1
|
Pedersen ML, Gildberg F, Baker J, Damsgaard JB, Tingleff EB. Ethnic disparities in the use of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2022; 58:505-522. [PMID: 36454269 PMCID: PMC9713127 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02387-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify and summarise extant knowledge about patient ethnicity and the use of various types of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings. METHODS A scoping review methodological framework recommended by the JBI was used. A systematic search was conducted in APA PsycINFO, CINAHL with Full Text, Embase, PubMed and Scopus. Additionally, grey literature searches were conducted in Google, OpenGrey and selected websites, and the reference lists of included studies were explored. RESULTS Altogether, 38 studies were included: 34 were primary studies; 4, reviews. The geographical settings were as follows: Europe (n = 26), Western Pacific (n = 8), Americas (n = 3) and South-East Asia (n = 1). In primary studies, ethnicity was reported according to migrant/national status (n = 16), mixed categories (n = 12), indigenous vs. non-indigenous (n = 5), region of origin (n = 1), sub-categories of indigenous people (n = 1) and religion (n = 1). In reviews, ethnicity was not comparable. The categories of restrictive practices included seclusion, which was widely reported across the studies (n = 20), multiple restrictive practices studied concurrently (n = 17), mechanical restraint (n = 8), rapid tranquillisation (n = 7) and manual restraint (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS Ethnic disparities in restrictive practice use in adult mental health inpatient settings has received some scholarly attention. Evidence suggests that certain ethnic minorities were more likely to experience restrictive practices than other groups. However, extant research was characterised by a lack of consensus and continuity. Furthermore, widely different definitions of ethnicity and restrictive practices were used, which hampers researchers' and clinicians' understanding of the issue. Further research in this field may improve mental health practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Locht Pedersen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. .,Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart (RFM), Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 70, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark. .,Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 70, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark.
| | - Frederik Gildberg
- grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart (RFM), Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 70, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark ,grid.425874.80000 0004 0639 1911Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 70, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| | - John Baker
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Janne Brammer Damsgaard
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Ellen Boldrup Tingleff
- grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart (RFM), Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 70, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark ,grid.425874.80000 0004 0639 1911Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 70, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark ,grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital/Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9 A, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruud T, Haugom EW, Pincus HA, Hynnekleiv T. Measuring Seclusion in Psychiatric Intensive Care: Development and Measurement Properties of the Clinical Seclusion Checklist. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:768500. [PMID: 35002798 PMCID: PMC8733687 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.768500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acute psychiatric units in general hospitals must ensure that acutely disturbed patients do not harm themselves or others, and simultaneously provide care and treatment and help patients regain control of their behavior. This led to the development of strategies for the seclusion of a patient in this state within a particular area separated from other patients in the ward. While versions of this practice have been used in different countries and settings, a systematic framework for describing the various parameters and types of seclusion interventions has not been available. The aims of the project were to develop and test a valid and reliable checklist for characterizing seclusion in inpatient psychiatric care. Methods: Development and testing of the checklist were accomplished in five stages. Staff in psychiatric units completed detailed descriptions of seclusion episodes. Elements of seclusion were identified by thematic analysis of this material, and consensus regarding these elements was achieved through a Delphi process comprising two rounds. Good content validity was ensured through the sample of seclusion episodes and the representative participants in the Delphi process. The first draft of the checklist was revised based on testing by clinicians assessing seclusion episodes. The revised checklist with six reasons for and 10 elements of seclusion was tested with different response scales, and acceptable interrater reliability was achieved. Results: The Clinical Seclusion Checklist is a brief and feasible tool measuring six reasons for seclusion, 10 elements of seclusion, and four contextual factors. It was developed through a transparent process and exhibited good content validity and acceptable interrater reliability. Conclusion: The checklist is a step toward achieving valid and clinically relevant measurements of seclusion. Its use in psychiatric units may contribute to quality assurance, more reliable statistics and comparisons across sites and periods, improved research on patients' experiences of seclusion and its effects, reduction of negative consequences of seclusion, and improvement of psychiatric intensive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torleif Ruud
- Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen Woldsengen Haugom
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Acute Psychiatry and Psychosis Treatment, Sanderud, Division of Mental Health, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway
| | - Harold Alan Pincus
- Department of Psychiatry and Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Torfinn Hynnekleiv
- Department of Acute Psychiatry and Psychosis Treatment, Division of Mental Health, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Reinsvoll, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maguire T, Carroll A, McKenna B, Dunn C, Daffern M. The Model for Understanding Inpatient Aggression: A Version for Mental Health Nurses Working in Prisons. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2021; 42:827-835. [PMID: 33480815 DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1871134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Preventing and managing aggression remains an important and challenging task for mental health nurses. Despite the concern, there is a dearth of frameworks to assist practice and inform assessment and intervention related to aggression, for forensic mental health nurses working in prisons. This paper presents a model for understanding aggression within prison mental health units. The model elucidates various personal and situational determinants of aggression. It offers a systematic framework for mental health nurses to investigate and understand aggression, to ultimately assist nurses to provide care in an informed and effective manner, and for services to consider structural factors that contribute to the risk of aggression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Maguire
- Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, Australia.,Forensicare, Fairfield, Australia
| | - Andrew Carroll
- Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, Australia.,Forensicare, Fairfield, Australia.,cCurious Minds Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brian McKenna
- Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, Australia.,Forensic Mental Health, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.,Auckland Regional Forensic Psychiatry Services, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Michael Daffern
- Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, Australia.,Forensicare, Fairfield, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A Visual Dashboard to Monitor Restraint Use in Hospitalized Psychiatry Patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2021; 47:282-287. [PMID: 33648859 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restraint events are tracked using a duration rate as part of a national psychiatry quality reporting program and tracked annually. Visual dashboards can help track metrics in near real time but are not routinely used in psychiatric settings. METHODS This observational study sought to characterize restraint events by extracting electronic medical record data on restraint episodes between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, in five inpatient units in one academic medical center. The data were also used to build a visual dashboard and calculate restraint metrics (duration and frequency) across locations and time. RESULTS A total of 540 distinct restraint events occurred during the study period. Highest restraint episode counts occurred during evening shift (54.8%), compared to daytime (37.2%) and nighttime (8.0%) shifts. Highest episode duration rates occurred in an adult unit (61.3% of total hours spent in restraints across all units), while highest episode counts occurred in the adolescent unit (48.3% of all restraint episodes). A visual dashboard with two views (summary and detailed) was created. The summary view integrates patient volume data (total patient hours per month) with total duration and number of episodes per month. The detailed view displays event frequency by hour of day, nursing shift, weekday, and patient length of stay at the time of restraint. CONCLUSIONS Visual dashboards can provide timely and efficient access to granular data elements and metrics related to restraint events, beyond the reporting requirement of a national quality program. Visual dashboards can reveal variations in restraint use and yield important opportunities for clinical quality improvement.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gemsa S, Noorthoorn EO, Lepping P, de Haan HA, Wierdsma AI, Hutschemaekers GJM. The Compulsory Care Act: Early Observations and Expectations of In- or Outpatient Involuntary Treatment. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:770934. [PMID: 35222103 PMCID: PMC8864544 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND On January 1, 2020, the Dutch Compulsory Care Act (WvGGZ) replaced the Special Admissions Act (BOPZ). While the old law only allowed compulsory treatment in hospitals, the new law allows it both inside and outside the hospital. Moreover, the new law prioritizes the patient's own opinion on coercive measures. By following patients' own choices, the Compulsory Care Act is hoped to lead to fewer admission days and less inpatient compulsory treatment in involuntarily admitted patients. METHODS We studied the seclusion and enforced-medication events before and after January 1, 2020, using coercive measures monitoring data in a Mental Health Trust. Trends in hours of seclusion and the number of enforced-medication events per month from 2012 to 2019 were compared with 2020. We used generalized linear models to perform time series analysis. Logistic regression analyses and generalized linear models were performed to investigate whether patient compilation determined