1
|
Knipper S, Falkenbach F, Maurer T. Radioguided surgery for lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:266-272. [PMID: 38587022 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review highlights recent advancements in radioguided surgery (RGS) for prostate cancer. Our objective is to provide expert insights into the state of research, as reflected in the selected articles, and to offer perspectives on the clinical implications and future directions that emerge from this rapidly evolving domain. RECENT FINDINGS Key findings include the potential of PSMA-RGS surgery to improve the detection of lymph node invasion in primary prostate cancer, to guide successful removal of metastatic lesions in oligorecurrent patients with acceptable complications, and the feasibility of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS using a miniaturized gamma probe. Additionally, the development of novel PSMA ligands and the integration of fluorescence imaging offer promising improvements in imaging and surgical guidance. SUMMARY PSMA-RGS is an emerging approach that shows promise for improving lymph node assessment and treatment outcomes in prostate cancer. However, its effect on cancer-specific as well as overall survival are still being investigated, and PSMA-targeted surgery remains an area of active research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center
| | | | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quarta L, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Stabile A, Scuderi S, Barletta F, Cucchiara V, Nocera L, Pellegrino A, Robesti D, Leni R, Zaurito P, Brembilla G, De Cobelli F, Samanes Gajate AM, Picchio M, Chiti A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. Defining the optimal target-to-background ratio to identify positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted [ 99mTc]Tc-PSMA radioguided surgery: updated results and ad interim analyses of a prospective phase II study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06789-5. [PMID: 38861182 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06789-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) might identify lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). The optimal target-to-background (TtB) ratio to define RGS positivity is still unknown. MATERIALS & METHODS Ad interim analyses which focused on 30 patients with available pathological information were conducted. All patients underwent preoperative PSMA positron emission tomography (PET). 99m-Technetium-PSMA imaging and surgery ([99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S) was administered the day before surgery. In vivo measurements were conducted using an intraoperative gamma probe. Performance characteristics and implications associated with different TtB ratios were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 9 (30%) patients had LNI, with 22 (13%) and 80 (11%) positive regions and lymph nodes, respectively. PSMA-RGS showed uptakes in 12 (40%) vs. 7 (23%) vs. 6 (20%) patients for a TtB ratio ≥ 2 vs. ≥ 3 vs. ≥ 4. At a per-region level, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for a TtB ratio ≥ 2 vs. ≥ 3 vs. ≥ 4 were 72%, 88% and 87% vs. 54%, 98% and 92% vs. 36%, 99% and 91%. Performing ePLND only in patients with suspicious spots at PSMA PET (n = 7) would have spared 77% ePLNDs at the cost of missing 13% (n = 3) pN1 patients. A TtB ratio ≥ 2 at RGS identified 8 (24%) suspicious areas not detected by PSMA PET, of these 5 (63%) harbored LNI, with one pN1 patient (11%) that would have been missed by PSMA PET. Adoption of a TtB ratio ≥ 2 vs. ≥ 3 vs. ≥ 4, would have allowed to spare 18 (60%) vs. 23 (77%) vs. 24 (80%) ePLNDs missing 2 (11%) vs. 3 (13%) vs. 4 (17%) pN1 patients. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-RGS using a TtB ratio ≥ 2 to identify suspicious nodes, could allow to spare > 50% ePLNDs and would identify additional pN1 patients compared to PSMA PET and higher TtB ratios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Quarta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Guo X, Zhang Y, Wei J, Yan P, Kang H, Shu Y, Liu C, Yang X. A preliminary investigation of precise visualization, localization, and resection of pelvic lymph nodes in bladder cancer by using indocyanine green fluorescence-guided approach through intracutaneous dye injection into the lower limbs and perineum. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1384268. [PMID: 38841156 PMCID: PMC11151086 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1384268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of using indocyanine green (ICG) injected intracutaneously through the lower limbs and perineum for visualized tracking, localization, and qualitative assessment of pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) in bladder cancer to achieve their accurate resection. Methods First, ICG was injected into the LN metastasis model mice lower limbs, and real-time and dynamic in vivo and ex vivo imaging was conducted by using a near-infrared fluorescence imaging system. Additionally, 26 patients with bladder cancer were enrolled and divided into intracutaneous group and transurethral group. A near-infrared fluorescence imaging device with internal and external imaging probes was used to perform real-time tracking, localization, and resection of the pelvic LNs. Results The mice normal LNs and the metastatic LNs exhibited fluorescence. The metastatic LNs showed a significantly higher signal-to-background ratio than the normal LNs (3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 2.0 ± 0.1, p < 0.05). In the intracutaneous group, the accuracy rate of fluorescent-labeled LNs was 97.6%, with an average of 11.3 ± 2.4 LNs resected per patient. Six positive LNs were detected in three patients (18.8%). In the transurethral group, the accuracy rate of fluorescent-labeled LNs was 84.4%, with an average of 8.6 ± 2.3 LNs resected per patient. Two positive LNs were detected in one patient (12.5%). Conclusion Following the intracutaneous injection of ICG into the lower limbs and perineum, the dye accumulates in pelvic LNs through lymphatic reflux. By using near-infrared fluorescence laparoscopic fusion imaging, physicians can perform real-time tracking, localization, and precise resection of pelvic LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunmeng Zhang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xinyu Guo
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yueying Zhang
- Public Experiment Center, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinzheng Wei
- The First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Pengyu Yan
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Haiming Kang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yang Shu
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeng N, Sun JX, Liu CQ, Xu JZ, An Y, Xu MY, Zhang SH, Zhong XY, Ma SY, He HD, Wang SG, Xia QD. Knowledge mapping of application of image-guided surgery in prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2013-2023). Int J Surg 2024; 110:2992-3007. [PMID: 38445538 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-guided surgery (IGS) refers to surgery navigated by medical imaging technology, helping doctors better clarify tumor boundaries, identify metastatic lymph nodes and preserve surrounding healthy tissue function. Recent studies have provided expectable momentum of the application of IGS in prostate cancer (PCa). The authors aim to comprehensively construct a bibliometric analysis of the application of IGS in PCa. METHOD The authors searched publications related to application of IGS in PCa from 2013 to 2023 on the web of science core collection (WoSCC) databases. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R package 'bibliometrix' were used for bibliometric analysis. RESULTS Two thousand three eighty-nine articles from 75 countries and 2883 institutions led by the United States were included. The number of publications related to the application of IGS in PCa kept high in the last decade. Johns Hopkins University is the top research institutions. Journal of Nuclear Medicine has the highest popularity as the selection of journal and co-cited journal. Pomper Martin G. had published the most paper. Ali Afshar-Oromieh was co-cited most frequently. The clinical efficacy of PSMA-PET/CT in PCa diagnosis and treatment are main topics in this research field, with emerging focuses on the use of fluorescence imaging guidance technology in PCa. 'PSMA' and 'PET/CT' are the main keywords as long-term research hotspots. CONCLUSION This study is the first bibliometric analysis of researches on application of IGS in PCa with three recognized bibliometric software, providing an objective description and comprehensive guidance for the future relevant investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Zeng
