1
|
Scilipoti P, Longoni M, de Angelis M, Zaurito P, Ślusarczyk A, Soria F, Pradere B, Krajewski W, D'Andrea D, Mari A, Giudice FD, Pichler R, Subiela JD, Marcq G, Gallioli A, Afferi L, Mastroianni R, Simone G, Albisinni S, Mertens LS, Laukhtina E, Oberneder K, Rodríguez Elena JL, Aranda J, Puentedura AL, Velasco JC, Contieri R, Hurle R, Mori K, Radziszewski P, Shariat SF, Gontero P, Necchi A, Rouprêt M, Montorsi F, Salonia A, Briganti A, Moschini M. Long-term Oncological Outcomes for Patients with Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG): A Comparative Analysis of Adequate Versus Inadequate BCG Treatment. Eur Urol Focus 2025:S2405-4569(25)00111-7. [PMID: 40393853 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 03/31/2025] [Accepted: 04/30/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillation is recommended for intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HiR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). There are limited comparisons of long-term outcomes between adequate and inadequate BCG. METHODS We analyzed data from a multicenter European database (2010-2024) for 1558 patients diagnosed with IR- or HiR-NMIBC who underwent BCG treatment and received at least five BCG instillations. Adequate BCG was defined as at least five of six induction instillations and two of three maintenance doses, or two of six doses of a reinduction course. A 3-mo landmark analysis was conducted. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), high-grade RFS (HG-RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression models. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was assessed via cumulative incidence curves and Fine-Gray competing-risks regression analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The cohort included 606 IR-NMIBC (39%), 840 HiR-NMIBC (54%), and 112 very HiR (VHR)-NMIBC (7.1%) cases. Adequate BCG was administered to 1226 patients (78%). Among 1239 patients (80%) with documented treatment termination reasons, 503 (41%) completed guideline-recommended treatment and 150 (12%) discontinued because of BCG intolerance. Over median follow-up of 37 mo, adequate BCG was associated with higher IPTW-adjusted 5-yr RFS (72% vs 52%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.85; p < 0.001), HG-RFS (83% vs 68%; HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.58; p < 0.001), PFS (92% vs 85%; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.74; p = 0.001), and OS (88% vs 71%; HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37-0.74; p = 0.001). CSM rates were comparable between the groups (3% vs 4.9%; p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Adequate BCG, as defined by the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG), was associated with significantly better RFS, PFS, and OS. These findings support use of the IBCG definition as a standardized benchmark for BCG exposure. However, further prospective validation to confirm causality is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Aleksander Ślusarczyk
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Oberneder
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Javier Aranda
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Caño Velasco
- Department of Urology, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Longoni M, Scilipoti P, Soria F, Pradere B, Krajewski W, D'Andrea D, Mari A, Del Giudice F, Pichler R, Subiela JD, Afferi L, Albisinni S, Gallioli A, Mertens LS, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Radziszewski P, Ślusarczyk A, Shariat SF, Necchi A, Xylinas E, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Moschini M. Oncological Outcomes in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-naïve High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review on Current Treatment Strategies and Future Perspectives. Eur Urol Oncol 2025:S2588-9311(25)00081-1. [PMID: 40204534 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is the standard treatment in patients harboring high-risk (HR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, BCG therapy faces frequent adverse events (AEs), limited efficacy, and ongoing shortages, leading to a low completion rate, access challenges, and high recurrence. In consequence, there is a growing interest in exploring alternative treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy combinations, and novel intravesical therapies. This systematic review summarizes current prospective evidence on BCG and alternative treatment options for BCG-naïve HR-NMIBC patients (PROSPERO: CRD42024564900). METHODS A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library retrieved 1042 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria (following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS In 12 studies on BCG-treated patients (n = 1418), recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 66-96% at 1-yr, 63-96% at 2-yr, and 39-66% at 5-yr follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 81-98% at 1-yr, 70-96% at 2-yr, and 70-84% at 5-yr follow-up. In nine studies focusing on patients treated with alternative strategies (n = 657), RFS rates were 51-99% at 1-yr, 48-88% at 2-yr, and 47-55% at 5-yr follow-up. PFS was 90-100% at 1-yr, 88-96% at 2-yr, and 84-93% at 5-yr follow-up. AE rates varied widely across studies, for both BCG and alternative treatments. Unfortunately, studies heterogeneity and a small sample sizes limit statistically meaningful conclusions. Twelve clinical trials are currently investigating new strategies for BCG-naïve HR NMIBC patients. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Alternative therapies for BCG-naïve HR NMIBC patients are emerging but need further validation. As challenges such as toxicity, cost, and long-term efficacy persist, ongoing trial results will be crucial in determining their role in future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Longoni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aleksander Ślusarczyk
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC no. 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akbulut I, Ödemiş İ, Atalay S. Analysis of local and systemic side effects of bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy in bladder cancer: a retrospective study in Türkiye. PeerJ 2025; 13:e18870. [PMID: 39959825 PMCID: PMC11829628 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder cancer is a growing health concern, especially in developing countries like Türkiye. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy is essential for reducing recurrence and progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, it can cause local and systemic adverse effects linked to bacterial virulence, allergic reactions, or nosocomial infections. Data from randomized studies on BCG side effects are limited, with severe cases often reported in case studies. This study investigates the association between intravesical BCG immunotherapy and its adverse effects. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 239 patients who underwent BCG immunotherapy between 2017 and 2024. Detailed demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and the adverse effects that developed following BCG therapy were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, including medians, counts, and percentage distributions, were calculated, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing the development of adverse effects. Results Adverse effects related to BCG immunotherapy were observed in 63.1% of the patients. The most common minor adverse effects were hematuria, dysuria, and cystitis, while major adverse effects included sepsis and lymphadenopathy. The analyses revealed that elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and the presence of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis in urine cultures were significant risk factors for the development of adverse effects. Additionally, patients who underwent the 6th cycle of BCG therapy were found to have a higher risk of developing adverse effects compared to those who received fewer cycles. Conclusion BCG immunotherapy is an effective treatment method for NMIBC; however, the adverse effects that occur during treatment must be closely monitored. Elevated AST levels, the presence of specific pathogens in urine cultures, and the number of BCG doses administered are significant factors that increase the risk of adverse effects. These findings highlight the necessity for more careful monitoring throughout the treatment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilkay Akbulut
