Fifth metatarsal fractures in the athlete: evidence for management

Zone 2 Fifth Metatarsal Fractures Treated Nonoperatively Have Similar Time to Healing to Those Treated Operatively

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the rate of union and time to clinical and radiographic healing in Zone 2 proximal fifth metatarsal (MT) fractures and compare these outcomes between Zone 2 fractures treated operatively and nonoperatively.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with fifth MT fractures who presented between December 2012 and April 2022 and confirmed to have Zone 2 fractures (defined as fractures entering the proximal 4-5 MT articulation on the oblique radiographic view) were included in the study analysis in either the operative or nonoperative cohort.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Nonunion, time to clinical healing by, and time to radiographic healing between operative and nonoperative treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 499 included patients, 475 patients (95.2%) were initially treated nonoperatively and 24 patients (4.8%) were treated operatively. Both groups were similar in demographics. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with nonunions between groups (6.1% in the nonoperative group vs. 3.8% in the operative group, P = 1.000). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to the time to clinical healing (9.9 ± 8.3 weeks for the nonoperative group vs. 15.4 ± 15.0 weeks for the operative group, P = 0.117) or the time to radiographic healing (18.7 ± 12 weeks for the nonoperative group vs. 18.5 ± 16.6 weeks for the operative group, P = 0.970).

CONCLUSIONS

Zone 2 fifth MT base fractures were successfully treated with nonoperative management. There was no evidence in this study that operative treatment leads to significantly faster clinical or radiographic healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Shockwave Treatment vs Surgery for Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fractures in Soccer Players: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical, radiologic, and functional outcomes between shockwave and operative treatments for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures in soccer players in a pilot study.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, 18 soccer players with fifth metatarsal stress fractures attended at Mutualidad de Futbolistas Españoles-Delegación Catalana were included. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups receiving either surgery with an intramedullary screw (group 1) or high-energy focused extracorporeal shockwave treatment (group 2 performed once a week for 3 weeks using 2000 impulses at an energy flux density of 0.21 mJ/mm2 and 4 Hz frequency). Clinical (pain), radiologic (bone healing), and functional (Tegner Activity Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society [AOFAS] ankle-hindfoot scales) outcomes before and after receiving the treatment were compared between both groups. In addition, ability and time to return to play was also compared between groups.

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences at last follow-up between surgery and extracorporeal shockwave treatment for bone healing, pain relief, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, Tegner score, and time return to play. No complications were reported in either of the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, extracorporeal shockwave treatment and operative treatment were found to be equally effective at reducing pain, achieving bone healing, and allowing the soccer players to return to play after proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. This study suggests that ESWT may be a good option for the management of proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures in soccer players. If this approach proves successful in larger trials, the shockwave approach might help avoid known complications of the surgical treatment like wound problems, nerve injury, and hardware intolerance. Further investigations with larger sample size should be conducted in order to confirm the present conclusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic, pilot randomized controlled trial.

Lower Extremity Stress Fractures in the National Basketball Association, 2013-2014 Through 2018-2019

BACKGROUND

Players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) are at risk for lower extremity stress fractures, partly because of the sport's high-intensity demand on the lower body.

PURPOSE

To provide insight on the identification and management of potential risk factors associated with lower extremity stress fractures in NBA athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using the NBA electronic medical record database for all players who were on an NBA roster for ≥1 game from the 2013-2014 through 2018-2019 seasons. Player characteristics, games missed, and treatment methodology were independently analyzed. Results were presented as incidence per 1000 player-games.

RESULTS

There were 22 stress fractures identified in 20 NBA players over the course of 6 years, with an average of 3.67 stress fractures per year and an incidence of 0.12 stress fractures per 1000 player-games. Most stress fractures occurred in the foot (17/22), and 45% (10/22) of stress fractures were treated surgically, with the most common site of operation being the navicular. On average, approximately 37 games and 243 days were missed per stress fracture injury. There was no significant difference in time to return to play between high-risk stress fractures treated operatively versus nonoperatively (269.2 vs 243.8 days; P = .82).