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mazzone E, Gandaglia G, Robesti D, Rajwa P, Gomez Rivas J, Ibáñez L, Soeterik TFW, Bianchi L, Afferi L, Kesch C, Darr C, Guo H, Zhuang J, Zattoni F, Fendler WP, Amparore D, Huebner NA, Giesen A, Joniau S, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Mattei A, Dal Moro F, Moreno Sierra J, Porpiglia F, Picchio M, Chiti A, van den Bergh R, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:231-240. [PMID: 37689506 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of local therapies including radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinical lymphadenopathies on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) has scarcely been explored. Limited data are available to identify men who would benefit from RP; on the contrary, those more likely to benefit already have systemic disease. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence in surgically managed PCa patients with lymphadenopathies on a PSMA PET/CT scan by integrating clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PSMA PET/CT parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified 519 patients treated with RP and extended lymph node dissection, and who received preoperative PSMA PET between 2017 and 2022 in nine referral centers. Among them, we selected 88 patients with nodal uptake at preoperative PSMA PET (miTxN1M0). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The outcome was PSA persistence, defined as a PSA value of ≥0.1 ng/ml at the first measurement after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the predictors of PSA persistence. Covariates consisted of biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group, clinical stage at MRI, and number of positive spots at a PET/CT scan. A regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, lymph node invasion (LNI) was detected in 63 patients (72%) and 32 (36%) experienced PSA persistence after RP. At multivariable analyses, having more than two lymph nodal positive findings at PSMA PET, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at MRI, and ISUP grade group >3 at biopsy were independent predictors of PSA persistence (all p < 0.05). At the regression tree analysis, patients were stratified in four risk groups according to biopsy ISUP grade, number of positive findings at PET/CT, and clinical stage at MRI. The model depicted good discrimination at internal validation (area under the curve 78%). CONCLUSIONS One out of three miN1M0 patients showed PSA persistence after surgery. Patients with ISUP grade 2-3, as well as patients with organ-confined disease at MRI and a single or two positive nodal findings at PET are those in whom RP may achieve the best oncological outcomes in the context of a multimodal approach. Conversely, patients with a high ISUP grade and extracapsular extension or SVI or more than two spots at PSMA PET should be considered as potentially affected by systemic disease upfront. PATIENT SUMMARY Our novel and straightforward risk classification integrates currently available preoperative risk tools and should, therefore, assist physician in preoperative counseling of men candidates for radical treatment for prostate cancer with positive lymph node uptake at prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Ibáñez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Timo F W Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junlong Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schilham MGM, Somford DM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Hermsen R, van Basten JPA, Hoekstra RJ, Scheenen TWJ, Gotthardt M, Sedelaar JPM, Rijpkema M. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioguided Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients with a Suspicion of Locoregional Lymph Node Metastases: The DETECT Trial. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:423-429. [PMID: 38176721 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) aims to optimize the peroperative detection and removal of PSMA-avid lymph node (LN) metastases (LNMs) and has been described in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). In newly diagnosed PCa patients undergoing pelvic LN dissections, PSMA RGS could guide the urologist toward PSMA-expressing LNMs as identified on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of 111In-PSMA RGS in primary PCa patients with one or more suggestive LNs on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT. Methods: This prospective, phase I/II study included 20 newly diagnosed PCa patients with at least 1 suggestive LN on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT. PSMA RGS was performed 24 h after 111In-PSMA-I&T administration, and postoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT was performed to verify successful removal of the suggestive lesions. The primary endpoint was determination of the safety and feasibility of 111In-PSMA RGS. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Feasibility was described as the possibility to peroperatively detect suggestive LNs as identified on preoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes included the accuracy of 111In-PSMA RGS compared with histopathology, tumor- and lesion-to-background ratios, and biochemical recurrence. Results: No tracer-related adverse events were reported. In 20 patients, 43 of 49 (88%) 18F-PSMA PET-suggestive lesions were successfully removed. 111In-PSMA RGS facilitated peroperative identification and resection of 29 of 49 (59%) RGS-target lesions, of which 28 (97%) contained LNMs. Another 14 of 49 (29%) resected LNs were not detected with 111In-PSMA RGS, of which 2 contained metastases. Conclusion: 111In-PSMA RGS is a safe and feasible procedure that allows peroperative detection of 18F-PSMA PET/CT-suggestive lesions in newly diagnosed PCa patients. The use of a radioactive PSMA tracer and a detection device (γ-probe) during surgery helps in identifying LNs that were suggestive of PCa metastases on the 18F-PSMA PET/CT before surgery and thus may improve the peroperative identification and removal of these LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melline G M Schilham
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean Paul A van Basten
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; and
| | - Tom W J Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Rijpkema
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dong B, Zhan H, Luan T, Wang J. The role and controversy of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment: a focused review. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:68. [PMID: 38403658 PMCID: PMC10895790 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03344-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is commonly performed alongside radical prostatectomy. Its primary objective is to determine the lymphatic staging of prostate tumors by removing lymph nodes involved in lymphatic drainage. This aids in guiding subsequent treatment and removing metastatic foci, potentially offering significant therapeutic benefits. Despite varying recommendations from clinical practice guidelines across countries, the actual implementation of PLND is inconsistent, partly due to debates over its therapeutic value. While high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of PLND in oncological outcomes is lacking, its role in increasing surgical time and risk of complications is well-recognized. Despite these concerns, PLND remains the gold standard for lymph node staging in prostate cancer, providing invaluable staging information unattainable by other techniques. This article reviews PLND's scope, guideline perspectives, implementation status, oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes, alternatives, and future research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baonan Dong
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Hui Zhan
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China.
