Surgical correction of midfoot arthritis with and without deformity

The Posttraumatic Tarsometatarsal Joints

Tarsometatarsal joint injuries can be painful and debilitating and are most commonly due to direct or indirect trauma. Posttraumatic arthritis is a well-known long-term complication, with incidence as high as 58%. Conservative treatment options include shoe modifications, orthotic inserts, topical or oral anti-inflammatories, and intra-articular corticosteroid injections. There are various joint prep and fixation techniques reported in the literature, many with positive clinical and radiographic outcomes. This article discusses nonoperative and operative management of posttraumatic tarsometatarsal joint arthritis, reviews available literature, and includes the authors' tips and techniques.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Tarsometatarsal Fusion Comparing Crossing Lag Screws and Lag Screw With Locking Plate

BACKGROUND

Tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis is a common operative procedure for end-stage arthritis of the TMT joints. To date, there is no consensus on the best fixation technique for TMT arthrodesis and which joints should be included.

METHODS

Thirty fresh-frozen feet were divided into one group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with a lag screw and locking plate and a second group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with 2 crossing lag screws. The arthrodesis was performed stepwise with evaluation of mobility between the metatarsal and cuneiform bones after every application or removal of a lag screw or locking plate.

RESULTS

Isolated lag-screw arthrodesis of the TMT I-III joints led to significantly increased stability in every joint (P < .05). Additional application of a locking plate caused further stability in every TMT joint (P < .05). An additional crossed lag screw did not significantly increase rigidity of the TMT II and III joints (P > .05). An IM screw did not influence the stability of the fused TMT joints. For TMT III arthrodesis, lag-screw and locking plate constructs were superior to crossed lag-screw fixation (P < .05). TMT I fusion does not support stability after TMT II and III arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

Each fixation technique provided sufficient stabilization of the TMT joints. Use of a lag screw plus locking plate might be superior to crossed screw fixation. An additional TMT I and/or III arthrodesis did not increase stability of an isolated TMT II arthrodesis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We report the first biomechanical evaluation of TMT I-III arthrodesis. Our results may help surgeons to choose among osteosynthesis techniques and which joints to include in performing arthrodesis of TMT I-III joints.

Comparison of Isolated Screw to Plate and Screw Fixation for Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis Including Clinical Outcome Predictors

BACKGROUND

The common treatment for end-stage tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthritis is an arthrodesis of the affected joints. This study was performed to examine the clinical and radiographic outcome after TMT arthrodesis and to identify risk factors for postoperative complications.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients with tarsometatarsal arthritis of at least 2 joints were retrospectively examined. Data were acquired using clinical and radiographic examination, pedobarographic analysis, and standardized questionnaires, including the European Foot and Ankle Society Score, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, a pain numeric rating scale (NRS), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the University of California at Los Angeles Activity (UCLA) Score. The fixation technique, any complications, and revision surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

All scores improved significantly, except for the UCLA Score. The mean pain NRS score was significantly reduced from 7.7 preoperative to 3.0 postoperative (P < .05). The overall nonunion rate was 12.6%. Compared with 2 crossed-screw fixation, locking plate plus compression screw fixation was associated with a decreased nonunion rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.165, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.032-0.854; P = .017). A body mass index >27 was significantly associated with a higher nonunion rate and wound healing problems (OR 12.05, 95% CI 1.430-101.468; P = .006; OR 5.03, 95% CI 1.273-19.871; P = .013). The overall reoperation rate was 25.2%.

CONCLUSION

TMT arthrodesis of the medial and central column resulted in significant improvement in foot function and pain. A major complication was nonunion. Locking plate plus compression screw fixation was associated with a lower nonunion rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Midfoot Charcot Reconstruction

Midfoot Charcot joints are complex problems that are most commonly seen in patients with peripheral neuropathy secondary to diabetes. The goal of management is to prevent pedal collapse, which can lead to ulceration; infection; and in some cases, amputation. Principles of surgical management should be centered on respecting the soft tissue, obtaining correction, maintaining correction, and supplementing with orthobiologics to achieve healing. The authors present strategies, case examples, and tips and tricks to treat this complex condition with external and internal fixation.

Comparison of Screws to Plate-and-Screw Constructs for Midfoot Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

We performed a prospective comparison of screws versus plate-and-screws for midfoot arthrodesis.

MATERIALS

Between 2010 and 2015, a total of 50 patients with midfoot arthritis received screws or plate-and-screws for their midfoot arthrodesis. Function and pain were graded with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM) and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Data regarding arthrodesis healing and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients received screws for fusion, where 21 achieved full arthrodesis healing by 6 months from surgery. Mean FAAM increased from 46.4 to 82.7 of 100 between initial and final visit. Mean pain decreased from 8.3 to 2.1 of 10 between initial and latest encounter. Twenty-five patients received plate-and-screws for their fusion, where 23 achieved full arthrodesis healing by 6 months from surgery. Mean FAAM increased from 48.2 to 86.3 of 100 between initial and final visit. Mean pain decreased from 8.0 to 1.8 of 10 between initial and latest encounter. These postoperative scores were not significantly different from patients with screws ( P > .05). Three and 6 patients with screws versus plate-and-screws, respectively, developed wound complications ( P = .03). Four and 2 patients with screws versus plate-and-screws, respectively, developed delayed or nonunion of their arthrodesis ( P = .15).