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of stress fractures in NBA players was 0.12 per 1000 player-games, and a high percentage of players returned to NBA activity after the injury. There was a relatively even distribution between high-risk stress fractures treated operatively and nonoperatively. When comparing high-risk stress fractures treated operatively to ones treated nonoperatively, no significant difference in average time to return to play in the NBA was found.

Conservative Treatment of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone Fractures in Professional Football Players Using Platelet-Rich Plasma

Injuries of the metatarsal bones in football are relatively rare and in most cases are localized in the fifth metatarsal. The gold standard of the diagnosis of fractures in this area can be X-rays, which in most cases allows verifying the diagnosis. The treatment tactics depend on the localization of the fracture according to Lawrence and Botte's classification: 3 zones of localization are distinguished. Fractures located in zones 2 and 3 belong to a high-risk group due to delayed consolidation and nonunion and therefore athletes are most often treated with osteosynthesis using intramedullary screws. The minimal recovery time for this type of treatment is at least 8 weeks. This report describes 7 cases of the fifth metatarsal bone fractures, located in zones 2 and 3 in professional football players who were treated with an immobilization boot, cryotherapy, nutritional supplements of calcium and vitamin D, and local injections of platelet-rich plasma, which contains numerous growth factors. The deadline for returning to regular training activities was 43 to 50 days, and there was no relapse of damage within 6 months of follow-up.Levels of Evidence: Level of evidence 4: case report study.

Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal (PFMT) are one of the most common foot injuries, accounting for 61% to 78% of all foot fractures, but full consensus on their classification, diagnosis, and treatment has not yet been reached.

»

The most commonly accepted classification is that of Lawrence and Botte, who divided the location of PFMT fractures into 3 zones with respect to their healing potential.

»

Avulsion fractures of the tuberosity of the base (zone 1) generally heal well, and nonoperative treatment is commonly recommended.

»

Internal fixation may be considered for displaced fractures that extend into the fourth-fifth intermetatarsal joint (zone 2) as well as for nondisplaced fractures in athletes or high-demand patients, with the aims of reducing the healing time and expediting return to sport or work.

»

Stress fractures of the proximal diaphysis (zone 3) are preferably treated operatively, particularly in the presence of signs of delayed union. With nonoperative treatment, supportive measures such as ultrasonography or external/extracorporeal shockwave therapy have been demonstrated to have limited potential for the enhancement of fracture-healing.

Outcomes of Surgically Treated Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Major League Soccer Athletes

BACKGROUND

Sports-related fractures of the fifth metatarsal are common in professional athletes. Data regarding outcomes of surgical management including refracture, complications, and return-to-play statistics are available for other professional American sports with a notable exception of soccer.

PURPOSE

To quantify the burden of operative fifth metatarsal fractures in Major League Soccer (MLS) athletes, to compare outcomes as well as refracture and complication rates with other professional sports, to analyze factors that may contribute to treatment failure, and to report on return-to-play characteristics for affected players.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We searched all injuries in the prospectively collected HealtheAthlete database for MLS for operative fifth metatarsal fractures for seasons 2013 to 2017. Additional information regarding each fracture including demographics, treatment, postoperative course, and return-to-play statistics were compiled from HealtheAthlete and supplemented by teams' chief medical officers, coaches, trainers, and online sources.

RESULTS

There were 21 fractures in 18 players during the study period. Mean time to radiographic healing was 8.5 weeks (n = 17). Mean time to return to play was 11.1 weeks (n = 19). Of 21 fractures, 20 (95%) players returned to sport. Of 18 players, 4 (22.2%) experienced refracture. Of 18 players, 5 (27.8%) and 2 (11.1%) reported previous stress injuries on the contralateral and ipsilateral limb, respectively. Player performance characteristics showed small declines in the first year of return that improved by the second year.

CONCLUSION

MLS athletes who sustain a sports-related fifth metatarsal fracture can expect a high rate of return to sport with time to radiographic healing and return to play as well as risk of refracture similar to other professional cohorts.

Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Professional Soccer Players: Case Series

OBJECTIVE

Fifth metatarsal fractures occur mainly in young athletes, with an estimated incidence of 1.8 per 1000 individuals per year. This study aims to evaluate the functional outcome of professional soccer players undergoing surgical treatment of fifth metatarsal base fractures.

