1
|
Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Cameron ID, Gray LC, Reed RL, Wiles LK, Westbrook J, Arnolda G, Bilton R, Ash R, Georgiou A, Kitson A, Hughes CF, Gordon SJ, Mitchell RJ, Rapport F, Estabrooks C, Alexander GL, Vincent C, Edwards A, Carson-Stevens A, Wagner C, McCormack B, Braithwaite J. The quality of care delivered to residents in long-term care in Australia: an indicator-based review of resident records (CareTrack Aged study). BMC Med 2024; 22:22. [PMID: 38254113 PMCID: PMC10804560 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study estimated the prevalence of evidence-based care received by a population-based sample of Australian residents in long-term care (LTC) aged ≥ 65 years in 2021, measured by adherence to clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations. METHODS Sixteen conditions/processes of care amendable to estimating evidence-based care at a population level were identified from prevalence data and CPGs. Candidate recommendations (n = 5609) were extracted from 139 CPGs which were converted to indicators. National experts in each condition rated the indicators via the RAND-UCLA Delphi process. For the 16 conditions, 236 evidence-based care indicators were ratified. A multi-stage sampling of LTC facilities and residents was undertaken. Trained aged-care nurses then undertook manual structured record reviews of care delivered between 1 March and 31 May 2021 (our record review period) to assess adherence with the indicators. RESULTS Care received by 294 residents with 27,585 care encounters in 25 LTC facilities was evaluated. Residents received care for one to thirteen separate clinical conditions/processes of care (median = 10, mean = 9.7). Adherence to evidence-based care indicators was estimated at 53.2% (95% CI: 48.6, 57.7) ranging from a high of 81.3% (95% CI: 75.6, 86.3) for Bladder and Bowel to a low of 12.2% (95% CI: 1.6, 36.8) for Depression. Six conditions (skin integrity, end-of-life care, infection, sleep, medication, and depression) had less than 50% adherence with indicators. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study of adherence to evidence-based care for people in LTC using multiple conditions and a standardised method. Vulnerable older people are not receiving evidence-based care for many physical problems, nor care to support their mental health nor for end-of-life care. The six conditions in which adherence with indicators was less than 50% could be the focus of improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Charlotte J Molloy
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Leonard C Gray
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital Campus, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Richard L Reed
- Discipline of General Practice, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Louise K Wiles
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bilton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Ruby Ash
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Clifford F Hughes
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Susan J Gordon
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Carole Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | | | - Charles Vincent
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, England, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- PRIME Centre Wales & Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, 8Th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Andrew Carson-Stevens
- PRIME Centre Wales & Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, 8Th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Cordula Wagner
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118, Utrecht, 3513 CR, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Center/VU University, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brendan McCormack
- The Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, City Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yap J, Holloway S. Evidence-based review of the effects of nutritional supplementation for pressure ulcer prevention. Int Wound J 2021; 18:805-821. [PMID: 34528752 PMCID: PMC8613380 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this evidence-based review was to explore whether the evidence supports the use of nutritional supplements in pressure ulcer (PU) prevention strategies. Several electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to May week 32 019), Ovid EMBASE (1947 to May 28, 2019), EBSCO CINAHL (until June 13, 2019), Scopus (until July 9, 2019), and the Web of Science (until June 13, 2019) were searched. No limitation was placed on the year of publication. Studies considered for inclusion were those with adult populations, and only English language texts with available full text were reviewed. AMSTAR (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies included in the systematic review. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 Levels of Evidence was used to assess the level of evidence. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) was used to assess guideline article, and Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) was also used for cross-sectional studies. The search identified 1761 studies. After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 studies were retained of various designs, including 10 systematic reviews, five clinical reviews, three randomised controlled trials, two observational studies, one quasi-experimental study, one cross-sectional study, one cohort study, and one Clinical Guideline. Two were rated as high-quality reviews, 14 were rated as moderate-quality reviews, five were rated as low-quality reviews, and three were rated as critically low-quality reviews. The majority of the reviewed studies were of low-to-moderate quality because of biases in the study design and incomplete data reporting, which did not fulfil the reporting criteria of the appraisal tools. However, the majority of the studies showed a reduction in PU incidence after nutritional supplement though not significant. Whether the use of pharmacological appraisal tools to assess non-pharmacological studies is appropriate is unclear. Regardless of the low-to-moderate quality of the studies in this review, nutritional supplements appear to play a role in PU prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JiannWen Yap
- Wound Healing & Tissue RepairCardiff University School of MedicineCardiffUK
- Wound & Stoma Care Unit, General Surgical DepartmentQueen Elizabeth HospitalKota KinabaluMalaysia
| | - Samantha Holloway
- Centre for Medical Education, School of MedicineCollege of Biomedical & Lifesciences, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kilpatrick KA, Paton P, Subbarayan S, Stewart C, Abraha I, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, O'Mahony D, Cherubini A, Soiza RL. Non-pharmacological, non-surgical interventions for urinary incontinence in older persons: A systematic review of systematic reviews. The SENATOR project ONTOP series. Maturitas 2020; 133:42-48. [PMID: 32005422 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence is especially common in older age. Non-pharmacological therapies are particularly desirable in this group. OBJECTIVE To define optimal evidence-based non-pharmacological, non-surgical therapies for urinary incontinence in older persons. METHODS A Delphi process determined critical outcome measures of interest. Studies of any non-pharmacological intervention reporting critical outcomes were identified through database searches for relevant systematic reviews in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane up to June 2018. Primary trials with a population mean age ≥65years were identified, from which data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed. Qualitative analysis and meta-analysis, when possible, were undertaken, followed by grading of the evidence using GradePro software. Finally, bullet-point recommendations were formulated for the indications and contraindications for non-pharmacological interventions for urinary incontinence in older persons. RESULTS Frequency of incontinence was identified as a critically important outcome. In total, 33 systematic reviews were identified with 27 primary trials meeting inclusion criteria. Evaluated therapies included exercise therapy, habit retraining, behavioural therapy, electrical stimulation, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, magnetic stimulation, caffeine reduction and acupuncture. From meta-analysis, group exercise therapy and behavioural therapy in women were beneficial in reducing episodes of incontinence (mean reduction of 1.07 (95 %CI 0.69-1.45) and 0.74 (95 %CI 0.42-1.06) episodes per day respectively, evidence grade 'moderate'). Evidence for other interventions was limited and of insufficient quality. CONCLUSIONS There is sufficient evidence to warrant recommendation of group exercise therapy for stress incontinence and behavioural therapy for urgency, stress or mixed urinary incontinence in older women. Evidence was insufficient to recommend any other non-drug therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty A Kilpatrick
