Surgically Treated Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Population-based Competing Risks Analysis

Surgically treated pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: The effect of tumor size on cancer-specific survival

INTRODUCTION

In soft tissue pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, it is unknown whether a specific tumor size cut-off may help to better predict prognosis, defined as cancer-specific survival (CSS). We tested whether different tumor size cut-offs, could improve CSS prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgically treated non-metastatic soft tissue pelvic sarcoma patients were identified (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 2004-2019). Kaplan-Meier plots, univariable and multivariable Cox-regression models and receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used.

RESULTS

Overall, 672 (65 %) liposarcoma (median tumor size 11 cm, interquartile range [IQR] 7-16) and 367 (35 %) leiomyosarcoma (median tumor size 8 cm, IQR 5-12) patients were identified. The p-value derived ideal tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm, in liposarcoma and 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In liposarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 92 vs 83 % (≤17.1 vs > 17.1 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 86.8 % (Δ = 3 %). Similarly, among previously established cut-offs (5 vs 10 vs 15 cm), also 15 cm represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 87.0 % (Δ = 3.2 %). In leiomyosarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 86 vs 55 % (≤7.0 vs > 7.0 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 68.6 to 76.5 % (Δ = 7.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In liposarcoma, the p-value derived tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm vs 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In both histologic subtypes, these cut-offs exhibited the optimal statistical characteristics (univariable, multivariable and AUC analyses). In liposarcoma, the 15 cm cut-off represented a valuable alternative.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A systematic review and clinical practice guidelines from the Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association

While surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localised retroperitoneal sarcoma, the use of radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the role of RT for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic review using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome model from 1990 to 2022 identified 66 studies (a mixture of preoperative and postoperative RT); one randomised controlled trial (RCT) with two publications, 18 registry studies, and 46 retrospective studies. In the RCT of preoperative RT, there was no difference in local/abdominal recurrence. The pooled analysis of this RCT and a retrospective study showed a significant abdominal recurrence free survival benefit with preoperative RT in low grade liposarcoma. The RCT and the majority of retrospective series found RT did not improve recurrence free survival (11 of 16 no difference in combined local and distant RFS, 11 of 13 no difference in distant metastasis free survival), disease specific survival (9 of 12 studies) or overall survival (33 of 49 studies). The majority of studies found no association between RT and perioperative morbidity. In summary, preoperative RT may improve local control for low grade (well-differentiated or grades 1-2 dedifferentiated) liposarcoma, but not other histological subtypes. There is no strong evidence that perioperative RT provides an overall survival benefit. Patients with low grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma can be considered for preoperative RT to improve abdominal recurrence free survival. The rationale and level of evidence in this scenario should be carefully discussed by the multidisciplinary team with patients. RT should not be routinely recommended for other histological subtypes.

A competing risk-based nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma

Considering the rarity and aggressive nature of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (RLMS), several prognostic factors might contribute to the cancer-specific mortality of these patients. This study aimed to construct a competing risk-based nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with RLMS. In total, 788 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2015) were included. Based on the Fine & Gray's method, independent predictors were screened to develop a nomogram for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS. After multivariate analysis, CSS was found significantly associated with tumor characteristics (tumor grade, size, range), as well as surgery status. The nomogram showed solid prediction power and was well calibrated. Through decision curve analysis (DCA), a favorable clinical utility of the nomogram was demonstrated. Additionally, a risk stratification system was developed and distinctive survival between risk groups was observed. In summary, this nomogram showed a better performance than the AJCC 8th staging system and can assist in the clinical management of RLMS.

Treatment for local control of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas: A review of the literature

Retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas are uncommon tumors for which complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. However, achieving complete gross resection with microscopically negative margins is challenging, and local recurrence rates can be high. Patients often succumb to uncontrolled local disease. Radiation therapy offers a potential means for sterilizing microscopic residual disease, although its use continues to be controversial. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation continues to be investigated as an adjunct to surgery, along with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the current management of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas, focusing on studies of surgery and radiation therapy to maximize local control.

The prognostic factors of primary colorectal sarcoma and the clinical outcomes of negative lymph node dissection

Background

Primary colorectal sarcoma is an extremely rare malignancy that is associated with poor patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of primary colorectal sarcoma and evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with these prognostic factors.