METHODS

We appraised 34 soccer players operated on from July 2001 to June 2016. All individuals were assessed by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after surgery, with a mean 23-month follow-up. The need for grafting, fracture healing, Torg classification, and return to sports were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 10 attackers, 7 offensive-defensive midfielders, 6 side defenders, 5 central defensive midfielders, 3 defenders, 2 goalkeepers, and 1 defensive midfielder, at an average age of 19 years. Preoperative and postoperative AOFAS averaged 42 and 99 points, respectively, whereas VAS scores were 6 and 0. The longer the time to get operated on, the greater was the need for grafting (P = .011). In our study, all fractures have consolidated. Return to sports occurred, on average, 73 days after surgical treatment, and it was not influenced by the time to get operated on, fracture healing, Torg classification, and grafting.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of the fifth metatarsal base fracture in professional soccer players presents good clinical results. Getting back to activities after surgery is not influenced by surgery time, fracture healing, Torg classification, and grafting.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Therapeutic studies, Case series.

Conservative treatment of refractures after modified tension band wiring of fifth metatarsal base stress fractures in athletes

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent fifth metatarsal base stress fractures (MT5-BSF) in athletes present a challenging problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the result of conservative treatment for the refracture of MT5-BSF after modified tension band wiring (MTBW).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The outcomes of 15 elite athletes undergoing conservative treatment for refracture of MT5-BSF after MTBW were retrospectively reviewed. They were instructed to avoid weight-bearing with short leg cast for 6 weeks. After that, they started partial weight with a postop shoe. Stepwise exercise followed bone union by radiographs.

RESULTS

Thirteen cases (86.6%) had a complete bone union after a mean of 18.9 ± 8.6 weeks. Twelve cases (80%) returned to their previous activity level and maintained for at least two consecutive seasons.

CONCLUSION

Eighty percent of all athletic patients with the conservative treatment for refractures with healed MT5-BSF after MTBW on the plantar-lateral side could maintain and return to their previous sports activity for at least 2 years.

Optimizing surgery of metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a cadaveric study on implications of intramedullary screw position, screw parameters and surrounding anatomic structures

AIMS

Many advocate screw fixation of fractures to the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal base, better known as Jones fractures (JF), to facilitate quicker ambulation and return to sport. Maximizing screw parameters based on fifth metatarsal (MT5) anatomy, alongside understanding the anatomic structures compromised by screw insertion, may optimize surgical outcomes. This study aims to (1) correlate the proximity of JF to the peroneus brevis (PB) and plantar fascia (PF) footprints and (2) quantify optimal screw parameters given MT5 anatomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3D CT-scan reconstructions were made of 21 cadaveric MT5s, followed by meticulous mapping of the PB and PF onto the reconstructions. Based on bone length, shape, narrowest intramedullary canal (IMC) diameter, and surrounding anatomy, two traditional debated screw positions were modeled for each reconstruction: (1) an anatomically positioned screw (AP), predicated on maximizing screw length by following the IMC for as long as possible, and (2) a clinically achievable screw (CA), predicated on maximizing screw length without violating the fifth tarso-metatarsal joint or adjacent cuboid bone. Fixation parameters were calculated for all models.

RESULTS

The PB and PF extended into the JF site in 29% and 43%, respectively. AP's did not affect PB and PF footprint but required screw entry through the cuboid and fifth tarso-metatarsal joint in all specimens. CA screw entry sites, avoiding the cuboid and fifth tarso-metatarsal joint, partially compromised the PB and PF insertions in 33% and 62% with a median surface loss of 1.6%%(range 0.2-3.2%) and 0.81%%(range 0.05-1.6%), respectively. Mean AP screw length was 64±3.6mm and thread length 49±4.2mm. Mean CA screw length was 48±5.8mm and thread length 28±6.9mm.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the challenges associated with surrounding MT5 anatomy as they relate to optimal JF treatment. Both the extent of JF as well as a clinically achievable positioned screw violate the PB and PF footprints - although the degree to which even partial disruption of these footprints has on outcome remains unclear. To minimize damage to surrounding structures, including the PB and PF footprint, while allowing a screw length approximately two thirds of the metatarsal length, the CA screw position is recommended. This position balances the desire to maximize pull out strength while avoiding cortical penetration or inadvertent fracture site distraction.