some of the observed changes in seclusion use or enforced-medication events. RESULTS The mean number of hours of seclusion between 2012 and 2019 was 27,124 per year, decreasing from 48,542 in 2012 to 21,133 in 2019 to 3,844 h in 2020. The mean incidence of enforced-medication events between 2012 and 2019 was 167, increasing from 90 in 2012 to 361 in 2019 and then fell to 294 in 2020. In 2020, we observed 3,844 h of seclusion and 294 enforced-medication events. Near to no outpatient coercion was reported, even though it was warranted. The time series analysis showed a significant effect of the year 2020 on seclusion hours (β = -1.867; Exp(β) = 0.155, Wald = 27.22, p = 0.001), but not on enforced-medication events [β = 0.48; Exp(β) = 1.616, Wald = 2.33, p = 0.13]. DISCUSSION There was a reduction in the number of seclusion hours after the introduction of the Compulsory Care Act. The number of enforced-medication events also increased from a very low baseline, but from 2017 onwards. To see whether these findings are consistent over time, they need to be replicated in the near future. CONCLUSION We observed a significant increase in enforced-medication use and a decrease in seclusion hours. The year 2020 predicted seclusion hours, but not enforced-medication events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Gemsa
- Ggnet Mental Health Institute, Child Psychiatry Service, Warnsveld, Netherlands
| | - Eric O Noorthoorn
- Ggnet Mental Health Institute, Child Psychiatry Service, Warnsveld, Netherlands
| | - Peter Lepping
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom.,Wrexham Academic Unit, Centre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, Wrexham, United Kingdom.,Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, India
| | - Hein A de Haan
- Ggnet Mental Health Institute, Child Psychiatry Service, Warnsveld, Netherlands.,Tactus Verslavingszorg, Addiction Care and Treatment Service, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Andre I Wierdsma
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Giel J M Hutschemaekers
- Behavioral Science Institute, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Indigo Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vruwink FJ, Wierdsma A, Noorthoorn EO, Nijman HLI, Mulder CL. Number of Seclusions in the Netherlands Higher in the 7 Years Since the End of a Nationwide Seclusion-Reduction Program. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:778793. [PMID: 34925102 PMCID: PMC8678042 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.778793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Between 2006 and 2012 the Dutch government funded a nationwide program for reducing the use of seclusion. Although an initial first trend study showed that the reported number of seclusions declined during the program, the objective of a 10% annual decrease was not met. We wished to establish whether the decline had continued after funding ended in 2012. Method: Using quasi Poisson time series modeling, we retrospectively analyzed the nationally reported numbers of seclusion and involuntary medication between 1998 and 2019, i.e., before, during and after the end of the nationwide program, with and without correction for the number of involuntary admissions. Results: With and without correction for the number of involuntary admissions, there were more seclusions in the seven years after the nationwide program than during the nationwide program. Although the reported number of involuntary medications also increased, the rate of increase was slower after the end of the nationwide program than before. Conclusions: Rather than continuing to decrease after the end of the nationwide program, the number of seclusions rose. This may mean that interventions intended to reduce the use of seclusion within this program are not properly sustained in daily clinical care without an ongoing national program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - André Wierdsma
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk L I Nijman
- Department of Social Sciences, Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis L Mulder
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Czernin K, Bermpohl F, Wullschleger A, Mahler L. Effects of Recovery-Orientation on the Use of Forced Medication and Maximum Daily Drug Dose: The "Weddinger Modell". Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:789822. [PMID: 34975584 PMCID: PMC8714674 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of the implementation of the Recovery-orientated psychiatric care concept "Weddinger Modell" on the incidence of forced medication, the total number of forced medication incidents per affected case, the maximum dose of a singular forced medication and the maximum voluntary daily drug dose of different psychotropic drugs administered during an inpatient stay. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 234 patients. A pre/post-comparison of patients on two acute psychiatric wards before (control group, n = 112) and after (intervention group, n = 122) the implementation of the Weddinger Modell in 2010 was performed. Patient data was selected at two reporting periods before and at two reporting periods after 2010. Results: No significant differences were found in the incidence of forced medication and the total number of forced medications. A significant reduction of the maximum forced medication dose of haloperidol in the intervention group was seen. Furthermore, the analysis of the intervention group showed a significant reduction of the maximum voluntary daily drug doses of clozapine, haloperidol and risperidone. Discussion: The results indicate that the implementation of the Weddinger Modell had no effect on the incidence of forced medication, but it can help to improve the approach to psychotropic drugs. Despite the reduction of mechanical coercive measures by the model, as shown in a previous study, there is no increase in forced medications or administered drug doses. Focus on Recovery helps in reducing coercion in acute psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Czernin