| | - Ting Luan
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Jiansong Wang
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collamati F, Morganti S, van Oosterom MN, Campana L, Ceci F, Luzzago S, Mancini-Terracciano C, Mirabelli R, Musi G, Nicolanti F, Orsi I, van Leeuwen FWB, Faccini R. First-in-human validation of a DROP-IN β-probe for robotic radioguided surgery: defining optimal signal-to-background discrimination algorithm. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06653-6. [PMID: 38376805 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06653-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In radioguided surgery (RGS), radiopharmaceuticals are used to generate preoperative roadmaps (e.g., PET/CT) and to facilitate intraoperative tracing of tracer avid lesions. Within RGS, there is a push toward the use of receptor-targeted radiopharmaceuticals, a trend that also has to align with the surgical move toward minimal invasive robotic surgery. Building on our initial ex vivo evaluation, this study investigates the clinical translation of a DROP-IN β probe in robotic PSMA-guided prostate cancer surgery. METHODS A clinical-grade DROP-IN β probe was developed to support the detection of PET radioisotopes (e.g., 68 Ga). The prototype was evaluated in 7 primary prostate cancer patients, having at least 1 lymph node metastases visible on PSMA-PET. Patients were scheduled for radical prostatectomy combined with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. At the beginning of surgery, patients were injected with 1.1 MBq/kg of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA. The β probe was used to trace PSMA-expressing lymph nodes in vivo. To support intraoperative decision-making, a statistical software algorithm was defined and optimized on this dataset to help the surgeon discriminate between probe signals coming from tumors and healthy tissue. RESULTS The DROP-IN β probe helped provide the surgeon with autonomous and highly maneuverable tracer detection. A total of 66 samples (i.e., lymph node specimens) were analyzed in vivo, of which 31 (47%) were found to be malignant. After optimization of the signal cutoff algorithm, we found a probe detection rate of 78% of the PSMA-PET-positive samples, a sensitivity of 76%, and a specificity of 93%, as compared to pathologic evaluation. CONCLUSION This study shows the first-in-human use of a DROP-IN β probe, supporting the integration of β radio guidance and robotic surgery. The achieved competitive sensitivity and specificity help open the world of robotic RGS to a whole new range of radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Silvio Morganti
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Campana
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria (SBAI), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Mancini-Terracciano
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mirabelli
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria (SBAI), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Nicolanti
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Orsi
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Faccini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Section of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nguyen HG, van den Berg NS, Antaris AL, Xue L, Greenberg S, Rosenthal JW, Muchnik A, Klaassen A, Simko JP, Dutta S, Sorger JM, Munster P, Carroll PR. First-in-human Evaluation of a Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Near-infrared Fluorescent Small Molecule for Fluorescence-based Identification of Prostate Cancer in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robotic-assisted Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:63-72. [PMID: 37516587 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing surgery likely recur due to failure to completely excise regional and/or local disease. OBJECTIVE The first-in-human evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy of IS-002, a novel near-infrared prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted fluorescence imaging agent, designed for intraoperative prostate cancer visualization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A phase 1, single-center, dose-escalation study was conducted in 24 men with high-risk prostate cancer scheduled for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with (extended) pelvic lymph node dissection using the da Vinci surgical system. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, urinalysis, and electrocardiogram were assessed over a 14-d period and compared with baseline. The pharmacokinetic profile of IS-002 was determined. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed for exploratory efficacy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS AEs predominantly included discoloration of urine (n = 22/24; expected, related, grade 1). There were no grade ≥2 AEs. IS-002 Cmax and area under the curve increased with increasing dose. Plasma concentrations declined rapidly in a biphasic manner, with the median terminal half-lives ranging from 5.0 to 7.6 h, independent of dose and renal function. At 25 μg/kg, the exploratory efficacy readouts for the negative and positive predictive values were, 97% and 45% for lymph nodes, and 100% and 80% for residual/locoregional disease detection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS IS-002 is safe and well tolerated, and has the potential to enable intraoperative tumor detection that could not be identified using standard imaging. PATIENT SUMMARY IS-002 is a new imaging agent that specifically targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor. In this study, we tested IS-002 for the first time in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing surgery and found that IS-002 is safe, is cleared from the body quickly, and potentially allows identification of prostate cancer in areas that would not be identified by conventional white light imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao G Nguyen
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Lingru Xue
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scott Greenberg
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jeffry P Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Pamela Munster
- Department of Medicine, Phase 1 Clinic, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Oosterom MN, Diaz-Feijóo B, Santisteban MI, Sánchez-Izquierdo N, Perissinotti A, Glickman A, Marina T, Torné A, van Leeuwen FWB, Vidal-Sicart S. Steerable DROP-IN radioguidance during minimal-invasive non-robotic cervical and endometrial sentinel lymph node surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-023-06589-3. [PMID: 38233608 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06589-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recently introduced tethered DROP-IN gamma probe has revolutionized the way robotic radioguided surgery is performed, fully exploiting the nature of steerable robotic instruments. Given this success, the current first-in-human study investigates if the DROP-IN can also provide benefit in combination with steerable non-robotic instruments during conventional laparoscopic surgery, showing equivalence or even benefit over a traditional rigid gamma probe. METHODS The evaluation was performed in ten patients during laparoscopic cervical (n = 4) and endometrial (n = 6) cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures. Surgical guidance was provided using the hybrid, or bi-modal, SLN tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid. SLN detection was compared between the traditional rigid laparoscopic gamma probe, the combination of a DROP-IN gamma probe and a steerable laparoscopic instrument (LaproFlex), and fluorescence imaging. RESULTS The gynecologists experienced an enlarged freedom of movement when using the DROP-IN + LaproFlex combination compared to the rigid laparoscopic probe, making it possible to better isolate the SLN signal from background signals. This did not translate into a change in the SLN find rate yet. In both cervical and endometrial cancer combined, the rigid probe and DROP-IN + LaproFlex combination provided an equivalent detection rate of 96%, while fluorescence provided 85%. CONCLUSION We have successfully demonstrated the in-human use of steerable DROP-IN radioguidance during laparoscopic cervical and endometrial cancer SLN procedures, expanding the utility beyond robotic procedures. Indicating an improved surgical experience, these findings encourage further investigation and consideration on a path towards routine clinical practice and improved patient outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION HCB/2021/0777 and NCT04492995; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04492995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Berta Diaz-Feijóo
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Institute Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Isabel Santisteban
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Núria Sánchez-Izquierdo
- Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Perissinotti
- Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ariel Glickman
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Institute Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tiermes Marina
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Institute Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aureli Torné
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Institute Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vidal-Sicart S, Goñi E, Cebrecos I, Rioja ME, Perissinotti A, Sampol C, Vidal O, Saavedra-Pérez D, Ferrer A, Martí C, Ferrer Rebolleda J, García Velloso MJ, Orozco-Cortés J, Díaz-Feijóo B, Niñerola-Baizán A, Valdés Olmos RA. Continuous innovation in precision radio-guided surgery. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2024; 43:39-54. [PMID: 37963516 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Since its origins, nuclear medicine has faced technological changes that led to modifying operating modes and adapting protocols. In the field of radioguided surgery, the incorporation of preoperative scintigraphic imaging and intraoperative detection with the gamma probe provided a definitive boost to sentinel lymph node biopsy to become a standard procedure for melanoma and breast cancer. The various technological innovations and consequent adaptation of protocols come together in the coexistence of the disruptive and the gradual. As obvious examples we have the introduction of SPECT/CT in the preoperative field and Drop-in probes in the intraoperative field. Other innovative aspects with possible application in radio-guided surgery are based on the application of artificial intelligence, navigation and telecare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Elena Goñi
