Erythropoietin regulates metabolic response in mice via receptor expression in adipose tissue, brain, and bone

The Role of Erythropoietin in Metabolic Regulation

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a key regulator of erythrocyte production, promoting erythroid progenitor cell survival, division, and differentiation in the fetal liver and adult bone marrow. Mice lacking EPO or its receptor (EPOR) die in utero due to severe anemia. Beyond hematopoiesis, EPO influences non-hematopoietic tissues, including glucose and fat metabolism in adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and the liver. EPO is used to treat anemia associated with chronic kidney disease clinically and plays a role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis and regulating fat mass. EPO enhances lipolysis while inhibiting lipogenic gene expression in white adipose tissue, brown adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and the liver, acting through the EPO-EPOR-RUNX1 axis. The non-erythroid EPOR agonist ARA290 also improves diet-induced obesity and glucose tolerance providing evidence for EPO regulation of fat metabolism independent of EPO stimulated erythropoiesis. Therefore, in addition to the primary role of EPO to stimulate erythropoiesis, EPO contributes significantly to EPOR-dependent whole-body metabolic response.

STAT5 as a Key Protein of Erythropoietin Signalization

Erythropoietin (EPO) acts on multiple tissues through its receptor EPOR, a member of a cytokine class I receptor superfamily with pleiotropic effects. The interaction of EPO and EPOR triggers the activation of several signaling pathways that induce erythropoiesis, including JAK2/STAT5, PI3K/AKT, and MAPK. The canonical EPOR/JAK2/STAT5 pathway is a known regulator of differentiation, proliferation, and cell survival of erythroid progenitors. In addition, its role in the protection of other cells, including cancer cells, is under intense investigation. The involvement of EPOR/JAK2/STAT5 in other processes such as mRNA splicing, cytoskeleton reorganization, and cell metabolism has been recently described. The transcriptomics, proteomics, and epigenetic studies reviewed in this article provide a detailed understanding of EPO signalization. Advances in this area of research may be useful for improving the efficacy of EPO therapy in hematologic disorders, as well as in cancer treatment.

Erythropoietin in bone homeostasis-Implications for efficacious anemia therapy

Bone homeostasis and hematopoiesis are irrevocably linked in the hypoxic environment of the bone marrow. Erythropoietin (Epo) regulates erythropoiesis by binding to its receptor, Epor, on erythroid progenitor cells. The continuous process of bone remodeling is achieved by the finely balanced activity of osteoblasts in bone synthesis and osteoclasts in bone resorption. Both osteoblasts and osteoclasts express functional Epors, but the underlying mechanism of Epo‐Epor signaling in bone homeostasis is incompletely understood. Two recent publications have provided new insights into the contribution of endogenous Epo to bone homeostasis. Suresh et al examined Epo‐Epor signaling in osteoblasts in bone formation in mice and Deshet‐Unger et al investigated osteoclastogenesis arising from transdifferentiation of B cells. Both groups also studied bone loss in mice caused by exogenous human recombinant EPO‐stimulated erythropoiesis. They found that either deletion of Epor in osteoblasts or conditional knockdown of Epor in B cells attenuates EPO‐driven bone loss. These findings have direct clinical implications because patients on long‐term treatment for anemia may have an increased risk of bone fractures. Phase 3 trials of small molecule inhibitors of the PHD enzymes (hypoxia inducible factor‐prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors [HIF‐PHIs]), such as Roxadustat, have shown improved iron metabolism and increased circulating Epo levels in a titratable manner, avoiding the supraphysiologic increases that often accompany intravenous EPO therapy. The new evidence presented by Suresh and Deshet‐Unger and their colleagues on the effects of EPO‐stimulated erythropoiesis on bone homeostasis seems likely to stimulate discussion on the relative merits and safety of EPO and HIF‐PHIs.