- Department of Psychiatry, St. Hedwig Hospital, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Felix Bermpohl
- Department of Psychiatry, St. Hedwig Hospital, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandre Wullschleger
- Department of Psychiatry, St. Hedwig Hospital, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Division of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Thonex, Switzerland
| | - Lieselotte Mahler
- Department of Psychiatry, St. Hedwig Hospital, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, Clinics in the Theodor-Wenzel-Werk, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Does high and intensive care reduce coercion? Association of HIC model fidelity to seclusion use in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:469. [PMID: 32993572 PMCID: PMC7523051 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02855-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A new inpatient care model has been developed in the Netherlands: High and Intensive Care (HIC). The purpose of HIC is to improve quality of inpatient mental healthcare and to reduce coercion. METHODS In 2014, audits were held at 32 closed acute admission wards for adult patients throughout the Netherlands. The audits were done by trained auditors, who were professionals of the participating institutes, using the HIC monitor, a model fidelity scale to assess implementation of the HIC model. The HIC model fidelity scale (67 items) encompasses 11 domains including for example team structure, team processes, diagnostics and treatment, and building environment. Data on seclusion and forced medication was collected using the Argus rating scale. The association between HIC monitor scores and the use of seclusion and forced medication was analyzed, corrected for patient characteristics. RESULTS Results showed that wards having a relatively high HIC monitor total score, indicating a high level of implementation of the model as compared to wards scoring lower on the monitor, had lower seclusion hours per admission hours (2.58 versus 4.20) and less forced medication events per admission days (0.0162 versus 0.0207). The HIC model fidelity scores explained 27% of the variance in seclusion rates (p < 0.001). Adding patient characteristics to HIC items in the regression model showed an increase of the explained variance to 40%. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that higher HIC model fidelity was associated with less seclusion and less forced medication at acute closed psychiatric wards in the Netherlands.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
From 2004 onwards, above 50 seclusion reduction programs (SRP) were developed, implemented and evaluated in the Netherlands. However, little is known about their sustainability, as to which extent obtained reduction could be maintained. This study monitored three programs over ten years seeking to identify important factors contributing to this. We reviewed documents of three SRPs that received governmental funding to reduce seclusion. Next, we interviewed key figures from each institute, to investigate the SRP documents and their implementation in practice. We monitored the number of seclusion events and the number of seclusion days with the Argus rating scale over ten years in three separate phases: 2008-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2017. As we were interested in sustainability after the governmental funding ended in 2012, our focus was on the last phase. Although in different rate, all mental health institutes showed some decline in seclusion events during and immediately after the SRP. After end of funding one institute showed numbers going up and down. The second showed an increase in number of seclusion days. The third institute displayed a sustained and continuous reduction in use of seclusion, even several years after the received funding. This institute was the only one with an ongoing institutional SRP after the governmental funding. To sustain accomplished seclusion reduction, a continuous effort is needed for institutional awareness of the use of seclusion, even after successful implementation of SRPs. If not, successful SRPs implemented in psychiatry will easily relapse in traditional use of seclusion.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The appropriate treatment of mentally unwell, aggressive patients has challenged psychiatry for centuries. Seclusion is practiced worldwide, but concerns remain regarding its appropriateness and lack of alternatives. Patients generally report seclusion as a negative experience, though there is a paucity of literature exploring this in detail. This investigation was a service evaluation appraising inpatients' perspective of processes occurring before (information, communication), during (review, care), and after (debrief, reflection) seclusion in a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU). In this phenomenological study, qualitative data were gathered using a questionnaire in a structured interview. All patients had been nursed in seclusion during admission to a male PICU at South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Ten patients were interviewed over 4 months. The central theme was perceived lack of communication in the patient-professional relationship, which manifested itself as (i) violence against patients, (ii) lack of psychological support, and (iii) the need for alternatives. Such feedback from patients queries whether national guidelines are appropriate and/or being adhered to. Healthcare practitioners have a responsibility to challenge accepted practice to continually improve the standard of patient-centred care. Utilising patient perspectives can be a powerful driver of change towards more humane treatment of vulnerable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Allikmets