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Isaac Cebrecos
- Instituto Clínic de Ginecología, Obstetricia y Neonatología (ICGON), Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Andrés Perissinotti
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Catalina Sampol
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Oscar Vidal
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Cirugía General y Digestiva, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Cirugía, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Saavedra-Pérez
- Cirugía General y Digestiva, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ada Ferrer
- Servicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Martí
- Servicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Ferrer Rebolleda
- Servicio Medicina Nuclear Ascires, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Jhon Orozco-Cortés
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijóo
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Instituto Clínic de Ginecología, Obstetricia y Neonatología (ICGON), Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Cirugía, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aida Niñerola-Baizán
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Biomedicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Renato Alfredo Valdés Olmos
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine & Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajwa P, Heidenreich J, Drzezga A, Schmidt M, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. The diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in primary staging of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: A single-center cohort analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:74-78. [PMID: 37750292 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a recommended imaging modality for patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Its routine implementation before radical prostatectomy (RP) may allow avoiding undertreatment. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for pelvic lymph node metastases in a large cohort of patients treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for high-risk PCa. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional database of patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT before RP and ePLND for high-risk PCa. The diagnostic estimates of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lymph node involvement were calculated. RESULTS We included 165 high-risk PCa patients. The median PSA value was 24.5 ng/mL (range: 6.7-185) and all the patients had biopsy Grade Group 4-5. In total, 46 (28%) of patients had clinical lymph node involvement at 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. A mean number of resected lymph nodes per patient was 22 (range: 15-45) and 149 (4.2%) of all resected nodes were positive for lymph node metastasis at final pathology. The diagnostic estimates for the detection of pN+ disease at RP were as follows: sensitivity 63% (95% CI: 51-75), specificity 97% (95% CI: 91-99), positive predictive value 94% (95% CI: 82-99), and negative predictive value 79% (95% CI: 70-86). The total accuracy of PSMA-PET was 83% (95% CI: 76-88). CONCLUSION Our analyses support high specificity and positive predictive value of pretreatment 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients treated with RP for high-risk PCa. While a positive finding should be considered as robust indicator for clinical decision-making, a negative result cannot reliably rule out the presence of lymph node involvement in high-risk PCa; there is a need for advanced risk stratification in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Julian Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Schmidt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Everaerts W, Walz J, Abascal Junquera JM, Goffin K, Grootendorst MR, van 't Klooster K, Juanpere N, Valhondo-Rama R, Vidal-Sicart S, Fumado L. A Multicentre Clinical Trial Evaluating a Drop-in Gamma Probe for Minimally Invasive Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:32-40. [PMID: 37495459 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the safety and performance of a drop-in gamma probe for prostate cancer (PCa) sentinel lymph node biopsy (SeLNB) in a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm clinical trial. OBJECTIVE The main objective was to determine the sentinel lymph node (SeLN) detection rate with the drop-in gamma probe system. The secondary objectives were overall performance and safety. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS At three European centres, patients received an ultrasound-guided systemic and tumour-targeted injection of [99mTc]Tc-nanocolloid followed by planar lymphoscintigraphy and/or single-photon emission computerised tomography. The next day, manual laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was performed, including SeLN dissection (SeLND) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SeLNs were detected with the drop-in probe and a rigid laparoscopic gamma probe (RLGP). The primary endpoint of the study was the SeLND rate defined as the percentage of patients with at least one SeLN detected in vivo by the drop-in probe. The secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, ease of SeLN detection, number of SeLNs detected, and safety. The first two patients at each site (six in total) were used for familiarisation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 27 patients were included in the main analysis. SENSEI successfully detected at least one SeLN in all 27 patients, resulting in a detection rate of 100% (95% confidence interval 87.2-100%). The total number of SeLNs identified with SENSEI was 85 (median three SeLNs per patient, range 1-6); of these 85 SeLNs, 12 were located outside of the ePLND template. In the nine patients in whom the RLGP was used, SENSEI detected two SeLNs that could not be detected with the RLGP due to manoeuvrability restrictions. Ten of the 27 patients were pN1; four patients had a false-negative SeLNB. No adverse events or complications were related to the use of the drop-in probe. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated that the drop-in gamma probe meets the performance and safety requirements for SeLNB in PCa. The device provided improved manoeuvrability and SeLN detection compared with the conventional RLGP. PATIENT SUMMARY A novel device was tested for detecting sentinel lymph nodes during minimally invasive surgery for prostate cancer. In this first evaluation, the performance and safety of the device were evaluated positively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Everaerts
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institute Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Jose M Abascal Junquera
- Department of Urology, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Klaas van 't Klooster
- Department of Clinical Operations, Lightpoint Medical Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nuria Juanpere
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Lluis Fumado
- Department of Urology, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Berrens AC, Scheltema M, Maurer T, Hermann K, Hamdy FC, Knipper S, Dell'Oglio P, Mazzone E, de Barros HA, Sorger JM, van Oosterom MN, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, Rietbergen DDD, Valdes Olmos RA, Vidal-Sicart S, Carroll PR, Buckle T, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen FWB. Delphi consensus project on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted surgery-outcomes from an international multidisciplinary panel. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023:10.1007/s00259-023-06524-6. [PMID: 38012448 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06524-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is increasingly considered as a molecular target to achieve precision surgery for prostate cancer. A Delphi consensus was conducted to explore expert views in this emerging field and to identify knowledge and evidence gaps as well as unmet research needs that may help change practice and improve oncological outcomes for patients. METHODS One hundred and five statements (scored by a 9-point Likert scale) were distributed through SurveyMonkey®. Following evaluation, a consecutive second round was performed to evaluate consensus (16 statements; 89% response rate). Consensus was defined using the disagreement index, assessed by the research and development project/University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness method. RESULTS Eighty-six panel participants (72.1% clinician, 8.1% industry, 15.1% scientists, and 4.7% other) participated, most with a urological background (57.0%), followed by nuclear medicine (22.1%). Consensus was obtained on the following: (1) The diagnostic PSMA-ligand PET/CT should ideally be taken < 1 month before surgery, 1-3 months is acceptable; (2) a 16-20-h interval between injection of the tracer and surgery seems to be preferred; (3) PSMA targeting is most valuable for identification of nodal metastases; (4) gamma, fluorescence, and hybrid imaging are the preferred guidance technologies; and (5) randomized controlled clinical trials are required to define oncological value. Regarding surgical margin assessment, the view on the value of PSMA-targeted surgery was neutral or inconclusive. A high rate of "cannot answer" responses indicates further study is necessary to address knowledge gaps (e.g., Cerenkov or beta-emissions). CONCLUSIONS This Delphi consensus provides guidance for clinicians and researchers that implement or develop PSMA-targeted surgery technologies. Ultimately, however, the consensus should be backed by randomized clinical trial data before it may be implemented within the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Berrens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs Scheltema
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ken Hermann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT West, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Hilda A de Barros
