1
|
Miller G, Ankerst DP, Kattan MW, Hüser N, Stocker F, Vogelaar S, van Bruchem M, Assfalg V. Pancreas Transplantation Outcome Predictions-PTOP: A Risk Prediction Tool for Pancreas and Pancreas-Kidney Transplants Based on a European Cohort. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1632. [PMID: 38757051 PMCID: PMC11098189 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with complicated type 1 diabetes having, for example, hypoglycemia unawareness and end-stage renal disease because of diabetic nephropathy, combined pancreas and kidney transplantation (PKT) is the therapy of choice. However, the shortage of available grafts and complex impact of risk factors call for individualized, impartial predictions of PKT and pancreas transplantation (PT) outcomes to support physicians in graft acceptance decisions. Methods Based on a large European cohort with 3060 PKT and PT performed between 2006 and 2021, the 3 primary patient outcomes time to patient mortality, pancreas graft loss, and kidney graft loss were visualized using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed for 5- and 10-y prediction of outcomes based on 26 risk factors. Results Risk factors associated with increased mortality included previous kidney transplants, rescue allocations, longer waiting times, and simultaneous transplants of other organs. Increased pancreas graft loss was positively associated with higher recipient body mass index and donor age and negatively associated with simultaneous transplants of kidneys and other organs. Donor age was also associated with increased kidney graft losses. The multivariable Cox models reported median C-index values were 63% for patient mortality, 62% for pancreas loss, and 55% for kidney loss. Conclusions This study provides an online risk tool at https://riskcalc.org/ptop for individual 5- and 10-y post-PKT and PT patient outcomes based on parameters available at the time of graft offer to support critical organ acceptance decisions and encourage external validation in independent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Miller
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM – Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Garching, Germany
- Core Facility Statistical Consulting, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Donna P. Ankerst
- Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Garching, Germany
| | - Michael W. Kattan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Norbert Hüser
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM – Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Stocker
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM – Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Serge Vogelaar
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Volker Assfalg
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM – Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assfalg V, Miller G, Stocker F, Hüser N, Hartmann D, Heemann U, Tieken I, Zanen W, Vogelaar S, Rosenkranz AR, Schneeberger S, Függer R, Berlakovich G, Ysebaert DR, Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen D, Mikhalski D, van Laecke S, Kuypers D, Mühlfeld AS, Viebahn R, Pratschke J, Melchior S, Hauser IA, Jänigen B, Weimer R, Richter N, Foller S, Schulte K, Kurschat C, Harth A, Moench C, Rademacher S, Nitschke M, Krämer BK, Renders L, Koliogiannis D, Pascher A, Hoyer J, Weinmann-Menke J, Schiffer M, Banas B, Hakenberg O, Schwenger V, Nadalin S, Lopau K, Piros L, Nemes B, Szakaly P, Bouts A, Bemelman FJ, Sanders JS, de Vries APJ, Christiaans MHL, Hilbrands L, van Zuilen AD, Arnol M, Stippel D, Wahba R. Rescue Allocation Modes in Eurotransplant Kidney Transplantation: Recipient Oriented Extended Allocation Versus Competitive Rescue Allocation-A Retrospective Multicenter Outcome Analysis. Transplantation 2024; 108:1200-1211. [PMID: 38073036 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whenever the kidney standard allocation (SA) algorithms according to the Eurotransplant (ET) Kidney Allocation System or the Eurotransplant Senior Program fail, rescue allocation (RA) is initiated. There are 2 procedurally different modes of RA: recipient oriented extended allocation (REAL) and competitive rescue allocation (CRA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of patient survival and graft failure with RA mode and whether or not it varied across the different ET countries. METHODS The ET database was retrospectively analyzed for donor and recipient clinical and demographic characteristics in association with graft outcomes of deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) across all ET countries and centers from 2014 to 2021 using Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS Seventeen thousand six hundred seventy-nine renal transplantations were included (SA 15 658 [89%], REAL 860 [4.9%], and CRA 1161 [6.6%]). In CRA, donors were older, cold ischemia times were longer, and HLA matches were worse in comparison with REAL and especially SA. Multivariable analyses showed comparable graft and recipient survival between SA and REAL; however, CRA was associated with shorter graft survival. Germany performed 76% of all DDRTs after REAL and CRA and the latter mode reduced waiting times by up to 2.9 y. CONCLUSIONS REAL and CRA are used differently in the ET countries according to national donor rates. Both RA schemes optimize graft utilization, lead to acceptable outcomes, and help to stabilize national DDRT programs, especially in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Assfalg
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Gregor Miller
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Felix Stocker
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Hüser
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Hartmann
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Ineke Tieken
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter Zanen
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Serge Vogelaar
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander R Rosenkranz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reinhold Függer
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Dirk R Ysebaert
- Department of HPB and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | | | - Dimitri Mikhalski
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anja S Mühlfeld
- Department of Nephrology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik CCM/CVK, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ingeborg A Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bernd Jänigen
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Transplant Unit, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology/Renal Transplantation, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Richter
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susan Foller
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Kevin Schulte