- Department of Life Sciences & Medicine, GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caryl Marshall
- Southwark High Support Rehabilitation, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Community Forensic LD/ASD, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, South London Partnership, London, United Kingdom
| | - Omar Murad
- Psychiatric Intensive Care, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kamal Gupta
- South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Muir-Cochrane E, Oster C, Grimmer K. International research into 22 years of use of chemical restraint: An evidence overview. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:927-956. [PMID: 31318109 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemical restraint (CR) (also known as rapid tranquilisation) is the forced (non-consenting) administration of medications to manage uncontrolled aggression, anxiety, or violence in people who are likely to cause harm to themselves or others. Our population of interest was adults with mental health disorders (with/without substance abuse). There has been a growing international movement over the past 22 years towards reducing/eliminating restrictive practices such as CR. It is appropriate to summarise the research that has been published over this time, identify trends and gaps in knowledge, and highlight areas for new research to inform practice. AIMS To undertake a comprehensive systematic search to identify, and describe, the volume and nature of primary international research into CR published since 1995. METHODS This paper reports the processes and overall findings of a systematic search for all available primary research on CR published between 1 January 1996 and 31 July 2018. It describes the current evidence base by hierarchy of evidence, country (ies) producing the research, CR definitions, study purpose, and outcome measures. RESULTS This review identified 311 relevant primary studies (21 RCTs; 46 non-controlled experimental or prospective observational studies; 77 cross-sectional studies; 69 retrospective studies; 67 opinion pieces, position or policy statements; and 31 qualitative studies). The USA, UK, and Australia contributed over half the research, whilst cross-country collaborations comprised 6% of it. The most common research settings comprised acute psychiatric wards (23.3%), general psychiatric wards (21.6%), and general hospital emergency departments (19.0%). DISCUSSION A key lesson learnt whilst compiling this database of research into CR was to ensure that all papers described non-consenting administration of medications to manage adults with uncontrolled aggression, anxiety, or violence. There were tensions in the literature between using effective CR without producing adverse events, and how to decide when CR was needed (compared with choosing non-chemical intervention for behavioural emergencies), respecting patients' dignity whilst safeguarding their safety, and preserving safe workplaces for staff, and care environments for other patients. The range of outcome measures suggests opportunities to standardise future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Muir-Cochrane
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, 5042
| | - Candice Oster
- On-Line Education and Development, Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, 5042
| | - Karen Grimmer
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, 5042.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lau S, Brackmann N, Mokros A, Habermeyer E. Aims to Reduce Coercive Measures in Forensic Inpatient Treatment: A 9-Year Observational Study. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:465. [PMID: 32536881 PMCID: PMC7267051 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Protecting the human rights is particularly important within the forensic context because patients in forensic psychiatry are not admitted voluntarily and so the treatment itself is of a coercive nature. Coercive measures (i.e., actions against the will of the patient such as forced medication, seclusion or restraint) form an additional incision of personal rights. Although the use of coercion within forensic psychiatric institutions remains controversial, little empirical research has been conducted on the use of coercive measures within forensic settings. The study presented here can contribute to close this research gap by informing about rates of coercive measures within the present institution. National and international organizations on the prevention of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment have emphasized the need to keep the incidents of coercive measures to a minimum. Criticisms by such organizations on high rates of seclusion, restraint, and compulsory medication have led to organizational changes within the present institution which is Switzerland's largest forensic clinic with an average of 124 patients per year. After a first visit of such a committee, e.g., the detailed documentation of coercive measures became obligatory and part of special reports. Changes in the use of coercive measures are presented here. Data on coercive measures was analyzed for years 2010 to 2018. With respect to the most invasive coercive measurement, restraint, a minimum of four patients in 2017 and a maximum of 14 patients in 2010 have been subject to this form of coercive measurement. A minimum of sixteen patients in 2012 and a maximum of 40 patients in 2010 were secluded. Though total number and duration show a trend towards a reduction in severity of coercive measures on average, a few patients are not responsive to deescalating interventions. Preventive mechanisms, documentation standards, and efforts to ensure humane and adequate treatment are discussed under ethical considerations of coercive measures within court mandated treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Lau