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Philip D Stricker
- Department of Urology, St Vincents Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincents Prostate Cancer Research Center Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Garvan Institute Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Renato A Valdes Olmos
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sergi Vidal-Sicart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tessa Buckle
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vonk J, Kruijff S, Slart RHJA, Szymanski W, Witjes MJH, Glaudemans AWJM. Towards molecular imaging-guided intervention theatres in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023:10.1007/s00259-023-06545-1. [PMID: 38012447 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06545-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Vonk
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - S Kruijff
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R H J A Slart
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - W Szymanski
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Photopharmacology and Imaging, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M J H Witjes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A W J M Glaudemans
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang H, Remke M, Horn T, Schwamborn K, Chen Y, Steiger K, Weichert W, Wester HJ, Schottelius M, Weber WA, Eiber M. Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and PSMA-ligand uptake detection combining autoradiography and postoperative pathology in primary prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:99. [PMID: 37971546 PMCID: PMC10654338 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been highly successful for imaging and treatment of prostate cancer. However, heterogeneity in immunohistochemistry indicates limitations in the effect of imaging and radionuclide therapy of multifocal disease. 99mTc-PSMA-I&S is a γ-emitting probe, which can be used for intraoperative lesion detection and postsurgical autoradiography (ARG). We aimed to study its intraprostatic distribution and compared it with (immuno)-histopathology. RESULTS Seventeen patients who underwent RGS between 11/2018 and 01/2020 with a total of 4660 grids were included in the preliminary analysis. Marked intratumor and intra-patient heterogeneity of PSMA expression was detected, and PSMA negative foci were observed in all samples (100%). Heterogeneous intra-patient PSMA-ligand uptake was observed, and no significant correlation was present between the degree of heterogeneity of PSMA expression and PSMA-ligand uptake. Higher PSMA-ligand uptake was observed in GS ≥ 8 than GS < 8 (p < 0.001). The appearance of Gleason Pattern (GP) 4 was strongly associated with higher uptake (coefficient: 0.43, p < 0.001), while GP 5 also affected the uptake (coefficient: 0.07, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION PSMA expression and PSMA-ligand uptake show marked heterogeneity. Prostate carcinoma with GP 4 showed significantly higher uptake compared with non-neoplastic prostate tissue. Our analyses extend the scope of applications of radiolabeled PSMA-ligands to ARG for identifying high-grade disease and using its signal as a noninvasive biomarker in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Xiang 37, Chengdu, 610040, Sichuan, China.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Marianne Remke
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Horn
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Schwamborn
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yiyao Chen
- Departments of Mathematics and Life Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Steiger
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Margret Schottelius
- Translational Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Departments of Nuclear Medicine and of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Agora, Pole de Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Pablos-Rodríguez P, Claps F, Rebez G, Vidal Crespo N, Gómez-Ferrer Á, Mascarós JM, Collado Serra A, Caltrava Fons A, Rubio-Briones J, Casanova Ramon Borja J, Ramírez Backhaus M. Personalised indocyanine-guided lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a randomised clinical trial. BJU Int 2023; 132:591-599. [PMID: 37410659 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the safety and efficacy of a personalised indocyanine-guided pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) against extended PLND (ePLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who were candidates for RP and lymphadenectomy, with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, were enrolled in this randomised clinical trial. Randomisation was made 1:1 to indocyanine green (ICG)-PLND (only ICG-stained LNs) or ePLND (obturator fossa, external, internal, and common iliac and presacral LNs). The primary endpoint was the complication rate within 3 months after RP. Secondary endpoints included: rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV), time to drainage removal, length of stay, percentage of patients classified as pN1, number of LNs removed, number of metastatic LNs, rate of patients with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, and rate of patients with androgen-deprivation therapy at 24 months. RESULTS A total of 108 patients were included with a median follow-up of 16 months. In all, 54 were randomised to ICG-PLND and 54 to ePLND. The postoperative complication rate was higher in the ePLND (70%) vs the ICG-PLND group (32%) (P < 0.001). Differences between major complications in both groups were not statically significant (P = 0.7). The pN1 detection rate was higher in the ICG-PLND group (28%) vs the ePLND group (22%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.7). The rate of undetectable PSA at 12 months was 83% in the ICG-PLND vs 76% in the ePLND group, which was not statistically significant. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in BCR-free survival between groups at the end of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS Personalised ICG-guided PLND is a promising technique to stage patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa properly. It has shown a lower complication rate than ePLND with similar oncological outcomes at short-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro de Pablos-Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Research Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Doctoral School of University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giacomo Rebez
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Natalia Vidal Crespo
- Department of Urology, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Murcia, Italy
| | - Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Ana Caltrava Fons
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barletta F, Ceci F, van den Bergh RCN, Rajwa P, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. The role of nuclear medicine tracers for prostate cancer surgery: from preoperative to intraoperative setting. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:502-509. [PMID: 37530704 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There has been a growing interest in the use of novel molecular imaging modalities for the management of prostate cancer (PCa), spanning from diagnostic to therapeutic settings. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of recently published studies investigating the use of novel nuclear medicine tracers across different stages of PCa management. RECENT FINDINGS Emerging evidence supports the use of molecular imaging for preoperative staging of PCa, where prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has shown superior accuracy compared to conventional imaging for the detection of nodal and distant metastases, which needs to be translated to new risk stratification. A role for PSMA PET has been proposed for PCa diagnosis, with local activity associated with histology. Surgical guidance, using either visual feedback or gamma-ray detectors to identify tissues with accumulated radio-labeled tracers, may improve the ability to resect locoregional diseases and thus maximize oncological control. PSMA targeted therapy (Lu-PSMA) has been mainly investigated in the castration-resistant setting, but might have a role in earlier settings such as neoadjuvant treatment. SUMMARY Novel molecular imaging using PSMA-based tracers could significantly improve PCa management in the diagnosis, staging, and intraoperative guidance settings, potentially leading to personalized and effective treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rodler S, Kidess MA, Westhofen T, Kowalewski KF, Belenchon IR, Taratkin M, Puliatti S, Gómez Rivas J, Veccia A, Piazza P, Checcucci E, Stief CG, Cacciamani GE. A Systematic Review of New Imaging Technologies for Robotic Prostatectomy: From Molecular Imaging to Augmented Reality. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5425. [PMID: 37629467 PMCID: PMC10455161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
New imaging technologies play a pivotal role in the current management of patients with prostate cancer. Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a standard of care for localized disease and through the already imaging-based console subject of research towards combinations of imaging technologies and RARP as well as their impact on surgical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the currently available literature for new imaging technologies for RARP. On 24 January 2023, we performed a systematic review of the current literature on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science according to the PRISMA guidelines and Oxford levels of evidence. A total of 46 studies were identified of which 19 studies focus on imaging of the primary tumor, 12 studies on the intraoperative tumor detection of lymph nodes and 15 studies on the training of surgeons. While the feasibility of combined approaches using new imaging technologies including MRI, PSMA-PET CT or intraoperatively applied radioactive and fluorescent dyes has been demonstrated, the prospective confirmation of improvements in surgical outcomes is currently ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany (T.W.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Marc Anwar Kidess
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany (T.W.); (C.G.S.)
| | - Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany (T.W.); (C.G.S.)
| | | | - Ines Rivero Belenchon
- Urology and Nephrology Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Seville, Spain;
| | - Mark Taratkin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 117418 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42122 Modena, Italy;
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy;
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Turin, Italy;
| | - Christian Georg Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany (T.W.); (C.G.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Berrens AC, Knipper S, Marra G, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Mierden S, Donswijk ML, Maurer T, van Leeuwen FW, van der Poel HG. State of the Art in Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Surgery-A Systematic Review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 54:43-55. [PMID: 37361200 PMCID: PMC10285550 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Identifying malignant tissue and leaving adjacent structures undisturbed constitute an ongoing challenge in prostate cancer (PCa) surgery. Image and radioguided surgical technologies targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) receptor may facilitate identification and removal of diseased tissue. Objective To perform a systematic review of the clinical studies on PSMA-targeted surgery. Evidence acquisition The MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase.com, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Identified reports were critically appraised according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term framework criteria. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed as per the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool. The strengths and limitations of the techniques and corresponding oncological outcomes were extracted as areas of interest. Data were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Evidence synthesis In total, 29 reports were selected, including eight prospective studies, 12 retrospective analyses, and nine case reports, all with a high or an unclear RoB. In 72.4% of studies, PSMA targeting was achieved via radioguided surgery (RGS), predominantly using 99mTc-PSMA-I&S (66.7%). Hybrid approaches that complement RGS with optical guidance are emerging. The majority of studies retrieved were pilot studies with a short follow-up. In 13 reports, salvage lymph node surgery was discussed (44.8%). In 12 more recent reports (41.4%), PSMA targeting was studied in primary PCa surgery (50.0% lymph nodes and 50.0% surgical margins), and four studied both primary and salvage surgery (13.8%). Overall, specificity was higher than sensitivity (median 98.9% and 84.8%, respectively). Oncological outcomes were discussed only in reports on the use of 99mTc-PSMA-I&S in salvage surgery (median follow-up of 17.2 mo). A decline in prostate-specific antigen level of >90% ranged from 22.0% to 100.0%, and biochemical recurrence ranged from 50.0% to 61.8% of patients. Conclusions In PSMA-targeted surgery, most studies address salvage PSMA-RGS using 99mTc-PSMA-I&S. Available evidence suggests that the specificity of intraoperative PSMA targeting is higher than the sensitivity. The studies that included follow-up did not yet objectify a clear oncological benefit. Lacking solid outcome data, PSMA-targeted surgery remains investigational. Patient summary In this paper, we review recent advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted surgery, which is used to help identify and remove prostate cancer. We found good evidence to suggest that PSMA targeting helps identify prostate cancer during surgery. The oncological benefits have yet to be investigated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Berrens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Urology division, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stevie van der Mierden
- Scientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten L. Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rossin G, Zorzi F, De Pablos-Rodríguez P, Biasatti A, Marenco J, Ongaro L, Perotti A, Tulone G, Traunero F, Piasentin A, Gomez-Ferrer A, Zucchi A, Trombetta C, Simonato A, Rubio-Briones J, Bartoletti R, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Claps F. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: An Overview of Diagnostic Performance, Oncological Outcomes, Safety, and Feasibility. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2543. [PMID: 37568905 PMCID: PMC10416990 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for prostate cancer (PCa) represents an innovative technique aimed at improving nodal staging accuracy. The routinary adoption of this procedure in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might be crucial to identify candidates who could effectively benefit from extensive pelvic lymph nodal dissection (ePLND). Despite some promising results, SNB for PCa is still considered experimental due to the lack of solid evidence and procedural standardization. In this regard, our narrative review aimed to analyze the most recent literature in this field, providing an overview of both the diagnostic accuracy measures and the oncological outcomes of SNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Rossin
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Federico Zorzi
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Pedro De Pablos-Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Arianna Biasatti
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Josè Marenco
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Luca Ongaro
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Alessandro Perotti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (A.P.); (A.Z.); (R.B.)
| | - Gabriele Tulone
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - Fabio Traunero
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Andrea Piasentin
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Alvaro Gomez-Ferrer
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Alessandro Zucchi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (A.P.); (A.Z.); (R.B.)
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Clínica de Urología, Hospital VITHAS 9 de Octubre, 46015 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (A.P.); (A.Z.); (R.B.)
| | - Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gelardi F, Antunovic L. New actors in prostate cancer surgical theatre: are we sharpening the eye with optical imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023:10.1007/s00259-023-06366-2. [PMID: 37500792 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizia Gelardi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
| | - Lidija Antunovic
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Al-Hammouri T, Almeida-Magana R, Lawrence R, Duffy T, White L, Burke E, Kudahetti S, Collins J, Rajan P, Berney D, Gabe R, Shaw G, Lu YJ. Protocol for a prospective study evaluating circulating tumour cells status to predict radical prostatectomy treatment failure in localised prostate cancer patients (C-ProMeta-1). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:581. [PMID: 37353740 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11081-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment decisions in prostate cancer (PCa) rely on disease stratification between localised and metastatic stages, but current imaging staging technologies are not sensitive to micro-metastatic disease. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) status is a promising tool in this regard. The Parsortix® CTC isolation system employs an epitope-independent approach based on cell size and deformability to increase the capture rate of CTCs. Here, we present a protocol for prospective evaluation of this method to predict post radical prostatectomy (RP) PCa cancer recurrence. METHODS We plan to recruit 294 patients diagnosed with unfavourable intermediate, to high and very high-risk localised PCa. Exclusion criteria include synchronous cancer diagnosis or prior PCa treatment, including hormone therapy. RP is performed according to the standard of care. Two blood samples (20 ml) are collected before and again 3-months after RP. The clinical team are blinded to CTC results and the laboratory researchers are blinded to clinical information. Treatment failure is defined as a PSA ≥ 0.2 mg/ml, start of salvage treatment or imaging-proven metastatic lesions. The CTC analysis entails enumeration and RNA analysis of gene expression in captured CTCs. The primary outcome is the accuracy of CTC status to predict post-RP treatment failure at 4.5 years. Observed sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values will be reported. Specificity will be presented over time. DISCUSSION CTC status may reflect the true potential for PCa metastasis and may predict clinical outcomes better than the current PCa progression risk grading systems. Therefore establishing a robust biomarker for predicting treatment failure in localized high-risk PCa would significantly enhance guidance in treatment decision-making, optimizing cure rates while minimizing unnecessary harm from overtreatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN17332543.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Dept. of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ricardo Almeida-Magana
- Dept. of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Lawrence
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Tom Duffy
- Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, London, UK
| | - Laura White
- Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, London, UK
| | - Edwina Burke
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Justin Collins
- Dept. of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Prabhakar Rajan
- Dept. of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Daniel Berney
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, London, UK.
| | - Greg Shaw
- Dept. of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK.