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertensiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Ageing-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ana Harth
- Medizinische Klinik I Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Klinikum der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Germany
| | - Christian Moench
- General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Sebastian Rademacher
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Nitschke
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Dionysios Koliogiannis
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, UKM Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Hoyer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Medical Center, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- I. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mario Schiffer
- Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Abteilung für Nephrologie, Universitäres Transplantationszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kai Lopau
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wuerzburg-Kidney Transplant Program, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Laszlo Piros
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balazs Nemes
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Institute of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Peter Szakaly
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Antonia Bouts
- Pediatric Nephrology Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan S Sanders
- Departement of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center and Transplant Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miha Arnol
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roger Wahba
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deniau B, Sen J, Chaussard M, Boutin L, Coutrot M, Guillemet L, Plaud B, Depret F, Dudoignon E. Early post-operative lactate increase following kidney transplant is associated with delayed graft function: A retrospective cohort study. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15288. [PMID: 38520246 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication following kidney transplant. This study aimed to assess the association between early post-operative lactate variation and DGF. METHODS This was a single center, retrospective cohort study between February 2021 and December 2022 in Saint-Louis Hospital (APHP, France). Venous lactate levels were measured immediately (H0) and 4 h (H4) after kidney transplant. The primary outcome was the occurrence of DGF (need for renal replacement therapy between transplantation and day 7). Secondary outcome was the occurrence of complications (i.e., death, vascular thrombosis, hemorrhagic shock, urological complications (hematoma, urinoma), local or systemic infection) between transplant and day 7. RESULTS Two hundred 12 patients were included, and 38 (17.9%) developed DGF. Venous lactate variation between H0 and H4 was higher in patients who developed DGF (-30 (IQR -83, -6)% vs. -15 (IQR -62, -11)%, p = .037), but the variation of level was more often positive (corresponding to an increased lactate production over time between H0 and H4) in patients who developed DGF ((28(85%) vs. 94(62%), p = .011). In multivariate logistic regression, positive venous lactate level variation between H0 and H4 was strongly associated with a reduced risk of developing DGF (OR .30 [.09-.79], p = .024). We did not find any association between post-operative hyperlactatemia and occurrence of complications between transplant and day 7. DISCUSSION DGF is a frequent complication following kidney transplantation. Its early prediction could help physicians optimize treatment and protect the kidney. Early venous lactate variation after kidney transplant could help to predict the occurrence of DGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Deniau
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Condition (MASCOT), Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
- INI CRCT, Paris, France
| | - Juliane Sen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Maïté Chaussard
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Louis Boutin
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Condition (MASCOT), Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Coutrot
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Lucie Guillemet
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Plaud
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Condition (MASCOT), Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
| | - François Depret
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Condition (MASCOT), Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
- INI CRCT, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Dudoignon
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Condition (MASCOT), Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, University Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- FHU PROMICE, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Artiles A, Domínguez A, Subiela JD, Boissier R, Campi R, Prudhomme T, Pecoraro A, Breda A, Burgos FJ, Territo A, Hevia V. Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 51:13-25. [PMID: 37006961 PMCID: PMC10064232 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Owing to population ageing, a growing number of kidney transplants (KTs) in elderly population are being performed. KT is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, in older patients, the decision between dialysis and KT can be difficult due to potential inferior outcomes. Few studies have been published addressing this issue, and literature outcomes are controversial. Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the evidence about outcomes of KT in elderly patients (>70 yr). Evidence acquisition A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022337038) was performed. Search was conducted on PubMed and LILACS databases. Comparative and noncomparative studies addressing outcomes (overall survival [OS], graft survival [GS], complications, delayed graft function [DGF], primary nonfunction, graft loss, estimated glomerular filtrate rate, or acute rejection) of KT in people older than 70 yr were included. Evidence synthesis Of the 10 357 yielded articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria (18 observational studies, one prospective multicentre study, and no randomised controlled trials), enrolling a total of 293 501 KT patients. Comparative studies reporting enough quantitative data for target outcomes were combined. There were significant inferior 5-yr OS (relative risk [RR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.35) and 5-yr GS in the elderly group (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14-1.65) to those in the <70-yr group. Short-term GS at 1 and 3 yr was similar between groups, and similar findings occurred with DGF, graft loss, and acute rejection rates. Few data about postoperative complications were reported. Conclusions Elderly recipients have worse OS at all time points and long-term GS compared with younger recipients (<70 yr). Postoperative complications were under-reported and could not be assessed. The DGF, acute rejection, death with functioning graft, and graft loss were not inferior in elderly recipients. Geriatric assessment in this setting might be useful for selecting better elderly candidates for KT. Patient summary Compared with younger population, kidney transplant in elderly patients has inferior patient and graft survival outcomes in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Artiles
