxen rank test, Chi² test and Kruskal Wallis test.

RESULTS

Enucleation weight was similar in the clusters 1,2,3, and 5 (62 g, 63 g, 61 g, 61 g), in cluster 4 it was slightly higher at 73 g. There was a significant reduction in operating time from 67 min (cluster 1) to 57 min (cluster 2), 46 min (cluster 3), 53 min (cluster 4), and 43 min (cluster 5), p < 0.001. Enucleation efficiency (g/min) showed a steady increase (1.72, 2.24, 2.79, 2.92 vs. 2.99, p < 0.001). Laser energy efficiency also improved (2.17 vs. 2.12 vs. 1.71 vs. 1.65 vs. 1.55; p < 0.001). There was no measurable learning curve regarding the length of hospital stay (mean 2.5 days), catheterization time (1.9 days), hemoglobin drop (approx. 1 g/dl) or complications (p > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP using the en-bloc technique is a safe and highly effective method. Over time, a slight but steady learning curve and improvement in operation time, enucleation efficiency and laser energy efficiency were shown even for an experienced surgeon - after 500 cases, still no plateau was reached. There was no measurable learning curve regarding blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and catheterization time.

Does Resectoscope Sheath Size Influence Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Outcomes? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is routinely performed with a 24F, 26F, or a 28F scope. Proponents of the larger scopes propose that a bigger sheath size allows for superior flow and visibility leading to a more efficient operation and better hemostasis. Those utilizing the smaller scopes suggest that the smaller sheath is less traumatic, resulting in lower stricture rates and temporary incontinence. We sought to compare outcomes of ambulatory HoLEP using the 24F and 28F laser scope. Materials and Methods: From May 2022 to March 2023, we randomized patients undergoing HoLEP (<200 cm3 in size) 1:1 to either a 24F or 28F scope. The primary outcome was differences in surgical duration between groups (minutes). Secondary outcomes included surgeon scope evaluation and postoperative patient results. Results: There was no difference in patient characteristics in those randomized to 28F (n = 76) vs 24F (n = 76) (p > 0.05) scopes. Procedural duration and efficiencies were not different between groups (all p > 0.05). The 28F scope was associated with improved surgeon-graded irrigation flow and visibility (p < 0.001). Patients treated with the 28F scope were more likely to achieve effective same-day trial of void (SDTOV) (28F 94.3% vs 24F 82.1%, p = 0.048) and have a shorter length of stay (LOS) (28F 7.0 vs 24F 11.9 hours, p = 0.014), however, rates of same-day discharge (SDD) were not statistically different (28F 87.8% vs 24F 78.4%, p = 0.126). There was no difference between the cohorts in rates of 90-day emergency room presentations, re-admissions, complications, or functional ouctomes (p > 0.05). Conclusions: We identified no clear advantage of scope size with regard to intraoperative or postoperative outcomes at 3-month follow-up due to scope size. However, if SDD is part of your postoperative pathway, the 28F scope may shorten LOS and increase rates of effective SDTOV. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05308017.

Same-day catheter removal after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarize all existing evidence regarding the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of same-day trial of void and catheter removal after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). Although there have been many reports of the safety and efficacy of same-day discharge from the hospital for selected patients undergoing HoLEP, in most of these reports, patients return to the hospital, usually on postoperative day one, to undergo a trial of void and catheter removal.

METHODS

PubMed®, Scopus®, and Cochrane® primary databases were systematically screened, from inception to 17 January 2023. The search strategy used the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) Framework. We followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Six studies met all the predefined criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Four studies were retrospective and two were prospective. Four studies were non-comparative, while two were comparative ones. The same-day catheter removal success rate ranged from 85.5 to 90% among studies, while only one grade-IIIb Clavien-Dindo complication was reported, which was unrelated to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Same-day catheter removal is a feasible, safe, and efficient approach for selected patients undergoing HoLEP. Certain factors, such as intraoperative furosemide administration, were found to improve same-day catheter-free rates, while preoperative PVR and urinary retention were independent predictive factors of same-day trial of void failure.