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - İlker Ödemiş
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sabri Atalay
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arita Y, Kwee TC, Akin O, Shigeta K, Paudyal R, Roest C, Ueda R, Lema-Dopico A, Nalavenkata S, Ruby L, Nissan N, Edo H, Yoshida S, Shukla-Dave A, Schwartz LH. Multiparametric MRI and artificial intelligence in predicting and monitoring treatment response in bladder cancer. Insights Imaging 2025; 16:7. [PMID: 39747744 PMCID: PMC11695553 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01884-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the 10th most common and 13th most deadly cancer worldwide, with urothelial carcinomas being the most common type. Distinguishing between non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is essential due to significant differences in management and prognosis. MRI may play an important diagnostic role in this setting. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS), a multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-based consensus reporting platform, allows for standardized preoperative muscle invasion assessment in BCa with proven diagnostic accuracy. However, post-treatment assessment using VI-RADS is challenging because of anatomical changes, especially in the interpretation of the muscle layer. MRI techniques that provide tumor tissue physiological information, including diffusion-weighted (DW)- and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI, combined with derived quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs), may potentially overcome the limitations of BCa evaluation when predominantly focusing on anatomic changes at MRI, particularly in the therapy response setting. Delta-radiomics, which encompasses the assessment of changes (Δ) in image features extracted from mpMRI data, has the potential to monitor treatment response. In comparison to the current Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), QIBs and mpMRI-based radiomics, in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis, may potentially allow for earlier identification of therapy-induced tumor changes. This review provides an update on the potential of QIBs and mpMRI-based radiomics and discusses the future applications of AI in BCa management, particularly in assessing treatment response. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Incorporating mpMRI-based quantitative imaging biomarkers, radiomics, and artificial intelligence into bladder cancer management has the potential to enhance treatment response assessment and prognosis prediction. KEY POINTS: Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) from mpMRI and radiomics can outperform RECIST for bladder cancer treatments. AI improves mpMRI segmentation and enhances radiomics feature extraction effectively. Predictive models integrate imaging biomarkers and clinical data using AI tools. Multicenter studies with strict criteria validate radiomics and QIBs clinically. Consistent mpMRI and AI applications need reliable validation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Arita
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Thomas C Kwee
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Keisuke Shigeta
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christian Roest
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ryo Ueda
- Office of Radiation Technology, Keio University Hospital, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alfonso Lema-Dopico
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sunny Nalavenkata
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Ruby
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Noam Nissan
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hiromi Edo
- Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
| | - Soichiro Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liedberg F, Xylinas E, Gontero P. Reply to Laila Schneidewind, Fabian P. Stangl, Jennifer Kranz, and Gernot Bonkat's Letter to Editor re: Fredrik Liedberg, Evanguelos Xylinas, Paolo Gontero. Quinolone Prophylaxis in Conjunction with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Instillations for Bladder Cancer: Time To Reconsider the Evidence and Open the Quinolone Box? Eur Urol Focus 2024;10:564-6. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00260-8. [PMID: 39694738 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institute of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schneidewind L, Stangl FP, Kranz J, Bonkat G. Re: Fredrik Liedberg, Evanguelos Xylinas, Paolo Gontero. Quinolone Prophylaxis in Conjunction with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Instillations for Bladder Cancer: Time To Reconsider the Evidence and Open the Quinolone Box? Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euf.2023.11.007. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00258-X. [PMID: 39674793 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Laila Schneidewind
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Fabian P Stangl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Kranz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin-Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Gernot Bonkat
- Alta Uro AG, Merian Iselin Klinik, Center of Biomechanics & Calorimetry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jaromin M, Konecki T, Kutwin P. Revolutionizing Treatment: Breakthrough Approaches for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1366. [PMID: 38611044 PMCID: PMC11010925 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the 10th most popular cancer in the world, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is diagnosed in ~80% of all cases. Treatments for NMIBC include transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) and intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors is scarce and usually leads to Radical Cystectomy. In this paper, we review recent advancements in conservative treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors. The main focus of the paper is FDA-approved medications: Pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene Firadenovec (Adstiladrin). Other, less researched therapeutic possibilities are also included, namely: N-803 immunotherapy, TAR-200 and TAR-210 intravesical delivery systems and combined Cabazitaxel, Gemcitabine and Cisplatin chemotherapy. Conservative treatment and delaying radical cystectomy would greatly benefit patients' quality of life; it is undoubtedly the future of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Piotr Kutwin
- 1st Department of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, 93-513 Lodz, Poland; (M.J.); (T.K.)
| |
Collapse
|