Intrathecal minocycline does not block the adverse effects of repeated, intravenous morphine administration on recovery of function after SCI

Acute Opioid Administration Undermines Recovery after SCI: Adverse Effects Are Not Restricted to Morphine

Previous studies have shown that administration of high doses of morphine in the acute phase of spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly undermines locomotor recovery and increases symptoms of chronic pain in a rat spinal contusion model. Similarly, SCI patients treated with high doses of opioid for the first 24 h postinjury have increased symptoms of chronic pain 1 year later. Whether these adverse effects are driven by morphine only or all opioids compromise recovery after SCI, however, is unknown. Based on our previous findings we hypothesized that activation of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) is key in the morphine-induced attenuation of locomotor recovery after SCI. Thus, we posited that opioids that engage KOR-mediated signaling pathways (morphine, oxycodone) would undermine recovery, and clinically relevant opioids with less KOR activity (fentanyl and buprenorphine) would not. To test this, we compared the effects of the clinically relevant opioids on locomotor recovery and pain in a male rat spinal contusion model. Rats were given a moderate spinal contusion injury followed by 7 days of intravenous morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, or saline, and recovery was assessed for 28 days. All opioids produced analgesia on tests of thermal, mechanical, and incremented shock reactivity. However, tolerance developed rapidly with buprenorphine administration, particularly with daily administrations of 5 morphine milligram equivalent (MME) buprenorphine. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) also developed across days following administration of higher doses (10 MME, 20 MME) of morphine and oxycodone. Fentanyl and buprenorphine did not produce OIH. Contrary to our hypothesis, however, we found that high doses of all opioids reduced recovery of locomotor function. Unlike the other opioids, the effects of buprenorphine on locomotor recovery appeared transient, but it also produced chronic pain. Morphine, oxycodone, and buprenorphine decreased reactivity thresholds on tests of mechanical and incremented shock stimulation. In sum, all opioids undermined long-term recovery in the rat model. Further interrogation of the molecular mechanisms driving the adverse effects is essential. This study provides critical insight into pain management strategies in the acute phase of SCI and potential long-term consequences of early opioid administration.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2023

This paper is the forty-sixth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2023 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug and alcohol abuse (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Macrophage polarization in spinal cord injury repair and the possible role of microRNAs: A review

The prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of spinal cord injury (SCI) have always posed significant medical challenges. After mechanical injury, disturbances in microcirculation, edema formation, and the generation of free radicals lead to additional damage, impeding effective repair processes and potentially exacerbating further dysfunction. In this context, inflammatory responses, especially the activation of macrophages, play a pivotal role. Different phenotypes of macrophages have distinct effects on inflammation. Activation of classical macrophage cells (M1) promotes inflammation, while activation of alternative macrophage cells (M2) inhibits inflammation. The polarization of macrophages is crucial for disease healing. A non-coding RNA, known as microRNA (miRNA), governs the polarization of macrophages, thereby reducing inflammation following SCI and facilitating functional recovery. This study elucidates the inflammatory response to SCI, focusing on the infiltration of immune cells, specifically macrophages. It examines their phenotype and provides an explanation of their polarization mechanisms. Finally, this paper introduces several well-known miRNAs that contribute to macrophage polarization following SCI, including miR-155, miR-130a, and miR-27 for M1 polarization, as well as miR-22, miR-146a, miR-21, miR-124, miR-223, miR-93, miR-132, and miR-34a for M2 polarization. The emphasis is placed on their potential therapeutic role in SCI by modulating macrophage polarization, as well as the present developments and obstacles of miRNA clinical therapy.