1
|
Esmaeilzadeh P. Privacy Concerns About Sharing General and Specific Health Information on Twitter: Quantitative Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e45573. [PMID: 38214964 PMCID: PMC10789368 DOI: 10.2196/45573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twitter is a common platform for people to share opinions, discuss health-related topics, and engage in conversations with a wide audience. Twitter users frequently share health information related to chronic diseases, mental health, and general wellness topics. However, sharing health information on Twitter raises privacy concerns as it involves sharing personal and sensitive data on a web-based platform. OBJECTIVE This study aims to adopt an interactive approach and develop a model consisting of privacy concerns related to web-based vendors and web-based peers. The research model integrates the 4 dimensions of concern for information privacy that express concerns related to the practices of companies and the 4 dimensions of peer privacy concern that reflect concerns related to web-based interactions with peers. This study examined how this interaction may affect individuals' information-sharing behavior on Twitter. METHODS Data were collected from 329 Twitter users in the United States using a web-based survey. RESULTS Results suggest that privacy concerns related to company practices might not significantly influence the sharing of general health information, such as details about hospitals and medications. However, privacy concerns related to companies and third parties can negatively shape the disclosure of specific health information, such as personal medical issues (β=-.43; P<.001). Findings show that peer-related privacy concerns significantly predict sharing patterns associated with general (β=-.38; P<.001) and specific health information (β=-.72; P<.001). In addition, results suggest that people may disclose more general health information than specific health information owing to peer-related privacy concerns (t165=4.72; P<.001). The model explains 41% of the variance in general health information disclosure and 67% in specific health information sharing on Twitter. CONCLUSIONS The results can contribute to privacy research and propose some practical implications. The findings provide insights for developers, policy makers, and health communication professionals about mitigating privacy concerns in web-based health information sharing. It particularly underlines the importance of addressing peer-related privacy concerns. The study underscores the need to build a secure and trustworthy web-based environment, emphasizing the significance of peer interactions and highlighting the need for improved regulations, clear data handling policies, and users' control over their own data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh
- Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, College of Business, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malchow T, Corsi NJ, Majdalany SE, Piontkowski AJ, Corsi MP, Friedman B, Butaney M, Rakic I, Arora S, Jamil M, Dalela D, Brodowsky E, Sood A, Ginsburg KB, Rogers C, Atiemo H, Abdollah F. Who Is Shaping the Future of Academic Urology? A Descriptive Analysis of Residency Program Directors. Urology 2023; 178:17-20. [PMID: 37209882 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the demographics, educational background, and scholarly characteristics of current urology residency program directors (PDs). METHODS Urology programs were identified by the listing on the "Accredited US Urology Programs" section of American Urological Association website as of October 2021. Demographics and academic data were collected via publicly available department website and Google search engine. Metrics obtained included years of service as PD from time of appointment, sex, medical school/residency/fellowship, all-time H-index, dual degrees obtained, and professorial ranking. RESULTS One hundred and forty-seven accredited urological residencies were reviewed; every PD was included. The majority were male (78%) and fellowship trained (68%). Women represented only 22% of PDs. The median active time served as PD, as of 11/2021, was 4years (IQR: 2-7). Forty (28%) were faculty at the same program they completed their residency. The median all-time H-index was 12 (IQR: 7-19; range 1-61). Twelve PDs also served as chair of their department. CONCLUSION The vast majority of PDs are male, fellowship trained, and have served for less than 5years. Future studies are necessary to follow the trends of representation in leaders of urology residency programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Malchow
- Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
| | - Nicholas J Corsi
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Sami E Majdalany
- Vattikuti Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Detroit, MI; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | - Brett Friedman
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburgh, TX
| | - Mohit Butaney
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Ivan Rakic
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Sohrab Arora
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Marcus Jamil
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Deepansh Dalela
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Emily Brodowsky
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Craig Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Humphrey Atiemo
- Vattikuti Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Detroit, MI
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malik RD, Rubin RS, Winter AG, Seideman CA. Uncovering the Impact and Influence of Urologists on Social Media. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00002-0. [PMID: 36682963 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rena D Malik
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Rachel S Rubin
- Department of Urology, Medstar Georgetown Urology, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Urology, George Washington Urology, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Casey A Seideman
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albersen M, Roussel E. Re: Nicholas Corsi, David-Dan Nguyen, Mohit Butaney, et al. Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact? Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:384-387. [PMID: 36336581 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|