Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of left atrial appendage occluder device infection

Appropriate Use Criteria of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Latest Evidences

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrythmia and it is linked to an increased risk of stroke. Even if anticoagulation therapy reduces the rate of stroke the benefits of this therapy have to been balanced with the increased risk of hemorrhagic event. Left atrial appendage closure is a valid alternative to long term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high hemorrhagic risk. Actually new devices with different features have been tested and introduced progressively in the clinical practice. Improvements preprocedural imaging evaluation and the learning curve of the operators led to percutaneous left atrial appendage closure a safe and effective procedure. A good knowledge of different devices and the technique of implant is necessary for optimization percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and the reduction of complications during the acute phase and follow up.

Imaging of Cardiac Device-Related Infection

Cardiac devices are frequently used in different cardiovascular conditions for the purpose of morbidity or mortality prevention. These include cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) like permanent pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators, ventricular assistance devices (VADs), left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices like the Watchman™, atrial and ventricular septal occluders like the Amplatzer™, among others. In the past years, there has been an increase in the development of these devices as a result of a rise in the number of indications for implantation, paired with the aging and more medically complex patient population. This has led to an increase in the incidence of cardiac device-related infections, one of the most feared and serious complications which is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and financial burden. Accurate diagnosis of cardiac device-related infections is essential given the management implications which often involve removal of the infected device, removal of other prosthetic material and long-term antimicrobial therapy. Clinical and laboratory data are useful diagnostic tools but multimodality imaging is often necessary. The recently published 2020 European Heart Rhythm Association International Consensus document, which is endorsed by many expert societies, has recommended the use of multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of CIED infections. (1) This allows better disease characterization by identifying abnormal fluid collections and guiding aspiration for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes (i.e. soft tissue ultrasound and computed tomography), evaluation for local extent of disease (i.e. transesophageal echocardiogram to evaluate for concomitant infective endocarditis), embolic manifestation of disease (i.e. computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) and metabolic tissue characterization (positron emission tomography and tagged white blood cell scan). (2) In addition, computed tomography (CT) allows for pre-procedural planning which has shown to be associated with better procedural outcomes.

Infection Rate and Outcomes of Watchman Devices: Results from a Single-Center 14-Year Experience

The Watchman device (WD) is a commonly used alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for stroke risk reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation who have an increased bleeding risk. There are rare case reports of WD-related infection. Currently, there is no formal study that has systematically evaluated the incidence and outcomes WD-related infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for WD-associated infections in a single-center cohort over a 14-year period. All patients who underwent WD implantation over a 14-year study period (July 2004 through December 2018) comprised our cohort. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and postimplantation events were identified through a retrospective chart review. Primary study outcomes included WD-related infection, other cardiovascular device-related infection, bacteremia, and mortality. A total of 181 patients (119 males; 65.7%) with a mean age of 75 years at implantation were included in the analysis. A total of 534.7 patient years of follow-up was accrued, with an average of 2.9 years per patient. The most common indications for implantation included gastrointestinal bleeding (56 patients; 30.9%) and intracerebral bleeding (51 patients; 28.2%). During the follow-up period, 37 (20.4%) patients died. Six developed evidence of bacteremia. Only 1 developed an implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection that required a complete system extraction. None of the cohort developed a WD-related device infection during the study period. We concluded that there is a low risk of WD-related infection even in the setting of a blood stream infection.

Transesophageal Echocardiography to Diagnose Watchman Device Infection

•

The authors report a rare case of infected Watchman device 4 months after placement.

•

A high index of suspicion allowed timely diagnosis of Watchman device infection.

•

Transesophageal echocardiography led to diagnosis of an infected Watchman device.

•

High clinical morbidity is associated with Watchman device endocarditis.

Convexity Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA) Infective Endocarditis and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (LAAO) Device Infection. A Case Report

An 83 year-old-man with left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) developed Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA) infective endocarditis. MRI at day 3 of onset showed distal small infarcts in both middle cerebral arteries and left postero-inferior cerebellar artery territories. MRI at day 6 revealed two sites of convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH). MRA and CTA failed to reveal a Mycotic aneurysm.

The radiologic findings favor the assumption of necrosis of distal branches of mca or of pial arteries wall.

This case present three unusual features: the presence of localized cSAH after initiation of antibiotherapy without mycotic aneurysm being individualized; the late occurrence of infective endocarditis after LAAO implantation; the very rare occurrence of PA in prosthetic infections.

Evidence-based percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and its prevalence is increasing. Cardioembolic stroke, most of the times secondary to thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage, is its most feared and life threatening consequence. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K-antagonists is currently the most used prophylaxis for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation; unfortunately, its benefits are limited by a narrow therapeutic window and an increased risk for bleeding, making it often undesired. Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage is a novel alternative strategy for cardioembolic stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation at a high risk of stroke but with contraindication for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. At present, several devices have been developed specifically for percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage. Current results show good feasibility and efficacy for these devices, with a high rate of successful implantation, although also associated with the inherent potential periprocedural complications. This work reviews the current state of the art of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Cardioembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation-rationale for preventive closure of the left atrial appendage

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmias, and a major cause of morbidity and mortality due to cardioembolic stroke. The left atrial appendage is the major site of thrombus formation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Loss of atrial systole in atrial fibrillation and increased relative risk of associated stroke point strongly toward a role for stasis of blood in left atrial thrombosis, although thrombus formation is multifactorial, and much more than blood flow irregularities are implicated. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K-antagonists is currently the most effective prophylaxis for stroke in atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately, this treatment is often contraindicated, particularly in the elderly, in whom risk of stroke is high. Moreover, given the risk of major bleeding, there is reason to be skeptical of the net benefit when warfarin is used in those patients. This work reviews the pathophysiology of cardioembolic stroke and critically spotlights the current status of preventive anticoagulation therapy. Various techniques to exclude the left atrial appendage from circulation were discussed as a considerable alternative for stroke prophylaxis.