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Group, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela Paton
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Group, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom; Dept of Geriatric Medicine, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Selvarani Subbarayan
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Group, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Carrie Stewart
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Group, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Iosief Abraha
- Geriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Cherubini
- Geriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roy L Soiza
- Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Group, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom; Dept of Geriatric Medicine, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kennedy KJ, Price K, Rando TL, Boylan J, Dyer AR. Ensuring healthy skin as part of wound prevention: an integrative review of health professionals' actions. J Wound Care 2018; 27:707-715. [PMID: 30398943 DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.11.707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a synthesis of the best available, recent primary or secondary research evidence on early preventative activities taken to increase skin health, and reduce the incidence of facility-acquired skin tears and pressure ulcers (PUs) in community, residential and health-care institutions. METHOD An integrative review focusing on a 10-year period, 2007-2017. A literature search of health databases was carried out, as well as a search of grey literature in relevant skin, wound care and nursing association journals. A second search was also conducted focused on literature from policy and guideline development organisations. Primary outcomes of interest were reduction in dry skin (xerosis), friable skin, or increases in healthy skin maintenance activities. Secondary outcomes of interest were reductions in PU or skin tear occurrences. Opinion, non-systematic literature reviews and discussion papers were excluded. RESULTS Of the 4932 references obtained from the searches, a total of 33 articles were included in the review: 27 peer-reviewed journal articles and six articles from the grey literature search. No guideline was found that focused on maintaining skin health as a person ages. Studies identified the main factors for maintaining skin health as nutrition, hydration and skin care regimen. CONCLUSION Skin care regimens, including a focus on good nutrition and pH balance, should start immediately on arrival in institutions such as hospitals or residential aged care, and continue throughout the stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate J Kennedy
- University of South Australia, School of Nursing and Midwifery, City East, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kay Price
- University of South Australia, School of Nursing and Midwifery, City East, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tabatha L Rando
- Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Healthy Ageing Node, Flinders at Tonsley, Clovelly Park, Australia
| | - Jo Boylan
- Southern Cross Care (SA & NT), Peter Taylor House, Parkside, Australia
| | - Anthony R Dyer
- Wound Management Innovation Cooperative Research Centre, Healthy Ageing Node, Flinders at Tonsley, Clovelly Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rimland JM, Abraha I, Dell’Aquila G, Cruz-Jentoft A, Soiza R, Gudmusson A, Petrovic M, O’Mahony D, Todd C, Cherubini A. Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent Falls in Older People: A Systematic Overview. The SENATOR Project ONTOP Series. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0161579. [PMID: 27559744 PMCID: PMC4999091 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls are common events in older people, which cause considerable morbidity and mortality. Non-pharmacological interventions are an important approach to prevent falls. There are a large number of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions, whose evidence needs to be synthesized in order to facilitate evidence-based clinical decision making. OBJECTIVES To systematically examine reviews and meta-analyses that evaluated non-pharmacological interventions to prevent falls in older adults in the community, care facilities and hospitals. METHODS We searched the electronic databases Pubmed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDRO and TRIP from January 2009 to March 2015, for systematic reviews that included at least one comparative study, evaluating any non-pharmacological intervention, to prevent falls amongst older adults. The quality of the reviews was assessed using AMSTAR and ProFaNE taxonomy was used to organize the interventions. RESULTS Fifty-nine systematic reviews were identified which consisted of single, multiple and multifactorial non-pharmacological interventions to prevent falls in older people. The most frequent ProFaNE defined interventions were exercises either alone or combined with other interventions, followed by environment/assistive technology interventions comprising environmental modifications, assistive and protective aids, staff education and vision assessment/correction. Knowledge was the third principle class of interventions as patient education. Exercise and multifactorial interventions were the most effective treatments to reduce falls in older adults, although not all types of exercise were equally effective in all subjects and in all settings. Effective exercise programs combined balance and strength training. Reviews with a higher AMSTAR score were more likely to contain more primary studies, to be updated and to perform meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS The aim of this overview of reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent falls in older people in different settings, is to support clinicians and other healthcare workers with clinical decision-making by providing a comprehensive perspective of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Rimland
- Geriatrics and Geriatric Emergency Care, Italian National Research Center on Aging, Ancona, Italy
| | - Iosief Abraha
- Geriatrics and Geriatric Emergency Care, Italian National Research Center on Aging, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Dell’Aquila
- Geriatrics and Geriatric Emergency Care, Italian National Research Center on Aging, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Roy Soiza
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Denis O’Mahony
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Antonio Cherubini
- Geriatrics and Geriatric Emergency Care, Italian National Research Center on Aging, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|