Mitochondrial DNA integrity changes with age but does not correlate with learning performance in honey bees

A critical look at proximate causes of social insect senescence: damage accumulation or hyperfunction?

Social insects have received attention for their extreme lifespan variation and reversal of the fecundity/longevity trade-off. However, proximate causes of senescence in general are disputed, and social insects often fail to meet the predictions of prevailing models. We present evidence for and against the long-held free radical theory of aging in social insects, and consider the application of the competing hyperfunction theory. Current results present problems for both theories, and a more complex picture of the biological processes involved emerges. The eusocial life style might allow colonies to allocate damage in ways that create seemingly senescence-free life histories. Only experimental approaches characterizing multiple senescence factors simultaneously will shed light on how social insects defy the conventions of senescence.

Ageing and somatic maintenance in social insects

Social insects offer exciting prospects for ageing research due to the striking differences in lifespan among castes, with queens living up to an order of magnitude longer than workers. A popular theory is that senescence is primarily the result of an accumulation of somatic damage with age, balanced by investment into processes of somatic maintenance. Investigation of these predictions in social insects has produced mixed results: neither damage accumulation nor investment into somatic maintenance is consistently different between castes with different lifespans. We discuss some limitations of the studies conducted thus far and consider an alternative proximate theory of ageing that has been recently proposed.