Predictors of Malreduction in Zone II and III Fifth Metatarsal Fractures Fixed With an Intramedullary Screw

BACKGROUND

Proper implant selection and placement is crucial during fixation of zone II and III fifth metatarsal fractures to avoid postoperative complications. This study examined the effects of screw parameters and placement on malreduction, delayed union, nonunion, and refracture rate.

METHODS

A retrospective review of zone II and proximal zone III fifth metatarsal fractures managed with intramedullary screw fixation was conducted. Comparisons were made between cortex distraction (gap) and ratios of screw length, diameter, and entry point. Further analysis was carried out between time to union and distraction in the lateral and plantar cortices.

RESULTS

The plantar and lateral gaps were both associated with the mean entry point ratio on the lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views (P < .001 for both views). No association between the plantar and lateral gaps and the screw diameter ratio (P = .393 for AP and P = .981 for lateral) or the screw length ratio (P = .966 for AP and P = .740 for lateral) was identified. The ratio of postoperative to preoperative apex height on AP and lateral views was correlated with the presence of lateral and plantar fracture gaps (P < .001). The presence of a plantar gap was associated with increased time to union (P = .022). A majority of fractures showed radiographic union at 12 weeks (38/43). Only 5 of 38 patients had delayed union. There were no refractures or nonunions as per available records.

CONCLUSION

Plantar or lateral fracture site distraction (gap) was not influenced by screw diameter ratio or screw length ratio. The entry point ratio had a significant effect on plantar and lateral gaps on postoperative radiographs, with lateral and inferior placement leading to fracture site distraction. Patients with a plantar gap did have an increased risk of delayed union. The results of this study emphasize the significance of the entry point when managing zone II and III fifth metatarsal base fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Return to Weightbearing and High-Impact Activities Following Jones Fracture Intramedullary Screw Fixation

BACKGROUND

Although the benefit of primary intramedullary (IM) screw fixation of fifth metatarsal Jones fractures in athletes is clear, limited data support its use in conventional patient populations. This study evaluated radiographic and functional outcomes following primary IM screw fixation in a series of Jones fractures to determine if similar excellent outcomes were achievable.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of 32 consecutive patients who underwent Jones fracture primary IM screw fixation by a single surgeon. Demographic risk factors of interest (age, gender, tobacco use, pertinent medical comorbidities, military service status, and prior nonoperative management) were collected prospectively. Primary outcomes included times to return to full weightbearing, radiographic union, and resumption of high-impact or restriction-free activities. Complications including reoperations were recorded. Categorical data are reported as frequencies, and statistical means with P values are reported for continuous variables. Mean age for the 32 patients was 33.4 years.

RESULTS

All 32 fractures healed uneventfully, and at mean follow-up time of 24.2 months, overall patient-reported satisfaction was 100%. Overall mean postoperative outcomes are as follows: 3.7 weeks return to full weightbearing, 10.8 weeks to radiographic union, and 13.0 weeks to resumption of restriction-free activities. Among the risk factors assessed, only preoperative peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) and active duty military service resulted in significantly increased and decreased time to resumption of restriction-free activities, respectively, but did not impact overall weightbearing or union times. Patient age, gender, and tobacco use had no effects on radiographic or functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Primary IM screw fixation was a safe, reliable option for all appropriate operative candidates with Jones fractures and may result in similar early weightbearing, osseous healing, and expeditious return to full activities consistently reported in high-level athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Jones Fractures in Sumo Wrestlers: Three Case Reports