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie Brackmann
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Mokros
- Department of Psychology, Fern Universität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany
| | - Elmar Habermeyer
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lykke J, Hjorthøj C, Thomsen CT, Austin SF. Prevalence, predictors, and patterns of mechanical restraint use for inpatients with dual diagnosis. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2020; 56:20-27. [PMID: 30828824 DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the prevalence, predictors, and patterns of mechanical restraint in an inpatient dual diagnosis population. DESIGN AND METHODS Data were longitudinally collected from patients affected by severe mental illness and comorbid substance abuse that were hospitalized in three large wards from 2006 to 2012. FINDINGS In a sample of 1698 hospitalizations, the use of mechanical restraint ranged between 1% and 4% per year. The diagnosis of schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-5.40), the use of stimulant substances (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 2.78-11.59) and male sex (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.12-9.27) were associated with an increased risk of being exposed to mechanical restraint. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Specialized interventions targeting people at risk of mechanical restraint may further reduce the incidence of restraint and improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jørn Lykke
- Mental Health Center, St Hans Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Carsten Hjorthøj
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | | | - Stephen F Austin
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand Psychiatry, Slagelse, Denmark.,North Zealand Mental Health Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hazewinkel MC, de Winter RFP, van Est RW, van Hyfte D, Wijnschenk D, Miedema N, Hoencamp E. Text Analysis of Electronic Medical Records to Predict Seclusion in Psychiatric Wards: Proof of Concept. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:188. [PMID: 31031650 PMCID: PMC6470375 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: With the introduction of "Electronic Medical Record" (EMR) a wealth of digital data has become available. This provides a unique opportunity for exploring precedents for seclusion. This study explored the feasibility of text mining analysis in the EMR to eventually help reduce the use of seclusion in psychiatry. Methods: The texts in notes and reports of the EMR during 5 years on an acute and non-acute psychiatric ward were analyzed using a text mining application. A period of 14 days was selected before seclusion or for non-secluded patients, before discharge. The resulting concepts were analyzed using chi-square tests to assess which concepts had a significant higher or lower frequency than expected in the "seclusion" and "non-seclusion" categories. Results: Text mining led to an overview of 1,500 meaningful concepts. In the 14 day period prior to the event, 115 of these concepts had a significantly higher frequency in the seclusion category and 49 in the non-seclusion category. Analysis of the concepts from days 14 to 7 resulted in 54 concepts with a significantly higher frequency in the seclusion-category and 14 in the non-seclusion category. Conclusions: The resulting significant concepts are comparable to reasons for seclusion in literature. These results are "proof of concept". Analyzing text of reports in the EMR seems therefore promising as contribution to tools available for the prediction of seclusion. The next step is to build, train and test a model, before text mining can be part of an evidence-based clinical decision making tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam C Hazewinkel
- Clinical Centre for Acute Psychiatry, Parnassia, Parnassia Group, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Remco F P de Winter
- Clinical Centre for Acute Psychiatry, Parnassia, Parnassia Group, The Hague, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roel W van Est
- Data Research Office, Antes, Parnassia Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Narda Miedema
- Clinical Centre for Acute Psychiatry, Parnassia, Parnassia Group, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Erik Hoencamp
- Clinical Centre for Acute Psychiatry, Parnassia, Parnassia Group, The Hague, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morisset J. [Reclusion and physical restraint in psychiatry: Influencing factors and alternatives.]. Rech Soins Infirm 2018:78-90. [PMID: 29771102 DOI: 10.3917/rsi.132.0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction and context: The use of reclusion and restraint is neither a recent practice nor a rare practice in psychiatric services. In France, the Controller General of Places of Deprivation of Liberty reported certain drifts in 2015. Since then, the public authorities have sought to frame this practice with the aim of limiting its use. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD The purpose of this study is to examine how, through a literature review, the topic of limitation of constraint measures and the definition of a future direction of research is discussed. RESULTS It appears that health professionals seek to identify the cultural, social, and environmental characteristics of patients undergoing these restraint measures. However, they also question their approaches, both ethically, environmentally, organizationally, or through caregiving. CONCLUSION Co-ordination within the multidisciplinary team is mentioned but little discussed in this literature review. The place given to the role of nursing seems to be questionable, in terms of its specific approach, its expertise, and its field of action, and must be the subject of a new study.