Is day-case surgery feasible for laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate? A systematic review

PURPOSE

Laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) for benign prostatic obstruction has become increasingly prevalent worldwide. Considering the medical cost-savings and concomitantly fewer nosocomial infections, the feasibility of same-day postoperative discharge of patients who have undergone laser EEP in terms of its safety and effectiveness has become a subject matter of growing interest. We aimed to review those studies focussing on day-case surgery (DCS) in patients undergoing laser EEP.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed-MEDLINE and Web of Science databases until October 2022 with the following search terms: "same day discharge AND laser enucleation of the prostate", "day-case AND laser enucleation of the prostate", "same day surgery AND laser enucleation of the prostate" and "one day surgery AND laser enucleation of the prostate" by combining PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) terms. We identified 15 eligible studies.

RESULTS

While 14 of the studies focussed on holmium laser EEP, one focused on thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate. We observed an improvement in functional parameters in all studies we reviewed, and DCS success and readmission rates ranged between 35.3-100% and 0-17.8%, respectively. The complication rates varied between 0 and 36.7%, most of the complicatons were Clavien-Dindo (CD) I and II. CD ≥ III complications did not significantly differ between same day discharge (SDD) and non-SDD groups in the studies.

CONCLUSION

Laser EEP is feasible and promising DCS treatment option delivering improved functional parameters compared to baseline values, and lower perioperative complication and readmission rates in certain patients.

Mini-HoLEP (MILEP) vs HoLEP: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Minimal invasiveness improves outcome in many surgical fields including urology. We aimed to assess intraoperative performance and clinical outcome of miniaturized holmium laser enucleation of prostate (MiLEP) (22FR).

METHODS

We ran a propensity score-matched analysis among all consecutive laser enucleations of prostate performed between 9/2022 and 2/2023. It resulted in two matched comparison groups: MiLEP 22 FR (n = 40) and holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP 26 Fr) (n = 40). Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

MiLEP was associated with significantly less intraoperative irrigation (20.5 L vs 15 L, p = 0.002E-3), less decrease in body core temperature (0.6°C vs 0.1°C, p = 0.003E-5), and less need for meatal dilation (25% vs 78%, p = 0.01E-3). These parameters were identified as being independent in the multivariate analysis. There was a trend toward less and a shorter period of postoperative stress incontinence (SI) for the MiLEP group compared to the HoLEP group: 15% and 42% (p = 0.01) at 1 month, 8% and 14% (p = 0.07) at 2 months, and 0 and 0.3% (p = 1) at 3 months, respectively. There were no differences in prostatic enucleation effectiveness, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and improvement in the international prostate symptom score and quality of life score.

CONCLUSIONS

MiLEP is feasible and provides better maintenance of body core temperature, reduction in amount of fluid irrigation, and decrease in need for meatal dilation without affecting effectiveness in comparison with HoLEP. MiLEP may reduce early postoperative stress incontinence, thereby shortening the recovery period.

Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy versus other treatment modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6500 cases

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend simple prostatectomy or endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) as treatment of choice for bladder prostatic obstruction (BPO) caused by large prostate glands. We aimed to provide a wide-ranging analysis of the currently available evidence, comparing safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) versus open simple prostatectomy (OSP), laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP), and laser EEP.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for retrospective and prospective studies comparing RASP to OSP or LSP or laser EEP (HoLEP/ThuLEP). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations were followed to design the search strategies, selection criteria, and evidence report. A meta-analysis evaluated perioperative safety and effectiveness outcomes. The weighted mean difference and risk ratio were used to compare continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for RCT article assessing risk of bias.

RESULTS

15 studies, including 6659 patients, were selected for meta-analysis: 13 observational studies, 1 non-randomized prospective study, and 1 randomized controlled trial. RASP was associated with statistically significant longer operative time (OT) and lower postoperative complication rate, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), and transfusion rate (TR) compared to OSP. LSP showed longer LOS and lower postoperative SHIM score, with no difference in OT, EBL, and complications. Compared to laser EEP, RASP presented longer LOS and catheterization time and higher TR. ThuLEP presented shorter OT than RASP. No difference were found in functional outcomes between groups both subjectively (IPSS, QoL) and objectively (Qmax, PVR).