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Yong-Jie Lu
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Barros HA, van Oosterom MN, van Leeuwen FWB, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen PJ. Real-Time Identification of Nodal Metastases With 99mTc-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based Radioguidance and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Primary Prostate Cancer Surgery-On the Road to Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery. Clin Nucl Med 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:00003072-990000000-00570. [PMID: 37220246 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Recent developments in image-guided prostate cancer surgery focus on extending prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed radioguidance with optical tumor detection using fluorescence, as radio- and fluorescence signals complement each other with in-depth detection and real-time visualization, respectively. As a step in this direction, we report here the integration of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging into a 99mTc-prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radioguided surgery workflow.
Collapse
|
25
|
Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Chiti A, Cozzarini C, Montorsi F. Re: Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-based Lymph Node Atlas for Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Validation of the New NRG Oncology 2020 Guideline. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00077-9. [PMID: 37183078 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rosiello G, Scilipoti P, Larcher A, Fallara G, Colandrea G, Basile G, Re C, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Mottrie A, Trevisani F, Marandino L, Raggi D, Necchi A, Bertini R, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Capitanio U. Neglected lymph nodal metastases in patients with renal cancer: when to extend the anatomical template of lymph node dissection during nephrectomy. World J Urol 2023:10.1007/s00345-023-04413-z. [PMID: 37148324 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04413-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still controversial. However, detecting lymph node invasion (LNI) is key due to prognostic implications and to identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapies such as adjuvant pembrolizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS Out of 796 patients, 261 (33%) received eLND, of whom 62 (8%) for suspicious lymph node (LN) metastases at preoperative staging (cN1). eLND was divided in 3 anatomical areas: (1) hilar, (2) side-specific (pre-/para-aortic or pre-/para-caval) and (3) inter-aorto-caval nodes. Overall maximum LN diameter was measured by a dedicated radiologist for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression models (MVA) were tested for the effect of maximum LN diameter in predicting the presence of nodal metastases outside the anatomical area of cN1. RESULTS LNI was confirmed in 50% of cN1, whilst only 13 out of 199 cN0 patients were pN1 at final histology (6.5%; p < 0.001). In a per-patient analysis, of 62 cN1 patients, 24% vs. 18% vs. 8% harboured pN1 disease only inside vs. in-outside vs. only outside the suspicious anatomical field of cN1 at preoperative CT/MRI scan. At MVA, increasing diameter of suspicious LNs was independently associated with risk of finding positive LNs outside the suspicious anatomical field (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.11; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Roughly 50% of cN1 patients undergoing eLND will harbour LN metastases, also outside the suspicious radiological area, and maximum LNs diameter at preoperative imaging correlates with such risk. Thus, an eLND might be justified in patients with large suspicious LN metastases, to better stage this patient population and to improve postoperative treatment management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Colandrea
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Amparore D, Porpiglia F. Fluorescence in prostate cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:417-419. [PMID: 37142366 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00164-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Małkiewicz B, Kiełb P, Kobylański M, Karwacki J, Poterek A, Krajewski W, Zdrojowy R, Szydełko T. Sentinel Lymph Node Techniques in Urologic Oncology: Current Knowledge and Application. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092495. [PMID: 37173960 PMCID: PMC10177100 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Lymph node (LN) metastases have a significant negative impact on the prognosis of urological malignancies. Unfortunately, current imaging modalities are insufficient when it comes to detecting micrometastases; thus, surgical LN removal is commonly used. However, there is still no established ideal lymph node dissection (LND) template, leading to unnecessary invasive staging and the possibility of missing LN metastases located outside the standard template. To address this issue, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has been proposed. This technique involves identifying and removing the first group of draining LNs, which can accurately stage cancer. While successful in breast cancer and melanoma, the SLN technique in urologic oncology is still considered experimental due to high false-negative rates and lack of data in prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer. Nevertheless, the development of new tracers, imaging modalities, and surgical techniques may improve the potential of the SLN procedures in urological oncology. In this review, we aim to discuss the current knowledge and future contributions of the SLN procedure in the management of urological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Kiełb
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Maximilian Kobylański
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Adrian Poterek
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Romuald Zdrojowy
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mallikarjunappa SS, Osunkoya AO. Radical prostatectomy findings in patients with locally aggressive Grade group 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma and negative limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 244:154415. [PMID: 36947981 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Current management options for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients include radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection and other local or systemic therapeutic approaches. However, there is paucity of data in the pathology literature on the radical prostatectomy findings in patients with locally aggressive Grade group 5 PCa with negative limited or extended lymph node dissection. A search was made through our Urologic Pathology files and consults of the senior author for patients who had radical prostatectomy specimens with locally aggressive Grade group 5 PCa and limited or extended lymph node dissection from 2010 to 2022. Patients with lymph node metastasis were excluded. Clinicopathologic and follow up data were obtained. Forty-two patients were included in the study. Mean age was 64 years (range: 49-79 years). Forty-one (98 %) patients had PCa Gleason score 4 + 5 = 9 and 1 (2 %) patient had Gleason score 5 + 4 = 9. Extraprostatic extension and/or bladder neck invasion was present in 30 (71 %) patients and seminal vesicle invasion was present in 20 (48 %) patients, of which 10 (50 %) were bilateral. Extended lymph node dissection was performed in 18 patients with mean of 22 lymph nodes (range: 6-51 lymph nodes). Limited lymph node dissection was performed in 24 patients with mean of 7 lymph nodes (range: 2-25 lymph nodes). This study demonstrates that a subset of patients with very advanced/high grade PCa still benefit from radical prostatectomy/tumor debulking even in the setting of positive margins, and may not have lymph node metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America; Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
de Barros HA, Duin JJ, Mulder D, van der Noort V, Noordzij MA, Wit EM, Pos FJ, Vogel WV, Schaake EE, van Leeuwen FW, van Leeuwen PJ, Grivas N, van der Poel HG. Sentinel Node Procedure to Select Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Patients with Occult Nodal Metastases for Whole Pelvis Radiotherapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:80-89. [PMID: 36874598 PMCID: PMC9975002 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate identification of men who harbor nodal metastases is necessary to select patients who most likely benefit from whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT). Limited sensitivity of diagnostic imaging approaches for the detection of nodal micrometastases has led to the exploration of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Objective To evaluate whether SLNB can be used as a tool to select pathologically node-positive patients who likely benefit from WPRT. Design setting and participants We included 528 clinically node-negative primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients with an estimated nodal risk of >5% treated between 2007 and 2018. Intervention A total of 267 patients were directly treated with prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT; non-SLNB group), while 261 patients underwent SLNB to remove lymph nodes directly draining from the primary tumor prior to radiotherapy (SLNB group); pN0 patients were treated with PORT, while pN1 patients were offered WPRT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and radiological recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were compared using propensity score weighted (PSW) Cox proportional hazard models. Results and limitations The median follow-up was 71 mo. Occult nodal metastases were found in 97 (37%) SLNB patients (median metastasis size: 2 mm). Adjusted 7-yr BCRFS rates were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77-86%) in the SLNB group and 49% (95% CI 43-56%) in the non-SLNB group. The corresponding adjusted 7-yr RRFS rates were 83% (95% CI 78-87%) and 52% (95% CI 46-59%), respectively. In the PSW multivariable Cox regression analysis, SLNB was associated with improved BCRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.59, p < 0.001) and RRFS (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, p < 0.001). Limitations include the bias inherent to the study's retrospective nature. Conclusions SLNB-based selection of pN1 PCa patients for WPRT was associated with significantly improved BCRFS and RRFS compared with (conventional) imaging-based PORT. Patient summary Sentinel node biopsy can be used to select patients who will benefit from the addition of pelvis radiotherapy. This strategy results in a longer duration of prostate-specific antigen control and a lower risk of radiological recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda A. de Barros
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 205 121 543; Fax: +31 205 122 459.