Methods

Between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2016, the clinical data of 315 patients with primary colorectal sarcoma were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and by log-rank test. The prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of covariates were also estimated. The optimal cutoff value for NLN count at dissection was identified using X-tile software and validated by univariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

Of the 315 patients with primary colorectal sarcoma identified, 88.6% received surgery. The median follow-up time was 34 months with an interquartile range (IQR) of 9-79 months. The 5-year rate of CSS was 76.73% and 27.8% for the surgery group and the non-surgery group, respectively (P<0.0001). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis performed on the data of nonmetastatic patients demonstrated that sex, race, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy had no effect on patient CSS, with age, tumor site, tumor grade, and NLN dissection being independent prognostic factors. A significant correlation was found between advanced age (>80 years old) and poor CSS (HR 1.964; 95% CI: 1.005-3.839; P=0.048). There were also significant correlations between colonic tumors and poor CSS (HR 2.903; 95% CI: 1.348-6.250; P=0.006) and grade IV tumors and poor CSS (HR 3.431; 95% CI: 1.725-6.823; P<0.001), while NLN dissection was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.946; 95% CI: 0.911-0.983; P=0.004). X-tile software analysis was used to determine that the optimal cutoff value for NLN count was 13. Patients who received NLN dissection with a cutoff value of 13 or more displayed better CSS than those who did not (P=0.016).

Conclusions

Primary colorectal sarcoma patients can benefit significantly from primary tumor surgery. Age, tumor site, grade and NLN dissection are independent prognostic factors for CSS in nonmetastatic patients. Importantly, nonmetastatic patients treated with NLN dissection with an NLN count of 13 or more have significantly better CSS.

Retroperitoneal tumors: Review of diagnosis and management

Retroperitoneal tumors are extremely rare tumors occurring in the retroperitoneum. Retroperitoneal tumors are divided into benign tumors and malignant tumors, including retroperitoneal sarcoma. Approximately 70-80% of primary retroperitoneal soft-tissue tumors are malignant; however, these only account for 0.1-0.2% of all malignancies. Retroperitoneal sarcoma is an orphan malignant disease with a low incidence. The information on benign retroperitoneal tumors is limited. The American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification updated to the 8th edition in 2017. In 2010, three new drugs for soft tissue sarcoma were approved based on the results of phase III trials, but the histological subtypes of the patients enrolled in the trials of each drug differed. Recently, in addition to surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma, the effectiveness of perioperative radiation therapy has become interesting. For malignant retroperitoneal tumors and retroperitoneal sarcoma, survival improvement and locoregional recurrence prevention can be undertaken by carrying out surgery to secure negative margins with wide and combined resection of some adjacent organs, and cooperation with a trained medical team comprising of radiologists, pathologists and medical oncologists in centralized hospitals. Some clinical trials aimed at further improving treatment results by adding preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy based on histological confirmation using a correct needle biopsy are in progress. In recent years, molecular profiling has been used to select eligible patients for chemotherapy. In the future, precision medicine with next-generation sequencing technology will be expected among the diverse and potential future treatments for retroperitoneal sarcoma. In this review, we summarized the current state of retroperitoneal tumors and retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of retroperitoneal tumors: a comprehensive data collection from multiple departments

BACKGROUND

There are only a limited number of comprehensive reports for retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs). The aim of this study was to perform an interdepartmental data collection for RPTs and to comprehensively clarify the clinical characteristics of this rare disease.

METHODS

All patients who were diagnosed with RPT from January 2005 to July 2018 in a single institution were included. The analyzed factors included demographics, clinical features, treatment methods, pathological diagnosis, and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 422 patients (215 males and 207 females) with primary RPTs were identified. Biopsy for RPT was performed in 180 patients (43%). Among the 422 patients, 239 (57%) underwent surgery. The most common tissue origin was mesodermal (n = 99, 41%), followed by neurogenic (n = 54, 23%), extragonadal (n = 27, 11%), and metastatic tumors (n = 13, 5%). Among the 99 resected mesodermal tumors, the most common pathological subtypes were liposarcoma (n = 55, 56%) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 16, 16%). The long-term outcomes after surgery were analyzed in patients with intermediate and malignant sarcomas (including liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and others combined, n = 71). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates in the intermediate tumors were 68.2% and 54.2%, respectively, whereas those in the malignant tumors were 48.6% and 28.9%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the intermediate tumors were 100% and 94.1%, respectively, whereas those in the malignant tumors were 78.4% and 72.8%, respectively (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestations of RPTs were extremely variable. Recurrence after repeating resection is commonly observed in patients with malignant retroperitoneal sarcoma.