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Domínguez
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Romain Boissier
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, La Conception University Hospital, Assistance-Publique, Marseille, France
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Thommas Prudhomme
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Urology Department, Fundación Puigvert, University Autónoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Burgos
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angelo Territo
- Urology Department, Fundación Puigvert, University Autónoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vital Hevia
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
- Corresponding author. Urology, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, Madrid 28034, Spain. Tel. +34 645 946 800; Fax: +34 913 368 760.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schwab S, Sidler D, Haidar F, Kuhn C, Schaub S, Koller M, Mellac K, Stürzinger U, Tischhauser B, Binet I, Golshayan D, Müller T, Elmer A, Franscini N, Krügel N, Fehr T, Immer F. Clinical prediction model for prognosis in kidney transplant recipients (KIDMO): study protocol. Diagn Progn Res 2023; 7:6. [PMID: 36879332 PMCID: PMC9990297 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-022-00139-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many potential prognostic factors for predicting kidney transplantation outcomes have been identified. However, in Switzerland, no widely accepted prognostic model or risk score for transplantation outcomes is being routinely used in clinical practice yet. We aim to develop three prediction models for the prognosis of graft survival, quality of life, and graft function following transplantation in Switzerland. METHODS The clinical kidney prediction models (KIDMO) are developed with data from a national multi-center cohort study (Swiss Transplant Cohort Study; STCS) and the Swiss Organ Allocation System (SOAS). The primary outcome is the kidney graft survival (with death of recipient as competing risk); the secondary outcomes are the quality of life (patient-reported health status) at 12 months and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope. Organ donor, transplantation, and recipient-related clinical information will be used as predictors at the time of organ allocation. We will use a Fine & Gray subdistribution model and linear mixed-effects models for the primary and the two secondary outcomes, respectively. Model optimism, calibration, discrimination, and heterogeneity between transplant centres will be assessed using bootstrapping, internal-external cross-validation, and methods from meta-analysis. DISCUSSION Thorough evaluation of the existing risk scores for the kidney graft survival or patient-reported outcomes has been lacking in the Swiss transplant setting. In order to be useful in clinical practice, a prognostic score needs to be valid, reliable, clinically relevant, and preferably integrated into the decision-making process to improve long-term patient outcomes and support informed decisions for clinicians and their patients. The state-of-the-art methodology by taking into account competing risks and variable selection using expert knowledge is applied to data from a nationwide prospective multi-center cohort study. Ideally, healthcare providers together with patients can predetermine the risk they are willing to accept from a deceased-donor kidney, with graft survival, quality of life, and graft function estimates available for their consideration. STUDY REGISTRATION Open Science Framework ID: z6mvj.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fadi Haidar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Kuhn
- Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Koller
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Katell Mellac
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ueli Stürzinger
- STCS Patient Advisory Board, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Tischhauser
- STCS Patient Advisory Board, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Binet
- Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Déla Golshayan
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Müller
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Fehr
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang B, Huang M, Zhang C, Yu Z, Hou Y, Miao Y, Chen Z. Individual dynamic prediction and prognostic analysis for long-term allograft survival after kidney transplantation. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:359. [DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02996-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Predicting allograft survival is vital for efficient transplant success. With dynamic changes in patient conditions, clinical indicators may change longitudinally, and doctors’ judgments may be highly variable. It is necessary to establish a dynamic model to precisely predict the individual risk/survival of new allografts.
Methods
The follow-up data of 407 patients were obtained from a renal allograft failure study. We introduced a landmarking-based dynamic Cox model that incorporated baseline values (age at transplantation, sex, weight) and longitudinal changes (glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, hematocrit). Model performance was evaluated using Harrell’s C-index and the Brier score.
Results
Six predictors were included in our analysis. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival at baseline showed an overall 5-year survival rate of 87.2%. The dynamic Cox model showed the individual survival prediction with more accuracy at different time points (for the 5-year survival prediction, the C-index = 0.789 and Brier score = 0.065 for the average of all time points) than the static Cox model at baseline (C-index = 0.558, Brier score = 0.095). Longitudinal covariate prognostic analysis (with time-varying effects) was performed.
Conclusions
The dynamic Cox model can utilize clinical follow-up data, including longitudinal patient information. Dynamic prediction and prognostic analysis can be used to provide evidence and a reference to better guide clinical decision-making for applying early treatment to patients at high risk.
Collapse
|