CONCLUSION

RASP has become a size-independent treatment for the management of BPO caused by a large prostate gland. It can duplicate the functional outcomes of OSP while offering a better safety profile. When compared to LSP, the latter still stands as a valid lower-cost option, but it requires solid laparoscopic skill sets and therefore it is unlikely to spread on larger scale. When compared to laser EEP, RASP offers a shorter learning curve, but it still suffers from longer catheterization time and LOS.

En bloc holmium laser enucleation of prostate in octogenarians and nonagenarians: clinical characteristics and outcome

Extended longevity leads to greater numbers of elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who seek surgical solutions. We assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians with BPH who underwent en bloc holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Retrospective cohort of all consecutive HoLEP patients treated in our medical center between January 2020 and January 2023. Cohort was divided into group aged < 80 years (n = 290) and group aged ≥ 80 years (n = 77). Their demographics, presentations, indications, and outcomes were compared. Octogenarians and nonagenarians had higher rates of indwelling catheters (p = 0.00001), chronic retention (p = 0.00006), larger prostates (p = 0.03), higher American Anesthesiology Association scores (p = 0.000001), and more antiplatelet medications (p = 0.0003) at presentation. They had longer operations (median 115 vs 90 min, respectively, p = 0.0008), longer hospital stay (median 2 vs 1 day, p = 0.01E-7), a higher complication rate (17% vs 7%, p = 0.02), and a higher transitory urinary incontinence (TUI) rate (54% vs 9%, p = 0.00001). TUI was more prevalent in the older group with indwelling catheters (61% vs, 13%, p = 0.00001). The functional outcome was similar for both age groups, and all patients could void spontaneously after the procedure. En-bloc HoLEP improves urinary symptoms and quality of life in patients ≥ 80 years of age despite larger prostates, more comorbidities, and higher complications rate, compared to younger men. HoLEP bestows a significant improvement in urologic quality of life regardless of age.

Same-day discharge for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review studies focused on the feasibility and outcomes of outpatient endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through December 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case control studies.

RESULTS

Of 773 studies, ten were included in the systematic review (n = 1942 patients) and four in the meta-analysis (n = 1228 patients). The pooled incidence of successful same-day discharge was 84% (95% CI 0.72-0.91). Unplanned readmission was recorded in 3% (95% CI 0.02-0.06) of ambulatory cases. In the reported criteria-selected patients submitted to SDD surgery, the forest plot suggested a lower rate of postoperative readmission (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.91, p = 0.02) and complications (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-1, p < 0.05) rates compared to standard protocols.

CONCLUSION

We provide the first systematic review and meta-analysis on SDD for endoscopic prostate enucleation. Despite the lack of randomized controlled trials, we confirm the feasibility and safety of the protocol with no increase in complications or readmission rate in well-selected patients.

The outcomes of same-day discharge following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgeries: our experience during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcomes of Same-Day Discharge (SDD) following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective review of HoLEP surgeries at a single institution between January 2021 and March 2022 was performed. Patient demographic and operative data were collected, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated in terms of safety and efficacy and compared in both groups using a t-test and chi-square test. Logistic regression was also performed to identify factors that correlate with the failure of SDD.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were identified; 135 patients were successfully discharged on the same day and 20 were admitted (87% SDD rate). Admitted HoLEP patients had a significantly higher median prostate-specific antigen (5.7 vs 3.9 ng/dL, P < 0.001), prostate volume (152.3 vs 100.6 mL, P < 0.001), and enucleated tissue weight (90.3 vs 56.9 g, P = 0.04) compared to the SDD group. The SDD group had a 2.9% (n = 4) readmission rate and a 5.2% (n = 7) Emergency Department (ED) visit rate. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative ED visits (P = 0.64), readmissions (P = 0.98), complications, and catheterization time (P = 0.98) between both groups. Preoperative predictors of SDD failure included prostate gland volume > 150 mL (OR = 7.17; CI 2.01-25.67; P < 0.01) and history of antiplatelet/anticoagulation use (OR = 6.59; CI 2.00-21.67; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge following HoLEP is a safe and effective approach that can be performed in most patients using a liberal discharge criteria and relying on postoperative findings only.

Predictors of readmission and impact of same-day discharge in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

Background

Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is becoming the gold standard for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our objective was to identify predictors of 30-day readmission and the impact of same-day discharge after HoLEP.

