Glansectomy and Reconstruction for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review

Long-term outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men age ≤50 years old compared with men >50 years old from a single tertiary referral centre: a propensity score matched analysis

Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the oncological outcomes in younger men are unclear. We aimed to analyse and compare oncological outcomes of men age ≤50 years (y) and >50 years with PeCa. A retrospective analysis of men ≤50 y with penile squamous cell carcinoma managed at a tertiary centre was performed. A propensity score matched cohort of men >50 y was identified for comparison. Matching was according to tumour, nodal stage and the types of primary surgery. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survivals (MFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots and compared using log-rank tests. Between 2005-2020, 100 men ≤50 y (median (IQR) age, 46 y (40-49)) were identified and matched with 100 men >50 y (median (IQR) age, 65 y (59-73)). 10, 24, 32, 34 men age ≤50 y were diagnosed in 2005-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2016 and 2017-2020 respectively. Median (IQR) follow-up was 53.5 (18-96) months. OS at 2 years: ≤50 y, 86%>50 y, 80.6%; 5 years: ≤50 y, 78.1%, >50 y, 63.1%; 10 years: ≤50 y, 72.3%, >50 y, 45.6% (p = 0.01). DSS at 2 years: ≤50 y, 87.2%>50 y, 87.8%; 5 years: ≤50 y, 80.9%>50 y, 78.2%; 10 years: ≤50 y, 78%, >50 y, 70.9% (p = 0.74). RFS was 93.1% in the ≤50 y group (vs. >50 y, 96.5%) at 2 year, and 90% (vs. >50 y, 88.5%) at 5 years, p = 0.81. Within the ≤50 y group, 2 years and 5 years MFS was 93% (vs. >50 y, 96.5%), and 89.5% (vs. >50 y, 92.7%) respectively, (p = 0.40). There were no statistical significance in DFS, RFS and MFS in men age ≤50 y and >50 y. PeCa in younger patients is fatal, public awareness and patient education are crucial for early detection and management.

Oncological Outcomes of Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) Laser Ablation for Penile Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To report oncological outcomes after thulium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) laser ablation for penile cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 71 patients with ≤cT1 penile cancer (2013-2022). All patients underwent Tm:YAG ablation with a RevoLix 200W continuous-wave laser. First, Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested local tumor recurrence rates. Second, Kaplan-Meier plots tested progression-free survival (≥T3 and/or N1-3 and/or M1).

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 38 (22-58) months. Overall, 33 (50.5%) patients experienced local tumor recurrence. Specifically, 19 (29%) vs 9 (14%) vs 5 (7.5%) patients had 1 vs 2 vs 3 recurrences over time. In multivariable Cox regression models, a trend for higher recurrence rates was observed for G3 tumors (hazard ratio:6.1; P = .05), relative to G1. During follow-up, 12 (18.5%) vs 4 (6.0%) vs 2 (3.0%) men were retreated with 1 vs 2 vs 3 Tm:YAG laser ablations. Moreover, 11 (17.0%) and 3 (4.5%) patients underwent glansectomy and partial/total penile amputation. Last, 5 (7.5%) patients experienced disease progression. Specifically, TNM stage at the time of disease progression was: (1) pT3N0; (2) pT2N2; (3) pTxN3; (4) pT1N1 and (5) pT3N3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tm:YAG laser ablation provides similar oncological results as those observed by other penile-sparing surgery procedures. In consequence, Tm:YAG laser ablation should be considered a valid alternative for treating selected penile cancer patients.