Collapse
|
16
|
van de Sande R, Noorthoorn E, Nijman H, Wierdsma A, van de Staak C, Hellendoorn E, Mulder N. Associations between psychiatric symptoms and seclusion use: Clinical implications for care planning. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2017; 26:423-436. [PMID: 28960735 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Findings from an increasing number of studies suggest that incorporating systematic short-term risk assessments in treatment planning could lead to safer practice on psychiatric admissions wards. The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between the scores of three structured observation tools - the Kennedy Axis V (K-Axis-V), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and the Social Dysfunction and Aggression Scale (SDAS) - and seclusion. In total, 1840 weekly risk assessments with these observation scales were collected over 2342 admission weeks. These assessment scores related to 370 acutely-admitted psychiatric patients and were subjected to a multilevel analysis. It was found that several dynamic and static factors were related to seclusion. Dynamic factors included violent behaviour, current substance abuse, suspiciousness, and negativism. Static factors included ethnicity and having been diagnosed with a substance abuse disorder. The findings suggest that the incorporation of the Kennedy-Axis V, the BPRS, and the SDAS into standard practice might be helpful in identifying patients at high risk of seclusion, and could be supportive to treatment planning and clinical decision-making in the prevention of seclusion use in acute psychiatric settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland van de Sande
- Department of Health, Utrecht University of Applied Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Noorthoorn
- GGnet Mental Health Centre, GGnet, Warnsveld, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Nijman
- Roosenburg, Altrecht Aventurijn, Den Dolder, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Wierdsma
- Department of Psychiatry, Research Centre O3, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cees van de Staak
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Hellendoorn
- Acute Psychiatric Care, Parnassia Groep Bavo Europoort, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Mulder
- Department of Psychiatry, Research Centre O3, ParnassiaBavoGroep, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raveesh BN, Pathare S, Noorthoorn EO, Gowda GS, Lepping P, Bunders-Aelen JGF. Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. Indian J Psychiatry 2016; 58:S221-S229. [PMID: 28216773 PMCID: PMC5282619 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.196847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess attitudes of Indian psychiatrists and caregivers toward coercion. MATERIALS AND Methods: The study was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysore, India. Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS), a 15-item questionnaire, was administered to self-selected psychiatrists across India and caregivers from Mysore to measure attitudes on coercion. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and investigating differences in subgroups by means of Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and analysis of variance. Reliability of the SACS was tested in this Indian sample. RESULTS A total of 210 psychiatrists and 210 caregivers participated in the study. Both groups agreed that coercion was related to scarce resources, security concerns, and harm reduction. Both groups agreed that coercion is necessary, but not as treatment. Older caregivers and male experienced psychiatrists considered coercion related to scarce resources to violate patient integrity. All participants considered coercion necessary for protection in dangerous situations. Professionals and caregivers significantly disagreed on most items. The reliability of the SACS was reasonable to good among the psychiatrists group, but not in the caregiver group (alpha 0.58 vs. 0.07). CONCLUSION Caregivers and psychiatrists felt that the lack of resources is one of the reasons for coercion. Furthermore, they felt that the need on early identification of aggressive behavior, interventions to reduce aggressiveness, empowering patients, improving hospital resources, staff training in verbal de-escalation techniques is essential. There is an urgent need in the standardized operating procedure in the use of coercive measure in Indian mental health setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B N Raveesh
- Department of Psychiatry, Dharwad Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dharwad
| | - S Pathare
- Co-ordinator, Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune
| | - E O Noorthoorn
- Head of research GGnet Community mental Health Centre, PO Box 2003, 7230 GC Warnsveld, the Netherlands and main researcher of the Dutch Information Centre for Coercive Measures, Stichting Benchmark GGZ, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - G S Gowda
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru
| | - P Lepping
- Honorary Professor (Bangor University and Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, India), Consultant Psychiatrist (BCULHB), Centre for Mental Health and Society, N Wales, UK
| | - J G F Bunders-Aelen
- Professor of Biology and Society, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|