Methods

Using NSQIP data from 2011 to 2019, we identified men who underwent HoLEP for the treatment of BPH. We compared patients based on time of discharge and readmission status. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to identify independent factors associated with 30-day readmission.

Results

A total of 3,489 patients met inclusion criteria with 833 (23.88%) being discharged within 24 hours and 2,656 (76.12%) discharged after 24 hours. There were 158 (4.53%) 30-day readmissions, mostly due to hematuria and urinary tract infection. Patients being readmitted were older (72 vs. 70 years old, P = 0.001), were more likely to have preoperative anemia (36.7% vs. 23.1%; P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (29.7% vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001), bleeding disorder (10.8% vs. 2.8%; P < 0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (≥3: 70.3% vs. 46.7%; P < 0.001) and a higher frailty burden (5-item modified frailty index [5i-mFI] ≥ 2: 36.1% vs. 19.1%; P < 0.001) compared to their counterparts. Factors independently associated with 30-day readmission were bleeding disorder (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.63-5.11; P < 0.001), 5i-mFI ≥ 2 (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.03-2.71; P = 0.038) and an ASA score ≥3 (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.21-2.70; P = 0.004); however, same-day discharge was not found to be a significant predictor of 30-day readmissions.

Conclusion

The overall readmission rate after HoLEP is low. Patients discharged within 24 hours have similar rates of readmission compared to patients discharged after 24 hours. We found bleeding disorder, frailty burden, and ASA score to be independent predictors of 30-day readmission.

Improving Prostatic Preoperative Volume Estimation and Planning before Laser Enucleation

We aimed to validate a formula for improving the estimation of prostatic volume by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) prior to transurethral laser enucleation. A total of 293 patients treated for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) by laser enucleation from 2019−2022 were included. The preoperative AUS volume was adjusted by the formula 1.082 × Age + 0.523 × AUS − 53.845, which was based on specimens retrieved by suprapubic prostatectomy. The results were compared to the weight of the tissue removed by laser enucleation as determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient test (ICC). The potential impact of preoperative planning on operating time was calculated. The ICC between the adjusted volumes and the enucleated tissue weights was 0.86 (p < 0.001). The adjusted volume was more accurate than the AUS volume (weight-to-volume ratio of 0.84 vs. 0.7, p < 0.001) and even more precise for prostates weighing >80 g. The median operating time was 90 min. The adjusted volume estimation resulted in an overall shorter expected preoperative operating time by a median of 21 min (24%) and by a median of 40 min in prostates weighing >80 g. The adjustment formula accurately predicts prostate volume before laser enucleation procedures and may significantly improve preoperative planning, the matching of a surgeon’s level of expertise, and the management of patients’ expectations.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate: What is the True Rate of Postoperative Opioid Use?

OBJECTIVES

To determine if patients were obtaining opioids after HoLEP from other sources - despite our opioid-free postoperative pathway - we utilized a national prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) to review all patients who underwent HoLEP at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all HoLEPs completed by two fellowship-trained surgeons. We utilized a national PDMP to determine the true rate of postoperative opioid use. The primary outcome was filling of an opioid prescription within 31 postoperative days. Student t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

From July 2018-July 2020, 284 men underwent HoLEP. Despite our opioid-free pathway, 35 men (12.4%) received postoperative opioids. Unfortunately, 41.2% of opioids were prescribed by our inpatient physician assistant on his own accord. To prevent confounding, these patients were excluded from primary analyses. Thus, only 7.4% of patients received postoperative opioids. On univariate analysis, surgeon experience, chronic opioid use, any opioid exposure, benzodiazepine use, and chronic pain were associated with postoperative opioid use. On multivariate analysis, only preoperative opioid exposure (OR 41.9, P = 0.0383) was identified as a significant variable.

CONCLUSION

92.6% of patients did not obtain postoperative opioids on our opioid-free post-HoLEP pathway, but 7.4% of patients did obtain opioids from outside sources. Proper education of the surgical team is key to prevent inappropriate opioid prescribing. On multivariate analysis, we identified that any preoperative opioid exposure was associated with an increased risk of obtaining postoperative opioids.