DISCUSSION

A comparison of outcomes of midfoot arthrodesis with screws or plate-and-screws has not been previously reported. Both constructs provide improved function and pain. Using screws might generate less wound complications, but using plate-and-screws might produce higher rates of bony healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized, prospective, and comparative cohort study.

Severe open Lisfranc injuries: one-stage operation through internal fixation associated with vacuum sealing drainage

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of treating severe open Lisfranc injuries by means of one-stage internal fixation with k-wires associated with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD).

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of 20 cases of severe open Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocation treated by using one-stage internal fixation with k-wires associated with VSD, after debridement and suturing during emergency treatment, were reviewed.

RESULTS

At 6 and 12 months after surgery, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scores were 69.2 and 78.2, the positive rates were 75 and 85 %, and the average visual analogue scale scores were 4.3 and 1.3, respectively. The average time of internal fixation surgery was 47 min (30-70 min). There were three cases of wound-edge necrosis; however, there were no cases of skin necrosis around the incision, or deep infection. The mean time of first hospital stay was 16.1 days (10-23 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of severe open Lisfranc fracture and dislocation through one-stage internal fixation with k-wires in association with VSD led to fast anatomical reduction, stabilized bony structure, fast soft tissue recovery, and good short-term follow-up results.

Categorization and surgical management of posttraumatic midfoot malunion

Objective

To assess a classification system for midfoot injury that was based on the characteristics of the foot malunion and to evaluate the suggested treatment strategies.

Methods

This retrospective review of data from patients with posttraumatic midfoot malunion categorized each foot deformity into one of three types based on the foot arch and then separated these categories into one of three subtypes based on the forefoot deformity. According to the types of malunion, fascio-cutaneous flap, osteotomy, joint arthrodesis or realignment was used to correct the deformity. Patients were assessed before surgery and at 12 and 24 months postoperation.

Results

Of the 24 patients identified, six had Lisfranc joint injuries, nine had Lisfranc joint complex injuries combined with cuboid compression fractures and nine had Lisfranc joint complex injuries combined with navicular fractures. Overall, eight patients presented with poor soft tissue and massive scar at the dorsal foot. Visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scores significantly improved over the 24-month study period. At the end of the study, 21 of 24 patients (87.5%) rated their functional outcome as excellent or good.

Conclusion

The classification of the midfoot malunion evaluated in this study may be helpful in the decision making process for surgical intervention.

Use of a spinal cage for creating stable constructs in ankle and subtalar fusion

In complicated foot surgery with reconstruction of the hindfoot, a gap will sometimes be present between the bones that must be filled and stabilized. Bone grafting with structural bone graft is 1 alternative; however, it can collapse and must be stabilized with screws or a nail. A locking intramedullary nail can be used but could lead to nonunion owing to distraction. Newer nails include a compression device but that can result in shortening. We developed a technique that includes distraction of the fusion area with a spinal cage and then compression of the construct by inserting a compression screw through the cage. We present our experience with this technique.We reviewed the data from 7 patients who had undergone surgery using this technique. The technique included distraction of the fusion area and insertion of a titanium cylindrical spinal cage filled with autologous cancellous bone graft. A cannulated compression screw was then inserted through the cage, creating compression of the fusion area against the cage and achieving stabilization of the fusion area. Postoperatively, a non-weightbearing cast was applied for 3 months, followed by a full weightbearing cast until radiographic fusion was apparent. Complete radiographic union was observed in all 7 patients within 6 to 12 months postoperatively. At the latest follow-up visit, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale score was 54 ± 16 (range 30 to 71) points. The use of a cylindrical titanium cage with a local bone graft and stabilization by distraction and compression provided a stable construct, avoided shortening, and led to good fusion. In addition, donor site complications and unpredictable strength loss and lysis of bone allograft were avoided.

Intramedullary foot fixation for midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy

Midfoot Charcot collapse commonly occurs through the tarsometatarsal and/or midtarsal joints, which creates the characteristic "rocker bottom" deformity. Intramedullary metatarsal fixation spanning the tarsus into the talus and/or calcaneus is a recently developed method for addressing unstable midfoot Charcot deformity. The intramedullary foot fixation technique has various advantages when addressing midfoot Charcot deformity in the neuropathic patient. These advantages include anatomical realignment, minimally invasive fixation technique, formal multiple joint fusion, adjacent joint fixation beyond the level of Charcot collapse, rigid interosseus fixation, and preservation of foot length. The goals of the intramedullary foot fixation procedure are to create a stable, plantigrade, and ulcer-free foot, which allows the patient to ambulate with custom-molded orthotics and shoes.

Salvage arthrodesis for charcot arthropathy

The principles of fusion of a Charcot joint arise from the assertion that successful fusion requires removal of all cartilage, debris, and sclerotic bone. The authors believe that reconstruction can prevent amputation in patients who have unbraceable or unstable deformities, or recurrent ulcerations. The goal with any Charcot reconstruction procedure is to achieve a plantigrade foot free of ulceration, and to prevent any future collapse, deformity, or ulcerations. The authors strongly believe arthrodesis of unstable joints of the Charcot neuropathic foot can lead to limb salvage and better quality of life.

Lisfranc arthrodesis

Lisfranc fracture-dislocations are complex injuries that require a high skill set from foot and ankle surgeons to diagnose and treat. Conservative treatment is seldom an option for treatment of Lisfranc injuries. The authors believe that even subtle injuries require surgical intervention. The comparison between open reduction internal fixation, partial arthrodesis, and complete arthrodesis is discussed, as well as various fixation techniques to accomplish these procedures when approaching a Lisfranc injury.