Jones fractures sometimes occur in athletes and are known to have complications, such as nonunion, delayed union, and recurrence, even with treatment. We describe three cases of Jones fractures in sumo wrestlers with treatment-related difficulties. All patients discontinued treatment at their own discretion. The two conservative cases had nonunion or delayed union, and the operative case had a broken screw. However, all patients continued sumo wrestling, with little impact on their careers. The risk factors of Jones fractures in sumo wrestling may be heavy weight, and training or competition characteristics unique to sumo wrestling. In cases of a complete Jones fracture, operative treatment is most commonly selected, as the risk for nonunion or refractures is less than that for conservative treatment. However, in the case of sumo wrestlers, there are risks of infection and problems with treatment compliance. As taking a rest may result in a lowered rank, completing a sufficient duration of treatment is difficult. Treatment is difficult and controversial in sumo wrestlers; all three patients discontinued treatment of their own accord. These cases suggest that it is important to thoroughly inform sumo wrestlers of the treatment options, and to decide the most appropriate treatment method for each patient.

Early return to playing professional football following fixation of 5th metatarsal stress fractures may lead to delayed union but does not increase the risk of long-term non-union

PURPOSE

5th metatarsal stress fractures are frequently encountered in professional football. There is concern that early return to play following intra-medullary screw fixation may lead to an increased risk of delayed union. The purpose of the study was to assess whether an early return to play after surgical fixation of 5th metatarsal fractures in professional football players is a risk factor for delayed union and the effect of this on the ultimate clinical outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of a series of 37 professional football players following intramedullary screw fixation of 5th metatarsal stress fractures. End points included time of return to play and to radiological union of the fracture.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 24 months the mean return to play was 10.5 weeks and mean time to complete radiological union was 12.7 weeks. Return to play at 8 weeks or less resulted in a higher risk of delayed radiological union (24% at 3 months), but this neither prevented the athlete from continuing to play football nor did it affect the ultimate risk of non-union (3% overall). A re-fracture occurred in 1 patient (3%) at 10 months who previously had complete radiographic union at 9 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary screw fixation of 5th metatarsal stress fractures leads to a predictable time of return to play and a low rate of non-union. If players return to play at 8 weeks or less a persistent line may be expected in up to a quarter of patients. However, if asymptomatic this radiological finding does not mean that athletes must avoid playing football as ultimately a good outcome is expected with low rates of non-union and refracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Cuboid Edema Syndrome Following Fixation of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Professional Athletes

Stress fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are common injuries in elite athletes. Fixation using an intramedullary screw represents the most popular surgery performed for treating these injuries, with excellent results in most cases. However, multiple reports in the literature highlight the possibility of painful hardware, usually related to the presence of the screw head, following intramedullary fixation In this case report, we outline 4 cases of professional athletes who developed lateral-based foot symptoms following complete healing of their surgically treated proximal fifth metatarsal fractures and were found to have significant cuboid edema on magnetic resonance images. We also outline recommendations regarding specific surgical technique considerations aiming to minimize this possible complication. Level of Evidence: Level V: Case report.

Case report: ischial stress fracture non-union in a college football player

Stress fractures are common injuries associated with repetitive high-impact activities, often in high-level athletes and military recruits. Although predominantly occurring in the lower extremities, stress fractures may occur wherever there is a sudden increase in frequency or intensity of activity, thereby overloading the yield point of the local bone environment. Ischial stress fractures are a rarely diagnosed cause of pain around the hip and pelvis. Often, patients present with buttock pain with activity, which can be misdiagnosed as proximal hamstring tendonitis or avulsion. Here, we report a case of a college football player who was diagnosed with an ischial stress fracture which went on to symptomatic non-union after extensive conservative management. We treated his ischial non-union with open reduction internal fixation utilizing a tension band plate and screws. This interesting case highlights an uncommon cause of the relatively common presentation of posterior hip pain and describes our technique for addressing a stress fracture non-union in the ischium.

