Asenapine prescribing patterns in the treatment of manic in- and outpatients: Results from the MANACOR study

Long-term treatment of bipolar disorder type I: A systematic and critical review of clinical guidelines with derived practice algorithms

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed at providing a critical, comprehensive synthesis of international guidelines' recommendations on the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder type I (BD-I).

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to January 15th, 2019 following PRISMA and PICAR rules. International guidelines providing recommendations for the long-term treatment of BD-I were included. A methodological quality assessment was conducted with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-AGREE II.

RESULTS

The final selection yielded five international guidelines, with overall good quality. The evaluation of applicability was the weakest aspect across the guidelines. Differences in their updating strategies and the rating of the evidence, particularly for meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies, could be responsible of some level of heterogeneity among recommendations. Nonetheless, the guidelines recommended lithium as the 'gold standard' in the long-term treatment of BD-I. Quetiapine was another possible first-line option as well as aripiprazole (for the prevention of mania). Long-term treatment should contemplate monotherapy, at least initially. Clinicians should check regularly for efficacy and side effects and if necessary, switch to first-line alternatives (i.e. Valproate), combine first-line compounds with different mechanisms of action or switch to second-line options or combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility to monitor improvements in long-term outcomes, namely relapse prevention and inter-episode subthreshold depressive symptoms, based on the application of their recommendations is an unmet need of clinical guidelines. In terms of evidence of clinical guidelines, there is a need for more efficacious treatment strategies for the prevention of bipolar depression.

Asenapine for the treatment of bipolar disorder

Introduction: Bipolar I disorder (BDI) is amongst the most debilitating psychiatric conditions with a great impact on both patients and their families. A class of drugs commonly used in this condition is second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) including asenapine, one of the latest to be introduced into the clinical practice worldwide to treat manic episodes in BDI. Areas covered: The aim of this paper is to critically review the literature on the pharmacological characteristics, tolerability, and safety data of asenapine, as well as on its short- and long-term clinical trials in manic episodes as both a monotherapy and as an add-on treatment. Expert opinion: The available data indicate that asenapine is an effective antimanic agent in both adult and pediatric patients and that it might also improve depressive symptoms and recurrences in BDI patients. Its tolerability profile is good, and its most common side effects are somnolence, light extrapyramidal symptoms, dizziness, weight gain, and oral (but reversible) hypoesthesia. Taken together, the published studies indicate that asenapine might be an effective therapeutic agent in BDI with a broad spectrum of clinical activities. Further double-blind, short- and long-term studies are, however, necessary to clarify its precise role in the treatment of BD.

Thresholds for severity, remission and recovery using the functioning assessment short test (FAST) in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Despite its importance, no distinction between none, mild, moderate and severe functional impairment is available. Categorization of functional impairment could help to better assess randomized controlled trials (RCT) and to study the correlates of functional impairment according to severity. The Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) is one of the most widely used measures of functional impairment in bipolar disorder and related conditions, but to date no severity cut-offs have been determined for their use in clinical research and practice.

METHOD

FAST and Global Functioning Assessment (GAF) ratings from 65 euthymic outpatients with bipolar disorder at the Hospital Clínic in Barcelona were analyzed. A linear regression was computed using the FAST as the independent variable and the GAF as the dependent variable. Cut-offs scores for the FAST were estimated taking into account the GAF scores as a reference.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis with GAF scores as the dependent variable yielded the following equation: GAF _score= 91,41-1,031 * FAST _score. The cut-off scores for the FAST scale derived from this equation were as follows: scores from 0 to 11 included patients with no impairment. Scores from 12 to 20, represented the category of mild impairment. Moderate impairment comprised scores from 21 to 40. Finally, scores above 40 represent severe functional impairment. Further, the 4 × 4 cross-tabulation resulted in a significant association of FAST and GAF severity gradation: (Chi²= 95,095; df = 9; p < 0,001). Chance-corrected agreement was κ = 0,65 (p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

In the absence of a better alternative, the GAF, a broad clinical measure, was used as gold standard for establishing FAST categories according to severity.

CONCLUSION

The categorization of functional impairment in four categories based on empirical data shows that 12, 20 and 40 represent clinically meaningful cut-offs of the FAST for mild, moderate, and severe functional impairment and for functional recovery, remission, and improvement. The proposed categories are suitable to be further implemented in clinical studies and RCTs.

A Review of Asenapine in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder places a significant burden on the affected individuals, their family, healthcare systems and the overall economy. More treatment options are needed, especially those with better efficacy and tolerability. Asenapine is a second-generation antipsychotic approved in Europe (brand name Sycrest^®) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe manic episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults, and in the US (brand name Saphris^®) for the treatment of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder in adults and children aged 10-17 years. It is the antagonistic activity at the D₂ receptor that is likely responsible for the antimanic properties of asenapine. Clinical trials have demonstrated that asenapine mono- and add-on therapy is effective in the short- and long-term treatment of mania associated with bipolar I disorder in adult and paediatric patients. In addition, post hoc and pooled data analyses have shown that asenapine is effective in reducing clinically significant depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar I disorder. The most common adverse events associated with asenapine are somnolence, dizziness, extrapyramidal symptoms, increased bodyweight and oral hypoesthesia. However, the incidence of these events, particularly weight gain, is generally lower than with olanzapine. In one study, asenapine has been shown to improve health-related quality of life. Economic analyses indicate that the use of asenapine can, over time, lead to a reduction in the costs of treatment.