| | - Jan J. Duin
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Mulder
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Arjen Noordzij
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M.K. Wit
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J. Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V. Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E. Schaake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gravestock P, Somani BK, Tokas T, Rai BP. A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031186. [PMID: 36769834 PMCID: PMC9918161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of prostate cancer imaging is rapidly evolving, with many changes to the way patients are diagnosed, staged, and monitored for recurrence following treatment. New developments, including the potential role of imaging in screening and the combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of theranostics, are underway. In this paper, we aim to outline the current landscape in prostate cancer imaging and look to the future at the potential modalities and applications to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-radioguided Surgery Facilitates Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer with Regional Lymph Node Metastases. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:95-98. [PMID: 36604297 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Lymph node metastases (LNMs) are common in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PC) and may be missed during extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Here we report on the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-radioguided surgery (RGS) during open radical prostatectomy (RP) with ePLND to resect locoregional LNMs identified on preoperative PSMA positron emission tomography (PET). Preoperative PSMA PET showed 78 LNMs in 35 patients undergoing RP with ePLND and RGS between January 2018 and June 2020. In 14 patients (40%), LNMs were located outside the ePLND template. RGS achieved resection of PSMA-positive LNMs in 33/35 patients (94%). On univariable analysis, lower metastatic burden with up to two PSMA-positive LNMs on preoperative PET was associated with better postoperative outcomes. Limitations include the retrospective analysis and the small sample size. RGS facilitates resection of PSMA-positive LNs in patients treated with RP. Our data indicate a favorable treatment outcome in patients with low metastatic LN burden on preoperative PSMA PET. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the use of radioactive guidance to remove lymph nodes affected by prostate cancer during surgical removal of the prostate. This approach can help to identify cancerous lymph nodes that might otherwise be missed and could lead to better survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
33
|
Plhak E, Pichler C, Gößnitzer E, Aigner RM, Kvaternik H. Development of in-House Synthesis and Quality Control of [ 99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S. Molecules 2023; 28:molecules28020577. [PMID: 36677636 PMCID: PMC9864623 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28020577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Many radioactive PSMA inhibitory substances have already been developed for PET diagnostics and therapy of prostate cancer. Because PET radionuclides and instrumentation may not be available, technetium-99 m labelled tracers can be considered as a diagnostic alternative. A suitable tracer is [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S, primarily developed for radio-guided surgery, which has been identified for diagnostics of prostate cancer. However, there is no commercial kit approved for the preparation of [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S on the market. This work presents an automated process for the synthesis of [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S concerning good manufacturing practice (GMP). We used a Scintomics GRP 4 V module, with the SCC software package for programming sequences for this development. The optimum reaction conditions were evaluated in preliminary experiments. The pH of the reaction solution was found to be crucial for the radiochemical yield and radiochemical purity. The validation of [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S (n = 3) achieved a stable radiochemical yield of 58.7 ± 1.5% and stable radiochemical purities of 93.0 ± 0.3%. The amount of free [99mTc]TcO4− in the solution and reduced hydrolysed [99mTc]TcO2 was <2%. Our automated preparation of [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S has shown reliability and applicability in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Plhak
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036 Graz, Austria
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Schubertstraße 1/EG/0122, 8010 Graz, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-316-385-30696
| | - Christopher Pichler
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Schubertstraße 1/EG/0122, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Edith Gößnitzer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Schubertstraße 1/EG/0122, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Reingard M. Aigner
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036 Graz, Austria
| | - Herbert Kvaternik
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036 Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang B, Li C, Zheng X, Yao K, Wang L. Re: Giorgio Gandaglia, Elio Mazzone, Armando Stabile, et al. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Radioguided Surgery to Detect Nodal Metastases in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol.2022;82:411-18. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e31-e32. [PMID: 36210216 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bingzhi Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
| | - Xiaoping Zheng
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
| | - Kun Yao
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
| | - Long Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Combes AD, Palma CA, Calopedos R, Wen L, Woo H, Fulham M, Leslie S. PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2594. [PMID: 36359439 PMCID: PMC9689635 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. The imaging assessment and treatment of prostate cancer has vastly improved over the past decade. The introduction of PSMA PET-CT has improved the detection of loco-regional and metastatic disease. PSMA PET-CT also has a role in the primary diagnosis and staging, in detecting biochemical recurrence after curative treatment and in metastasis-directed therapy. In this paper we review the role of PSMA PET-CT in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D. Combes
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Catalina A. Palma
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Ross Calopedos
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Lingfeng Wen
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Henry Woo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Urology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Michael Fulham
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Scott Leslie
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Urology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mandal S. Round up. Indian J Urol 2022; 38:249-251. [PMID: 36568467 PMCID: PMC9787442 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_319_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Swarnendu Mandal
- Department of Urology, AIIMS, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India,
E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|