High-Risk Stress Fractures: Diagnosis and Management

Stress fractures are common overuse injuries in athletes. They occur during periods of increased training without adequate rest, disrupting normal bone reparative mechanisms. There are a host of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including biochemical and biomechanical, that put athletes at risk. In most stress fractures, the diagnosis is primarily clinical, with imaging indicated at times, and management focused on symptom-free relative rest with advancement of activity as tolerated. Overall, stress fractures in athletes have an excellent prognosis for return to sport, with little risk of complication. There is a subset of injuries that have a greater risk of fracture progression, delayed healing, and nonunion and are generally more challenging to treat with nonoperative care. Specific locations of high-risk stress fracture include the femoral neck (tension side), patella, anterior tibia, medial malleolus, talus, tarsal navicular, proximal fifth metatarsal, and great toe sesamoids. These sites share a characteristic region of high tensile load and low blood flow. High-risk stress fractures require a more aggressive approach to evaluation, with imaging often necessary, to confirm early and accurate diagnosis and initiate immediate treatment. Treatment consists of nonweight-bearing immobilization, often with a prolonged period away from sport, and a more methodic and careful reintroduction to athletic activity. These stress fractures may require surgical intervention. A high index of suspicion is essential to avoid delayed diagnosis and optimize outcomes in this subset of stress fractures.

Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal: Is operative intervention justified? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of results

BACKGROUND

This study assesses the outcomes of surgical vs. conservative management in the treatment of the Jones fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review using four databases from their inception until September 2014 was undertaken. Six studies were found evaluating operative therapy compared to conservative treatment.

RESULTS

Six relevant studies were included, with a total of 237 patients. Of these, 51% were treated non-operatively, and 49% had surgical intervention. Those in the non-operative group were found to have a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of fracture non-union (OR 5.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.65-12.40, P<0.001). Studies also reported a prolonged healing time and a longer time to return to sports. Of the trials with time to union as an outcome measure, 3 of 4 trials found favourable results in the operative cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention is recommended for patients presenting with a Jones fracture as it is found to result in a lesser non-union rate and an improved time to union.

Enthesopathy of the lateral cord of the plantar fascia

The objective of this study was to raise awareness of the diagnosis of enthesopathy of the lateral cord of the plantar fascia (LCPF) and describe its sonographic findings. We conducted a retrospective case series of 13 sonographic examinations with the diagnosis of LCPF enthesopathy. Two cadaver dissections of the plantar foot were performed for anatomic correlation. Sonographic findings of LCPF enthesopathy included generalized or focal hypoechoic thickening, loss of the normal fibrillar echo texture, cortical irregularity of the fifth metatarsal tuberosity, and vascularity on color Doppler imaging. Anatomic dissections of the plantar foot detailed the course of the LCPF and served as a guide for optimal sonographic imaging. Enthesopathy of the LCPF is an important etiology of nontraumatic pain at the base of the fifth metatarsal. Sonographic evaluation can readily show the characteristic findings of LCPF enthesopathy.

Surgical versus conservative treatment for high-risk stress fractures of the lower leg (anterior tibial cortex, navicular and fifth metatarsal base): a systematic review

AIM

To compare surgical and conservative treatment for high-risk stress fractures of the anterior tibial cortex, navicular and proximal fifth metatarsal.

METHODS

Systematic searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and PEDro were performed to identify relevant prospective and retrospective studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Main outcomes were return to sport and complication rate.

RESULTS

18 studies were included (2 anterior tibia (N=31), 8 navicular (N=200) and 8 fifth metatarsal (N=246)). For anterior tibial fracture, no studies on initial surgery were eligible. Conservative treatment resulted in high complication rates and few cases returned to sport. For navicular fracture, a weighted mean return to sport of 22 for conservative and 16 weeks for surgical treatment was found. Six weeks of non-weightbearing cast was mostly used as conservative treatment. Surgical procedures varied widely. For the fifth metatarsal fracture, weighted mean return to sport was 19 for conservative and 14 weeks for surgical treatment. Surgery consisted of intramedullary screw fixation or tension band wiring. For conservative methods, insufficient details were reported. Overall, there was a high risk of bias; sample sizes were small and GRADE level of evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong conclusions for surgical or conservative therapy for these high-risk stress fractures cannot be drawn; quality of evidence is low and subjected to a high risk of bias. However, there are unsatisfying outcomes of conservative therapy in the anterior tibia. The role of initial surgery is unknown. For the navicular, surgery provided an earlier return to sport; and when treated conservatively, weightbearing should be avoided. For the fifth metatarsal, surgery provided the best results. Treatment decision-making would greatly benefit from further prospective research.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO database of systematic reviews: CRD42013004201.