Management of asenapine treatment in clinical practice: Recommendations from a panel of experts

INTRODUCTION

The choice of an antipsychotic should be based on bipolar disorder (BD) symptoms and the particular needs of each patient, as well as the adverse events potentially associated with treatment. Asenapine is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for the management of type-I BD, with distinct pharmacokinetic and receptor affinity profiles.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Recommendations document developed by a panel of experts with extensive experience in the use of asenapine in psychiatric care, including emergency department, hospital, and outpatient care. Recommendations were discussed in a single meeting and were based on both the clinical experience of the panel of experts and the empirical evidence provided in the scientific literature.

RESULTS

The present document describes the patient profile that best suits the pharmacodynamic characteristics of asenapine, as well as the advantages and limitations of the pharmacokinetics associated with the sublingual route. The document also addresses the main safety issues of asenapine and suggests interventions aimed at mitigating the most frequent adverse reactions associated with asenapine treatment. Finally, the article provides advice on dosing and overall management of asenapine treatment, including the combination with other treatments and the switch from other antipsychotics to asenapine.

CONCLUSIONS

In this recommendations document, we provide clinicians with guidance on the use of asenapine in real-life practice, including the identification of patients who best suit the characteristics of this antipsychotic.

The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Biological Treatment of Bipolar Disorders: Acute and long-term treatment of mixed states in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

Although clinically highly relevant, the recognition and treatment of bipolar mixed states has played only an underpart in recent guidelines. This WFSBP guideline has been developed to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the acute and long-term treatment of bipolar mixed states in adults.

METHODS

Material used for these guidelines is based on a systematic literature search using various data bases. Their scientific rigour was categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F), and different grades of recommendation to ensure practicability were assigned. We examined data pertaining to the acute treatment of manic and depressive symptoms in bipolar mixed patients, as well as data pertaining to the prevention of mixed recurrences after an index episode of any type, or recurrence of any type after a mixed index episode.

RESULTS

Manic symptoms in bipolar mixed states appeared responsive to treatment with several atypical antipsychotics, the best evidence resting with olanzapine. For depressive symptoms, addition of ziprasidone to treatment as usual may be beneficial; however, the evidence base is much more limited than for the treatment of manic symptoms. Besides olanzapine and quetiapine, valproate and lithium should also be considered for recurrence prevention.

LIMITATIONS

The concept of mixed states changed over time, and recently became much more comprehensive with the release of DSM-5. As a consequence, studies in bipolar mixed patients targeted slightly different bipolar subpopulations. In addition, trial designs in acute and maintenance treatment also advanced in recent years in response to regulatory demands.

CONCLUSIONS

Current treatment recommendations are still based on limited evidence, and there is a clear demand for confirmative studies adopting the DSM-5 specifier with mixed features concept.

Bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a recurrent chronic disorder characterised by fluctuations in mood state and energy. It affects more than 1% of the world's population irrespective of nationality, ethnic origin, or socioeconomic status. Bipolar disorder is one of the main causes of disability among young people, leading to cognitive and functional impairment and raised mortality, particularly death by suicide. A high prevalence of psychiatric and medical comorbidities is typical in affected individuals. Accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder is difficult in clinical practice because onset is most commonly a depressive episode and looks similar to unipolar depression. Moreover, there are currently no valid biomarkers for the disorder. Therefore, the role of clinical assessment remains key. Detection of hypomanic periods and longitudinal assessment are crucial to differentiate bipolar disorder from other conditions. Current knowledge of the evolving pharmacological and psychological strategies in bipolar disorder is of utmost importance.

Asenapine for bipolar disorder

Asenapine (Saphris(®)) is an atypical antipsychotic drug which has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults, as well as the treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I in both adult and pediatric populations. Asenapine is a tetracyclic drug with antidopaminergic and antiserotonergic activity with a unique sublingual route of administration. In this review, we examine and summarize the available literature on the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of asenapine in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). Data from randomized, double-blind trials comparing asenapine to placebo or olanzapine in the treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes showed asenapine to be an effective monotherapy treatment in clinical settings; asenapine outperformed placebo and showed noninferior performance to olanzapine based on improvement in the Young Mania Rating Scale scores. There are limited data available on the use of asenapine in the treatment of depressive symptoms of BD, or in the maintenance phase of BD. The available data are inconclusive, suggesting the need for more robust data from prospective trials in these clinical domains. The most commonly reported adverse effect associated with use of asenapine is somnolence. However, the somnolence associated with asenapine use did not cause significant rates of discontinuation. While asenapine was associated with weight gain when compared to placebo, it appeared to be modest when compared to other atypical antipsychotics, and its propensity to cause increases in hemoglobin A1c or serum lipid levels appeared to be similarly modest. Asenapine does not appear to cause any clinically significant QTc prolongation. The most commonly reported extra-pyramidal symptom associated with asenapine was akathisia. Overall, asenapine appears to be a relatively well-tolerated atypical antipsychotic, effective in the treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes of BD.