[Organ-preserving treatment as the most important option in the treatment of primary penile cancer]

The treatment of patients with penile cancer presents a significant challenge for therapists and patients alike. In this context, the focus must not only be on surgical techniques but rather on patient education and collaborative treatment planning. Consistent information about potential organ preservation and its consequences is essential. Following clinical examination and histological confirmation of the diagnosis, an organ-preserving and stage-adapted surgical procedure should be used in almost all cases. Intraoperatively, the aim should be to achieve tumour-free surgical margins through rapid pathological examination. Psycho-oncological support should be offered to all patients. Centralisation of treatment appears highly desirable for Germany, considering the excellent outcomes observed in English and Dutch centres. Until this has been achieved, following the valuable experience of the "Second Opinion Network for Testicular Tumours", the Second Opinion platform "eKonsil Urologie" (https://www.ekonsil.org) can be used as a reference.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Management of Penile Cancer: Results from the Spanish National Registry of Penile Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer (PC) is a rare malignancy with an overall incidence in Europe of 1/100,000 males/year. In Europe, few studies report the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, and treatment of PC. The aim of this study is to present an updated outlook on the aforementioned factors of PC in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentric, retrospective, observational epidemiological study was designed, and patients with a new diagnosis of PC in 2015 were included. Patients were anonymously identified from the Register of Specialized Care Activity of the Ministry of Health of Spain. All Spanish hospitals recruiting patients in 2015 were invited to participate in the present study. We have followed a descriptive narration of the observed data. Continuous and categorical data were reported by median (p25th-p75th range) and absolute and relative frequencies, respectively. The incidence map shows differences between Spanish regions.

RESULTS

The incidence of PC in Spain in 2015 was 2.55/100,000 males per year. A total of 586 patients were identified, and 228 patients from 61 hospitals were included in the analysis. A total of 54/61 (88.5%) centers reported ≤ 5 new cases. The patients accessed the urologist for visually-assessed penile lesions (60.5%), mainly localized in the glans (63.6%). Local hygiene, smoking habits, sexual habits, HPV exposure, and history of penile lesions were reported in 48.2%, 59.6%, 25%, 13.2%, and 69.7%. HPV-positive lesions were 18.1% (28.6% HPV-16). The majority of PC was squamous carcinoma (95.2%). PC was ≥cT2 in 45.2% (103/228) cases. At final pathology, PC was ≥pT2 in 51% of patients and ≥pN1 in 17% of cases. The most common local treatment was partial penectomy (46.9% cases). A total of 47/55 (85.5%) inguinal lymphadenectomies were open. Patients with ≥pN1 disease were treated with chemotherapy in 12/39 (40.8%) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PC incidence is relatively high in Spain compared to other European countries. The risk factors for PC are usually misreported. The diagnosis and management of PC are suboptimal, encouraging the identification of referral centers for PC management.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: penile cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update French oncology guidelines concerning penile cancer.

METHODS

Comprehensive Medline search between 2020 and 2022 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer to update previous guidelines. Level of evidence was evaluated according to AGREE-II.

RESULTS

Epidermoid carcinoma is the most common penile cancer histology. Physical examination is mandatory to define local and inguinal nodal cancer stage. MRI with artificial erection can help to assess deep infiltration in cases of organsparing intention. Node negative patients (defined by palpation and imaging) will present micro nodal metastases in up to 25% of cases. Invasive lymph node assessment is thus advocated except for low risk patients. Sentinel node dynamic biopsy is the first line technique. Modified bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy is an option with higher morbidity. 18-FDG-PET is recommended in patients with palpable nodes. Chest, abdominal and pelvis computerized tomography is an option. Fine needle aspiration (when positive) is an easy way to assess inguinal palpable node pathological involvement. Its results determine the type of lymphadenectomy to be performed (for diagnostic or curative purposes). Treatment is mostly surgical. Free margins status is essential, but it also has to be organ-sparing when possible. Brachytherapy and topic agents can cure in selected cases. Lymph node assessment should be synchronous to the removal of the tumour when possible. Limited inguinal lymph node involvement (pN1 stage) can be cured with the only lymphadenectomy. In case of larger lymph node stage, one should consider multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy and inclusion in a trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile cancer needs demanding surgery to be cured, surrounded by chemotherapy in node positive patients. Lymph nodes involvement is a major prognostic factor. Thus, inguinal node assessment cannot be neglected.